0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views9 pages

NTCC

Uploaded by

Rishi Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views9 pages

NTCC

Uploaded by

Rishi Kumar
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

DECODING OF STANDARDS AND

IDENTIFICATIONS OF IN_LIEU
ITEMS FOR MANDATORY
SPARES OF MIG-29

PRESENTED BY: -
ANURAG KUMAR JHA
INTRODUCTION
The report focuses on the critical issue of spare parts for MiG-29 fighter aircraft at 11
BRD, Nasik. It highlights the importance of a robust local manufacturing and
procurement ecosystem to ensure the aircraft's operational readiness. The primary
objective is to identify standardized in-lieu spare parts for mechanical aggregates to
streamline the overhaul process and facilitate emergency repairs.
Key Points
• Dependency: The current reliance on global vendors, particularly Russia, for spare
parts is a significant challenge.
• Airworthiness: Maintaining the aircraft's airworthiness and the integrity of spare
parts is paramount.
• Operational Readiness: A strong local supply chain is crucial for national
security.
• Focus: The report is limited to metal spares for mechanical aggregates of MiG-29.
STANDARD AND NON-STANDARD

STANDARD NON-STANDARD

• Manufactured, tested, and • Lack standardized manufacturing


certified according to national standards and testing procedures
(e.g., GOST)
• Well-documented with clear • Limited documentation and
method of calling, material, dimensions, unclear method of calling
etc.
• Readily available from multiple • Often indigenized items
vendors
• Example: Cotter pin 5x28.3.036 • Potential challenges in
GOST 397-79 procurement and quality control
MANDATORY AND NON-MANDATORY
SPARES
i. Aircraft Overhaul Process: Dismantling into electronic and mechanical
aggregates.
ii. Focus: Mechanical aggregates (940 mandatory spares, including rubber and
metal).
iii. Goal: Balance between SPARES
MANDATORY minimizing downtime and controlling inventory costs.
NON-MANDATORY
SPARES
• Critical components • Replaced based on condition
replaced during every testing (flight hours,
overhaul. lifespan).
• Essential for aircraft • Cost-benefit analysis for
operation. stocking.
• Prioritized for stocking to • Managed by Materials
minimize downtime. Planning Group based on
failure rates
• Determined by part's
INDEGINIZATION

 Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Reduced downtime, increased aircraft


availability, and improved mission readiness.
 Self-Reliance: Reduced dependence on global supply chains, mitigating supply
chain disruptions and political uncertainties.
 Economic Growth: Stimulates domestic market, creates jobs, and decreases
reliance on foreign currency.
 Technological Advancement: Invites competition, drives research in materials
science and manufacturing techniques.
 Stronger Defense Ecosystem: Fuels domestic manufacturing and strengthens
overall defense capabilities.
IN-LIEU ITEMS
• Definition: In-lieu items are compatible replacements for original spares
used in emergency situations or to mitigate procurement delays.
• Rigorous Evaluation: In-lieu items undergo strict analysis to ensure
functionality, safety, and airworthiness.
• Benefits:
o Increased operational readiness by reducing aircraft downtime.
o Cost-effective alternative to original parts.
o Enhanced supply chain resilience by reducing reliance on single
source
METHODOLOGY OF IDENTIFYING IN-
LIEU SPARES
•Problem: 940 mandatory mechanical spares for MiG-29 overhaul.
•Solution: Systematic process to identify in-lieu spares.
•Steps:
1. Data Cleaning: Removed duplicates and redundancies from the spare parts list
provided by MPG.
2. Categorization: Divided spares into metal and non-metal components.
3. Standardization: Classified metal spares as standard or non-standard.
4. Technical Grouping: Grouped standardized metal spares based on technical
specifications.
5. In-Lieu Search: Identified potential in-lieu spares using online databases and
technical expertise.
• Tools: IMMOLS, CIMD, DRDO-2003 compendiums.
RESULTS
SPARES TYPES IN-LIEU JUSTIFICATION
CONCLUSION
• Achievements: Identified and documented standard and
non-standard spares, found in-lieu pairs for mechanical
aggregates of MiG-29.
• Limitations: Limited resources hindered comprehensive
analysis of material properties and standards.
• Potential: Expanded access to resources can lead to
identification of more in-lieu spares.
• Benefits: Reduced repair downtime and improved aircraft
readiness.

You might also like