INTRODUCTION

The planning of an airport is such a complex process that the

analysis of one activity without regard to the effect on other
ac
p rotivvide
itiesaccep
will not solutions.
table

Top 5 reasons of project failure/delays:

Time Constraint issues.

Lack of Planning in the Project Management
Process. Changes in Project Scope and
Decisions.
Lack of Labor and Resources.
THE BERLIN BRANDENBURG AIRPORT (BER)

BER meant to open its door on October 30, 2011, but poor
planning
and construction work has delayed the project multiple
times and inflated its cost to the tunes of billions of euros.
ELEMENTS
OF AN
AIRPORT
 TYPES OF AIRPORT
STUDIES

Airport Airport
System Site
Plan Selectio
n
Airport Airport
Master Project
Plan Plan
 THE
AIRPOR
T
SYSTE
M PLAN
A representation of the aviation facilities that are required to
meet the immediate and future needs of a metropolitan
area, region, state, or country.
Presents the recommendations for the general
location and characteristics of new airports and heliports and
the nature of expansion for existing ones to meet forecasts of
aggregate demand.
Its overall purpose is to determine the extent, type, nature,
location, and timing of airport development needed to
establish a viable, balanced, and integrated system of airports
 It includes the timing and estimated costs of
development and relates airport system planning to the
policy and objectives of the relevant jurisdiction
STATE OF
STATE OF TEXAS
MICHIGA SEVEN Texas
N -
COUNTRY Airport
Michigan
AMERIC REGION System
Aviation
A Plan
National Plan System Southeast
of Integrated Plan Michigan
Airport Regional
Systems Aviation
(NPIAS) System Plan
 responsible for implementing policies on civil
a viation
to assure safe, economic and efficient air
travel.
PHILIPPINES
Department of
regulates the technical, operational,
Transportatio
n – Civil safety and security aspects of aviation and
Aviation
maintains the sole registry for aircraft and
Authority
liens, other interests in aircraft or aircraft
engines.
OBJECTIVES OF AIPORT SYSTEM
PLAN
1. The orderly and timely development of a system of airports
adequate to
meet present and future aviation
needs.
its role in a balanced
2. The development of aviation and

to meet multimodal
3.The protection and enhancement of the environment.
transportation system.
4.The provision of the framework within which specific airport

programs may be developed consistent with the short- and

long-range airport system requirements.
5. The implementation of land - use and airspace plans which
optimize these

resources in an of t en - constrained environment.

6.The development of long -range

fiscal plans and the establishment

of priorities for airport financing within the governmental

budgeting process.

7.The establishment of the mechanism for

ELEMENTS OF AIPORT SYSTEM
PLAN
1.Exploration of issues that impact aviation in the study area
2.Inventory of the current system
3.Identification of air transportation needs
4.Forecast of system demand
5.Consideration of alternative airport systems
6.Definition of airport roles and policy strategies
7.Recommendation of system changes, funding
strategies, and airport
development
AIRPORT
SITE
SELECTIO
N
The scope of the site
selection process w ill vary
with size, complexity, and
role of the new ai r po rt , but
there a re basically three
st ep s — identifica tion,
screening, and selection.
IDENTIFICATION

criteria is developed that will be used to evaluate

different sites and determine if a site can function as an
airport and meets the needs of the community and users.
Several potential sites that meet the criteria are
identified.
SCREENING

an evaluation of all potential sites that meet the initial

criteria should be conducted, screening out those with
the most obvious shortcomings. Screening factors might
include topography, natural and man - made
obstructions, airspace, access, environmental impacts,
and development costs.
The remaining potential sites should then undergo a detailed
comparison using comprehensive evaluation criteria. While the
criteria will vary, the following is typically considered:

Operational capabili ty — airspace considerations, obstructions,

weather Capacity po t en t ial — available land, suitability for
construction, weather Ground acce ss — distance from the demand
for aw
high via
aytion
infrsaestru
rvice s, e, available public transportation
ctur
regional
mode s Development co sts — terrain, land costs, condition
s,
land values, soil availability of utilities
Environmental consequences—aircraft noise, air quality,
ground water ru noff , impact on flora and fauna, existence of
endangered species or cultural artifacts, historical features,
changes in local land use, relocation of families and
businesses, changes in socioeconomic characteristics
Compatibility with area-wide planning — impact on land use,
effect on comprehensive land - use plans and transportation
plans at the local and regional levels
SELECTION

the final step is selecting and recommending a

preferred site
 THE
AIRPOR
T
MASTE
R PLAN
An airport master plan is a concept of the ultimate
development of a specifi c airport.

Entire
airport
area
B
o use
t Use of land
s
h adjacent to
the airport
f
OBJECTIVES OF AN
AIRPORT MASTER
PLAN
Develop physical facilities of an
airport

Develop land on and adjacent to the

airport Determine the environmental

effects of airport construction and

operations Establish access

requirements
OBJECTIVES OF AN
AIRPORT MASTER
PLAN
Establish schedule of priorities and phasing for
the
improvements proposed in the
plan
Establish achievable financial plan to support
the

implementation schedule

Establish continuing planning process

Flowchart for preparing an airport master
plan
Flowchart for preparing an airport master
plan
WHAT DOES A MASTER PLAN
REPORT CONTAINS?
Master plan vision, goals, and
objectives Inventory of existing
conditions Forecast of aviation
demand
Demand/capacity analysis and facility
requirements Alternatives development
Preferred development plan
WHAT DOES A
MASTER PLAN
CONTAINS?
REPORT
Implementation plan
Environmental
overview Airport
plans package
Stakeholder and
public involvement
 THE
AIRPOR
T
PROJEC
T PLAN
THE AIRPORT PROJECT
PLAN
Focuses on a specific
element of the airport
NAIA Runway
ma
T steimplemen
o be r plan. ted in
the short term.
Includes addition and
modification of certain
facilities and provision.
Aims to provide the
specific details of the
 Meet airport master plan
requirements
constraint and
s.
It is a detailed plan for :
1.Developing the specific
NAIA Terminal
physical facilities at an airport
2. Determining the
environmental effects
of this development
3.Determining the detailed
costs and financial planning
4.Establishing a schedule
for the construction
LAND-
USE
PLANNIN
G
Essential part of an airport master plan .
Must project the extent of aircraft noise that will be generated.
Estimate the compatibility ofexisting land
use with airport operations using contours.
Land -use plan for areas outside the airport boundary aims to
minimize the disturbing effects of noise.
Delineationof noise contours is the most promisingapproach
for establishing noise - sensitive areas.
BOSTON LOGAN AIRPORT – NOISE CONTOUR
Achieve land use compatibility through
zoning Height and hazard zoning and
Land -use zoning.
Land uses can be classified as either closely
related to aviation or remotely related to
aviation.
CLARK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – LAND-USE
Land - use plan within the airport is a very effective tool in
helping airport management.
The land - use plan provided by the
airport authority will greatly influence and
assist the governing bodies.
Collaborative land - use management between local
communities and
transportation entities is necessary to contain costs and
ensure the system has room to grow to meet future
demand.
ENVIRONMENT
AL IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
POLICIES & REPUBLIC
ACTS
Airport and Airway Improvement Act
of 1982 and the Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 Republic Act No . 9497
ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS

RELATED TO AIRPORT
FACILITIES
NOISE POLLUTION
AIR
POLLUTION
WATER POLLUTION
DEFORESTATION
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
1.The environmental impact of the proposed development
2.Any adverse environmental effects which cannot be avoided
should the development be implemented
3.Alternatives to the proposed development
4.The relationship between local short - term uses of the
environment and the maintenance and enhancement of long -
term productivity
5.Any irreversible environmental and irretrievable
commitments of resources which would be involved in the
proposed development should it be implemented
6. Growth inducing impact
7. Mitigation measures to minimize impact

In the application of these guidelines attention

must be directed to the following questions. Will the proposed
development

8. Cause controversy
9. Noticeably affect the ambient noise level for a significant number
of people
10.Displace a significant number of people
5. Divide or disrupt an established community or divide existing
uses

6. Have any effect on areas of unique interest or scenic beauty

7. Destroy or derogate important recreational areas

8. Substantially alter the pattern of behavior for a species

9. Interfere with important wildlife breeding, nesting, or feeding

grounds

10. Significantly increase air or water pollution

11. Adversely affect the water table of an area

12. Cause excessive congestion on existing ground

transportation facilities
 ECONOMIC
AND
FINANCIAL
FEASIBILITY
ECONOMIC FEASIBLE

The degree to which the economic

advantages of something to be made, done,
or achieved are greater than the economic costs.
FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE

Funds are available or will be obtained, and that is equal

to or in excess of the estimated total project and
related costs, without jeopardizing the applicant's financial
viability.
EVALUATION OF ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
The economic criterion used in evaluating an aviation investment
is the total cost of facilities, including quantifiable social costs,
compared with the value of the increased effectiveness measured
in terms of total benefits.
Costs - the monetary value of goods and services that
producers and consumers purchase.
- Capital Investments
- Administration
- Operation
- Maintenance
Benefits- valuesthat we can quantifyin terms of the that
money generates; an advantage or p rofi t gained from it

something
- Red
Impurocvtion in Airractring
ed Ope aft and passenger delays
Efficiency
TECHNIQUES FOR COMPARING BENEFITS WITH COSTS
Time value of money based on an appropriate rat whic
discount reflects the opportunity cost of capital. e h

o Discount rate - is a value by which a unit of money

received in the future is multiplied to obtain its present
value or present worth.
A project is considered economically feasible when the
ratio of the benefits to costs is greater than unity, that is,
the benefits exceed the costs.
Net Present Value
NPV=Present Value of Benefits-Present Value
of Costs
EVALUATION OF FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
The financial feasibility study is an to determine if
analysis marketable at reasonable bonds are
inte·rWha
est rtaitsesa. bond?
Bond is an investment security where an investor lends
money to a company or a government for a set period of time, in
exchange for regular interest payments.
General Obligation Bonds - are municipal bonds that
provide a way for state and local governments to raise
money for projects that may not generate a revenue stream
directly.
Revenue Bonds - are supported by a specific revenue
FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY – TRAFFIC AND EARNINGS
STUDY

In the Traffic and Earnings study, the forecast of demand is

utilized and rates and charges established for the
various revenue categories.
Typical airport revenue bond should show an expected
coverage by net revenues (gross revenues minus costs) of
at least 1.25 times the debt service requirements.
CONTINUIN
G
PLANNING
PROCESS
A continuous airport planning process is necessary in order to
respond to the needs of air transportation in a changing
environment.
The airport systemplan and airport master plan should be
formally reviewed and updated at least every 5 years.

Specific Objectives:
1.Surveillance, maintenance, inventory
2.Review and validation of data
3.Reappraisal of the airport system and master plan
4.Modification of the airport system and master plan
1.Development of a continuous mechanism
2.Provision of a means for receiving and considering public
comment
3.Redefinition of air transportation goals and policies
4.Integration of airport system planning into a multimodal
planning process
5.Analysis of special issues
6.Publication of interim reports and formal plan updates
THAN
GROUP
3
COLAMBOT, JAMES WALTER
DE LEON, CRIS IAN

K
MATEO, ERMELYN MORALES,
ALEXIS LORRAINE PENES,
ANDREI
TIANGCO, PAOLO

YOU
ZALUN, TRISHA ANNE