Basic differences between traditional and agile methodology.
Download as PPTX, PDF1 like182 views
The document discusses the benefits of choosing agile methodology over traditional methods like waterfall for software development projects, highlighting key differences in phases, focus, and costs. It emphasizes agile's adaptability to change and higher success rates compared to traditional methodologies, supported by statistics and cited reports. References include studies illustrating the advantages of agile approaches and comparisons of project management styles.
![Benefits of using Scrum [over waterfall]](https://cdn.slidesharecdn.com/ss_thumbnails/piotrnowinskiscrumbenefits-151209124444-lva1-app6892-thumbnail.jpg?width=560&fit=bounds)
Basic differences between traditional and agile methodology.
- 1. Why to choose AgileMethodology in a software development project?
- 2. 2 Main Topics ● Phases ●Focus ● Costs ● Statistics
- 3. 3 Traditional Methodology Workflow(a.k.a. Waterfall)
- 4. 4 Agile Methodology Worflow ScrumFramework
- 5. 5 Fix Time Project Focusby Different Methodologies Quality Fix Scope Estimated Cost Estimated Time Assumes the risk of Time, Cost and Quality Fix Cost Quality Scope Estimated The risk fade out with the project progress (Banica ,3)
- 6. 6 Responding to changeover following a plan (Gablas ,4, 10)
- 7. 7 Success Rate fromDifferent Methodologies Agile Client Focus Traditional Risk Focus (The Standish Group ,3)
- 8. 8 Works Cited Banica, Logica,et al. “Towards an Agile Approach in Academic Software Development - A Case Study.” Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati: Fascicle: XVII, Medicine, vol. 22, no. 2, May 2016, pp. 88–95. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=122353160&site=ehost-live. Explain the context about what is the Iron Triangle. Group, The Standish. “CHAOS REPORT 2015”, 2015, https://www.standishgroup.com/sample_research_files/CHAOSReport2015-Final.pdf. This report is a important reference for the IT software development market. It shows the comparison of success and fails between Traditional and Agile Methodologies. Gablas, Branislav, et al. “The Change in Management Style during the Course of a Project from the Classical to the Agile Approach.” Journal of Competitiveness, no. 4, Dec. 2018, pp. 38–53. EBSCOhost, doi:10.7441/joc.2018.04.03. https://web.b.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=dba7560b-92e2-4e1a- a4e5- 8e34e0a8841c%40sessionmgr101&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=134630522&db=asn This reference is important because shows the difference the cost spent in the project timeline between Traditional and Agile Methodology.