ORGANISATION BEHAVIOR L
ORGANISATION BEHAVIOR L
BEHAVIOR
Wezzie T. kapunda (MBA)
0882595998
ORGANIZATION
Psychology
Sociology
Social psychology
Anthropology
Economics
Political
Psychology
Motivation
Outcomes:
1. Performance
2. Employee satisfaction
3. [email protected]
growth & development 34
Philosophy and values, vision, mission, goals all help to create a
recognizable organizational culture. This culture also a reflection of
the formal organization with its formal policies, structures and
procedures and the existing social and cultural environment. The
formal and informal organizations provide the glue that binds the
varied elements of the institution into an effective working team.
a) Autocratic model,
b) Custodial model,
c) Supportive model,
d) Collegial model and
e) System model
The selection of a model by manager is determined by a number of
factors.
The prevailing philosophy, values, vision, mission and goals of managers
affect, and are affected by, their OB model. In addition
environmental conditions help determine which model will be most
effective.
Autocratic model
is the model that depends upon strength, power and formal authority.
In an autocratic organization, the people (management/owners) who
manage the tasks in an organization have formal authority for
controlling the employees who work under them.
These lower-level employees have little control over the work
function.
Their ideas and innovations are not generally welcomed, as the key
decisions are made at the top management level.
The guiding principle behind this model is that management/owners
have enormous business expertise, and the average employee has
relatively low levels of skill and needs to be fully directed and guided.
This type of autocratic management system was common in factories in
the industrial revolution era.
One of the more significant problems associated with the autocratic
model is that the management team is required to micromanage the
staff – where they have to watch all the details and make every single
decision.
Clearly, in a more modern-day organization, where highly paid
specialists are employed an autocratic system becomes impractical
and highly inefficient.
The Custodial Model
Custodial model seek to make employees feel as if the boss caring for
their personal needs
It depends on economic resource
Since employees physical needs are already met, the employer look to
security needs as a motivating factor e.g good salary
In their worst these welfare programs later became known as
paternalism.
To satisfy the needs of employees, a number of companies began
welfare programs in the 1890s
In the 1930s welfare programs evolved into a variety of fringe benefits
to provide employee security.
Employers-and unions and government-began caring for the security
needs of workers (rewards & benefits).
A successful custodial approach depends on economic resources.
The resulting managerial orientation is toward money to pay wages
and benefits.
Mgt orientation, to support the employees job performance rather
than to simply support employee benefits The custodial approach
leads to employee dependence on the organization rather than being
dependent on their boss.
As a result of their treatment, they are well maintained and
contented.
The Supportive Model
The supportive model depends on leadership instead of power or money.
Through leadership, management provides a climate to help employees grow
and accomplish in the interests of the organization the things of which they
are capable.
Management’s orientation, therefore, is to support the employee’s job
performance rather than to simply support employee benefit payments as in
the custodial approach
The supportive model of organizational behavior tends to be especially
effective in affluent (rich) nations bcz it responds to employee wide array of
needs
It has less immediate application in the developing nations, because their
employees current needs and social conditions are often quite different
The Collegial Model
A useful extension of the supportive model is the collegial model.
The term ‘collegial’ relates to a body of people working together co-
operatively.
This model embodies a team concept, first achieved widespread
applications in research laboratories and similar work environments.
The collegial model depends on management’s building a feeling of
partnership with employees.
Managers are seen as joint contributor rather than as boss.
Moreover, the managerial orientation is toward teamwork by which
the employee response to this situation is responsibility
In this kind of environment employees normally feel some degree of
fulfillment, worthwhile contribution, and self actualization, even
though the amount may be modest in some situations.
This self-actualization will lead to moderate enthusiasm in
performance.
The System model
An emerging model of OB is the system model. It is the result of a strong
search for higher meaning at work by many of today’s employees; they want
more than just a paycheck and job security from the jobs.
In the system model the org looks at the overall structure and team
environment
Individual have different goals, talent and potential
Apart from salary, job security but also want to work in a positive work
environment where the org adds value to community and customers
System act as a partnership of managers and employees with a common
goal, where everybody feels that they have a stake in the organisation
To accomplish this, managers must increasingly demonstrate a sense of
caring and compassion, being sensitive to the needs of a diverse workforce
with rapidly changing needs and complex personal and family needs.
Under the system model, managers try to convey each worker, ‘you
are an important part of our whole system…..’. The role of a manager
becomes one of facilitating employee accomplishments through a
variety of actions (e.g. John W. Newstrom; Organizational Behavior;
11th edition; page 40)
In response, many employees embrace the goal of organizational
effectiveness, and recognize the mutuality of company-employee
obligations in a system viewpoint.