Developing EBM performance measures when some objectives are more equal than others

Developing EBM performance measures when some objectives are more equal than others

• 1.
  Developing EBM performancemeasures when some objectives are more equal than others Mark Dickey-Collas Marta Ballesteros ICES ASC 2024 L
• 2.
  Performance measures for EBM Thinkabout properties of EBM objectives Haugen et al submitted
• 3.
  Perceptions & propertiesof objectives
• 4.
  Performance measures for heterogenousobjectives?
• 5.
  Global Biodiversity Framework:explicit & shared, knowledge informed
• 6.
  Can we co-learnwith GBF how to overcome plurality of perceptions of disciplines? Fairness, values, benefits, equity, standards for process? Restoring, enhancing, contributing, mainstreaming? It is known that EBM prompts "scale" mismatches. Are we also ignoring "objectives" mismatches in current EBM implementation?
• 7.
  “Policy making, farfrom being a sphere in which science can be neatly separated from politics, is a sphere in which they necessarily come together” Jasanoff 1990 Politicisation perceived as leading to “tainted” science Researchers enveloped into grey area of negotiations & power dynamics Consequences for researchers Solutions Personal & professional integrity Trading transparency for discretionally Advising instead of giving advice ICES advice principles
• 8.
  EBM objectives: lessdiamond ~ more picture with many dimensions
• 9.
  Challenges roles of • managers •politicians • rights holders • civil society
• 10.
  Summary & thanks! • Heterogenousproperties & perceptions of objectives • Performance measures must acknowledge this • Need to review assessment frameworks • Researchers adapt modus operandi  Accept plurality  Ensure integrity, frameworks & discretion