0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views21 pages

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents and Disinfectants

The document outlines various methods for evaluating antimicrobial agents and disinfectants, including tube dilution, agar plate, filter paper, and Kelsey-Sykes methods. It details the procedures for each method, the organisms used for testing, and the interpretation of results. Advantages and disadvantages of these methods are also discussed, highlighting their effectiveness and limitations in practical applications.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views21 pages

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Agents and Disinfectants

The document outlines various methods for evaluating antimicrobial agents and disinfectants, including tube dilution, agar plate, filter paper, and Kelsey-Sykes methods. It details the procedures for each method, the organisms used for testing, and the interpretation of results. Advantages and disadvantages of these methods are also discussed, highlighting their effectiveness and limitations in practical applications.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

EVALUATION OF

ANTIMICROBIAL
AGENTS AND
DISINFECTANTS
METHODS
 Tube dilution and agar
plate method
 Filter paper and cup-
plate method
 Ditch-plate method
 Phenol coefficient
method
 Kelsey-Sykes method
Tube dilution and Agar plate
method
 The chemical agent is incorporated into the nutrient broth or agar
medium and inoculated with the test microorganisms.
 These tubes are incubated at 30 to 35 C for 2 to 3 days and then
the results in the form of turbidity or colonies are observed.
Filter paper, Cup-plate or Cylinder
plate method
 The agar is melted, cooled at 45 C ,inoculated with the test microorganisms and
poured into a sterile petri plate.
 When the inoculated agar has solidified, holes about 9mm in diameter are cut in
the medium with a sterile cork borer.
 The antimicrobial agent is directly placed in the holes.
 The antimicrobial agent is applied to the surface of the solidified, inoculated agar
by using a filter paper disc and cylinder respectively.
 The zone of inhibition is observed after incubation at 30 to 35 C for 2 to 3 days.
 The diameter of the zone of inhibition gives an indication of the relative activities
of different antimicrobial substances against the test.
Ditch-plate method or Giant colony
method
 A solution of the antimicrobial agent substance is carefully run into the
ditch which is prepare in an agar plate.
 A loopful of each test microorganism is then streaked outwards from the
ditch on the agar surface.
 Microorganisms resistant to the antimicrobial agent grow right upto the
ditch whereas susceptible microorganisms show a zone of inhibition
adjacent to the ditch or centre of plate.
 The width of the inhibition zone gives an indication of the relative activity
of the antimicrobial substance against the various test microorganisms.
Phenol coefficient method
 A test chemical is rated for its microbicidal property with reference to
phenol under identical conditions.
 In this test similar quantities of microorganisms are added to rising
dilutions of phenol and of the disinfectant to be tested.
 In the UK the organism used is Salmonella typhi and the USA Salmonella
typhi, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa are used.
 The phenol coefficient test includes:
1. Rideal -Walker test (RW test)
2. Chick –Martin test (CM test)
3. United States Food and Drug Administration test ( FDA test)
4. The US Association of Official Agriculture Chemists test (AOAC test)
Rideal–Walker Test
 The phenol coefficient of test disinfectants may be calculated by
Rideal – Walker test that use Rideal – Walker broth and Salmonella
typhi as the sensitive microorganism.
 Different dilutions of the test disinfectant and phenol are prepared
and 5ml of each of dilution is inoculated with 0.5ml of the 24
hours broth culture of the organisms.
 All tubes( Disinfectant + Organisms and phenol + Organisms) are
placed in a 17.5 C water bath.
 Subcultures of each reaction mixture are taken and transferred to
5ml sterile broth after 2.5,5,7.5 and 10 minutes.
 The broth tubes are incubated at 37 C for 48 to 72 hours and are
examined for the presence or absence of growth.
Chick–Martin Test
 This type of test is done in controlled amount of organic matter in
the form of standardization of yeast cells.
 In this test all conditions are like Rideal-Walker test but the
temperature is 20 C and the exposure time is 30 minutes.
 Chick-Martin coefficient is the mean of highest concentration of
phenol showing growth and lowest concentration preventing
growth divided by the same mean of disinfectants under this test.
 If greater than one, so more effective (Test disinfectants)than
phenol coefficients.
 The Rideal – Walker coefficient of the disinfectant is then
calculated as follows:
RW coefficient =Dilution of disinfectant killing in 7.5 but not in
5 min.
Dilution of phenol killing in 7.5 but not in 5
min.
 If a phenol coefficient or Rideal – Walker coefficient of the given
test disinfectant is 1,it means that the disinfectant has the same
effectiveness as phenol.
 Phenol coefficient of test disinfectant is less than 1 means it is less
effective and more than 1 means it is more effective as compared
to phenol.
Advantages
 They are inexpensive and can be performed quickly.
 They give reproducible results in the hands of experienced
workers.
 They are valuable to eliminate useless products and supply
standards for crude preparations.
Disadvantages
 Choice of the test organism: In most tests only one organism is used i.e.
Salmonella typhi.
 Phenol coefficient tests compare the activity of bacteriocides at only one
concentration with a fixed death time and reaction temperature.
 Most phenol coefficient tests give no indication of the activity of
disinfectants in the presence of organic matter.
 These tests do not give any information related to tissue toxicity.
 Sampling errors are large in phenol coefficient tests.
 These tests do not give any indication of the effects of dilution on the
activity of the disinfectant and are used to evaluate phenolic disinfectants
only.
Kelsey-Sykes method
 It is a triple challenge test (Test disinfectant is checked 3 times with successive addition
of microbial suspension with the same concentration of disinfectants).
 In this method several test bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus vulgaris,
Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are used.
 This test can be carried out in clean (No organic matter) or dirty (With organic matter)
conditions.
 In both cases the final concentration of bacterial cells should about 10 9 /ml.
 Clean conditions are stimulated by using broth as the suspending fluid and dirty
conditions by the use of a yeast suspension or inactivated horse serum as the
suspending fluid.
 The dilutions of the disinfectant are made in hard water.
 The samples taken at 8,18 and 28 are then incubated at 30 to 32 C
and the number of tubes showing growth or the number of
colonies/ drop from the surface plate culture is recorded.

Interpretation of result: A disinfectant is satisfactory for use at


the initial concentration if,
a. No growth occurs in 2 or more of the 5 tubes of the 18 minutes
samples i.e. subcultures taken after second incremental addition
of bacteria; or
b. There are not more than 5 colonies from the 5 drops on the agar
plate.
Bibliography
 Pharmaceutical Microbiology by Chandrakant Kokare
THANK YOU

You might also like