Developing a Weighted Collection Development Allocation Formula

Developing a Weighted Collection Development Allocation Formula

• 2.
  • Questions arewelcome at any time, but we do reserve the option of deferring a question until later in the workshop • Interactive discussions are welcome • We will do some brainstorming later • There are no bad ideas or wrong answers • No critiquing of ideas or suggestions while brainstorming • Ideas and suggestions will be grouped and sorted after brainstorming • There will be a break about halfway through
• 3.
  • In 1997the Arkansas State University library had no equitable means of making allocations • One department accounted for nearly 20% of all collection development expenditures • Funds had not been reallocated/redistributed in many years • There was no funding to support new programs
• 4.
  •We searched literatureto discover methods of making allocations, including the use of a formula (this was before much of this type of information was available online) •We chose to use a formula based on one used by Colorado State University and described in SPEC Kit #36.
• 5.
  Do these stepsbefore selecting formula factors
• 6.
  •Doing this ismuch like a brainstorming session • Cost of materials • Degrees awarded per department or program • Faculty per department or program • Number of course sections offered • Number of courses in catalog • Number of degree programs • Number of majors in each program • Semester credit hour production (actual enrollment) • Use of materials
• 7.
  •Evaluate and refinethe list • Eliminate duplicates and non-viable suggestions • Identify the factors that are most relevant to your campus
• 8.
  •What we used •Cost of materials (from the Library and Book Trade Almanac) • Degrees awarded per department or program • Faculty per department or program (FTE faculty) • Number of course sections offered • Number of courses in catalog • Number of degree programs • Number of majors in each program • Semester credit hour production (actual enrollment) • Use of materials
• 9.
  •Determine what datais available or could be gathered • Both internal (within your library and within the field) and external (campus, community, company, etc.) • Eliminate possible factors for which data cannot be obtained •Gather samples of available data
• 10.
  These will notbe easy decisions!
• 11.
  •The original factorswe used • Semester credit hour production (actual enrollment) • Number of classes offered • Degrees awarded • Faculty per department • Cost of materials from Library and Book Trade Almanac •Other factors that could have been used • Number of degree programs • Departmental external funding and/or research productivity • Use of materials • Number of courses in catalog
• 12.
  •Weights • The assignedweight values are inserted into the Excel spreadsheet and are used in formula calculations • Weighting is the assigning of values to indicate the importance or impact of each factor in the formula relative to the other formula factors
• 13.
  •Assigning weights toeach factor • These should be determined based upon each institution’s priorities and culture • Library Committee • Faculty Senate • Institutional Administration • Someone or something else? • We subdivided some factors before assigning weights • We chose not to vary weights within a factor, but it can be done • Do test runs and adjust weights if needed
• 14.
  (by non-mathematicians) HOW THEFORMULA WORKS
• 16.
  •You can doseparate formula runs for… • Books • Journals • Print • Online resources (databases/ejournals/eBooks) • Any other budgets your library may have • Or any combination of these •We chose to run a single formula for all allocations
• 17.
  •Before running theformula, determine how much of your budget to allocate and how much to keep back for library use (if any) •You may choose to make adjustments to individual allocations after running the formula • Do no harm • Nonparticipation • Special entities or campus initiatives
• 18.
  •Your formula willprobably need to be modified at some point in the future •We have changed our formula • Weights were adjusted • Added departmental external funding as a factor in 2012 • Removed this factor in 2015
• 19.
  •Document, document, document! •Makethe decisions and modify the formula to fit your library’s needs •Feel free to contact either of us with any questions you may think of later
• 20.
  To download aninteractive copy of the demo spreadsheet http://www.astate.edu/a/library/charleston
• 21.
  Linda Creibaum Acquisitions Librarian DeanB. Ellis Library Arkansas State University Jonesboro P.O. Box 2040 State University, AR 72467 870-972-3354 [email protected] Jeff Bailey Library Director Dean B. Ellis Library Arkansas State University Jonesboro P.O. Box 2040 State University, AR 72467 870-972-2724 [email protected]
• 22.
  Thank you!!!