Commercial Law
ADMN 1306
with
Prof. Peter Mazzacano
10/12/24 1
Contract Law (Part
Week 3 2): Consideration
and Intention
Today’s Agenda:
2
Contract Law (Part 2)
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
To examine such questions as:
What other essential elements must be
present for a contract to exist?
What is the nature of consideration?
What is the difference between
consideration and a gratuitous promise?
What are the presumptions regarding the
intention to create a legal relationship?
3
Requirements of a Valid
Contract
Consensus (offer and acceptance)
Consideration
Intention
Capacity
Legality
Writing (if required by statute)
4
Consideration & Intention
to Create Legal Relations
The acceptance of an offer leads to an
agreement. Before an agreement is binding in
law, it must have two primary elements:
1. Consideration
2. Mutual intention to create legal relations
5
Consideration & Intention
to Create Legal Relations
Which of the following, if any, is a contract?
1.Betty offers to give a book to Lou. Lou
accepts.
2.Betty offers Lou the book in exchange for
Lou’s promise to pay twenty-five dollars. Lou
accepts.
3.Betty offers to give Lou the book if Lou
promises to pick it up at Betty’s house. Lou
agrees. 6
Consideration in History
In ancient Roman law consideration was not
usually necessary when forming contracts
In most Civil Law countries (e.g., Europe,
Asia) consideration is not required
In most Common Law jurisdictions,
consideration is required
7
The Meaning of
Consideration
Consideration is the price that one party pays
for the promise of another (something for
something or a bargain)
A gratuitous promise is one without
consideration
For example, a charitable pledge
Gratuitous promises are not legally binding
under contract law
A promise of forbearance may be sufficient
consideration
8
Adequacy of
Consideration
Valid consideration must be:
Specific but not necessarily adequate
With reference to present/future promises
Not “past consideration”
A promise to pay additional money for a pre-
existing obligation is not enforceable
9
Motive vs. Consideration:
Past Consideration
Motive cannot change a gratuitous promise
into a binding contract, nor can it reduce a
binding promise into a merely voluntary
obligation.
If one person promises to reward another
who has previously done an act gratuitously
or given something of value, the promise is
not binding. That promise is gratuitous—for
“past consideration” is no consideration at
all.
10
Relation Between Existing Legal
Duty and Consideration (1 of 2)
• Where A has an existing contractual duty to B, a
later promise by B to pay A something extra to
perform that obligation is not binding.
• Performance by A is not good consideration for
the later promise because A was already
contractually bound to perform
• Possible to exact a legally enforceable promise
from a customer to pay an increased price by
delivering a paperclip (or any other item of
token value) to him/her in return for the
promise, or by insisting that the customer make
11
the promise under seal
Relation Between Existing Legal
Duty and Consideration (2 of 2)
If the second agreement resolves some
uncertainty or dispute over the entitlements
arising from the pre-existing contract,
Canadian courts will find the subsequent
contract has consideration
Clarifying an unclear term in a long-term
contract, in order to create certainty and to
avoid future costly disputes, enures to the
parties’ mutual benefit, and is something of
value that flows from and to each contracting
party. It thus serves as a functional form of
12
consideration
Break
10 minutes
13
Gratuitous Reduction of a Debt
The rule in Foaks v. Beer says that if you
agree to forego a part of someone's debt to
you, it's a gratuitous promise which isn't
binding.
14
Gratuitous Reduction of a Debt
Agreement to accept less than the amount
owning is a gratuitous promise
Binding only if:
Before the due date
Under seal
Made by a third party
Five provinces (including Ontario) have
legislation binding the creditor who accepts
lesser payment in full satisfaction of the debt
owing
15
Request for Goods or Services
A request for goods or services creates an
obligation to pay a reasonable price
Quantum meruit
16
The Use of a Seal
The use of a seal eliminates the requirement
of consideration
The seal must be placed on the document at
the time of signing
Business tender – offer under seal becomes
irrevocable like an option
17
Intent to Create Legal Relations (1
of 2)
Intention is presumed in commercial
situations
The presumption may be rebutted
Reasonable bystander test
Parties may agree to not have their
agreement enforced by the courts
18
Intent to Create Legal Relations (2
of 2)
Contract formation requires a “meeting of the
minds” on all the essential terms which means
the parties words and conduct show an
intention to contract from the view of an
objective reasonable bystander
In the commercial context, disputes over
intention often arise when negotiations are
concluded orally with a written contract to be
produced after the fact. Is there an intention
to contract at the conclusion of the oral
negotiations or not until the written document
is signed? 19
Strategies to Manage the Legal
Risks
Parties must be clear about their intentions to
contract.
Standard form contracts may be used to
acknowledge the existence of consideration.
Out of an abundance of caution, the signature
line will have the symbol of a seal beside it and
be prefaced with the phrase “signed, sealed and
delivered”.
Businesses managers should be aware of
exemption clauses as a means of limiting
liability, and choice-of-forum clauses redirecting
the dispute away from the courts. 20
Chapter 7, Case 3, p. 160
What arguments may be made on behalf of the
town both to keep the money paid and to
require Autotech to honour its commitment?
What do you think the decision would be?
21
Questions?
22
For Next Week (Week 4)
Midterm Exam 1
23