Scribd
Upload
153 views15 pages

3-D Model of Managerial Effectiveness: Presented by

The document summarizes William Reddin's 3-D Model of Managerial Effectiveness. The model evaluates managers based on their Task Orientation, Relationship Orientation, and Effectiveness. It identifies eight leadership styles based on levels of those three dimensions - four less effective styles like Missionary and Deserted, and four more effective styles like Developer and Executive. The document provides descriptions and examples of each leadership style.

Uploaded by

Priyanka Patil
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
153 views15 pages

3-D Model of Managerial Effectiveness: Presented by

The document summarizes William Reddin's 3-D Model of Managerial Effectiveness. The model evaluates managers based on their Task Orientation, Relationship Orientation, and Effectiveness. It identifies eight leadership styles based on levels of those three dimensions - four less effective styles like Missionary and Deserted, and four more effective styles like Developer and Executive. The document provides descriptions and examples of each leadership style.

Uploaded by

Priyanka Patil
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

3-D Model of Managerial Effectiveness

Presented By: Darshan Patil (M-11-37) Pankaj Patil (M-11-38) Priyanka Patil (M-11-39) Sachin Patil (M-11-40)

Under the guidance of, Prof. Rangana Ghatak

Brief About 3-D Model


William James Reddin Reddins 3 Dimensions: Task Orientation: Relationship Orientation Effectiveness

Task Orientation: the extent to which a manager directs his (or her) subordinates efforts towards goal attainment. Relationship Orientation: the extent to which a manager has personal job relationships. Effectiveness: the extent to which a manager achieves the output requirements of his or her position.

RELATED BASIC TYPES


(High relationship orientation & low task orientation)
LESS EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP STYLE: MISSIONARY - An supportive approach - Emphasizes congeniality and positive climate - Supportive Behaviour - May avoid or smooth over conflict - Find difficulty denying request

MORE EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP STYLE: DEVELOPER - Objective counterpart of the missionary style - Employment contribution is recognized - Approach to subordinates is collegial - Feel pride in discovering and promoting talent.

INTEGRATED TYPE

(High relationship orientation & high task orientation)


LESS EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP STYLE: COMPROMISER - Express appreciation of both orientation - Compromise solutions or expediency - Sensitive to reality considerations - Good motivators

MORE EFFECTIVE LEADERSHIP STYLE: EXECUTIVE - Integrates both task and human relations orientation - consultative, interactive, and problem solving approach - Favor a team approach - Stimulate communication among subordinates

SEPARATED BASIC TYPE

Deserted
Less Effective Leadership Style Hand-off or Laizze Faire Approach Avoidance of any involvement Neutral Attitude Adverse to Managerial Task Status quo

SEPARATED BASIC TYPE


Bureaucratic
More Effective Leadership Style legalist and Procedural Adherence to rules and regulation Acceptance of Authority Preference to formal channels of communication Autocratic, rigid and fussy

DEDICATED BASIC TYPE

Autocratic
Less Effective Leadership Style Directive and controlling approach Concern for output high Formal Errors are not tolerated Straightforward and critical

DEDICATED BASIC TYPE

Benevolent Autocratic
More Effective Leadership Style Communicative counterpart Directive and interventionist Task Masters

Labels and judgment about effectiveness


More effective 1.Warm hearted 2.Flexible 3.Dignified 4.Firm 5.Sensitive 6.Progressive Less Effective 1. Sentimental 2. Weak minded 3. Rigid 4. Reactionary 5. Soft 6. Overbearing

Example:A man yells Everybody out in a theatre would be a benevolent autocrat. But precisely same content used to a close office or restaurant is considered as a autocratic.

Style labels Dominant Style Any of the basic style that we have learned so far. Supportive Style It is most frequently used after dominant style. Over rejection Style This style is used very rarely by a manager.

You might also like