![Overall Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data]
miniguez@life.arizona.edu Very satisfied
bill.macaulay@flsmidth.com Very satisfied
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Very satisfied
brenda.wilson@victrex.com Somewhat satisfied
mczajkowska@redarling.com Very satisfied
dylan@gotwetwedry.com Very satisfied
michela.dibella@gaasi.com Very satisfied
tburchett@maranaaz.gov Very satisfied
Business Results
Based on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a
direct result of this training.
miniguez@life.arizona.edu 90%
bill.macaulay@flsmidth.com 80%
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 100%
brenda.wilson@victrex.com 40%
mczajkowska@redarling.com 40%
dylan@gotwetwedry.com 60%
michela.dibella@gaasi.com 50%
tburchett@maranaaz.gov 70%
Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to
improve in the next 12 months. Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to
this training, as well as all other factors like onthe job experience, incentives, and process
improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by 20% in the
next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.)
miniguez@life.arizona.edu 90%
bill.macaulay@flsmidth.com 70%
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 90%
brenda.wilson@victrex.com 40%
mczajkowska@redarling.com 50%
dylan@gotwetwedry.com 80%
michela.dibella@gaasi.com 50%
tburchett@maranaaz.gov 70%
If you think this training will have a positive impact on your job performance, what areas will be
impacted most? Check all that apply.
miniguez@life.arizona.edu increasing quality
miniguez@life.arizona.edu increasing productivity
miniguez@life.arizona.edu increasing employee satisfaction
bill.macaulay@flsmidth.com increasing quality
bill.macaulay@flsmidth.com decreasing costs
bill.macaulay@flsmidth.com increasing customer satisfaction
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov increasing quality
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov increasing productivity
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov increasing ability to innovate
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov decreasing time to complete task(s)
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov decreasing costs
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov increasing employee satisfaction
brenda.wilson@victrex.com increasing quality
brenda.wilson@victrex.com increasing productivity
brenda.wilson@victrex.com increasing ability to innovate
mczajkowska@redarling.com increasing productivity
dylan@gotwetwedry.com increasing productivity
dylan@gotwetwedry.com increasing sales
dylan@gotwetwedry.com decreasing costs
michela.dibella@gaasi.com increasing quality
michela.dibella@gaasi.com increasing productivity
- 4 / 6 -](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/748f0b9f-4388-4f5f-b22a-86e0027d8653-151109131415-lva1-app6892/85/Class_Summary_-_Excel_2010_-_Part_1_Nov_2_2015-4-320.jpg)
![ver. 001
miniguez@life.arizona.edu 50%
bill.macaulay@flsmidth.com 70%
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov 90%
brenda.wilson@victrex.com 40%
mczajkowska@redarling.com 30%
dylan@gotwetwedry.com 40%
michela.dibella@gaasi.com 70%
tburchett@maranaaz.gov 60%
Environment
Comments (Environment):
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov This class was far better than the last time I attended. I love the new format. Easier to follow and far less
interruptions.
General Questions
Other (please specify) [What was your main objective for completing this training?]:
tevasquez@maranaaz.gov Refresher course
brenda.wilson@victrex.com Refresher course for work
Response Rate
Form Type Evaluations
Sent
Evaluations
Received
Response
Rate
Post Event 8 8 100.00%
Report Recommendations
Interpreting the Report
Below are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the
report.
Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students
that completed evaluations.
Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report.
Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events.
Recommended Actions
Below are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to
automatically run complementary reports for drillingdown further into the data or analyzing the information in another way.
If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to
gather additional feedback regarding the scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for
improvement.
If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with
those learners to gether additional feedback on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share
this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future learners to maximize job impact and business
results.
Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review
performance on a regular basis.
Recommended Links
Run the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more
effective and impactful.
Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scalebased and multiplechoice answers for all of the evaluations.
Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals.
Report Criteria
Reporting Date: Nov 2, 2015 to Nov 2, 2015
Scale: 1 Low 9 High
Class: Excel 2010 Part 1 Nov 2, 2015
- 6 / 6 -](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/748f0b9f-4388-4f5f-b22a-86e0027d8653-151109131415-lva1-app6892/85/Class_Summary_-_Excel_2010_-_Part_1_Nov_2_2015-6-320.jpg)
More Related Content
Similar to Class_Summary_-_Excel_2010_-_Part_1_Nov_2_2015 (20)
Class_Summary_-_Excel_2010_-_Part_1_Nov_2_2015
- 1. Class Summary Excel 2010 Part 1 Nov 2, 2015 Run By: Carrie Williams (cwilliamsaz15) MTM Tool: Class Summary Date Run: Nov 2, 2015 From Saved Query: No Date: Nov 2, 2015 Instructor(s): Williams Course: Excel 2010 Part 1 Learning Provider: New Horizons Southern California Location: New Horizons Tucson (Learning Partner) Client: Public Class Summary Student Instructor Courseware Business Results Additional Questions Learning Effectiveness Environment [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.80 8.71 8.00 7.00 8.00 8.50 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.80 8.43 8.00 8.00 8.00 7.50 michela.dibella@gaasi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 Average 8.95 8.89 8.75 8.63 8.75 8.75 Summary (cont) Student Average [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 8.53 [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 8.35 michela.dibella@gaasi.com 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 Average 8.86 Instructor Student The instructor was knowledgeable about the subject. Participants were encouraged to take part in class discussions. Instructor overall The instructor''s presentation skills were adequate. The instructor provided realworld experiences and examples. Average [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.80 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 8.80 michela.dibella@gaasi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 Average 8.88 9.00 9.00 9.00 8.86 8.95 Courseware Student Clarity of the training content Technical depth of the training content The material was organized logically. Effectiveness of the labs in reinforcing the knowledge/skills learned in the modules Relevance of the labs to real world job situations Time dedicated to activities such as discussions, practices, and labs (as opposed to lecture) [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 8.00 michela.dibella@gaasi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 Average 8.88 8.75 8.75 9.00 9.00 8.88 Courseware (cont) Language quality - 1 / 6 -
- 2. Student of the courseware (grammar, terminology, style) Average [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 8.71 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 8.43 michela.dibella@gaasi.com 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 Average 9.00 8.89 Business Results Student This training will improve my job performance. Average [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 michela.dibella@gaasi.com 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 Average 8.75 8.75 Additional Questions Student How well did this training meet your expectations? Average [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 7.00 7.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 michela.dibella@gaasi.com 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 Average 8.63 8.63 Learning Effectiveness Student I have learned new knowledge/skills from this training. Average [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 8.00 8.00 michela.dibella@gaasi.com 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 Average 8.75 8.75 Environment Student The physical environment was conducive to learning. The hardware was setup and functioning appropriately. Average [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 8.00 8.50 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 7.00 8.00 7.50 michela.dibella@gaasi.com 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 [email protected] 9.00 9.00 9.00 Average 8.75 8.75 8.75 Comments - 2 / 6 -
- 3. Instructor Comments: (Instructor) [email protected] wonderful! thank you Ms. Williams [email protected] Mrs. Williams made it easy to understand and was able to teach Excel 1 in a matter that made it easy to relate to real life. [email protected] Great job Carrie! I can tell you love your job. Thank you. [email protected] couldn't have done better! User Information First Name [email protected] Maria [email protected] Bill [email protected] Teri [email protected] Brenda [email protected] Margaret [email protected] dylan michela.dibella@gaasi.com Michela [email protected] Tammy Last Name [email protected] Iniguez [email protected] Macaulay [email protected] Vasquez [email protected] Wilson [email protected] Czajkowska [email protected] moody michela.dibella@gaasi.com Di Bella [email protected] Burchett Phone Number [email protected] 5208704232 [email protected] 5209092519 [email protected] 5208506205 [email protected] 8568030560 [email protected] 887 2400 [email protected] 5206684007 michela.dibella@gaasi.com (858) 3122918 [email protected] 5203821956 What was your main objective for completing this training? [email protected] Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) [email protected] Prepare for a career change [email protected] Other [email protected] Other [email protected] Solve a particular problem [email protected] Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) michela.dibella@gaasi.com Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) [email protected] Build new skills and knowledge (not related to a new software deployment) Courseware Comments (Courseware): [email protected] Thank you. What suggestions do you have for enhancing the courseware? [email protected] great training [email protected] I wouldn't [email protected] No change. [email protected] I would include more information regarding Excel such as pivot tables [email protected] I wouldnt - 3 / 6 -
- 4. Overall Satisfaction Overall, how satisfied are you with this training course? (check only one) [Student Data] [email protected] Very satisfied [email protected] Very satisfied [email protected] Very satisfied [email protected] Somewhat satisfied [email protected] Very satisfied [email protected] Very satisfied michela.dibella@gaasi.com Very satisfied [email protected] Very satisfied Business Results Based on your response to the prior question, estimate how much of the improvement will be a direct result of this training. [email protected] 90% [email protected] 80% [email protected] 100% [email protected] 40% [email protected] 40% [email protected] 60% michela.dibella@gaasi.com 50% [email protected] 70% Estimate how much you expect your job performance related to the course subject matter to improve in the next 12 months. Include in your estimate any performance improvements due to this training, as well as all other factors like onthe job experience, incentives, and process improvements. (For example, if you feel that you can improve your performance by 20% in the next 12 months based on this training plus all other factors, enter 20% here.) [email protected] 90% [email protected] 70% [email protected] 90% [email protected] 40% [email protected] 50% [email protected] 80% michela.dibella@gaasi.com 50% [email protected] 70% If you think this training will have a positive impact on your job performance, what areas will be impacted most? Check all that apply. [email protected] increasing quality [email protected] increasing productivity [email protected] increasing employee satisfaction [email protected] increasing quality [email protected] decreasing costs [email protected] increasing customer satisfaction [email protected] increasing quality [email protected] increasing productivity [email protected] increasing ability to innovate [email protected] decreasing time to complete task(s) [email protected] decreasing costs [email protected] increasing employee satisfaction [email protected] increasing quality [email protected] increasing productivity [email protected] increasing ability to innovate [email protected] increasing productivity [email protected] increasing productivity [email protected] increasing sales [email protected] decreasing costs michela.dibella@gaasi.com increasing quality michela.dibella@gaasi.com increasing productivity - 4 / 6 -
- 5. michela.dibella@gaasi.com increasing ability to innovate michela.dibella@gaasi.com decreasing time to complete task(s) michela.dibella@gaasi.com decreasing costs michela.dibella@gaasi.com increasing customer satisfaction [email protected] increasing quality [email protected] increasing productivity [email protected] decreasing time to complete task(s) [email protected] increasing customer satisfaction Additional Questions Is this your first time at New Horizons? [email protected] No [email protected] Yes [email protected] No [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes michela.dibella@gaasi.com Yes [email protected] Yes Would you recommend New Horizons to others? [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes michela.dibella@gaasi.com Yes [email protected] Yes Other classes you are interested in taking: [email protected] 2nd part [email protected] More advanced Excel classes [email protected] PowerPoint Would you be willing to provide a public quote about your experience taking this course? [email protected] Yes [email protected] No [email protected] Yes [email protected] No [email protected] No [email protected] No michela.dibella@gaasi.com No [email protected] Yes Return on Investment Would you like to be notified about advanced or complementary courses? [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes [email protected] Yes [email protected] No [email protected] Yes michela.dibella@gaasi.com No [email protected] Yes Job Impact What percent of your total work time requires the knowledge or skills presented in this training? Please check only one. - 5 / 6 -
- 6. ver. 001 [email protected] 50% [email protected] 70% [email protected] 90% [email protected] 40% [email protected] 30% [email protected] 40% michela.dibella@gaasi.com 70% [email protected] 60% Environment Comments (Environment): [email protected] This class was far better than the last time I attended. I love the new format. Easier to follow and far less interruptions. General Questions Other (please specify) [What was your main objective for completing this training?]: [email protected] Refresher course [email protected] Refresher course for work Response Rate Form Type Evaluations Sent Evaluations Received Response Rate Post Event 8 8 100.00% Report Recommendations Interpreting the Report Below are tips to help you understand the information in the report. For additional information, please click the Help tab above the report. Summarizes scores from each student for selected question categories and questions; compare and analyze scores for all students that completed evaluations. Student comments provide additional insight into the scores displayed within the report. Determine the students’ overall perceived value derived specifically from training to proactively manage future training events. Recommended Actions Below are recommended next steps to take after reviewing the information in this report. Additionally, you'll find links to automatically run complementary reports for drillingdown further into the data or analyzing the information in another way. If any learner rated the class much lower than others, and the learner provided an email address, follow up with that person to gather additional feedback regarding the scores. Share that feedback with instructor and course managers as areas for improvement. If any learner rated the class much higher than others, especially in the areas of job impact or business results, follow up with those learners to gether additional feedback on how they were able to maximize their use of what they learned on the job. Share this feedback with course managers to ensure they share the knowledge with future learners to maximize job impact and business results. Schedule this report to be emailed automatically to the course and instructor managers on a daily basis so they are able to review performance on a regular basis. Recommended Links Run the Learner Comments report to review all the qualitative feedback for specific approaches to make the learning more effective and impactful. Run the Quick Question report to summarize the scalebased and multiplechoice answers for all of the evaluations. Run the Performance to Goals report to view how these results compared to your goals. Report Criteria Reporting Date: Nov 2, 2015 to Nov 2, 2015 Scale: 1 Low 9 High Class: Excel 2010 Part 1 Nov 2, 2015 - 6 / 6 -