More Related Content
Similar to Digital citizenship (20)
Digital citizenship
- 1. Student Page Digital Citizenship Cell Phones Used in School Title For Educators Introduction Designed by Task Danielle Eggeman Process [email protected] Evaluation Conclusion Credits Based on a template from The WebQuest Page
- 2. Student Page Introduction Title Cell phones have become more and more resourceful in these last few years with being able to take pictures, videos, and also accessing Introduction the internet, not to mention being able to talk to anyone at almost Task anytime. This makes them a pretty nice tool to have around but is the classroom really a place that students should have them Process around? Some would say yes while others would say no. In this Evaluation webquest we will look at different opinions and explore the good Conclusion and bad influences cell phones have on students. Credits
- 3. Student Page The Task Title For this assignment I will put you into groups and each Introduction group will debate a side of cell phone usage in the Task classroom. As a part of this you as an individual will need to write couple of paragraphs based on your own Process opinion about cell phones in the classroom and also Evaluation answer the questions to the case study number seven. Conclusion Credits
- 4. Student Page The Process *To accomplish the task, I will first split you into your groups and then assign Title you either for or against the use of cell phones. Introduction *Next you and your group will need to decide how you want to debate your information are you going to use power point, stand and talk about it, make Task posters etc. Any combination of things could work just be sure to present your Process side of the argument clearly. *After that you and your group need to do some research and find Evaluation information regarding your case. Also you can be looking for any information that will help you in your own paper as well. Conclusion *Once the information is gathered and put together I will have you present. The individual paper and case study will be turned in 2 days after just in case anything in the debate may have changed your mind or could help you in your paper. http://www.bamaed.ua.edu/edtechcases/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A- ZVCjfWf8&feature=player_embedded http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/10/19/ne w-milford-high-school-has-students-using- cell-phones-as-mobile-learning-devices/ Credits
- 5. Student Page Evaluation CATEGORY 4 3 2 1 Information All information Most information Most information Information had several Title presented in the debate presented in the debate presented in the debate inaccuracies OR was was clear, accurate and was clear, accurate and was clear and accurate, usually not clear. Introduction thorough. thorough. but was not usually thorough. Use of Facts/Statistics Every major point was Every major point was Every major point was Every point was not Task well supported with adequately supported supported with facts, supported. several relevant facts, with relevant facts, statistics and/or Process statistics and/or examples. statistics and/or examples. examples, but the relevance of some was questionable. Evaluation Presentation Style Team consistently used Team usually used Team sometimes used One or more members gestures, eye contact, gestures, eye contact, gestures, eye contact, of the team had a Conclusion tone of voice and a tone of voice and a tone of voice and a presentation style that level of enthusiasm in a level of enthusiasm in a level of enthusiasm in a did not keep the way that kept the way that kept the way that kept the attention of the attention of the attention of the attention of the audience. audience. audience. audience. Rebuttal All counter-arguments Most counter- Most counter- Counter-arguments were accurate, relevant arguments were arguments were were not accurate and/ and strong. accurate, relevant, and accurate and relevant, or relevant strong. but several were weak. Organization All arguments were Most arguments were All arguments were Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea clearly tied to an idea clearly tied to an idea clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized (premise) and (premise) but the (premise). in a tight, logical organized in a tight, organization was fashion. logical fashion. sometimes not clear or logical. Understanding of The team clearly The team clearly The team seemed to The team did not show Topic understood the topic in- undestood the topic in- understand the main an adequate depth and presented depth and presented points of the topic and understanding of the their information their information with presented those with topic. forcefully and ease. ease. convincingly. Respect for Other All statements, body Statements and Most statements and Statements, responses Team language, and responses were responses were and/or body language responses were respectful and used respectful and in were consistently not respectful and were in appropriate language, appropriate language, respectful. appropriate language. but once or twice body but there was one Credits language was not. sarcastic remark.
- 6. Student Page Conclusion You have now heard both sides of whether or not students should use cell Title phones in the classroom hopefully you have learned some positives and Introduction negatives about the situation and based your opinion on the facts and not just the fact that you would like to use your phone during class. Cell phones are Task very helpful there is a time and place for them and the classroom is not one of Process them. Evaluation Conclusion Credits
- 7. Student Page Credits & References Google images for all the images shown Title Introduction http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/10/19/ne Task w-milford-high-school-has-students-using- Process cell-phones-as-mobile-learning-devices/ Evaluation Conclusion http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_A- ZVCjfWf8&feature=player_embedded Credits