RVS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Kannampalayam, Coimbatore – 641 402

DEPARTMENT OF PETROCHEMICAL ENGINEERING (R – 2021)

NAAN MUDHALVAN PROJECT PRESENTATION

ACADEMIC YEAR (2023 – 2024)

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

.
 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

 (An initiative of Naan Mudhalvan in collaboration with L&T EduTech)

Presented by :

KATHIRESH.M

JAYASURIYA.M

KAMALNATH.C.V

KARUN K VINOD
 Task -1

Waste characterization and quantification

Characterization of Waste :

 Preparation of general profile

 Survey Phase
 Waste Stream Characterization
 Preparation of general profile SULUR

Number of Nature No. of Male Female Total % of total

wards Of area household populatio
n
WardNo.171 rural 500 1300
(sulur) 700 2000 1.8%

Coimbatore
Total 2000

Population density in surrounding regions

 Survey Phase

 Name of Surveyor...KATHIRESH M..........

 Name of Authority…NSS
 The waste is not disposed properly, it can pollute the environment .
 Wastes are left around the dust bin.
 Disposes of household waste
 Family member
 The household waste disposed is collected by
 Waste collector from the municipality does the door-to-door waste
collection
 Waste Collecting period
 Everyday
 Waste Stream Assessment & Quantification in
sulur at Selected Points
Near by region and Sources:
Name the near by region………sulur……
sulur: Domestic,Shops,Institutions,Office
 Quantification: Segregation results of solid waste samples per day
 Gross
weight
Sampling Organic Plastic Glass Stone Shell Metal
(grams)
stations (grams) (grams) (grams) (grams) (grams) (grams)

S1 185.80 250.45 150 0 0 0 0

S2 125.15 528.4 112.66 0 20 0 0

S3 138000 50000 16000 0 1900 0 0

Percentage of various components in solid waste samples

Sampling Organic Plastic Glass (%) Stone (%) Shell (%) Metal (%)
Stations waste(%) (%)
S1 75.40 11.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

S2 80.4 14.7 0.00 1.52 0.13 0.00

S3 25.8 12.8 0.00 55.66 0.00 0.00

S4 70.4 13.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

S5 68.8 15.6 0.00 2.80 0.00 0.00

S6 72.4 18.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

S7 70.3 18.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.10

 Task - 2
WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEM

 Waste Collection and Transport

 Hotel Waste Collection Practices
 Market
 Transportation to Dump Yard
 Waste Collection
 CollectionandSegregation
 Management plans for effective waste collection

Component Bins for Door to Door Street Sweeping Secondary

segregation collection Collection
Segregation of waste a Arrange for door to Organize Street Is there any
Indicator source by storing of door collection of sweeping covering communal
waste in 3 different segregated solid all the residential bins
bins wet, dry and and commercial located?
waste from
Domesti areas on
chazardous all
Al l the day of the year
waste households
irrespective of Sundays
including slums and and public holidays.
informal settlements,
commercial,
Institutional and
other non-residential
premises.
Existing Practices Only wet and dry Organized street Yes
waste is sweeping is carried out
Informal settlements
collected.Domestich are missed in the
azardous waste is collection
also collected alone Proce
with dry waste ss

Component Bins Doorto Doorcollection StreetSweeping Secondary

forsegregation Collection
 Comparison of cost

Hauled System Stationary Container System(₹/week),

Round Trip HaulDistance (x), km
Container TOTAL COST=1001RS
(₹/week)
10.8(x)
43,316.64 +

650 (x)
0 0.00 10.00

5 2.14 10.71

10 4.29 11.43

15 6.43 12.14

20 8.57 12.86

25 10.71 13.57

30 12.80 14.29
 Task - 3
WASTE TRANSFER AND TRANSPORT

Vehicle Routing :
 Occupancy rate: ….4….occupants per house Collection frequency:
….1week….with service collection Collection crew size: ….One
person….
 Collection vehicle capacity:….24.6 mt…..
 Compacted waste density: ….320kg/mt…..
 Waste generated per person per day: …..1.6kg…..
Vehicle Routing for Residential Colony in coimbatore
 Feasibility and economic analysis

 The collected data areas follows:

 Cost of transfer station=…Rs. 405/ton….
 Average Pay load for direct haul=5.6 tons…
 Average Pay load for transfer haul station to land fill=…36.7 tons…
 Average cost of trucks for direct or transfer haul=…Rs.20/km…
 Costing Tabulation for Analysis

Distance in km Cost of Direct Haul Cost of Transfer Haul

0 0.00 10.00

5 2.14 10.71

10 4.29 11.43

15 6.43 12.14

20 8.57 12.86

25 10.71 13.57

30 12.86 14.29

35 15.00 15.00

40 17.14 15.71
 Task - 4
WASTE PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES

The Material Recovery Facility in ......sulur…

 Initial Moisture content=…25%......
 Moisture loss=….20%.ofinitialvaluefromlightfractionHeavyfractioninlight fraction
=….6%........
 Light fraction in heavy fraction=……15%..........
 Ferrous metals=…80%....
 Glass=…..80%
 Aluminium =……70 %........
Components Vs Weigh to Processed waste in MRF:
Component Percentagebyweight

FoodWaste 30

Paper 35

Cardboard 2
Plastics 2

Textile 1

Rubber 0.5

Leather 0.5

GardenTrimming 12

Wood 2

Glass 6

Tin Cans 4

Nonferrous metals 1

Ferrous metals 2
 Tanner’s Diagram

 content, W=……0.24%......
 Ash content, A=…4.93%.....
 Combustible,C=….94.83%..........
Comprehensive analysis of waste treatment practices

Current Gapsinthe Proposed

S.No Type of waste treatment treatment treatment
method methods

1 Food waste 20%composting 80% is going to the Canbeusedinprodu

landfill cing
Biogas

Recyclablewaste- 100% is getting

2 Plastics,glassand recycledinMRF --- --------
metals

3 E-waste(batteries, 30% only 70 % of the e waste 70% of the e-waste

circuit boards, is generated goes to has to be segregated in
electrical waste etc.) segregated and landfill without treating. the source and given it
processed in the to the PCB
MRF) certifiedvendorsforpro
per recycling.

4 Sanitary waste 100%isgoingto the Not treated It must be

landfill properly
incinerate
d.
 Task- 5
WASTE DISPOSAL AND WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Waste Disposal Plan for sulur
 Asanitary land fill to serve the sulur, population has been worked out for the
following data.
 Solid waste generation per day by per person (for the locality chosen) = 0.5 kg Out
of generated waste only 30% reaches the landfills.
 Compacted density of solid waste in landfill=253kg/m 3
 Average depth of compacted solid waste=4 m
 Population of sulur =2409
Current Disposal Practices in sulur :
Sulur there is no landfill, and the reasons were analyzed. It was found that
for My coimbatore solid waste disposal itself there is an area requirement of
4062.45 m2/year.
 Waste Management Plan using Input data

 Annual Precipitation: 1080mm/yr

 AverageTemperature:300C
 Waste Generated = 10000 t/yr MRF:
 Composting:
 Incineration:
Flow chart of management Plan
Flow chart of management plan
Conclusion :

In conclusion, the comprehensive waste characterization

and quantification efforts in My sulur, Coimbatore, have
yielded crucial technical insights vital for optimizing
urban sustainable waste management strategies.