The 'impact analysis' or
detailed study phase of EIA
involves:
i. identifying the impacts more
specifically
ii. predicting the characteristics
of the main impacts
iii.evaluating the significance of
the residual impact
Impact Analysis 1
EMCA
Initial Environmental IEE Sch.
Screening
Examination (IEE) Review 2
EIA
Required EIA Not
Scoping/
Terms of Required
Reference
Full-Scale
You EIA
are
here EIA
Approved
EIA Decision
Review Making EIA Audit and
Monitoring
Evaluation
EIA Not
Approved
Evaluate
Options
2
The term ‘environment’
includes:
(Commonly referred to as “valued
environmental/ ecosystem components
(VECs)
human health and safety
flora, fauna, ecosystems and biodiversity
soil, water, air, climate and landscape
useof land, natural resources and raw
materials
protected areas and sites of special
significance
heritage, recreation and amenity assets
livelihood,lifestyle and well being of
affected communities
Impact identification methods
i. checklists
ii. matrices
iii. networks
iv. overlays and geographical
information systems (GIS)
v. expert systems
vi. professional judgement
vii. Risk assessment
Impact Analysis 4
Example of a checklist
(For rural and urban water supply and sanitation projects)
Aspects of EIA Checklist Questions Yes No Additional
Will the project: Data needs
Sources of Impacts 1. Require the acquisition or conversion of significant areas
of land for reservoir/treatment works etc. (e.g. > 50 ha
rural, > 5 ha urban)?
2. Result in significant quantities of eroded material, effluent
or solid wastes?
3. Require significant accommodation or service amenities to
support the workforce during construction (eg > 100
manual workers)?
Receptors of Impacts 4. Flood or otherwise affect areas which support
conservation worthy terrestrial or aquatic ecosystems,
flora or fauna (eg protected areas, wilderness areas,
forest reserves, critical habitats, endangered species); or
that contain sites of historical or cultural importance?
5. Flood or otherwise affect areas which will affect the
livelihoods of local people (eg require population
resettlement; affect local industry, agriculture, livestock
or fish stocks; reduce the availability of natural resource
goods and services)?
6. Involve siting sanitation treatment facilities close to
human settlements (particularly where locations are
susceptible to flooding)?
7. Affect sources of water extraction?
Environmental Impacts 8. Cause a noticeable permanent or seasonal reduction in
the volume of ground or surface water supply?
9. Present a significant pollution risk through liquid or solid
wastes to humans, sources of water extraction,
conservation worthy aquatic ecosystems and species, or
commercial fish stocks?
10. Change the local hydrology of surface water-bodies (eg
streams, rivers, lakes) such that conservation-worthy or
commercially significant fish stocks are affected?
11. Increase the risk of diseases in areas of high population
density (eg onchocerciasis, filariasis, malaria, hepatitis,
gastrointestinal diseases)?
12. Induce secondary development, eg along access roads,
or in the form of entrepreneurial services for construction
and operational activities?
Mitigation Measures 13. Be likely to require mitigation measures that may result in
the project being financially or socially unacceptable?
Comments
I recommend that the programme be assigned to
Category
Signature: Delegation.........................................Desk...................................
Sectoral Matrix (Leopold Matrix)
Valued Env.
Component
(VEC)
Archaeological/Historical
Surface Water Quality
Seismology/Geology
Terrestrial Wildlife
Development
Socioeconomic
Public Health
Land Quality
Resettlement
Projects
Air Quality
Aesthetics
Industries
Land Use
Fisheries
Erosion
Forests
Noise
Ports and Harbours
Airports
Rapid Transit
Highways
Oil/Gas Pipelines
Significant Impact Moderate - Significant Impact Insignificant Impact
Checklist Example2
Actions Affecting Potential
Resources and
Values: Damages:
1. Disruption of 1. Impairment of Other
Hydrology Beneficial Water
2. Resettlement Uses
3. Encroachment on 2. Social Inequities
Precious Ecology 3. Loss of ecological
4. Encroachment on Values
Historic/ 4. Loss of these Values
Cultural Values 5. Conflicts with Other
5. Cooling Tower Beneficial Water
Obstruction Uses
6. Regional Flooding 6. Hazard to Plant
Hazard Operations
7. Waste Emissions 7. Intensification of
Related to Siting Problems of
Pollution Control
Impact Analysis 7
Example of a network
(showing linkages leading to changes in quality of
life, wildlife and tourism)
CHANGING QUALITY CHANGING QUALITY
OF LIFE FOR WILDLIFE OF TOURISM
Loss of Habitat Increased Incidents
between Loss of Natural
Wildlife & People Wilderness Value
Deforestation & Erosion of River Bank Overgrazing Changes in
Loss of Biodiversity Gorge Erosion Around
Animal Behaviour
Access Paths Water Holes
Too small an area
for animal numbers
Riparian Constriction Harrassment
Selective Cutting of wildlife
of trees for Water Wave Vegetation of wildlife
Pollution Effects Reduced movements
Curio Wood
More Fences/ Visual DisturbanceIncreasing
Oily discharges River Bank & Island Enclosures Impacts of wildlife noise levels
from boats etc. Development
New Road
Demand for Expansion of More Aircraft More & Bridge at Old
More More
Curios Rafting Jetties & Hotels/Camps Flying Over Motor Drift/Zambezi
Increased & Tourist Facilities Falls & Town Vehicles National Park
Licences Boat Licences
Increased Visitor Numbers
Demand for More Direct Improved Border Improved Road Links
Low-spending International Facilities - Livingston/Lusaka
Tourism Increases Flights - Zambia/Botswana/Namibia
Increased customs co-operation
Airport Upgrading between Zimbabwe/Zambia
(Bisset)
Choice of EIA method
depends on:
the type and size of the proposal
the type of alternatives being
considered
the nature of the likely impacts;
the availability of impact
identification methods
the experience of the EIA team
with their use
the resources available - cost,
information, time, personnel
Impact Analysis 9
Main advantages and
disadvantages of impact
identification methods
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Checklists • simple to understand • do not distinguish
–simple and use between direct and
–ranking • good for site selection indirect impacts
and and priority setting • do not link action and
weighting impact
• the process of
incorporating values
can be controversial
Matrices • link action to impact • difficult to distinguish
• good method for direct and indirect
displaying EIA results impacts
• significant potential
for double-counting of
impacts
Networks • link action to impact • can become very
• useful in simplified complex if used beyond
form for checking for simplified version
second order impacts
• handles direct and
indirect impacts
Overlays • easy to understand • address only direct
• good display method impacts
• good siting tool • do not address impact
duration or probability
GIS and • excellent for impact • heavy reliance on
computer identification and knowledge and data
expert analysis • often complex and
systems
• good for ‘experimenting’ expensive
Impact Analysis 10
Information required to
establish baseline conditions
current conditions
current and expected
trends
effects of proposals already
being implemented
effects of other proposals
yet to be implemented
Impact Analysis 11
An environmental impact
(Wathern, 1988)
Impact Analysis 12
Impact characteristics can
vary in:
nature (positive/negative,
direct/indirect)
magnitude (severe, moderate, low)
extent/location (area/volume
covered, distribution)
timing (during construction,
operation etc, immediate, delayed)
duration (short term/long term,
intermittent/continuous)
reversibility/irreversibility
likelihood (probability, uncertainty)
significance (local, regional, global)
Impact Analysis 13
Orders of Impact Example
River Embankment
1st Order
Dry Flood Plains
2nd Order
Loss of Plain Fisheries
3rd Order Loss of Fisheries Income
4th Order Social Tension & Poverty Intensified
Impact characteristic
summary table
IMPACT TYPE
IMPACT
air quality health etc
CHARACTERISTIC
nature
magnitude
extent/location
timing
duration
reversibility
likelihood (risk)
significance
Impact Analysis 15
Data Requirements
Project
» Type
» Size
» Location
Area of potential impact
» Physical resources
» Biological resources
» Economic development
resources
» Quality of life
» Other existing and planned
projects
16
Sources of Information
Existing reports on environmental
resources in the area
Previous assessment reports
» EIA reports on similar project types
» Reports on other projects in the
region that may cause similar
disturbances
Regional planning, policy and other
reports
Field studies
Local citizens and traditional knowledge
17
Methods of impact prediction
‘best estimate’ professional
judgement and experience with
similar project types
quantitative mathematical
models
experiments and physical
models
case studies as analogues or
references
Impact Analysis 18
Types of uncertainty in
impact prediction
scientific uncertainty – limited
understanding of the
ecosystem or community
affected
data uncertainty – incomplete
information or insufficient
methodology
policy uncertainty – unclear or
disputed objectives or
standards
Impact Analysis 19
Types of social impacts
demographic – changes to
population numbers,
distribution
cultural – changes to customs,
traditions and values
community – changes to
cohesion, relationships etc.
socio-psychological – changes
to quality of life and well being
Impact Analysis 20
Health impacts
Examples of health impacts by sector
Communicable Non Nutrition Injury Psychosocial
disease communicable disorder and
disease loss of well-
being
Mining Tuberculosis Dust induced Crushing Labour migration
lung disease
Agriculture Parasitic Pesticide Loss of
infections poisoning subsistence
Industry Poisoning by Occupational Disempowerment
pollutants injury
Forestry Loss of food Occupational
production injury
Dams and Water borne Poisoning by Increased food Drowning Involuntary
irrigation diseases pollutants production displacement
schemes
Transportation HIV/Aids Heart disease Traffic injury Noise and
induced stress
Energy Indoor air Electromagnetic Community
pollution radiation displacement
Source: Birley, 2000
Impact Analysis
21
Factors affecting economic
impacts
duration of construction and
operation
workforce requirements for each
period
skill requirements (local availability)
earning
raw material and other input
purchases
capital investment
outputs
the characteristics of the local
economy
Impact Analysis 22
Factors affecting fiscal
impacts
size of investment and workforce
requirements
capacity of existing service
delivery and infrastructure
systems
local/regional tax or other
revenue raising processes
demographic changes arising
from project requirements
Impact Analysis 23
Examples of threshold tests
for environmental
acceptability
Box 3: Examples of threshold tests for environmental acc eptability
Level of ac ce ptability Potentia l impa ct threshold
Unacce ptable Exceeds legal threshold, e.g.
q ualitystandard
Unacce ptable Increases level of risk to public
health and safety ab ove
q ualitative or quantitative criteria
(e.g. in so me jurisdictions an
inc reased risk of death of 1 in a
million per year
Unacce ptable Extinc tion of b iolo gical species,
loss of genetic diversity, rare or
endangered species, c ritical
habitat
Norma llyunacc epta ble C onflict with existing
environmental policies , land-use
p lans
Norma llyunacc epta ble Loss of popula tions of commercial
b iolo gica l species
Norma llyunacc epta ble Large-sca le loss of productive
c ap acity of renewable resources
May be acce ptable only with Avoidance of spread of biolog ical
minimiz
a tion, mitigation, management d isease, pests, feral animals,
weeds
May be acce ptable only with Taking of rare or endangered
minimiz
a tion, mitigation, management spec ies
May be acce ptable only with Some loss of threatened habitat
minimiz
a tion, mitigation, management
Norma llyacce pta ble Some loss of populations and
habitats of non-threatened
spec ies
Norma llyacce pta ble M odification of landsc ape without
d owngrading special aesthetic
va lues
Norma llyacce pta ble Emissio ns d emonstrably less than
the c arryin g capacity of the
receiving environment
Source : Sip p e 1999
Key elements for assessing
impact significance
environmental standards
level of public concern
scientific and professional
evidence concerning:
- resource loss/ecological
damage
- negative social impacts
- foreclosure of land and
resource use options
Impact Analysis 25
Guiding principles for
determining impact
significance:
use established procedure
or guidance
adapt relevant criteria or
comparable cases
assign significance
rationally and defensibly
be consistent in the
comparison of alternatives
document the reasons for
judgements
Impact Analysis 26
Test for significance by
asking three questions
Are there residual environmental
impacts?
If yes, are these likely to be
significant or not?
If yes, are these significant
effects likely to occur?
Impact Analysis 27
Impact significance criteria
environmental loss and
deterioration
social impacts resulting from
environmental change
non-conformity with
environmental standards
probability and acceptability of
risk
Impact Analysis 28
Ecological significance
criteria
reduction in species diversity
habitat depletion or fragmentation
threatened, rare and endangered
species
impairment of ecological functions
e.g.
– disruption of food chains;
– decline in species population;
– alterations in predator-prey
relationships.
Impact Analysis 29
Social significance criteria
human health and safety
decline in important resource
loss of valued area
displacement of people
disruption of communities
demands on services and
infrastructure
Impact Analysis 30
Environmental standards
limits on effluent discharge
concentrations
clean air standards, water quality
standards
policy objectives and targets
plans or policies that protect or
limit use of natural resources
Impact Analysis 31
Alternative approaches to
determining significance
apply technical criteria
when changes are
predictable
use negotiation when
significance is disputable
Impact Analysis 32
Practical guidance
Impacts are likely to be significant if
they:
are extensive over space or time
are intensive in concentration or in
relation to assimilative capacity
exceed environmental standards or
thresholds
do not comply with environmental
policies/ land use plans
affect ecological sensitive areas and
heritage resources
affect community lifestyle,
traditional land uses and values
Impact Analysis 33
Possible Strategies for
Alternatives
Re-evaluate regional plans (e.g., to
address cumulative impacts with other
planned projects)
Review project options (i.e.,
alternatives and modifications)
Evaluate site mitigation strategies;
including compensation strategies
Likely you’ll use a combination of
strategies
34
Examples of Project
Alternatives
No-build alternative
Demand alternatives (e.g., using existing
energy capacity more efficiency rather
than building more capacity)
Activity alternatives (e.g., providing public
transport rather than increasing road
capacity)
Location/rerouting alternatives
35
More Examples of
Project Alternatives
Process alternatives (e.g., re-use of
process water, reducing waste, different
logging methods)
Scheduling alternatives (e.g., timing of
project construction)
Input alternatives (e.g., use of different
raw materials or sources of energy)
(refer to topic on industrial ecology & cleaner
production)
36
Where to from Here?
No Further
Action
Required:
Issues with: No Effect Write up
Issues with: findings in
EIA Project
Insignificant Effect Report
Issues with: Unknown
Significant
Effect
Issues with: Significant
Effects within the
Scope of the EIA
Issues with: Significant
Effects outside the
Scope of the EIA
Action Action
Required: Required:
Identify
Develop the
Information
Environmental &
Needs & Tasks
Social
Required to
Management
Resolve
Plan & Protection
Outstanding E
Write up findings and Measures to
& S impacts
recommendations in Resolve E&S
EIA report impacts
Example EIA Report Contents
1. Description of the Project
2. Description of the Baseline Environment
3. Screening of Potential Environmental Issues
and Rationale for their Significance Grading
4. Environmental Mitigation (Protection)
Measures
5. Environmental Monitoring and Institutional
Requirements
6. Recommendations for Additional Studies
7. Conclusions
38
EIA in the Project Cycle
Conventional Corresponding
Project Planning Environmental
Protection Activity
Project
Reconnaissance Survey
Screening
Initial
Environmental
Examination
Pre-feasibility Study
Environmental
Impact
Assessment
Feasibility Study
Checking Design
Final Design
Monitoring Construction
Construction
Monitoring
Operations and
Environmental
Effects
Operation
39
@@@@@@
The end
UNEP Training Resource Manual Topic 6 Slide 40