T.DeepikaMsc(IT)
Department of CS and IT
Nadar saraswathi college of arts and science
Theni
1
2
Local Area Networks and
Medium Access Control Protocols
• A local area network (LAN) is a data communication system that allows a
number of independent devices to communicate directly with each other in
a limited geographic area.
Area diameter · few km
Data rate = several Mbps
Owned by a single organization
• LANs are broadcast networks. A single transmission medium is shared by a
community of users. All information is received by all users. LANs are also
called multiple access networks (with low-cost and simplicity).
• The medium access control (MAC) protocols are to coordinate the access
to the channel so that information gets through from a source to a
destination in the same broadcast network.
Other layers
Network
Physical
Logical link control (LLC)
Media access control (MAC)
Project 802
Other layers
Network
Data link
Physical
OSI model
3
• In 1985, the Computer Society of the IEEE started a project, called
Project 802, to set up standards so that LAN equipments
manufactured by different companies is compatible.
• Project 802 divides the data link layer into sub-layers:
• Logical link control (LLC)
• Media access Control
• LAN compared with the OSI model
4
• The LLC is the upper sublayer and is same for all LANs. Its functions
include error detection and retransmission.
• The MAC sublayer coordinates the data link tasks within a specific
LAN.
• The MAC sublayer is manufacturer-specific and dependent on the
LAN type.
• For LANs specified by project 802 are following:
• Ethernet (802.3)
• Token bus (802.4)
• Token ring (802.5)
• Wireless LANs (802.11)
5
Sharing a transmission medium
• Static sharing (channelization schemes) is a collision-free sharing
• Dynamic sharing (MAC schemes) minimizes the incidence of
collision
Medium sharing techniques
Static channelization Dynamic medium access control
scheduling Random access
• Random access methods constitute the first major class of MAC
procedures
6
ALOHA random access scheme
• It was developed at the University of Hawaii in the early 1970s to
connect computers situated on different Hawaiian islands. The
computers of the ALOHA network transmit on the same radio channel
whenever they have a packet to transmit. From time-to-time packet
transmission will collide, but these can be treated as transmission
errors, and recovery can take place by retransmission. When traffic is
very light, the probability of collision is very small, and so
retransmissions need to be carried out infrequently.
• ALOHA scheme requires stations to use a random retransmission
time. (This randomization is intended to spread out the retransmission
and reduces the likelihood of additional collisions between stations. )
• ALOHA is the father of multiple access protocols.
7
Pure ALOHA (unslotted ALOHA):
1. Protocol
● A user transmits whenever it has packets to transmit
● When two or more packet transmissions overlap in time, a
collision occurs and all the packets involved in the collision are
destroyed. (non-capture)
● If ACK not received within timeout, then a user picks random
backoff time (to avoid repeated collision)
● User retransmits packet after backoff time
t
t0t0-X t0+X t0+X+2tprop
t0+X+2tprop + B
Time-out
Backoff period B
First transmission Retransmission
8
Analysis (Throughput and delay)
1. Definitions and assumptions
1. X: packet transmission time (assume constant)
2. S: throughput (average # successful packet transmissions per X seconds)
3. G: load (average # transmission attempts per X sec)
4. Traffic traffic (new arrivals + retransmissions) is a Poisson process with
rate G packet/slot
Xt 0 0t Xt 0
Vulnerable
period
2. The probability of a successful transmission is the probability
that they are no additional packet transmission in the vulnerable
period.
9
10
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0
0.0078125
0.015625
0.03125
0.0625
0.125
0.25
0.5 1 2 4
G
S
Throughput S versus load G for pure ALOHA
184.02/1 e
S reaches a peak value of 1/2e at G=0.5, and then declines back toward
0. For a given value of S, say, S=0.05, there are two associated values
of G.
For small G, S ¼ G.
For large G, there are many backlogged users.
ALOHA system cannot achieve throughput higher than 18.4 percent
(1/2e).
11
The average (delay) number of transmission attempts/packet is
G/S=e2G attempts per packet
The avergae number of unsuccessful attempts per packet is
=G/S-1=e2G-1
The first transmission requires X+tprop seconds, and each
subsequent retransmission requires 2tprop+X+B, where B is the
average backoff time and tprop is the one way propagation delay.
Thus the average packet transmission time is approximately given
by
E[Taloha]=X+tprop+(e2G-1)(X+2tprop+B)
Express delay in multiples of X
E[Taloha]/X=1+a+(e2G-1)(1+2a+B/X)
Where a=tprop/X is the one way normalized propagation delay. If the
backoff time is uniformly distributed between 1 and K packet
transmission times, then B=(K+1)X/2
12
1f
0f
1f
0f
MHzf
MHzf
413
407
1
0


Transmission rate
9600bps
ALOHA network
ALOHA is a packet-switched radio communication network that was
invented by Norm Abrahmson at the University of Hawaii in the early
1970s.
Ethernet is its direct descendant.
13
Slotted ALOHA
Slotted ALOHA is to constrain the user to transmit in
synchronized fashion. All users keep track of transmission
slots and are allowed to initiate transmission only at the
beginning of a time slot (the time axis is divided into time
slots with durations equal to the time to transmit a packet)
t
(k+1)XkX t0 +X+2tprop+ B
Vulnerable
period
Time-out
Backoff period B
t0 +X+2tprop
Only packets that arrive during prior X seconds collide.
Throughput of Slotted ALOHA
GG
eGe
G
G
GPGPS



!0
)(
seconds]Xinarrivalsno[]collisionno[
0
14
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.015…
0.03125
0.0625
0.125
0.25
0.5
1
2
4
8
Ge-G
Ge-2G
G
S
0.184
0.368
15
Smax=1/e=36.8%
Efficiency=throughput · 36% (upper bound=36%)
The average packet delay in slotted ALOHA
E[Tslotted-aloha]/X=1+a+(eG-1)(1+2a+B/X)
Example – ALOHA and Slotted ALOHA
Suppose that a radio system uses a 9600 bps channels for sending call
setup request messages to a base station. Suppose that packets are 120
bits long, that the timeout is 20ms, and that the backoff is uniformly
distributed between 1 and 7. What is the maximum throughput possible
with ALOHA and slotted ALOHA? Compare the average delay in
ALOHA and slotted ALOHA when the load when the load is 40 percent
of the maximum possible throughput of the ALOHA system.
16
The system transmits packets at a rate of 9600 bits/second£1
packet/120bits = 80 packets/second. The maximum throughput for
ALOHA is then 80(0.184) ¼ 15 packets/second. The maximum
throughput for slotted ALOHA is then ¼ 30 packets/second.
The load at 40 percent of the maximum of the ALOHA system is 15
£ 0.40 = 6 packets/second. G is expressed in packet arrivals/packet
transmission time, therefore, G=6/80. Assuming that the propagation
delay is negligible, the average packet delay for ALOHA in multiples
of X is then
1+(e12/80-1)(1+(1+7)/2)=1.81 packet transmission time.
The slotted ALOHA system with a load of 6 packets/second
1+(e6/80-1)(1+(1+7)/2)=1.39 packet transmission time.
Application of Slotted ALOHA
 Reservation protocol allows a large number of stations with
infrequent traffic to reserve slots to transmit their packets in
future cycles
 Each cycle has mini-slots allocated for making reservations
 Stations use slotted ALOHA during mini-slots to request slots
17
cycle
X-second slotReservation
mini-slots
. . .. . .
18
Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection
The access mechanism used in an Ethernet is called CSMA/CD, standardized
in IEEE 802.3
CSMA/CD is the result of an evolution from multiple access (MA) to carrier
sense multiple access (CSMA), and finally, to CSMA/CD.
In MA, there was no provision for traffic coordination.
In a CSMA system, any user (work station) wishing to transmit must first listen
to the existing traffic on the line. A device listens by checking for a voltage. No
voltage means the line is idle. CSMA cuts down on the number of collisions
but does not eliminate them.
In CSMA/CD system, the station listens again after each packet transmission.
The extremely high voltages indicate a collision.
MA
CSMA
CSMA/CD
Carrier Sensing Multiple Access (CSMA)
19
A
Station A begins
transmission at t
= 0
A
Station A captures
channel at t = tprop
• A station senses the channel before it starts transmission
– If busy, either wait or schedule backoff (different options)
– If idle, start transmission
– Vulnerable period is reduced to tprop (due to channel capture effect)
– When collisions occur they involve entire frame transmission times
– If tprop >X (or if a>1), no gain compared to ALOHA or slotted ALOHA
(another station) BS
CSMA Options
 Transmitter behavior when busy channel is sensed
 1-persistent CSMA (most greedy)
 Start transmission as soon as the channel becomes idle
 Low delay and low efficiency
 Non-persistent CSMA (least greedy)
 Wait a backoff period, then sense carrier again
 High delay and high efficiency
 p-persistent CSMA (adjustable greedy)
 Wait till channel becomes idle, transmit with prob. p; or wait one tprop
time & re-sense with probability 1-p
 Delay and efficiency can be balanced
20
Sensing
(spread out the
transmission attempts)
21
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.0…
0.0…
0.125
0.3…
1
2.8…
8
22.…
64
1-Persistent
CSMA
0.53
0.45
0.16
S
G
0.01
0.1
1
Figure 6.21 - Part 2
Throughput versus load G for 1-persistent
(three different a=tprop/X )
An analysis of the throughput
S versus load G for CSMA is
beyond the scope of this text.
The normalized propagation delay a = tprop/X has a significant impact on the
maximum achievable throughput since tprop constitutes the vulnerable period.
22
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.01…
0.04…
0.125
0.35…
1
2.82…
8
22.6…
64
Non-Persistent
CSMA
0.81
0.51
0.14
S
G
0.01
0.1
1
Figure 6.21 - Part 1
Throughput versus load G for non-persistent
(three different a=tprop/X )
1-persistent is sharper than non-persistent.
a=tprop/X has import impact on the throughput.
When a approaches 1, both 1-persistent and non-persistent is
worse than ALOHAs.
23
Analysis of CSMA/CD protocol
• In CSMA/CD protocol, a node with a packet to transmit must
proceed as follows:
1. Wait until the channel is idle;
2. When the channel is idle, transmit and listen while
transmitting
3. In case of a collision, stop the packet transmission, and then
wait for a random delay and go to (1).
• Note: when a node “goes back to (1)” after its waiting time, it
senses the signal from the other nodes and must then wait until the
end of that transmission before transmitting.
• In CSMA, collisions result in wastage of X seconds spent
transmitting an entire frame
• CSMA-CD reduces wastage of time (or bandwidth) to detect
collision and abort transmission
CSMA/CD reaction time
24
It takes 2 tprop to find out if channel has been captured
(The reaction time in CSMA-CD is 2tprop)
A begins to
transmit at
t = 0
A B B begins to
transmit at
t = tprop- ;
B detects
collision at
t = tprop
A B
A B
A detects
collision at
t= 2 tprop- 
25
Efficiency (throughput):
The nodes attempt to transmit at discrete times, in time slots with a
duration of 2tpropeach. The slot duration of 2tprop is used to guarantee that, if
nodes select to transmit at the beginning of two different slots, then they
can’t collide.
Let  be the probability that during a given time slot there is no collision
and that one node starts transmitting. Let N (N ¸ 2) nodes compete for a
time-slotted channel by transmitting packets with probability p,
independently of one another, in any given time slot.
26
Let A be the average number of time slots that are wasted
before a successful transmission
A=0 + (1-)(1+A)
First time slot
is successful
First time slot
is wasted
) A=-1-1
With =0.4 ) A=1.5 slots
where  is the time to transmit a packet.
Throughput for Random Access MACs
 For small a: CSMA-CD has best throughput
 For larger a: Aloha & slotted Aloha better throughput
27
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.01 0.1 1
ALOHA
Slotted ALOHA
1-P CSMA
Non-P CSMA
CSMA/CD
a
max
(throughput)
28
Tree Protocol for Collision Resolution
(divide-and-conquer approach)
Base Station
0 1 7
There are 8 users in a radio cell.
At a given epoch, users 0, 1, 2, 5, and 7 have packets ready for
transmission, while users 3, 4, and 6 are idle. When the ready users
transmit simultaneously, collisions will occur. The interval of time
within which the collisions are resolved is referred to as the
collision resolution interval (CRI).
29
Collision resolution can be performed on a per collision resolution
interval basis. The channel states are described by the 3-tuple {idle,
collision, success}. Assume that the users can detect the channel
states.
With 8 users, the binary tree has 4 levels, with the root at level 0
and the leaves at level 3, where ready users are indicated by the
underline.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
A
B C
D E F G
Level 0
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
30
Consider that, at the end of the (i-1)th collision resolution
interval, and hence the start of the ith collision resolution
interval, users 0, 1, 2, 5 and 7 are ready for packet
transmission. At the root node A, collisions occur. Split the
tree into two halves and resolve the left half first. Then at
intermediate node B (level 1), users 0, 1, and 2 transmit,
resulting in collision. Divide the subtree into two halves and
search the left half. Users 0 and 1 transmit and collision
occurs. Further divide the subtree with node D as the root, into
two halves. Since each of the halves only has the leaf node,
transmission by user 0, and then by user 1, will both be
successful. This completes the search of the left half of the
subtree with node D as the root. The algorithm next searchs
the right half of the subtree with node B as the root. The
procedure is repeated with the entire tree has been searched
and all ready users have successfully transmitted.
31
C C C S CS S S S
0 1 2 5 7
A B D E C F G
time
CRIi
At start of CRIi users 0, 1, 2, 5 and 7 are ready
Scheduling approaches to MAC
 About random access:
 Simple and easy to implement
 In low-traffic, packet transfer has low-delay
 However, limited throughput and in heavier traffic,
packet delay has no bound. A station of bad luck may
never have a chance to transfer its packet.
 Scheduling approach:
 provides orderly access to shared medium so that every
station has chance to transfer
32
Scheduling approach—reservation protocol
 The time line has two kinds of periods:
 Reservation interval of fixed time length
 Data transmission period of variable frames.
 Suppose there are M stations, then the reservation interval
has M minislots, and each station has one minislot.
 Whenever a station wants to transfer a frame, it waits for
reservation interval and broadcasts reservation bit in its
minislot.
33
Scheduling approach—reservation protocol
(Cont.)
 By listening to the reservation interval, every station
knows which stations will transfer frames, and in which
order.
 The stations having reserved for their frame transfer their
frames in that order
 After data transmission period, next reservation interval
begins.
34
35
Reservation protocol
1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 1 1 3 5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1 1 3 7
Reservation
interval
Frames-transmission
Scheduling approach—polling protocol
 Stations take turns accessing the medium:
 At any time, only one station has access right to transfer
into medium
 After this station has done its transmission, the access
right is handed over (by some mechanism) to the next
station.
 If the next station has frame to transfer, it transfers the
frame, otherwise, the access right is handed over to the
next next station.
 After all stations are polled, next round polling from the
station 1 begins.
36
Centralized polling vs. distributed polling
 Centralized polling: a center host which polls the
stations one by one
 Distributed polling: station 1 will have the access right
first, then station 1 passes the access right to the next
station, which will passes the access right to the next
next station, …
37
38
t
1 32 4 5 1 2
polling messages
packet transmissions
… M
Figure 6.28
Interaction of polling messages and transmissions in polling systems
39Figure 6.30
Token-passing rings – a distributed polling network
Station interfaces: are connected to form a
ring by point-to-point lines
Stations: are attached to the ring
by station interfaces.
Note: point-to-point lines, not a shared bus.
Station interfaces have important functions.
Token: a small frame, runs around the ring, whichever gets
the token, it has the right to transmit data frames.
The information flows in one direction.
token
Comparison of scheduling & random access
 Scheduling
 Methodical orderly access: dynamic form of time
division multiplexing, round-robin (only) when the
stations have information to send.
 Less variability in delay, supporting applications with
stringent delay requirement. In high load, performance
is good. E.g., token-ring may reach nearly 100 percent of
performance when all stations have plenty of
information to send.
 Some channel bandwidth carries explicit scheduling
information.
40
Comparison of scheduling & random access
(Cont.)
 Random access
 Chaotic, unordered access
 If rich bandwidth and light load, random access has low
delay, otherwise, delay is undeterminably large.
 Quite a lot bandwidth is used in collision to alert
stations of the presence of other transmissions.
41
Thankyou
42

More Related Content

PDF
QOS (Quality of Services) - Computer Networks
PPTX
Multiple Access Protocal
PPSX
Multiple access control protocol
PPTX
Media Access Control
PPTX
Distance Vector Routing
PPTX
Quality of Service
PPTX
Geographic Routing in WSN
QOS (Quality of Services) - Computer Networks
Multiple Access Protocal
Multiple access control protocol
Media Access Control
Distance Vector Routing
Quality of Service
Geographic Routing in WSN

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Link state routing protocol
PPTX
Qos Quality of services
PPTX
TCP protocol flow control
PPT
PPT
MEDIUM ACCESS CONTROL Sublayer IN CN.ppt
PPT
Routing
PPTX
Computer networks - Channelization
PPT
Ppt for tranmission media
PPTX
ALOHA Protocol (in detail)
PPT
Framming data link layer
PPTX
Network Layer
PPTX
Circuit Switching
PPT
Network Layer,Computer Networks
PPTX
Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance CSMA/CA
PDF
Spanning tree protocol (stp)
PDF
IEEE standards 802.3.&802.11
PPTX
PPTX
TCP & UDP ( Transmission Control Protocol and User Datagram Protocol)
PDF
Issues in routing protocol
Link state routing protocol
Qos Quality of services
TCP protocol flow control
MEDIUM ACCESS CONTROL Sublayer IN CN.ppt
Routing
Computer networks - Channelization
Ppt for tranmission media
ALOHA Protocol (in detail)
Framming data link layer
Network Layer
Circuit Switching
Network Layer,Computer Networks
Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance CSMA/CA
Spanning tree protocol (stp)
IEEE standards 802.3.&802.11
TCP & UDP ( Transmission Control Protocol and User Datagram Protocol)
Issues in routing protocol
Ad

Similar to aloha (20)

PDF
Unit-2 Media Access Protocols.pdf
PDF
Computer Network : 02 - Medium Access Control
PPTX
Computer Networks ppt for the following data base and it's analysis
PPTX
Unit 3 - Data Link Layer - Part B
PPTX
module 2 ppt.pptx
PDF
CN R16 -UNIT-4.pdf
PPT
kamalaveni.ppt
PDF
CN-unit-iii.pdf computer network presentaion
PPT
10 high speedla-ns
PPT
Unit 1 mac vsd
PPT
Mac sub layer
PPT
16 high speedla-ns
PPT
16 high speedla-ns
PPTX
The medium access sublayer
PPT
lecture5aseel.pptsssssssssssssssssssssssss
PDF
Dc ch09 : high speed la ns and wireless lans
PPT
9 multiple access
PPT
Mac layer
DOCX
seminar report on multiple access control protocol submitted by munesh
PPTX
computer__networks .pptx
Unit-2 Media Access Protocols.pdf
Computer Network : 02 - Medium Access Control
Computer Networks ppt for the following data base and it's analysis
Unit 3 - Data Link Layer - Part B
module 2 ppt.pptx
CN R16 -UNIT-4.pdf
kamalaveni.ppt
CN-unit-iii.pdf computer network presentaion
10 high speedla-ns
Unit 1 mac vsd
Mac sub layer
16 high speedla-ns
16 high speedla-ns
The medium access sublayer
lecture5aseel.pptsssssssssssssssssssssssss
Dc ch09 : high speed la ns and wireless lans
9 multiple access
Mac layer
seminar report on multiple access control protocol submitted by munesh
computer__networks .pptx
Ad

More from DeepikaT13 (20)

PPTX
Mobile computing
PPTX
Image processing
PPT
Spatial filtering
PPT
Exceptions
PPTX
Hive architecture
PPTX
Rdbms
PPTX
Sotware engineering
PPTX
Data mining
PPT
Computer network
PPTX
Storage management in operating system
PPTX
PPTX
Data mining
PPTX
Neural network
PPTX
memory reference instruction
PPTX
breadth first search
PPTX
constructors
PPTX
Disjoint set
PPTX
Destructors
PPTX
Crisp set
PPTX
Computer registers
Mobile computing
Image processing
Spatial filtering
Exceptions
Hive architecture
Rdbms
Sotware engineering
Data mining
Computer network
Storage management in operating system
Data mining
Neural network
memory reference instruction
breadth first search
constructors
Disjoint set
Destructors
Crisp set
Computer registers

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
2025 High Blood Pressure Guideline Slide Set.pptx
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
PPTX
PLASMA AND ITS CONSTITUENTS 123.pptx
PDF
Farming Based Livelihood Systems English Notes
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
PDF
fundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-6th-edition_incropera.pdf
PPTX
Key-Features-of-the-SHS-Program-v4-Slides (3) PPT2.pptx
PDF
Disorder of Endocrine system (1).pdfyyhyyyy
PDF
Solved Past paper of Pediatric Health Nursing PHN BS Nursing 5th Semester
PPTX
UNIT_2-__LIPIDS[1].pptx.................
PPTX
Diploma pharmaceutics notes..helps diploma students
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
PPTX
4. Diagnosis and treatment planning in RPD.pptx
PDF
Nurlina - Urban Planner Portfolio (english ver)
PDF
PUBH1000 - Module 6: Global Health Tute Slides
PDF
0520_Scheme_of_Work_(for_examination_from_2021).pdf
PDF
Lecture on Viruses: Structure, Classification, Replication, Effects on Cells,...
PPTX
Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCI) – Unit IV |...
PDF
Diabetes Mellitus , types , clinical picture, investigation and managment
PDF
Physical education and sports and CWSN notes
2025 High Blood Pressure Guideline Slide Set.pptx
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
PLASMA AND ITS CONSTITUENTS 123.pptx
Farming Based Livelihood Systems English Notes
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
fundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-6th-edition_incropera.pdf
Key-Features-of-the-SHS-Program-v4-Slides (3) PPT2.pptx
Disorder of Endocrine system (1).pdfyyhyyyy
Solved Past paper of Pediatric Health Nursing PHN BS Nursing 5th Semester
UNIT_2-__LIPIDS[1].pptx.................
Diploma pharmaceutics notes..helps diploma students
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
4. Diagnosis and treatment planning in RPD.pptx
Nurlina - Urban Planner Portfolio (english ver)
PUBH1000 - Module 6: Global Health Tute Slides
0520_Scheme_of_Work_(for_examination_from_2021).pdf
Lecture on Viruses: Structure, Classification, Replication, Effects on Cells,...
Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCI) – Unit IV |...
Diabetes Mellitus , types , clinical picture, investigation and managment
Physical education and sports and CWSN notes

aloha

  • 1. T.DeepikaMsc(IT) Department of CS and IT Nadar saraswathi college of arts and science Theni 1
  • 2. 2 Local Area Networks and Medium Access Control Protocols • A local area network (LAN) is a data communication system that allows a number of independent devices to communicate directly with each other in a limited geographic area. Area diameter · few km Data rate = several Mbps Owned by a single organization • LANs are broadcast networks. A single transmission medium is shared by a community of users. All information is received by all users. LANs are also called multiple access networks (with low-cost and simplicity). • The medium access control (MAC) protocols are to coordinate the access to the channel so that information gets through from a source to a destination in the same broadcast network.
  • 3. Other layers Network Physical Logical link control (LLC) Media access control (MAC) Project 802 Other layers Network Data link Physical OSI model 3 • In 1985, the Computer Society of the IEEE started a project, called Project 802, to set up standards so that LAN equipments manufactured by different companies is compatible. • Project 802 divides the data link layer into sub-layers: • Logical link control (LLC) • Media access Control • LAN compared with the OSI model
  • 4. 4 • The LLC is the upper sublayer and is same for all LANs. Its functions include error detection and retransmission. • The MAC sublayer coordinates the data link tasks within a specific LAN. • The MAC sublayer is manufacturer-specific and dependent on the LAN type. • For LANs specified by project 802 are following: • Ethernet (802.3) • Token bus (802.4) • Token ring (802.5) • Wireless LANs (802.11)
  • 5. 5 Sharing a transmission medium • Static sharing (channelization schemes) is a collision-free sharing • Dynamic sharing (MAC schemes) minimizes the incidence of collision Medium sharing techniques Static channelization Dynamic medium access control scheduling Random access • Random access methods constitute the first major class of MAC procedures
  • 6. 6 ALOHA random access scheme • It was developed at the University of Hawaii in the early 1970s to connect computers situated on different Hawaiian islands. The computers of the ALOHA network transmit on the same radio channel whenever they have a packet to transmit. From time-to-time packet transmission will collide, but these can be treated as transmission errors, and recovery can take place by retransmission. When traffic is very light, the probability of collision is very small, and so retransmissions need to be carried out infrequently. • ALOHA scheme requires stations to use a random retransmission time. (This randomization is intended to spread out the retransmission and reduces the likelihood of additional collisions between stations. ) • ALOHA is the father of multiple access protocols.
  • 7. 7 Pure ALOHA (unslotted ALOHA): 1. Protocol ● A user transmits whenever it has packets to transmit ● When two or more packet transmissions overlap in time, a collision occurs and all the packets involved in the collision are destroyed. (non-capture) ● If ACK not received within timeout, then a user picks random backoff time (to avoid repeated collision) ● User retransmits packet after backoff time t t0t0-X t0+X t0+X+2tprop t0+X+2tprop + B Time-out Backoff period B First transmission Retransmission
  • 8. 8 Analysis (Throughput and delay) 1. Definitions and assumptions 1. X: packet transmission time (assume constant) 2. S: throughput (average # successful packet transmissions per X seconds) 3. G: load (average # transmission attempts per X sec) 4. Traffic traffic (new arrivals + retransmissions) is a Poisson process with rate G packet/slot Xt 0 0t Xt 0 Vulnerable period 2. The probability of a successful transmission is the probability that they are no additional packet transmission in the vulnerable period.
  • 9. 9
  • 10. 10 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0 0.0078125 0.015625 0.03125 0.0625 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 G S Throughput S versus load G for pure ALOHA 184.02/1 e S reaches a peak value of 1/2e at G=0.5, and then declines back toward 0. For a given value of S, say, S=0.05, there are two associated values of G. For small G, S ¼ G. For large G, there are many backlogged users. ALOHA system cannot achieve throughput higher than 18.4 percent (1/2e).
  • 11. 11 The average (delay) number of transmission attempts/packet is G/S=e2G attempts per packet The avergae number of unsuccessful attempts per packet is =G/S-1=e2G-1 The first transmission requires X+tprop seconds, and each subsequent retransmission requires 2tprop+X+B, where B is the average backoff time and tprop is the one way propagation delay. Thus the average packet transmission time is approximately given by E[Taloha]=X+tprop+(e2G-1)(X+2tprop+B) Express delay in multiples of X E[Taloha]/X=1+a+(e2G-1)(1+2a+B/X) Where a=tprop/X is the one way normalized propagation delay. If the backoff time is uniformly distributed between 1 and K packet transmission times, then B=(K+1)X/2
  • 12. 12 1f 0f 1f 0f MHzf MHzf 413 407 1 0   Transmission rate 9600bps ALOHA network ALOHA is a packet-switched radio communication network that was invented by Norm Abrahmson at the University of Hawaii in the early 1970s. Ethernet is its direct descendant.
  • 13. 13 Slotted ALOHA Slotted ALOHA is to constrain the user to transmit in synchronized fashion. All users keep track of transmission slots and are allowed to initiate transmission only at the beginning of a time slot (the time axis is divided into time slots with durations equal to the time to transmit a packet) t (k+1)XkX t0 +X+2tprop+ B Vulnerable period Time-out Backoff period B t0 +X+2tprop Only packets that arrive during prior X seconds collide.
  • 14. Throughput of Slotted ALOHA GG eGe G G GPGPS    !0 )( seconds]Xinarrivalsno[]collisionno[ 0 14 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.015… 0.03125 0.0625 0.125 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 Ge-G Ge-2G G S 0.184 0.368
  • 15. 15 Smax=1/e=36.8% Efficiency=throughput · 36% (upper bound=36%) The average packet delay in slotted ALOHA E[Tslotted-aloha]/X=1+a+(eG-1)(1+2a+B/X) Example – ALOHA and Slotted ALOHA Suppose that a radio system uses a 9600 bps channels for sending call setup request messages to a base station. Suppose that packets are 120 bits long, that the timeout is 20ms, and that the backoff is uniformly distributed between 1 and 7. What is the maximum throughput possible with ALOHA and slotted ALOHA? Compare the average delay in ALOHA and slotted ALOHA when the load when the load is 40 percent of the maximum possible throughput of the ALOHA system.
  • 16. 16 The system transmits packets at a rate of 9600 bits/second£1 packet/120bits = 80 packets/second. The maximum throughput for ALOHA is then 80(0.184) ¼ 15 packets/second. The maximum throughput for slotted ALOHA is then ¼ 30 packets/second. The load at 40 percent of the maximum of the ALOHA system is 15 £ 0.40 = 6 packets/second. G is expressed in packet arrivals/packet transmission time, therefore, G=6/80. Assuming that the propagation delay is negligible, the average packet delay for ALOHA in multiples of X is then 1+(e12/80-1)(1+(1+7)/2)=1.81 packet transmission time. The slotted ALOHA system with a load of 6 packets/second 1+(e6/80-1)(1+(1+7)/2)=1.39 packet transmission time.
  • 17. Application of Slotted ALOHA  Reservation protocol allows a large number of stations with infrequent traffic to reserve slots to transmit their packets in future cycles  Each cycle has mini-slots allocated for making reservations  Stations use slotted ALOHA during mini-slots to request slots 17 cycle X-second slotReservation mini-slots . . .. . .
  • 18. 18 Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection The access mechanism used in an Ethernet is called CSMA/CD, standardized in IEEE 802.3 CSMA/CD is the result of an evolution from multiple access (MA) to carrier sense multiple access (CSMA), and finally, to CSMA/CD. In MA, there was no provision for traffic coordination. In a CSMA system, any user (work station) wishing to transmit must first listen to the existing traffic on the line. A device listens by checking for a voltage. No voltage means the line is idle. CSMA cuts down on the number of collisions but does not eliminate them. In CSMA/CD system, the station listens again after each packet transmission. The extremely high voltages indicate a collision. MA CSMA CSMA/CD
  • 19. Carrier Sensing Multiple Access (CSMA) 19 A Station A begins transmission at t = 0 A Station A captures channel at t = tprop • A station senses the channel before it starts transmission – If busy, either wait or schedule backoff (different options) – If idle, start transmission – Vulnerable period is reduced to tprop (due to channel capture effect) – When collisions occur they involve entire frame transmission times – If tprop >X (or if a>1), no gain compared to ALOHA or slotted ALOHA (another station) BS
  • 20. CSMA Options  Transmitter behavior when busy channel is sensed  1-persistent CSMA (most greedy)  Start transmission as soon as the channel becomes idle  Low delay and low efficiency  Non-persistent CSMA (least greedy)  Wait a backoff period, then sense carrier again  High delay and high efficiency  p-persistent CSMA (adjustable greedy)  Wait till channel becomes idle, transmit with prob. p; or wait one tprop time & re-sense with probability 1-p  Delay and efficiency can be balanced 20 Sensing (spread out the transmission attempts)
  • 21. 21 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.0… 0.0… 0.125 0.3… 1 2.8… 8 22.… 64 1-Persistent CSMA 0.53 0.45 0.16 S G 0.01 0.1 1 Figure 6.21 - Part 2 Throughput versus load G for 1-persistent (three different a=tprop/X ) An analysis of the throughput S versus load G for CSMA is beyond the scope of this text. The normalized propagation delay a = tprop/X has a significant impact on the maximum achievable throughput since tprop constitutes the vulnerable period.
  • 22. 22 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.01… 0.04… 0.125 0.35… 1 2.82… 8 22.6… 64 Non-Persistent CSMA 0.81 0.51 0.14 S G 0.01 0.1 1 Figure 6.21 - Part 1 Throughput versus load G for non-persistent (three different a=tprop/X ) 1-persistent is sharper than non-persistent. a=tprop/X has import impact on the throughput. When a approaches 1, both 1-persistent and non-persistent is worse than ALOHAs.
  • 23. 23 Analysis of CSMA/CD protocol • In CSMA/CD protocol, a node with a packet to transmit must proceed as follows: 1. Wait until the channel is idle; 2. When the channel is idle, transmit and listen while transmitting 3. In case of a collision, stop the packet transmission, and then wait for a random delay and go to (1). • Note: when a node “goes back to (1)” after its waiting time, it senses the signal from the other nodes and must then wait until the end of that transmission before transmitting. • In CSMA, collisions result in wastage of X seconds spent transmitting an entire frame • CSMA-CD reduces wastage of time (or bandwidth) to detect collision and abort transmission
  • 24. CSMA/CD reaction time 24 It takes 2 tprop to find out if channel has been captured (The reaction time in CSMA-CD is 2tprop) A begins to transmit at t = 0 A B B begins to transmit at t = tprop- ; B detects collision at t = tprop A B A B A detects collision at t= 2 tprop- 
  • 25. 25 Efficiency (throughput): The nodes attempt to transmit at discrete times, in time slots with a duration of 2tpropeach. The slot duration of 2tprop is used to guarantee that, if nodes select to transmit at the beginning of two different slots, then they can’t collide. Let  be the probability that during a given time slot there is no collision and that one node starts transmitting. Let N (N ¸ 2) nodes compete for a time-slotted channel by transmitting packets with probability p, independently of one another, in any given time slot.
  • 26. 26 Let A be the average number of time slots that are wasted before a successful transmission A=0 + (1-)(1+A) First time slot is successful First time slot is wasted ) A=-1-1 With =0.4 ) A=1.5 slots where  is the time to transmit a packet.
  • 27. Throughput for Random Access MACs  For small a: CSMA-CD has best throughput  For larger a: Aloha & slotted Aloha better throughput 27 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.01 0.1 1 ALOHA Slotted ALOHA 1-P CSMA Non-P CSMA CSMA/CD a max (throughput)
  • 28. 28 Tree Protocol for Collision Resolution (divide-and-conquer approach) Base Station 0 1 7 There are 8 users in a radio cell. At a given epoch, users 0, 1, 2, 5, and 7 have packets ready for transmission, while users 3, 4, and 6 are idle. When the ready users transmit simultaneously, collisions will occur. The interval of time within which the collisions are resolved is referred to as the collision resolution interval (CRI).
  • 29. 29 Collision resolution can be performed on a per collision resolution interval basis. The channel states are described by the 3-tuple {idle, collision, success}. Assume that the users can detect the channel states. With 8 users, the binary tree has 4 levels, with the root at level 0 and the leaves at level 3, where ready users are indicated by the underline. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 A B C D E F G Level 0 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
  • 30. 30 Consider that, at the end of the (i-1)th collision resolution interval, and hence the start of the ith collision resolution interval, users 0, 1, 2, 5 and 7 are ready for packet transmission. At the root node A, collisions occur. Split the tree into two halves and resolve the left half first. Then at intermediate node B (level 1), users 0, 1, and 2 transmit, resulting in collision. Divide the subtree into two halves and search the left half. Users 0 and 1 transmit and collision occurs. Further divide the subtree with node D as the root, into two halves. Since each of the halves only has the leaf node, transmission by user 0, and then by user 1, will both be successful. This completes the search of the left half of the subtree with node D as the root. The algorithm next searchs the right half of the subtree with node B as the root. The procedure is repeated with the entire tree has been searched and all ready users have successfully transmitted.
  • 31. 31 C C C S CS S S S 0 1 2 5 7 A B D E C F G time CRIi At start of CRIi users 0, 1, 2, 5 and 7 are ready
  • 32. Scheduling approaches to MAC  About random access:  Simple and easy to implement  In low-traffic, packet transfer has low-delay  However, limited throughput and in heavier traffic, packet delay has no bound. A station of bad luck may never have a chance to transfer its packet.  Scheduling approach:  provides orderly access to shared medium so that every station has chance to transfer 32
  • 33. Scheduling approach—reservation protocol  The time line has two kinds of periods:  Reservation interval of fixed time length  Data transmission period of variable frames.  Suppose there are M stations, then the reservation interval has M minislots, and each station has one minislot.  Whenever a station wants to transfer a frame, it waits for reservation interval and broadcasts reservation bit in its minislot. 33
  • 34. Scheduling approach—reservation protocol (Cont.)  By listening to the reservation interval, every station knows which stations will transfer frames, and in which order.  The stations having reserved for their frame transfer their frames in that order  After data transmission period, next reservation interval begins. 34
  • 35. 35 Reservation protocol 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1 1 3 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1 3 7 Reservation interval Frames-transmission
  • 36. Scheduling approach—polling protocol  Stations take turns accessing the medium:  At any time, only one station has access right to transfer into medium  After this station has done its transmission, the access right is handed over (by some mechanism) to the next station.  If the next station has frame to transfer, it transfers the frame, otherwise, the access right is handed over to the next next station.  After all stations are polled, next round polling from the station 1 begins. 36
  • 37. Centralized polling vs. distributed polling  Centralized polling: a center host which polls the stations one by one  Distributed polling: station 1 will have the access right first, then station 1 passes the access right to the next station, which will passes the access right to the next next station, … 37
  • 38. 38 t 1 32 4 5 1 2 polling messages packet transmissions … M Figure 6.28 Interaction of polling messages and transmissions in polling systems
  • 39. 39Figure 6.30 Token-passing rings – a distributed polling network Station interfaces: are connected to form a ring by point-to-point lines Stations: are attached to the ring by station interfaces. Note: point-to-point lines, not a shared bus. Station interfaces have important functions. Token: a small frame, runs around the ring, whichever gets the token, it has the right to transmit data frames. The information flows in one direction. token
  • 40. Comparison of scheduling & random access  Scheduling  Methodical orderly access: dynamic form of time division multiplexing, round-robin (only) when the stations have information to send.  Less variability in delay, supporting applications with stringent delay requirement. In high load, performance is good. E.g., token-ring may reach nearly 100 percent of performance when all stations have plenty of information to send.  Some channel bandwidth carries explicit scheduling information. 40
  • 41. Comparison of scheduling & random access (Cont.)  Random access  Chaotic, unordered access  If rich bandwidth and light load, random access has low delay, otherwise, delay is undeterminably large.  Quite a lot bandwidth is used in collision to alert stations of the presence of other transmissions. 41