Ch. 3 Project Formulation Planning
Ch. 3 Project Formulation Planning
PHASE 2
CHAPTER 3: PROJECT
FORMULATION/PLANNING
CHAPTER 3: PROJECT
PLANNING/FORMULATION
1- LIFE OF A PROJECT
2- PROJECT PROPOSAL
3. BIDDING FOR SMALL PROJECT
1- LIFE OF A PROJECT
1.2 Project
1.2 Project Life
Life Cycle-Timeline
Cycle-Timeline
Phase 3
Phase 2
Implementatio
Level Total Effort
Phase 1 Formulation/ n
Planning Phase 4
Conception/
Termination
Initiation
Time
4
1.3 Project
1.3 Project Formulation/Planning
Formulation/Planning
PHASE 2-
PROJECT
FORMULATION
RGC
Contractor/firm
Concept Approval Customer
CSOs
Private sector
Project Formulation
Non-revenue project Revenue-project
DPs vs RGC Client vs contractor/firm
DPs vs CSO Client vs customer
CSOs vs RGC Client vs supplier
Project Proposal
RGC Project
DPs Project
Negotiation
Proposal Approval
Business owner Contract
s
2-PROJECT PROPOSAL
2. Project
2. Project Proposal
Proposal
1.1 Project
Context:
Part I: Project Context
1.2 Relevance
1.2.1 Conformity with business or client’s objectives and
priorities
Explain briefly how the project is related to the objectives of
the business or institution.
Explain how the proposal is related to the priorities and
operational activities set out in the current business Action
Plan.
1.2 Project
Rational/Objectives:
Part II: Rationale and
Objectives 2.3 Indicators
2.1 Rationale 2.3.1 Type of indicators
2.1.1 Institutional set-up and 2.3.2 Methodology for
organizational issues producing indicators
2.1.2 Stakeholder analysis 2.4 Baselines
2.1.3 Problem analysis 2.5 Means of verification
2.1.4 Logical framework matrix 2.6 Setting up the key
2.2 Objectives assumptions
2.2.1 Development objective
2.2.2 Specific objective
2. Project Proposal
2. Project Proposal
1.2 Project
Rational/Objectives:
Part II: Rationale and Objectives
2.1 Rationale
2.1.1 Institutional set-up and organizational issues
Institutional capacity assessment is particularly important for projects that
will rely on local partners for the implementation of activities.
1.2 Project
Rational/Objectives:
Part II: Rationale and Objectives
2.1 Rationale
2.1.1 Institutional set-up and organizational issues (Cont.)
Since it influences the choice of partners with whom the project formulator
will interact in proposal formulation, institutional capacity assessment should
be done at an early stage. Attention should be paid to:
- Appropriate partners for project implementation and the degree of coordination
between them
- The likely relevance of the project to institutional and organizational needs
- The specific roles and responsibilities of different agencies
- The capacities of different institutions and agencies to participate in
project implementation
- The design of appropriate capacity-building elements in the project and thus the
formulation of a
2. Project Proposal
2. Project Proposal
1.2 Project
Rational/Objectives:
Part II: Rationale and Objectives
2.1 Rationale
2.1.2 Stakeholder analysis
A high-quality project proposal is the end-result of a participatory process that
involves discussions, meetings and workshops with key stakeholders. Project
design begins, therefore, with a systematic analysis of stakeholders.
Stakeholders are the people, groups, organizations and institutions who might
influence or be influenced by a problem or by the potential solution to a problem;
stakeholder analysis clarifies their views and interests.
The proposal should describe the characteristics and size of the target and
beneficiary groups (eg by age, gender and ethnic composition).
Stakeholder identification offers an opportunity to encourage interested
individuals and groups to participate in the project from its outset. Their
participation at this stage allows the planning of participatory activities in
2. Project Proposal
2. Project Proposal
1.2 Project
Rational/Objectives:
Part II: Rationale and Objectives
2.1 Rationale
2.1.2 Stakeholder analysis (Cont.)
The first step in stakeholder identification is to make a
list of those who might be interested in or affected by
the project. The second step involves classifying them,
for the purposes of the project, into operational
categories, such as:
1. Primary stakeholders
2. Secondary stakeholders
3. Tertiary stakeholders
2. Project Proposal
2. Project Proposal
Village administrations Responsible for making Lack of capacity for integrated Authority and Main actors in micro-planning at
and implementing village planning influence in the village level
development plans village
Secondary stakeholders
Development Actively involved in Lack skills for village Experienced in Sub-contracting implementation of
NGOs implementing rural development microplanning working with community development
development activities villages activities
Provincial forestry services Lack enabling framework Insufficient financial means to Can mobilize staff for Directly involved in project
conditions for effectiveness implement yearly plans project operations implementation
(law enforcement, etc.)
Tertiary stakeholders
Education and research Have education and research Lack means to finance Competence in Might collaborate in implementing
institutions missions collaboration research, studies and relevant activities
surveys
Finance institutions Finance local development Lack means to finance Experience in Will be contacted for involvement
activities collaboration providing in the local credit
development loans system
2. Project Proposal
2. Project Proposal
1.2 Project
Rational/Objectives:
1.2 Project
Rational/Objectives:
Part II: Rationale and Objectives
2.1 Rationale
2.1.4 Logical framework matrix
The logical framework is presented in tabular form as the logical
framework matrix include in the project proposal. It summarizes the scope
and essential building blocks of the project and consists of:
- four columns (‘strategic intervention’, ‘measurable indicators’,
‘means of verification’ and ‘key assumptions’)
- four rows (‘development objective’, ‘specific objective’,
‘outputs’ and ‘activities’)
2. Project Proposal
2. Project Proposal
1.2 Project
Rational/Objectives:
Part II: Rationale and Objectives
2.1 Rationale
2.1.4 Logical framework matrix (Cont.)
The logical framework matrix provides a baseline for the monitoring and
evaluation of the project’s achievements, and for reporting on progress. It is
based on the vertical cause/effect logic and provides answers to the following
questions:
•Where does the business and/or institution want to be in the medium
and long terms? (development objective and specific objectives )
• How will the stakeholders get there? (outputs, activities, inputs)
• How will they know they have got there? (measurable indicators)
• What will provide the evidence they have reached there?
(means of verification)
2. Project Proposal
2. Project Proposal
1.2 Project
Rational/Objectives:
Note: Number of indicators: The fewer the indicators per objective and output, the better. But
it is often necessary to use more than one indicator for each objective statement. For example
one indicator may provide good quantitative information, which needs to be complemented by
another indicator that focuses on qualitative matters (such as the opinions of target groups).
However, the trap of including too many indicators should be avoided
2.3 Indicators
2.2.2. Indicators
Methodology for producing
indicators::
A range of methods can be used to produce indicator data. They
include:
document reviews
surveys or assessment
interviews
focus groups
observations
workshops.
1.4
Selection of Strategy Work Responsibili Resource
Breakdown ty Schedule plan &
Step 3 – matrix matrix budget
Implementation
3.1 Output and Activities
For example:
The project will work collaboratively with all stakeholders directly or indirectly
A project is a participatory exercise from beginning to end,
Results-based-management approach
Results Based
Results Based Management
Management (RBM)
(RBM)
54
The Results Chain
Impact
The positive & negative, intended or unintended
Overall long-term results produced.
Goal
Results
Outcome
s The medium-term results of an output.
Outputs
The products, capital goods and services which
result.
55
Logframe The Results Chain
Outputs
The products, capital goods and services which
result.
56
3.3 Work
Plan
Some donors ask for the work plan before
giving their approval. The work plan
usually needs to be adjusted just before Work plan as a monitoring tool when
the project operations start and during the
operations start
implementation.
The work plan is a key tool for monitoring
The work plan is established by the project project operations. It helps the team in
design team and consists of the following charge of implementation to see whether
three matrices: the activities are carried out:
69
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
The project budgeting process
involves two steps.
· First, the project cost estimate is allocated
to the various work packages in the
project work breakdown structure.
70
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
3.4.2.1 Allocating the Total Budgeted Cost (TBC)
71
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
3.4.2.1 Allocating the Total Budgeted Cost
(TBC)
1.Top-down Approach
Approaches
2.Bottom-up Approach
72
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
3.4.2.1 Allocating the Total Budgeted Cost
(TBC)
1.Top-down Approach
1.Top-down Approach
Total project costs are reviewed in relation to the
work scope for each work package, and a proportion
of total project cost is allocated to each work
package;
Use the actual cost of a previous, similar project as
the basis for estimating the cost of the current
project.
This technique requires a good deal of expert
judgment and is generally less costly that others are,
but it can also be less accurate.
Example:1
– An IT project to develop a certain application required 500
development hours. The total cost was $50,000 73
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
3.4.2.1 Allocating the Total Budgeted Cost
(TBC)
1.Top-down Approach
1.Top-down Approach
Example 2:
– For example, if a previous project cost $20,000, and the
current project is 20 percent bigger, then you would
estimate costs of $24,000.
74
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
3.4.2.1 Allocating the Total Budgeted Cost
(TBC)
2.Bottom-up Approach
2.Bottom-up Approach
Example 1,
– If you had a big construction project, then one of the
components may be to build a fence. This would be simple
enough to estimate by adding the material cost of the fence
posts to the labor charge (daily labor rate multiplied by the
number of days it will take to install the fence).
75
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
3.4.2.1 Allocating the Total Budgeted Cost
(TBC)
2.Bottom-up Approach
2.Bottom-up Approach
77
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
3.4.2.1 Allocating the Total Budgeted Cost
(TBC)
2.Bottom-upApproach
2.Bottom-up
2.Bottom-up
2.Bottom-up Approach
Approach
Approach
Þ Planned Resource Utilization: Indicates the amounts & types
of resources needed to perform each activity.
80
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
3.4.2.2 Developing the Cumulative Budgeted Cost
(CBC)
Once a total budgeted cost has been established for
each work package, the second step in the project
budgeting process is to distribute each TBC over the
duration of its work package.
A cost is determined for each period, based on when
the activities that make up the work package are
scheduled to be performed.
The cumulative budgeted cost (CBC) is the amount that
was budgeted to accomplish the work that was
scheduled to be performed up to that point in time.
The CBC for the entire project or each work package
provides a baseline against which actual cost and work
performance can be compared at any time during the
project.
It’s important to use the cumulative budget as the
standard against which actual cost is compared.
81
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
Example:Work
Example: WorkBreakdown
BreakdownStructure
Structurefor
forPacking
PackingMachine
MachineProject
Project
TBC: Packaging
TBC: Packaging Machine
Machine $100,000
$100,000
Design-$24,000
Design-$24,000 Build-$$60,000
Build- 60,000 Install&
Install &Test
Test$$16,000
16,000
82
3.4.2. Project Budgeting
3.4.2.2 Developing the Cumulative Budgeted Cost
(CBC)
Amount that is budgeted to accomplish the work
that is scheduled to be performed up to that point in
time.
Budgeted cost by period for the Packaging Machine Project
Week
TBC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Design 24 4 4 8 8
Build 60 8 8 12 12 10 10
Total 100 4 4 8 8 8 8 12 12 10 10 8 8
CBC 4 8 16 24 32 40 52 64 74 84 92 100
Impact #1 Enhancing the Government’s ability to lead and drive its Aid for Trade as a means to strengthen the effectiveness of the mainstreaming of Trade in its development policies
and development of its institutions
Outcome #1: Strengthen the NIU’s capacity to monitor and evaluate progress made under Trade SWAp, including evaluating impacts and results of technical assistance
NIU staff NIU staff time 300
1 International Evaluator Day 500 12 6,000 71200
1 National Evaluator Day 0 0 - 71400 The amount of
Output #1: A mid-term International Evaluator DSA Day 0 0 - 71600 contract was for
independent evaluation of $15,000. The
CEDEP II is organized and International Evaluator payment made
Lumpsum 0 0 - 71600
carried out transport so far was
National consultant DSA Day 0 0 - 71400 $9,000.
Staff DSA Day 0 0 - 71600
Local transport Lumpsum 0 0 - 71600
TOTAL OUTPUT 1 6,000
NIU staff NIU staff time 600
1 International Evaluator Day 750 30 22,500 71200
Output #2: A final 1 National Evaluator Day 300 25 7,500 71400
independent evaluation of International Evaluator DSA Day 125 20 2,500 71200
CEDEP II is organized and International Evaluator Travel Lumpsum 3000 1 3,000 71200
carried out National consultant DSA Day 45 10 450 71400
Staff DSA Day 34 50 1,700 71600
Local transport Lumpsum 25 20 500 71600
TOTAL OUTPUT 2 38,150
Sub-total Outcome #1 44,150 900
3.5 Sustainability
The sustainability of a project can be assessed in terms of its
ability to sustain results even after the withdrawal of donor
support.
Political
Economic &
Financial Facto Technolo
consideratio rs gy
ns.
Institutio
nal
Capacity
3.5 Sustainability
The project should therefore be designed to be sustainable in technical,
financial, social, economic and institutional terms. Questions to address
include:
Description Key Question
Social Have local needs been considered?
sustainabili Are the approaches to involve local communities in project
ty: Implementation adequate?
Do the activities, including the planned changes in the
target group’s attitudes, take into account local traditions, beliefs and
social practices?
Will the target group feel a sense of ownership of the results?
What is the strategy for promoting ownership?
Have gender issues been adequately analyzed and taken into account?
Will all stakeholders consider the project’s strategy to be fair and
equitable?
Technical Is the choice of methods and technologies appropriate given the
sustainabili resource needs for maintenance?
ty: Do the technologies maximize the use of local labour?
Will planned capacity building allow the continued use of new
technologies?
Institutiona Do the implementing institutions have the technical and financial
3.5 Sustainability
The project should therefore be designed to be sustainable in technical,
financial, social, economic and institutional terms. Questions to address
include:
Description Key Question
Financial What guarantee is there that project results will be sustained at the end
sustainabili of donor’s
ty: financial involvement?
What level of operational costs will need to be met after project
completion?
What sustainable financing mechanisms are envisaged beyond project
completion?
Economic If the project intends to promote activities for income generation, will
sustainabili there be an
ty: adequate framework for providing beneficiaries with adequate market
access?
Has thought been given to the impact of trade and market
forces?
Political Has the policy environment been adequately assessed and taken into
sustainabili account?
ty: Is there sufficient political support and commitment to the
Part 4: Implementation
Arrangements
Part 4: Implementation Arrangements
The project proposals should include the Implementation
Arrangements, partnerships and collaborations that will ensure the
successful implementation of the project. It provides guidance on
describing the management structure and on reporting, review,
monitoring and evaluation.
Part 4: Implementation Arrangements
4.1 Organization structure and stakeholder involvement
mechanisms
4.1.1 Executing agency and partners
4.1.2 Project management team
4.1.3 Project steering committee
4.1.4 Stakeholder involvement mechanisms
4.2 Reporting, review, monitoring and evaluation
4.1 Organization structure and stakeholder involvement
mechanisms
Projects should have a simple structure that fits within the existing
structures of the beneficiary country. However, in some cases,
projects will be implemented almost entirely through sub-contracts
and consultancies.
Executing Agency:
Collaborating Agency
Forest Department (FD)
Project Coordinator
(at FD’s Headquarters)
Project Accountant
PAS
MAFF PCO Academic
Headed by and Located in MOI DP
Multisector
NGOs
SMT 1 SMT 2
Siem Reap PPC
NGOs
Private Sector
DF Contracted
D/KF
DWG DWG (Khan)
CPs/
CAHE
The project proposal should indicate the arrangements that will be made for project
monitoring, reporting and evaluation. A preliminary monitoring and reporting
schedule should be provided, indicating the dates of presentation for the project
inception report, progress reports and technical reports.
The proposal should also indicate how and when the project management team will
monitor the progress of the project, and how and when internal participatory
evaluations involving stakeholders will be conducted.
109
3.4 Proposal
3.4 Proposal Contents
Contents
Technical
Technical Management
Management Cost
Cost
Objectives
Objectives
To provide
To provide least
least To
To do
do the
the project
project Price
Price ofof the
the project
project
risky &
risky & most
most work &
work & achieve
achieve is realistic
is realistic and
and
beneficial solution
beneficial solution the result
the result reasonable
reasonable
110
3.4.1.Technical Section
3.4.1.Technical Section
111
3.4.2.Management Section
3.4.2.Management Section
Description of
Project structure
work tasks
112
3.4.3. Cost
3.4.3. Cost Section
Section
Labor
Labor Documentation
Documentation
Materials
Materials Overhead
Overhead
consultant
consultant Escalation
Escalation
Equipment&
Equipment &
facilitiesrental
rental
Contingency
Contingency
facilities
Travel
Travel Fee
Fee
113
3.4.3.1. Pricing
3.4.3.1. Pricing the
the Project
Project
Be careful not to overprice or under
price the proposed project.
Reliability of
Cost estimates
Risk
Competition PRICING (Contingency)
114
4.Proposal Submission
4.Proposal Submission and
and Follow-up
Follow-up
Submission:
Due date by which proposals must be
submitted.
To whom the proposals should be
submitted.
Number of copies to be submitted.
Mail delivery/ hand delivery.
Suggestion:
Send two sets of proposals by different
express mail services for safe and on-
time arrival. 115
4. Follow-up
Contractors should be proactive.
Ensure about the arrival of the
proposal.
Provide clarification to the customer, if
any.
Do not be aggressive.
Be responsive.
116
5. Evaluation
5. Evaluation of
of Proposals
Proposals
May be ??
Three lowest-priced proposals for
further discussion.
Screen out proposals with prices
above the budget.
Rejecting proposals- Failure to
meet the requirement in the
technical section.
Using scorecard by a Review team.
117
5.1 Criteria
5.1 Criteria for
for Evaluating
Evaluating Proposals
Proposals
Fixed- Price
Fixed- Price Cost-Reimbursement
Cost-Reimbursement
contract
contract contract
contract
Low risk
Low risk for
for High
High risk
risk for
for Low risk
Low risk for
for High
High risk
risk for
for
the customer
the customerthe the contractor
contractor the
the contractor
contractorthe
the customer
customer
119
5.2.1 Fixed-
5.2.1 Fixed- Price
Price contract
contract
Necessity
Necessity
Develop accurate and complete cost
estimates.
Include sufficient contingency.
Careful not to overprice.
Most appropriate for projects that are
well defined and little risk.
Examples: Construction of a standard
model house, Designing of a brochure
with detail specifications, etc. 120
5.2.2 Cost-Reimbursement
5.2.2 Cost-Reimbursement contract
contract
Customer agrees to pay the contractor
for all actual costs plus some agreed-
upon fee.
Most appropriate for projects that
involve high risk.
Examples: Development of a new
technology, new product development,
job of cleaning up a site, etc.
121
Contract Provisions
Contract Provisions -- Example
Example
Misrepresentation of Costs:
Illegal for the contractor to overstate
the hours or costs expended on the
project.
Notice of Cost Overruns or
Schedule Delays:
Contractor must inform the customer
immediately of any actual or
anticipated cost overruns or schedule
delays.
Submit in writing both the reason and 122
Approval of Subcontractor:
Indicates when the contractor needs to
get advance approval from customer
before hiring a sub-contractor.
Customer-furnished Equipment or
Information:
List the items the customer will
provide to the contractor throughout
the project along with the dates.
Patents:
Covers ownership of patents that may
result from conducting the project.
123
Disclosure of Proprietary
Information:
Prohibits contractor from disclosing to
anyone else the project confidential
information, technologies, etc.
Termination:
Explain the conditions under which the
customer can terminate the contract.
Terms of Payment:
How the customer will make payment?
Monthly payments based on actual
costs. 124
Equal monthly or quarterly payments
based on expected overall duration of
the project.
Percentages of total contract amount
paid as per completion of work as
agreed upon.
Single payment at completion of the
project.
First payment after signing the
contract and final payment at
completion.
Bonus/ Penalty Payments:
Contractor gets a bonus if the project 125
Penalty provision: Customer may
reduce the final payment if the
project is not completed on schedule
or performance requirements are not
achieved.
Changes:
Covers procedure for proposing,
approving and implementing changes
to project scope or schedule.
Changes can be either proposed by
customer or contractor.
Changes must be documented and
approved by the customer.
May necessitate a change in price. 126
Thanks!
Questions & Answers
127