PHILANTHROPY AND
SERVICE
Lydia Butler
November 19, 2014
PROBLEM: SERVICE AND
PHILANTHROPY WITHOUT
THOUGHT
Problem: Service and Philanthropy
Without Thought
• Volunteer rates among students for community service is
declining (Moore, Warta, Erichsen, 2014).
• Fraternities and sororities receive incentives for their
philanthropic efforts both on the national level as well as
the local level (the university) by including a section to
document the service and philanthropy efforts in awards
packets (Parker, 2012).
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Fraternity and sorority members at small, private,
liberal arts colleges and universities.
• Private liberal arts students in national or international
fraternal organizations
• Students in these organizations typically have requirements regarding
community service
• They also sponsor or support a philanthropy either locally or
nationally through different events that they hold on campus
• Institutional Setting: Small, private liberal arts institution
(5,000 students or less)
• Most familiar with this type of institution
• Students who attend private-four year institutions have the highest
rates of service participation (Rockenbach, Hudson, Tuchmayer,
2014).
BACKGROUND
INFORMATION
Literature Review
Literature Review
• Community service volunteer rate is declining with college
students
• Demographics
• Students over the age of 20 are more likely to volunteer than
traditional-aged first year students
• African-American, Latino and Asian American students- more likely to
volunteer than Caucasian students
• Higher academic achieving students more likely to volunteer
• Those that belong to Greek organizations- almost twice as likely to
volunteer
• Students who live on-campus more likely to volunteer than those off
campus
• The type of volunteering activity is the single most important
factor in a students’ decision to volunteer
• Defining volunteer
• Altruism must be central motive
• Must be selfless (motive)
(Moore, Warta, Erichsen, 2014)
• Student Philanthropy is a teaching strategy that colleges and
universities are increasingly using
• Similar to service-learning courses
• Students research problems and understand the grant writing
process
(Olberding, 2011)
• Evident that students want to give
• Spend time volunteering or on Spring Breaks
• HOWEVER, they are rarely taught HOW to give.
• Often just see the end result and not the behind the scenes
• Learning that giving doesn’t have to happen later in their
lives. It can occur now.
(Strickland, 2008)
Literature Review
• More involvement in service does not necessarily mean
students understand the importance of it or the value
behind it.
• Acts of volunteerism may look similar on the surface for
many students, but the motivation and reasoning for
doing that service may be entirely different for each
person.
(Rockenbach, et. all, 2014)
Literature Review
• A comprehensive study on Greek Life & Philanthropy
• Greek giving is more prevalent in the past (social media, etc).
• Incentives for philanthropic efforts
• Awards from the college or university
• Recognized nationally or internationally by organization
• 25% of participants stated that chapters on their campus includes
philanthropy in chapter programming (Parker, 2012, p. 4)
• Primary way chapter engage non-profits (locally) is by raising money,
followed by volunteering either directly or at special events
• Recording service hours
• National organization incentives
• Questions raised by study
• “It’s good that they’re raising all of this money and recording the hours,
but why aren’t the non-profits more involved?” (Parker, 2012, p.6)
Literature Review
DEPARTMENT
INFORMATION
Where will this program fall?
Office of Fraternity/Sorority Life or Office
of Student Involvement
• Director/Dean for this area would oversee the program
• Student leaders would also be able to help create the
program for internship credit
• Graduate assistants for Fraternity/Sorority life could also
help develop the program
• Professors and staff can volunteer to present or cultivate
conversation for the students about the importance of
philanthropy and service
PROGRAM PROPOSAL
How do we get students actively engaged with their
philanthropy and service efforts?
“Your path to Citizenship”
• Comprehensive engagement workshop series
• Similar to service-learning, but without the “classroom”
component
• Four different topics: based on each of the four years of
college
• Local Impact
• Global Impact
• Reflections
• Citizenship
Year 1- Local Impact
• Understanding the importance of community service and philanthropy on the
local level. Establishing that dualistic thinking to go beyond just fulfilling
requirements.
• 2 hour Program will take place in October
• Members are settled into their organizations, but are still in the new member
phase
• Interactive workshop
• Speaker- professor or professional about initiative
• Pre-test will be administered to all students
• Students will break into groups based on similar interests, but separate from
their other chapter members
• Define philanthropy and service
• Identify 3 ways in which philanthropy impacts are seen on campus
• Identify local service impacts from fraternity and sorority community
Year 2- Global Impact
• Understanding how and why philanthropy and service is important
on a global scale
• 2 hour program in November of second year of school
• These members have now experienced a year of philanthropy and service
in fraternity/sorority life
• Non-profit speaker- Keynote
• Working together in chapter groups
• They have identified the local impact that they can make through their
work
• Students will then be asked to work together to create SMART goals that
they can attain in terms of philanthropy and service for the rest of their
college careers
Year 3- Reflection
• Looking back the previous three years and understanding all of the
work you’ve done and its importance for self-discovery
• 2 hour program in April of third year
• Selected students will present their experiences and their growth with
philanthropy and service
• There will be two (30 minute) workshops
• Workshops will be conducted by faculty and staff (career services and
director of Greek Life)
Year 4- Citizenship
• How to continue philanthropic efforts once students become alumni
• 2 hour program in April of fourth year
• Alumni panel of students
• First-Year group collaboration for reflection
• Reflection on what philanthropy and service are will also be decided upon
and presented from each group
• Developing personal and societal goals
• The post-test will be administered
• Develop and commit to a plan for after college involvement
THEORY BASED
LEARNING OUTCOMES
What are the students hopefully going to gain from this?
Learning Outcomes
• By participating in this program, students will grow
intellectually by creating their own meaning out of the
work that they are doing with philanthropy and service.
• Throughout this program, students will be challenged in
their approach to philanthropy and service by learning
from their peers to understand and internalize the
importance of exceeded simple requirements.
• By sharing these experiences with students in similar
organizations, students will better understand the impact
that they can make on a local and global scale.
THEORY IN THE
PROGRAM
Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development
• Position 3: Mulitplicity legitimate but not subordinate
• Accept that there is human uncertainty not everything that has been told to
them is the “be-all-end-all” truth.
• However, they believe this uncertainty is temporary and does not
overshadow the Truth of the world
• Uncertainty is tolerated, but only to a certain point.
• Position 4: Late Multiplicity
• Double-dualism
• Students’ mindsets shifting from “what they want” (position 3) to the way
they want us to think.
• Evident in second and third year of program- as educators, we want
students to critically think about the world around them and in parts 2 and
3 of the program, they are asked to do just that.
(“Perry”, 1999)
• Position 5: Relativism
• “involves adopting a way of understanding, analyzing, and evaluating that
requires a radical re-perception of all knowledge and values as contextual
and relativistic” (“Perry”, 1999, p.12)
• Relativistic thinking becomes the norm for students
• See this in parts 2, 3, and 4: Students are critically thinking about the work
that they are doing and how it not only affects/benefits them, but also how
it relates on a global scale.
• Position 6: Commitment to Relativism
• Perry believed that “relativism one is threatened with unbearable
disorientation and that students had three alternatives: to go limp, become
an active opportunist, or transcend the disorientation through
commitment” (“Perry”, 1999, p.12)
• Students realize that commitments need to be made to establish their
bearings in the relativistic world.
• During part 4 of the program, students will have to decide if they are going
to continue with or follow through with the plan they have created to
implement philanthropy and service into their lives.
Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development
• Seeing duality in the world
• Students are able to understand the difference that they can make
• Making decisions for themselves and helping others
• Teaching themselves and one another
• Understanding their role as college students and developing the
intellectual aspect of philanthropy and service
Schlossberg Transition Theory
• 4 S’s
• Situation: What is their situation at the time of the transition?
• This can be evident in the first year students going through the program
• These students are just coming into college from all different
backgrounds and because of this, their approach to philanthropy and
service may differ drastically
• Self: How is the student’s inner strength in coping with this
situation?
• Students may be resilient to doing more than just the minimum
requirement
• Looking at how student reacts when working with the group
Schlossberg Transition Theory
• 4 S’s Continued
• Support: What type of support is the student receiving in this
situation?
• Students will be working in groups to answer the questions posed to
them.
• Student affairs staff, professors and outside speakers
• Hopefully with this support, adaptation to the program will be more
progressive than if the students did not have this structured program.
• Strategies: How will the students cope with this transition?
• Students are going to have to learn how to do more than just fulfill the
requirements of their organizations.
• Students using the groups as a coping mechanism for service projects
HOW TO MEASURE
LEARNING OUTCOMES
Pre-Testing
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
7. Please$define$service$in$your$own$words:$$$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
8. Do$you$feel$that$your$philanthropic$and$service$efforts$can$make$a$difference$in$the$
world?$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
9. Please$rate$your$chapter’s$emphasis$or$the$importance$of$philanthropy$and$service$on$
your$development$as$a$member:$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
10. Please$rate$your$collegiate$philanthropy$and$service$opportunities$in$regards$to$
preparation$for$philanthropy$and$service$involvement$after$college:$$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
For$all$questions,$please$use$the$following$values$for$the$scale$answers$(1=little$to$no$
involvement$*ex:$less$than$5$times$per$year,$5=very$involved$*ex:$1$or$more$times$a$month)$
$
1. Please$describe$your$involvement$with$service$and/or$philanthropy$$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
Please$describe$any$involvement$in$detail:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
$
2. Please$rate$your$view$on$the$importance$of$participating$in$philanthropic$and$service$
efforts$as$a$college$student:$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
3. Do$you$believe$that$participating$in$philanthropy$and$service$affects$your$moral$
compass$or$outlook$as$a$college$student?$
$
YES$ $ $ NO$
$
Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
4. Do$you$believe$that$student$involvement$during$college$can$help$you$to$develop$your$$$$$$$$$
purpose$“calling”$in$life?$
$
YES$$ $ NO$
$
Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
5. In$your$organization,$are$philanthropy$and$service$events$considered$social$events$or$
times$to$strengthen$your$brother/sisterhood?$
$
YES$$ $ NO$
$
Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
6. Please$define$philanthropy$in$your$own$words:$$ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Post-Testing
For$all$questions,$please$use$the$following$values$for$the$scale$answers$(1=little$to$no$
involvement$*ex:$less$than$5$times$per$year,$5=very$involved$*ex:$1$or$more$times$a$month)$
$
1. Please$describe$your$involvement$with$service$and/or$philanthropy$throughout$your$
college$career.:$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
Please$describe$any$involvement$in$detail:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
$
2. Please$rate$your$view$on$the$importance$of$participating$in$philanthropic$and$service$
efforts$as$a$college$student:$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
3. Do$you$believe$that$participating$in$philanthropy$and$service$affects$your$moral$
compass$or$outlook$as$a$college$student?$
$
YES$ $ $ NO$
$
Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
4. Do$you$believe$the$your$involvement$with$philanthropy$and$service$during$college$has$
helped$you$to$develop$your$purpose$or$“calling”$in$life?$
$
YES$$ $ NO$
$
Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
5. In$your$organization,$are$philanthropy$and$service$events$considered$social$events$or$
times$to$strengthen$your$brother/sisterhood?$
$
YES$$ $ NO$
$
Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
6. Please$define$philanthropy$in$your$own$words:$$ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
7. Please$define$service$in$your$own$words:$$$ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$
8. Do$you$feel$that$your$philanthropic$and$service$efforts$can$make$or$have$made$a$
difference$in$the$world?$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
9. Please$rate$your$chapter’s$emphasis$or$the$importance$of$philanthropy$and$service$on$
your$development$as$a$member:$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
10. As$a$result$of$your$involvement$with$philanthropy$and$service$during$college,$please$
rate$your$likelihood$of$continuing$these$efforts$once$you$have$graduated$from$college:$$
$
1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
Sources
• Moore, E.W. , Warta, S., Erichsen, K. (2014). College students’ volunteering: factors related
to current volunteering, volunteer settings, and motives for volunteering. College
Student Journal, 48(3), 386-396.
• Olberding, J. C. (2011). Does student philanthropy work? A study on long-term effect of
the “learning by giving” approach. Innovation for Higher Education 37, 71-87.
• Parker, P. (2012) Greek life and philanthropy: a student to determine the links,
challenges, and opportunities between Greek life leadership and community
goodwill. NP Catalyst, 1-25.
• Perry's intellectual scheme. (1999). New directions for Student Services, (88), 5.
• Rockenbach, A. B., Hudson, T. D., & Tuchmayer, J. B. (2014). Fostering meaning, purpose,
and enduring commitments to community service in college: A multidimensional
conceptual model. Journal of Higher Education, 85(3), 312-338.
• Schervish, P. G. (2006). The moral biography of wealth: philosophical reflections on the
foundation of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3),
477-492.
• Schlossberg, N. K. (2011). The challenge of change: the transition model and its
applications. Journal Of Employment Counseling, 48(4), 159-162.
• Strickland, S. M. (2008). Learning how to give and how giving happens: the development
summer internship program at the university of Michigan teaches students the
business behind philanthropy. Phi Kappa Psi Forum 88(2), 9.

More Related Content

PDF
Immersion in Scholarship: Directors
PDF
Staffing 8 2-12
PDF
Training and Enrichment: Designing and Implementing A Four-Year Developmental...
PDF
Sustained Dialogue Presentation from Rhonda Fitzgerald.pptx
PDF
The Pandemic and Social Change: Ageism and Intersectional Disparities
PPTX
Service-Learning Principles, Theories and Practices
PPTX
Not just fun: The importance for social transition
PDF
Bonner Pathways Project Launch Meeting
Immersion in Scholarship: Directors
Staffing 8 2-12
Training and Enrichment: Designing and Implementing A Four-Year Developmental...
Sustained Dialogue Presentation from Rhonda Fitzgerald.pptx
The Pandemic and Social Change: Ageism and Intersectional Disparities
Service-Learning Principles, Theories and Practices
Not just fun: The importance for social transition
Bonner Pathways Project Launch Meeting

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Developing an Academic identity for Widening Participation Students in Higher...
PDF
2017 Bonner Diversity and Inclusion
PDF
Kilgore & Araújo: Improving Student Equity with Great Instructional Design
PDF
Political Consciousness but not Political Engagement
DOCX
PatriciaHunt Resume
DOCX
Lifelong learning 1
PPTX
First Generation Students: Campus Climate, Transition, Programming, and Persi...
PDF
Student Observation of Teaching: Partnerships for individual growth and cultu...
PDF
State of the Student Association Report 2013
PDF
Bonner Student Developmental Model and Pipeline Project
DOCX
Kelby's Resume 2015
PDF
Mobilizing for Racial Justice
DOC
Research report of hashimu mapengo 2013
PPTX
NASPA 2015 Presentation
PDF
2015 Zahra Ahmed CV
PDF
2020 New Bonner Directors & Coordinators Orientation - Cornerstones & Capstones
PDF
2020 cornerstones capstones condensed
PPTX
It Takes a Village: Building a Support System for Diversity Abroad
PPTX
Exit Decisions of Teacher Education Students
PPTX
Civic Engagement: What, Why and How Iowa Campus Compact Can Help
Developing an Academic identity for Widening Participation Students in Higher...
2017 Bonner Diversity and Inclusion
Kilgore & Araújo: Improving Student Equity with Great Instructional Design
Political Consciousness but not Political Engagement
PatriciaHunt Resume
Lifelong learning 1
First Generation Students: Campus Climate, Transition, Programming, and Persi...
Student Observation of Teaching: Partnerships for individual growth and cultu...
State of the Student Association Report 2013
Bonner Student Developmental Model and Pipeline Project
Kelby's Resume 2015
Mobilizing for Racial Justice
Research report of hashimu mapengo 2013
NASPA 2015 Presentation
2015 Zahra Ahmed CV
2020 New Bonner Directors & Coordinators Orientation - Cornerstones & Capstones
2020 cornerstones capstones condensed
It Takes a Village: Building a Support System for Diversity Abroad
Exit Decisions of Teacher Education Students
Civic Engagement: What, Why and How Iowa Campus Compact Can Help
Ad

Similar to Butler philanthropy andservice (20)

PPTX
Service-Learning: Making A Difference
PDF
Bonner Directors 2016 - Student Learning Outcomes
PDF
v june_2011
PPT
Introduction to Service Learning
PDF
Developing Greater Impact with High-Impact Practices: Internships and Civic ...
PDF
Developing Greater Impact with High-Impact Practices: Internships and Civic E...
PDF
AAC&U Presentation Internships Upload
PPTX
Who cares? 2016 GCP Collaboratory Plenary
PPT
Chapter 28
PDF
Introduction to Bonner High-Impact Initiative Learning Outcomes
PPTX
Social science as an area of study
PDF
'23 NSO - Cornerstones Activities
PPTX
Atlaanz becka currant final
PDF
Reaching Out and Reaching In: Impacts of a University-Community Outreach and ...
PDF
Service-Learning Presentation
PDF
'22 NDM - Cornerstones Activities.pdf
PPTX
3 12 mcmahon,guerico16
PPTX
York’s residence learning plan oacuho
PPTX
8 Bonner Cornerstone Activities for Cohorts
PDF
'23 NSO - Cornerstones Activities reduced.pdf
Service-Learning: Making A Difference
Bonner Directors 2016 - Student Learning Outcomes
v june_2011
Introduction to Service Learning
Developing Greater Impact with High-Impact Practices: Internships and Civic ...
Developing Greater Impact with High-Impact Practices: Internships and Civic E...
AAC&U Presentation Internships Upload
Who cares? 2016 GCP Collaboratory Plenary
Chapter 28
Introduction to Bonner High-Impact Initiative Learning Outcomes
Social science as an area of study
'23 NSO - Cornerstones Activities
Atlaanz becka currant final
Reaching Out and Reaching In: Impacts of a University-Community Outreach and ...
Service-Learning Presentation
'22 NDM - Cornerstones Activities.pdf
3 12 mcmahon,guerico16
York’s residence learning plan oacuho
8 Bonner Cornerstone Activities for Cohorts
'23 NSO - Cornerstones Activities reduced.pdf
Ad

More from lbutle10 (11)

PDF
Cpc weekly agenda
PDF
E learning glossary
PDF
Lydia resume
PPTX
Nolr fa14 conflict management
PPTX
Nolr fa14 fighting apathy in your organization
PDF
Nolr
PDF
Fsl board (1)
PDF
Recruitment brochure e portfolio
PDF
Perry's ethical development handout
PPTX
Instructional design and development
PPTX
Learning object- University of North Texas
Cpc weekly agenda
E learning glossary
Lydia resume
Nolr fa14 conflict management
Nolr fa14 fighting apathy in your organization
Nolr
Fsl board (1)
Recruitment brochure e portfolio
Perry's ethical development handout
Instructional design and development
Learning object- University of North Texas

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
PDF
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PPTX
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PDF
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
PDF
CRP102_SAGALASSOS_Final_Projects_2025.pdf
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2020).pdf
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PDF
Skin Care and Cosmetic Ingredients Dictionary ( PDFDrive ).pdf
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
DOCX
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY- PART (1) WHO ARE WE.pdf
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
CRP102_SAGALASSOS_Final_Projects_2025.pdf
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2020).pdf
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Skin Care and Cosmetic Ingredients Dictionary ( PDFDrive ).pdf
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx

Butler philanthropy andservice

  • 3. Problem: Service and Philanthropy Without Thought • Volunteer rates among students for community service is declining (Moore, Warta, Erichsen, 2014). • Fraternities and sororities receive incentives for their philanthropic efforts both on the national level as well as the local level (the university) by including a section to document the service and philanthropy efforts in awards packets (Parker, 2012).
  • 4. DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE Fraternity and sorority members at small, private, liberal arts colleges and universities.
  • 5. • Private liberal arts students in national or international fraternal organizations • Students in these organizations typically have requirements regarding community service • They also sponsor or support a philanthropy either locally or nationally through different events that they hold on campus • Institutional Setting: Small, private liberal arts institution (5,000 students or less) • Most familiar with this type of institution • Students who attend private-four year institutions have the highest rates of service participation (Rockenbach, Hudson, Tuchmayer, 2014).
  • 7. Literature Review • Community service volunteer rate is declining with college students • Demographics • Students over the age of 20 are more likely to volunteer than traditional-aged first year students • African-American, Latino and Asian American students- more likely to volunteer than Caucasian students • Higher academic achieving students more likely to volunteer • Those that belong to Greek organizations- almost twice as likely to volunteer • Students who live on-campus more likely to volunteer than those off campus • The type of volunteering activity is the single most important factor in a students’ decision to volunteer • Defining volunteer • Altruism must be central motive • Must be selfless (motive) (Moore, Warta, Erichsen, 2014)
  • 8. • Student Philanthropy is a teaching strategy that colleges and universities are increasingly using • Similar to service-learning courses • Students research problems and understand the grant writing process (Olberding, 2011) • Evident that students want to give • Spend time volunteering or on Spring Breaks • HOWEVER, they are rarely taught HOW to give. • Often just see the end result and not the behind the scenes • Learning that giving doesn’t have to happen later in their lives. It can occur now. (Strickland, 2008) Literature Review
  • 9. • More involvement in service does not necessarily mean students understand the importance of it or the value behind it. • Acts of volunteerism may look similar on the surface for many students, but the motivation and reasoning for doing that service may be entirely different for each person. (Rockenbach, et. all, 2014) Literature Review
  • 10. • A comprehensive study on Greek Life & Philanthropy • Greek giving is more prevalent in the past (social media, etc). • Incentives for philanthropic efforts • Awards from the college or university • Recognized nationally or internationally by organization • 25% of participants stated that chapters on their campus includes philanthropy in chapter programming (Parker, 2012, p. 4) • Primary way chapter engage non-profits (locally) is by raising money, followed by volunteering either directly or at special events • Recording service hours • National organization incentives • Questions raised by study • “It’s good that they’re raising all of this money and recording the hours, but why aren’t the non-profits more involved?” (Parker, 2012, p.6) Literature Review
  • 12. Office of Fraternity/Sorority Life or Office of Student Involvement • Director/Dean for this area would oversee the program • Student leaders would also be able to help create the program for internship credit • Graduate assistants for Fraternity/Sorority life could also help develop the program • Professors and staff can volunteer to present or cultivate conversation for the students about the importance of philanthropy and service
  • 13. PROGRAM PROPOSAL How do we get students actively engaged with their philanthropy and service efforts?
  • 14. “Your path to Citizenship” • Comprehensive engagement workshop series • Similar to service-learning, but without the “classroom” component • Four different topics: based on each of the four years of college • Local Impact • Global Impact • Reflections • Citizenship
  • 15. Year 1- Local Impact • Understanding the importance of community service and philanthropy on the local level. Establishing that dualistic thinking to go beyond just fulfilling requirements. • 2 hour Program will take place in October • Members are settled into their organizations, but are still in the new member phase • Interactive workshop • Speaker- professor or professional about initiative • Pre-test will be administered to all students • Students will break into groups based on similar interests, but separate from their other chapter members • Define philanthropy and service • Identify 3 ways in which philanthropy impacts are seen on campus • Identify local service impacts from fraternity and sorority community
  • 16. Year 2- Global Impact • Understanding how and why philanthropy and service is important on a global scale • 2 hour program in November of second year of school • These members have now experienced a year of philanthropy and service in fraternity/sorority life • Non-profit speaker- Keynote • Working together in chapter groups • They have identified the local impact that they can make through their work • Students will then be asked to work together to create SMART goals that they can attain in terms of philanthropy and service for the rest of their college careers
  • 17. Year 3- Reflection • Looking back the previous three years and understanding all of the work you’ve done and its importance for self-discovery • 2 hour program in April of third year • Selected students will present their experiences and their growth with philanthropy and service • There will be two (30 minute) workshops • Workshops will be conducted by faculty and staff (career services and director of Greek Life)
  • 18. Year 4- Citizenship • How to continue philanthropic efforts once students become alumni • 2 hour program in April of fourth year • Alumni panel of students • First-Year group collaboration for reflection • Reflection on what philanthropy and service are will also be decided upon and presented from each group • Developing personal and societal goals • The post-test will be administered • Develop and commit to a plan for after college involvement
  • 19. THEORY BASED LEARNING OUTCOMES What are the students hopefully going to gain from this?
  • 20. Learning Outcomes • By participating in this program, students will grow intellectually by creating their own meaning out of the work that they are doing with philanthropy and service. • Throughout this program, students will be challenged in their approach to philanthropy and service by learning from their peers to understand and internalize the importance of exceeded simple requirements. • By sharing these experiences with students in similar organizations, students will better understand the impact that they can make on a local and global scale.
  • 22. Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development • Position 3: Mulitplicity legitimate but not subordinate • Accept that there is human uncertainty not everything that has been told to them is the “be-all-end-all” truth. • However, they believe this uncertainty is temporary and does not overshadow the Truth of the world • Uncertainty is tolerated, but only to a certain point. • Position 4: Late Multiplicity • Double-dualism • Students’ mindsets shifting from “what they want” (position 3) to the way they want us to think. • Evident in second and third year of program- as educators, we want students to critically think about the world around them and in parts 2 and 3 of the program, they are asked to do just that. (“Perry”, 1999)
  • 23. • Position 5: Relativism • “involves adopting a way of understanding, analyzing, and evaluating that requires a radical re-perception of all knowledge and values as contextual and relativistic” (“Perry”, 1999, p.12) • Relativistic thinking becomes the norm for students • See this in parts 2, 3, and 4: Students are critically thinking about the work that they are doing and how it not only affects/benefits them, but also how it relates on a global scale. • Position 6: Commitment to Relativism • Perry believed that “relativism one is threatened with unbearable disorientation and that students had three alternatives: to go limp, become an active opportunist, or transcend the disorientation through commitment” (“Perry”, 1999, p.12) • Students realize that commitments need to be made to establish their bearings in the relativistic world. • During part 4 of the program, students will have to decide if they are going to continue with or follow through with the plan they have created to implement philanthropy and service into their lives.
  • 24. Perry’s Theory of Intellectual and Ethical Development • Seeing duality in the world • Students are able to understand the difference that they can make • Making decisions for themselves and helping others • Teaching themselves and one another • Understanding their role as college students and developing the intellectual aspect of philanthropy and service
  • 25. Schlossberg Transition Theory • 4 S’s • Situation: What is their situation at the time of the transition? • This can be evident in the first year students going through the program • These students are just coming into college from all different backgrounds and because of this, their approach to philanthropy and service may differ drastically • Self: How is the student’s inner strength in coping with this situation? • Students may be resilient to doing more than just the minimum requirement • Looking at how student reacts when working with the group
  • 26. Schlossberg Transition Theory • 4 S’s Continued • Support: What type of support is the student receiving in this situation? • Students will be working in groups to answer the questions posed to them. • Student affairs staff, professors and outside speakers • Hopefully with this support, adaptation to the program will be more progressive than if the students did not have this structured program. • Strategies: How will the students cope with this transition? • Students are going to have to learn how to do more than just fulfill the requirements of their organizations. • Students using the groups as a coping mechanism for service projects
  • 28. Pre-Testing $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7. Please$define$service$in$your$own$words:$$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8. Do$you$feel$that$your$philanthropic$and$service$efforts$can$make$a$difference$in$the$ world?$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ 9. Please$rate$your$chapter’s$emphasis$or$the$importance$of$philanthropy$and$service$on$ your$development$as$a$member:$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ 10. Please$rate$your$collegiate$philanthropy$and$service$opportunities$in$regards$to$ preparation$for$philanthropy$and$service$involvement$after$college:$$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ For$all$questions,$please$use$the$following$values$for$the$scale$answers$(1=little$to$no$ involvement$*ex:$less$than$5$times$per$year,$5=very$involved$*ex:$1$or$more$times$a$month)$ $ 1. Please$describe$your$involvement$with$service$and/or$philanthropy$$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ Please$describe$any$involvement$in$detail:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2. Please$rate$your$view$on$the$importance$of$participating$in$philanthropic$and$service$ efforts$as$a$college$student:$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ 3. Do$you$believe$that$participating$in$philanthropy$and$service$affects$your$moral$ compass$or$outlook$as$a$college$student?$ $ YES$ $ $ NO$ $ Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4. Do$you$believe$that$student$involvement$during$college$can$help$you$to$develop$your$$$$$$$$$ purpose$“calling”$in$life?$ $ YES$$ $ NO$ $ Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5. In$your$organization,$are$philanthropy$and$service$events$considered$social$events$or$ times$to$strengthen$your$brother/sisterhood?$ $ YES$$ $ NO$ $ Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 6. Please$define$philanthropy$in$your$own$words:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
  • 29. Post-Testing For$all$questions,$please$use$the$following$values$for$the$scale$answers$(1=little$to$no$ involvement$*ex:$less$than$5$times$per$year,$5=very$involved$*ex:$1$or$more$times$a$month)$ $ 1. Please$describe$your$involvement$with$service$and/or$philanthropy$throughout$your$ college$career.:$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ Please$describe$any$involvement$in$detail:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2. Please$rate$your$view$on$the$importance$of$participating$in$philanthropic$and$service$ efforts$as$a$college$student:$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ 3. Do$you$believe$that$participating$in$philanthropy$and$service$affects$your$moral$ compass$or$outlook$as$a$college$student?$ $ YES$ $ $ NO$ $ Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4. Do$you$believe$the$your$involvement$with$philanthropy$and$service$during$college$has$ helped$you$to$develop$your$purpose$or$“calling”$in$life?$ $ YES$$ $ NO$ $ Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5. In$your$organization,$are$philanthropy$and$service$events$considered$social$events$or$ times$to$strengthen$your$brother/sisterhood?$ $ YES$$ $ NO$ $ Please$explain$your$answer:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 6. Please$define$philanthropy$in$your$own$words:$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7. Please$define$service$in$your$own$words:$$$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8. Do$you$feel$that$your$philanthropic$and$service$efforts$can$make$or$have$made$a$ difference$in$the$world?$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ 9. Please$rate$your$chapter’s$emphasis$or$the$importance$of$philanthropy$and$service$on$ your$development$as$a$member:$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ 10. As$a$result$of$your$involvement$with$philanthropy$and$service$during$college,$please$ rate$your$likelihood$of$continuing$these$efforts$once$you$have$graduated$from$college:$$ $ 1$ $ 2$ $ 3$ $ 4$ $ 5$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
  • 30. Sources • Moore, E.W. , Warta, S., Erichsen, K. (2014). College students’ volunteering: factors related to current volunteering, volunteer settings, and motives for volunteering. College Student Journal, 48(3), 386-396. • Olberding, J. C. (2011). Does student philanthropy work? A study on long-term effect of the “learning by giving” approach. Innovation for Higher Education 37, 71-87. • Parker, P. (2012) Greek life and philanthropy: a student to determine the links, challenges, and opportunities between Greek life leadership and community goodwill. NP Catalyst, 1-25. • Perry's intellectual scheme. (1999). New directions for Student Services, (88), 5. • Rockenbach, A. B., Hudson, T. D., & Tuchmayer, J. B. (2014). Fostering meaning, purpose, and enduring commitments to community service in college: A multidimensional conceptual model. Journal of Higher Education, 85(3), 312-338. • Schervish, P. G. (2006). The moral biography of wealth: philosophical reflections on the foundation of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3), 477-492. • Schlossberg, N. K. (2011). The challenge of change: the transition model and its applications. Journal Of Employment Counseling, 48(4), 159-162. • Strickland, S. M. (2008). Learning how to give and how giving happens: the development summer internship program at the university of Michigan teaches students the business behind philanthropy. Phi Kappa Psi Forum 88(2), 9.