Wind Turbine Components
Wind Turbine Components
CONSERVATION
SYSTEM
History
The first electricity generating wind turbine, was a
battery charging machine installed in July 1887 by Scottish
academic, James Blyth to light his holiday home in
Marykirk, Scotland. Some months later American
inventor Charles F Brush built the first automatically
operated wind turbine for electricity production
in Cleveland, Ohio. Although Blyth's turbine was
considered uneconomical in the United Kingdom electricity
generation by wind turbines was more cost effective in
countries with widely scattered populations. In Denmark by
1900, there were about 2500 windmills for mechanical loads
such as pumps and mills, producing an estimate combined
peak power of about 30 MW.
The first automatically operated wind turbine, built in Cleveland
in 1887 by Charles F. Brush. It was 60 feet (18 m) tall, weighed 4
tons (3.6 metric tonnes) and powered a 12kW generator.
The largest machines were on 24-metre (79 ft)
towers with four-bladed 23-metre (75 ft) diameter
rotors. By 1908 there were 72 wind-driven electric
generators operating in the US from 5 kW to 25 kW.
Around the time of World War I, American windmill
makers were producing 100,000 farm windmills
each year, mostly for water-pumping. By the 1930s,
windmills for electricity were common on farms,
mostly in the United States where distribution
systems had not yet been installed. In this period,
high-tensile steel was cheap, and windmills were
placed atop prefabricated open steel lattice towers
Types
Largest capacity
Tower
supports the rotor and the nacelle containing the mechanical gear,
the electrical generator, the yaw mechanism, and the stall control.
• Tubular steel structures
• Lattice structures
-Resonant frequency of the tower, rotor, nacelle should not
match the fluctuations due to wind
BLADES
Modern wind turbines have two or three blades
Single-bladed wind turbine has the advantage of saving the cost
of one rotor blade and its weight; it also runs much faster.
However, it is not widespread commercially due to the difficulties
of balancing the rotor, It is also likely to generate a supersonic tip
speed and a highly pulsating torque and causing excessive
vibrations.
Besides of the higher rotational speed, the noise, and visual
intrusion problems, these turbines also require a counterweight to
be placed on the other side of the hub from the blade in order to
balance the rotor. This obviously negates the savings on weight
compared to a two-bladed design.