EEF_Metacognition_and_self-regulated_learning.pdf

Guidance Report
METACOGNITION AND
SELF-REGULATED LEARNING

2 Education Endowment Foundation
The authors would like to thank the many researchers and practitioners who provided support and feedback on drafts of this
guidance. In particular we would like to thank the Advisory Panel and Review Team:
Advisory Panel: Kate Atkins (Rosendale School), Professor Steve Higgins (Durham University), Dr David Whitebread (Cambridge
University), Alex Quigley (Huntington School) and Professor Jonathan Sharples (EEF and UCL Institute of Education).
Review team: Professor Daniel Muijs and Dr Christian Bokhove (University of Southampton).
Written by: Alex Quigley (Huntington School), Professor Daniel Muijs (previously University of Southampton, now at Ofsted) and
Eleanor Stringer (Education Endowment Foundation).

3
3
Metacognition and self-regulated learning
Foreword 4
Introduction 5
Summary of recommendations 6
What are metacognition and self-regulated learning? 8
Recommendation 1 Teachers should acquire the professional understanding and skills
to develop their pupils’ metacognitive knowledge
10
Recommendation 2 Explicitly teach pupils metacognitive strategies, including how to
plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning
12
Recommendation 3 Model your own thinking to help pupils develop their metacognitive
and cognitive skills
16
Recommendation 4 Set an appropriate level of challenge to develop pupils’ self-
regulation and metacognition
18
Recommendation 5 Promote and develop metacognitive talk in the classroom 20
Recommendation 6 Explicitly teach pupils how to organise, and effectively manage,
their learning independently
22
Recommendation 7 Schools should support teachers to develop their knowledge of
these approaches and expect them to be applied appropriately
26
References 28
How was this guidance compiled? 30
CONTENTS

FOREWORD
“We hope this report
brings some clarity
and guidance to an
area of teaching and
learning that holds
so much promise but
that can be difficult to
implement.”
When we launched the Sutton Trust-
EEF Teaching and Learning Toolkit in
2011, we designed it particularly with
busy teachers and senior leaders in
mind. Our aim was to bridge the gap
between educational research and
classroom practice, presenting our
accumulated understanding of ‘what
works’ in a practical and accessible
way.
But there was one particular bit of
education jargon we couldn’t avoid:
‘metacognition and self-regulation’.
Rated by the Toolkit as ‘high impact
for very low cost, based on extensive
evidence’ it can nonetheless seem an
elusive topic. And with good reason.
Beyond a simple definition of ‘thinking about thinking’
or ‘learning to learn’, it can be hard to describe what
metacognition means in the classroom.
On a very basic level, it’s about
pupils’ ability to monitor, direct,
and review their learning. Effective
metacognitive strategies get
learners to think about their own
learning more explicitly, usually by
teaching them to set goals, and
monitor and evaluate their own
academic progress.
Teaching metacognition is easier
said than done; there’s certainly
no simple method or trick. We
know that learners develop
some metacognitive knowledge
and skills naturally, and most teachers support
metacognition in their teaching without realising it. That
said, it can be difficult to give concrete examples of what
metacognitive knowledge and skills actually look like.
But with a large body of international evidence telling us
that when properly embedded these approaches are
powerful levers for boosting learning, it’s clear that we
need to spend time looking at how to do this well.
Teachers want to know more too. Since we launched
the Teaching and Learning Toolkit, the strand on
metacognition and self-regulation has consistently
ranked as one of our most popular and has been
accessed over 120,000 times.
This is why we’ve produced this report. It offers seven
practical, evidence-based recommendations to
support teachers to develop metacognitive knowledge
and skills in their pupils. The guidance is relevant to
early years practitioners, teachers, and senior leaders
in primary and secondary schools, as well as those in
post-16 settings.
To develop the recommendations, we reviewed the
best available international research and consulted
experts, teachers, and academics to arrive at key
principles for effective teaching. Each recommendation
is accompanied by specific examples designed to
bring the work alive for teachers.
We hope this report brings some clarity and guidance
to an area of teaching and learning that holds so much
promise but that can be difficult to implement. The EEF
and its partners, particularly our network of Research
Schools, will be producing a range of supporting
resources, tools, and training to help you implement
the recommendations in your classrooms.
Sir Kevan Collins
Chief Executive
Education Endowment Foundation

5
INTRODUCTION
5
review our Early Years Toolkit, specifically the strand
on self-regulation strategies, for further guidance).1
It is aimed primarily at senior leaders and teachers
responsible for staff development. It may also be useful
for class teachers with an interest in how research can
improve their teaching. Further audiences who may
find the guidance relevant include governors, parents,
programme developers, and educational researchers.
Acting on the guidance
Additional EEF resources to support the
implementation of the recommendations made in
this report are in the process
of development. As well as
these resources, our other
guidance reports can support
the implementation of specific
recommendations. The subject-
specific reports, such as those on
literacy, maths, and science, can be
used in conjunction with this report
to support pupils’ attainment in
these subjects. The more general
guidance, such as Putting Evidence
to Work—A School’s Guide to
Implementation, can also support
teachers and senior staff to apply
the recommendations in a school.2
You may also want to seek support from our national
network of Research Schools, a collaboration
between the EEF and the Institute for Effective
Education. Research Schools aim to lead the way
in the use of evidence-based teaching, building
affiliations with large numbers of schools in their
region, and supporting the use of evidence at scale.
“Often the research
evidence is generic
and hard to interpret;
by giving specific
examples we have
tried to bring the
work alive for
teachers.”
What does this guidance cover?
This guidance report is relevant to the teaching of all
students, within any subject area. Most of the examples
included are from Key Stages 1 to 4, where the research
is strongest. It introduces a simplified framework for self-
regulated learning and metacognition.
In due course, we will publish a more detailed research
review exploring the subject in more depth; this is an
area of academic discussion that may be of interest to
some teachers. Here, however, we have simplified the
frameworks to allow for ease of understanding and use
in real-world settings—we focus on what the evidence
says about what teachers can do to develop these
skills. Often the research evidence is generic and hard
to interpret; by giving specific examples we have tried to
bring the work alive for teachers (but this means they are
less directly supported by strong evidence).
This guidance draws on a review of the evidence
about self-regulated learning and metacognition led
by Professor Daniel Muijs and Dr Christian Bokhove
(University of Southampton). It is not a new study in
itself, but rather is intended as an accessible overview
of existing research with clear, actionable guidance.
More information about the review and the process
is at the end of the report. Some key references are
included here; for those wishing to explore the subject
in more depth, the forthcoming review will contain a
more comprehensive reference section.
Who is this guidance for?
This guidance is applicable to both primary and
secondary schools, and some recommendations may
be relevant for early years education (you may want to

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
Model your
own thinking
to help pupils
develop their
metacognitive and
cognitive skills
• Modelling by
the teacher is a
cornerstone of
effective teaching;
revealing the thought
processes of an
expert learner helps
to develop pupils’
metacognitive skills.
• Teachers should
verbalise their
metacognitive thinking
(‘What do I know
about problems like
this? What ways of
solving them have I
used before?’) as they
approach and work
through a task.
• Scaffolded tasks, like
worked examples,
allow pupils to
develop their
metacognitive and
cognitive skills without
placing too many
demands on their
mental resources.
3
Page 18
• Self-regulated
learners are aware of
their strengths and
weaknesses, and can
motivate themselves
to engage in, and
improve, their learning.
• Developing pupils’
metacognitive
knowledge of how
they learn—their
knowledge of
themselves as a
learner, of strategies,
and of tasks—is
an effective way
of improving pupil
outcomes.
• Teachers should
support pupils to
plan, monitor,
and evaluate their
learning.
Teachers should
acquire the
professional
understanding and
skills to develop
their pupils’
metacognitive
knowledge
Page 12
1
Sections are colour
coded for ease of
reference
Find this info on:
• Explicit instruction
in cognitive and
metacognitive
strategies can improve
pupils’ learning.
• While concepts
like ‘plan, monitor,
evaluate’ can be
introduced generically,
the strategies are
mostly applied in
relation to specific
content and tasks,
and are therefore best
taught this way.
• A series of steps—
beginning with
activating prior
knowledge
and leading to
independent
practice before
ending in structured
reflection—can be
applied to different
subjects, ages and
contents.
Explicitly
teach pupils
metacognitive
strategies,
including how
to plan, monitor,
and evaluate their
learning
Page 14
2

7
Set an appropriate
level of challenge
to develop pupils’
self-regulation and
metacognition
• Challenge is crucial
to allow pupils to
develop and progress
their knowledge of
tasks, strategies,
and of themselves as
learners.
• However, challenge
needs to be at an
appropriate level.
• Pupils must have the
motivation to accept
the challenge.
• Tasks should not
overload pupils’
cognitive processes,
particularly when they
are expected to apply
new strategies.
4
Page 20
• As well as explicit
instruction and
modelling, classroom
dialogue can be
used to develop
metacognitive skills.
• Pupil-to-pupil and
pupil-teacher talk
can help to build
knowledge and
understanding
of cognitive and
metacognitive
strategies.
• However, dialogue
needs to be
purposeful, with
teachers guiding
and supporting
the conversation
to ensure it is
challenging and
builds on prior subject
knowledge.
Promote
and develop
metacognitive talk
in the classroom
5
Page 22
Explicitly teach
pupils how to
organise and
effectively manage
their learning
independently
• Teachers should
explicitly support
pupils to develop
independent learning
skills.
• Carefully designed
guided practice,
with support gradually
withdrawn as the
pupil becomes
proficient, can allow
pupils to develop
skills and strategies
before applying them
in independent
practice.
• Pupils will need timely,
effective feedback and
strategies to be able
to judge accurately
how effectively they
are learning.
• Teachers should
also support pupils’
motivation to
undertake the learning
tasks.
6
Page 24
Schools should
support teachers
to develop
knowledge of
these approaches
and expect them
to be applied
appropriately
• Develop teachers’
knowledge and
understanding
through high
quality professional
development and
resources.
• Senior leaders
should provide
teachers with time
and support to make
sure approaches
are implemented
consistently.
• Teachers can use
tools such as ‘traces’
and observation to
assess pupils’ use of
self-regulated learning
skills.
• Metacognition
shouldn’t be an ‘extra’
task for teachers to
do but should be built
into their teaching
activities.
7
Page 28

This spelling test anecdote is a familiar scene that
is played out in classrooms across the country. The
actions and thoughts of Freya as she
is learning her spelling, inside and
outside of the classroom, is simply
the typical stuff of everyday learning
and school. And yet, despite much of
her thinking and strategies remaining
hidden and implicit in the classroom,
her success is instructive. Freya
exhibits the thoughts and actions of a
successful self-regulated learner and
she deploys crucial metacognitive
strategies.
Why does this matter? Well,
there is a strong body of research
from psychology and education demonstrating the
importance of metacognition and self-regulation to
effective pupil learning. The Sutton Trust-EEF Teaching
and Learning Toolkit—which summarises international
evidence—rates ‘metacognition and self-regulation’
as a high impact, low cost approach to improving the
attainment of disadvantaged learners.3
But what is it? Essentially, self-regulation is about the
extent to which learners like Freya are aware of their
strengths and weaknesses and the strategies they use
to learn. It describes how they can motivate themselves
to engage in learning and develop strategies to
enhance their learning and to improve. It will look
different for learners of different ages, and for different
tasks, but teachers will recognise these characteristics
in their most effective learners.
Freya fiddled with her pencil case. Every Friday, she would experience a quiet dread when facing the weekly spelling test.
This week, though, she felt more confident than before. After a couple of weeks characterised by annoying mistakes, she had
worked hard in readiness for this week’s test. She had devised two of her own mnemonics and she had practised her ‘le’
ending words, as well as ‘surprise’ with an ‘r’, repeatedly.
As Mr Thomas began the spelling test, Freya listened hard. She knew that sometimes she would feel a little pressure when
her teacher moved quickly onto the next spelling, but that this week she would listen carefully and remember what she had
practised.
One or two words were no doubt tricky, but Freya had weighed up her options each time and she was utterly confident of her
success. Before Mr Thomas had a chance to cycle through the correct spellings, Freya sat up straight, with a smile lighting up
her face, fuelled by quiet satisfaction. She had already thought about her new spelling routine and how she would stick to it
next week too.
Zimmerman gives a helpful description of what a successful self-regulated learner looks like:4
‘These learners are proactive in their efforts to learn because they are aware of their strengths and limitations and because
they are guided by personally set goals and task-related strategies, such as using an arithmetic addition strategy to check the
accuracy of solutions to subtraction problems. These learners monitor their behavior in terms of their goals and self-reflect
on their increasing effectiveness. This enhances their self-satisfaction and motivation to continue to improve their methods of
learning.’
WHAT ARE METACOGNITION AND SELF-REGULATED
LEARNING?
What does a self-regulated learner look like?
“Self-regulation is
about the extent to
which learners like
Freya are aware of
their strengths and
weaknesses and the
strategies they use to
learn.”

9
Self-regulated learning can be broken into three
essential components that teachers need to know
about to help their pupils to develop into successful
learners:
• Cognition is the mental process involved
in knowing, understanding, and learning.
By cognitive strategies, we mean skills like
memorisation techniques or subject-specific
strategies like making different marks with
a brush or using different methods to solve
equations in maths. This is the bread and
butter of good teaching; cognitive strategies
are fundamental to acquiring knowledge and
completing learning tasks.
• Metacognition is about the ways learners monitor
and purposefully direct their learning. For example,
having decided that a particular cognitive strategy
for memorisation is likely to be successful, a
pupil then monitors whether it has indeed been
successful and then deliberately changes (or not)
their memorisation method based on that evidence.
By metacognitive strategies, we mean the strategies
we use to monitor or control our cognition, such
as checking that our memorisation technique was
accurate or selecting the most appropriate cognitive
strategy for the task we are undertaking.
• Motivation is about our willingness to engage
our metacognitive and cognitive skills and apply
them to learning. Motivational strategies will include
convincing oneself to undertake a tricky revision task
now—affecting our current well-being—as a way of
improving our future well-being in the test tomorrow.
Cognition, metacognition, and motivation all interact in
complex ways during the learning process. For Freya,
she deployed cognitive strategies, like using mnemonics
and doing some self-testing practice
at home. She used metacognitive
strategies to plan her spelling
practice, recognising why using a
mnemonic was the right tool for
the job, while monitoring her own
difficulties with time pressures during
the test. Finally, Freya mustered the
motivational strategies to engage in
repeated practice and to persevere
during a pressured challenge.
Metacognition is the focus of this guidance report, but
that does not mean cognition and motivation are any less
important. In fact, it is impossible to be metacognitive
without having different cognitive strategies to hand and
possessing the motivation and perseverance to tackle
problems and apply these strategies.
“It is impossible to
be metacognitive
without having
different cognitive
strategies to hand.”

Teachers should acquire the professional understanding
and skills to develop their pupils’ metacognitive
knowledge
1
Self-regulated learners are aware of their strengths
and weaknesses, and can motivate themselves to
engage in, and improve, their learning. At the heart
of this is metacognition. This term is increasingly well
known in schools, but beyond a simple definition of
‘thinking about thinking’, teachers can quickly run
out of classroom examples to describe it accurately.
Understanding what we mean is the first step in
helping teachers to improve pupils’ metacognition.
We approach any learning task or opportunity with
some metacognitive knowledge about:
• our own abilities and attitudes (knowledge of
ourselves as a learner);
• what strategies are effective and available
(knowledge of strategies); and
• this particular type of activity (knowledge of the
task).
When undertaking a learning task, we start with
this knowledge, then apply and adapt it. This is
metacognitive regulation. It is about planning how
to undertake a task, working on it while monitoring
the strategy to check progress, then evaluating the
overall success. The diagram opposite represents the
metacognitive regulation cycle.
This is not a one-off process of discrete steps, but
an ongoing cycle. As you progress through the task
applying your metacognitive and cognitive skills, you
update your metacognitive knowledge (of yourself,
strategies, and tasks), as well as updating your subject
knowledge and skills.
The cycle of plan, monitor, evaluate and the
different aspects of metacognitive knowledge (learner,
strategies, task) are recurrent themes throughout
this guidance. Teachers should consider these
when setting learning tasks and supporting pupils to
complete them. In an expert learner, these processes
are unconscious and automatic. In novice learners,
however, it can be valuable to make them explicit.
1. Planning
METACOGNITION
COGNITION
2. Monitoring
3. Evaluation
Misconception 1: Metacognition is only developed in older pupils.
A common misconception is that metacognition is only developed effectively in mature young adults and not young children. We
know from research, however, that children as young as three have been able to engage in a wide range of metacognitive and self-
regulatory behaviours, such as setting themselves goals and checking their understanding.6
They also show greater accuracy on
tasks they have chosen to accept than on tasks they would have preferred to opt out of.7
There is clear evidence that the level of security and self-knowledge remains rather inaccurate until about eight years of age,
with children being over-optimistic about their levels of knowledge.8
However, although older children typically exhibit a broader
repertoire of metacognitive strategies, the evidence suggests that younger children do typically develop metacognitive knowledge,
even at a very early age.

Metacognition and self-regulated learning 11
METACOGNITION
My knowledge of myself (my
approach to maths problems); the
task (what do I know about this type
of problem); and strategies (different
ways to solve them)
“ I need to think about
how we have done these
problems before and
choose the best strategy.
...I know, I’ll start by
writing out the problem as
an algebraic equation.”
Translating the words into an equation
COGNITION
1. Planning: 3. Evaluation:
“Writing out the equations
has successfully moved
me on to the next step
with this task.”
2. Monitoring:
“Has this improved my
understanding of the task?
Yes, it now looks like a
type of problem I’m
familiar with: a
simultaneous equation.”
TASK:
Mason and Jasmine
have £5 between them.
Mason has 90p more
than Jasmine. How
much money does
Jasmine have?
In this example, John starts with some knowledge
of the task (word problems in maths are often solved
by expressing them as equations) and of strategies
(how to turn sentences into an equation). His
knowledge of the task then develops as it emerges
from being a word problem into a simultaneous
equation. He would then continue through this cycle
if he has the strategies for solving simultaneous
equations. He could then evaluate his overall
success by substituting his answers into the word
problem and checking they are correct. If this was
wrong, he could attempt other strategies and once
more update his metacognitive knowledge.
Most learners will go through many of these thinking
processes to some extent when trying to solve a
problem or tackle a task in the classroom. The most
effective learners will have developed a repertoire of
different cognitive and metacognitive strategies and
be able to effectively use and apply these in a timely
fashion. They will self-regulate and find ways to
motivate themselves when they get stuck. Over time,
this can further increase their motivation as they
become more confident in undertaking new tasks
and challenges.
As with other aspects of knowledge and skills, pupils
will develop differently. The extent to which skills are
acquired is in part dependent on the opportunities
pupils receive to develop them outside of school and in
the home, which is likely (though not necessarily) to be
correlated with social background.
Metacognition is part of the fabric of successful learning,
but it can prove both complex and subtle. It is ever-
present in the classroom, but unless teachers have a
strong understanding of the metacognitive demands of
the topics they are teaching, they may miss opportunities
to develop pupils’ knowledge and skills. Various
studies have shown that self-regulated learning—and in
particular metacognition—has a significant impact on
pupils’ academic performance, beyond that predicted by
prior achievement.5
This recommendation introduces the
key concepts teachers should be aware of; the rest of the
guidance focuses on how teachers can improve pupils’
learning by integrating these concepts into their teaching.
To use an example to make the cycle more concrete, imagine a learner, John, is set a maths question to answer:

Title / Category
2 Explicitly teach pupils metacognitive strategies, including
how to plan, monitor, and evaluate their learning.
While all children like Amy develop metacognition
to some extent—and this will continue to develop
further as they mature—the extent to which this
happens differs significantly between learners; most
will not spontaneously develop all the strategies
they need or would find useful and therefore
require explicit instruction in key metacognitive
strategies. There is some evidence to suggest that
disadvantaged pupils are less likely to use such
strategies and are, therefore, most likely to benefit
from the whole range of approaches to supporting
metacognitive and self-regulatory skills, including
explicit teaching.9,10
‘Explicit instruction’ does not denote simply ‘telling’ but
describes all the activities that a teacher orchestrates
to effect learning in their pupils. It is not to be
confused with a lecturing approach but combines
explicit teacher input with interactive questioning and
feedback. It is important to provide explicit instruction
in metacognitive regulation strategies, in particular:11
• planning—encouraging pupils to think about
the goal of their learning (set by the teacher, or
themselves) and to consider how they will approach
the task; this includes ensuring they understand the
goal, activate relevant prior knowledge about the
task, select appropriate strategies, and consider
how to allocate their effort;
• monitoring—emphasising the need, while
undertaking the learning task, for pupils to assess
the progress they are making; this includes the
self-testing and self-questioning activities that are
necessary to control learning, and making changes
to their chosen strategies; and
• evaluating—appraising the effectiveness of their
plan and its implementation.
This framework can seem clunky and only relevant
to discrete, demanding tasks for older learners. In
fact, the underlying skills are relevant to most learning
choices a pupil makes. During a lesson, a pupil
must decide how much effort to put into listening to
the teacher’s explanation of a new topic (planning);
while listening, they can consider whether they are
understanding the teacher (monitoring) and what to
do if they don’t (planning a good question to ask and
evaluating if they now have understood the explanation
successfully and are ready to move on).
Teachers can explicitly teach these skills by prompting
pupils with examples of the things they should be
considering at each stage of a learning task. For
example, a common activity in art is to draw or paint
a self-portrait. Effective teacher questioning while
modelling a self-portrait can aid the development of
metacognitive reflection:
Planning:
‘What resources do I need to carry out a self-portrait?’
‘Have I done a self-portrait before and was it successful?’
‘What have I learned from the examples we looked at
earlier?’
‘Where do I start and what viewpoint will I use?’
‘Do I need a line guide to keep my features in
proportion?’
Amy’s geography teacher has asked the class to prepare a short presentation about rainforest ecosystems. To plan this, Amy
reflects on how she learned best on the last topic—using the school textbooks—and decides to read the relevant chapter
before drafting her presentation points. However, when reading it she decides that the chapter does not really improve her
understanding. She starts to panic as she was relying on this.
Then Amy remembers a geography website her teacher mentioned. She adapts her strategy and searches the website.
This provides a more useful overview and she uses the information to summarise some interesting facts. She reflects on the
experience and decides that next time she will gather a range of resources before starting to research a topic rather than relying
on one source.
2

13
Monitoring:
‘Am I doing well?’
‘Do I need any different techniques to improve my self-
portrait?’
‘Are all of my facial features in proportion?’
’Am I finding this challenging?’
‘Is there anything I need to stop and change to improve
my self-portrait?’
Evaluation:
‘How did I do?’
‘Did my line guide strategy work?’
‘Was it the right viewpoint to choose?’
‘How would I do a better self-portrait next time?’
‘Are there other perspectives, viewpoints or techniques
I would like to try?’
You can see—through this worked
example of a teacher posing
metacognitive questions—that
some questions for planning aim to
activate prior knowledge (resources,
previous exemplars) whereas other
questions model deploying the right
cognitive strategies (viewpoint, line
guides). The monitoring questions
emphasise both general progress
(proportion, editing) alongside
checking general motivation
(meeting goals and dealing with
challenge). Finally, the evaluation
questions concentrate upon the success of the
cognitive strategies (line guide, viewpoint, comparison
with other techniques) and on what can be taken
forward from the learning.
As discussed, these prompts must accompany
instruction in the relevant specific cognitive strategies.
In this example, pupils will only be able to consider
these questions and approaches if they understand the
importance of perspective and the different techniques.
The next section gives an example of applying it with a
particular strategy.
Case study: Using self-regulation to improve writing
An EEF-funded project aimed to use memorable experiences and an approach called ‘Self-Regulated Strategy
Development’ (SRSD)12
to help struggling writers in Years 6 and 7. SRSD provides a clear structure to help pupils plan, monitor
and evaluate their writing. It aims to encourage pupils to take ownership of their work and can be used to teach most genres of
writing, including narrative writing.
Led by the Calderdale Excellence Project, this project had a focus on pupils using cognitive strategies like the mnemonic
IPEELL—Introductory paragraph, Points, Examples and elaboration, End, Links (such as connectives and openers), and
Language (for example, ‘wow’ words, genre specific vocabulary, punctuation, and self-scoring). The approach explicitly teaches
the writing process while encouraging pupils to take ownership of their progress with monitoring and evaluation strategies.
Overall, the project appeared to have a large positive impact on writing outcomes in the independently evaluated efficacy trial.
The overall effect size for writing—comparing the progress of pupils in the project to similar pupils who did not participate—was
+0.74 standard deviations, or an estimated nine months’ additional progress.13
“Some questions
for planning aim
to activate prior
knowledge, whereas
other questions model
deploying the right
cognitive strategies...”
13

14
Title / Category
How should teachers teach
metacognitive strategies?
While there may be some benefit to introducing pupils
to the general importance of planning, monitoring,
and evaluating, the particular strategies are often quite
subject- or task-specific, and the evidence suggests
that they are best taught through subject content.
The following seven-step model for explicitly teaching
metacognitive strategies can be applied to learning
different subject content at different phases and ages.
It involves:
1. Activating prior knowledge;
2. Explicit strategy instruction;
3. Modelling of learned strategy;
4. Memorisation of strategy;
5. Guided practice;
6. Independent practice; and
7. Structured reflection.
Let’s consider a worked example of the seven-step
model. Graphic organisers can function successfully in
many different ways, such as an effective note-taking
strategy in science14
or as a planning tool in history. In
a Year 9 history lesson, pupils are exploring the causes
of World War One. To cohere the complex subject
knowledge into a planning tool that organises their
ideas, the teacher introduces a fishbone diagram (a
commonly used graphic organiser):
1. Activating prior knowledge. The teacher discusses
with pupils the different causes that led to World War
One while making notes on the whiteboard.
2. Explicit strategy instruction. The teacher
then explains how the fishbone diagram will help
organise their ideas, with the emphasis on the
cognitive strategy of using a ‘cause and effect
model’ in history that will help them to organise
and plan a better written response.
3. Modelling of learned strategy. The teacher uses
the initial notes on the causes of the war to model
one part of the fishbone diagram.
4. Memorisation of learned strategy. The teacher
tests if pupils have understood and memorised the
key aspects of the fishbone strategy, and its main
purpose, through questions and discussion.
5. Guided practice. The teacher models one further
fishbone cause with the whole group, with pupils
verbally contributing their ideas.
6. Independent practice. Pupils complete their own
fishbone diagram analysis.
7. Structured reflection. The teacher encourages
pupils to reflect on how appropriate the model was,
how successfully they applied it, and how they might
use it in the future.
This approach allows the teacher to develop solid
knowledge and understanding which then forms
the basis of increasingly independent practice as
the teacher changes their guidance and gradually
withdraws the scaffolding.
CATEGORY 1 CATEGORY 2
CATEGORY 3 CATEGORY 4
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause
Cause
EFFECT

15
Misconception 2: Metacognition is a general skill that can be separated from subject knowledge
This is perhaps the most common misconception about metacognition. The clue is in the word: without cognition, there is no
metacognition.
Contrary to the misconception, metacognition is specific to the task being undertaken and stronger where learners have a
thorough grounding in subject knowledge. It is, for example, very hard to have knowledge about how one can learn in a subject
without solid subject knowledge. For example, Willingham and Lovette note that teaching pupils reading comprehension
strategies—metacognitive strategies for improving reading for meaning—can give pupils the edge, but that the effects of this
strategy are limited if the pupil lacks the required background knowledge of the reading material.15
While some of the metacognitive strategies in this guidance can be described generically, they can only be improved through
practice—and this means applying them to specific tasks. Other EEF guidance reports, such as those on literacy and
mathematics, provide more detailed subject-specific guidance for teachers.16

3
16
Model your own thinking to help pupils develop their
metacognitive and cognitive skills.
A tailor will teach an apprentice by allowing them to
work alongside them watching their movements and
techniques closely, modelling their craft. Teachers in
all subjects do the same – reveal their expert subject
knowledge and skill to their novice learners.
All teachers use modelling to some extent. The most
effective teachers—like a master craftsman working with
their novice apprentice—are aware of their expertise
and of how to reveal their skills to learners and how to
assess whether their pupils have understood them; they
are metacognitive about their teaching.
Teacher modelling
Teachers can model their thinking as they approach a
task to reveal the reflections of an effective learner. In
Recommendation 2, we gave the example of a teacher
posing questions about how to plan, monitor, and
evaluate while approaching a self-portrait task—an
example of teachers making such strategies explicit.
Similarly, teachers can outline their thinking about their
knowledge; for example, while teaching young pupils
how to perform a forward roll safely in PE, a teacher
might talk through her actions as she demonstrates:
‘I don’t want to hurt my neck and
want to do this neatly. So first, to
protect my neck, I need to tuck
my chin to chest like this. Then
when I start to roll, I remember
not to roll onto my head. Instead,
look how I’m going to roll onto
my back and shoulders. This also
means my back is round, so I can
smoothly roll like this. Now, who
can remember what I did first to
protect my neck?’
Such modelling is only effective if
the pupils have access to relevant
knowledge (in this example, if
these are very young children, they may not even know
what a forward roll is supposed to look like, so the
teacher might perform one without talking it through
first). It is also more effective when pupils are engaged
in the task being modelled and have the opportunity to
practise it immediately after the demonstration.
Modelling of this type is rarely planned by teachers
as these processes or skills come ‘naturally’ to them,
but that risks these important prompts remaining
implicit, which is particularly ineffective for novice
pupils. To move from novice to expert, our pupils need
to know how an expert athlete, artist, historian, or
scientist habitually thinks and acts. We need to make
these largely implicit processes explicit to our novice
learners.
There is some evidence, at least in terms of
metacognition, that such scaffolding should not
be too specific as this may inhibit reflection. Some
‘deliberate difficulty’17
is required so that pupils
have gaps where they have to think for themselves and
monitor their learning with increasing independence.
Reinforcing the value of the processes modelled by
engaging the pupils in reflecting on how successful
they were at the end of the activity, or lesson, is also
important.
Removing the scaffolding
Ultimately, the purpose of modelling is to help
novice pupils become more capable of learning
independently and thinking metacognitively. The
modelling process involves teachers making gradual
changes in support. Initially, scaffolding such as direct
modelling and support from the teacher, is necessary,
but as guided practice moves to independent
practice, teacher input will change to monitoring
and intervening only when necessary. Practice and
independent work help to develop cognitive and
metacognitive knowledge. Over time, such thinking
becomes habitual – acting as ‘internal scaffolding’
that will support future learning.
“The most effective
teachers—like a
master craftsman
working with his
novice apprentice—
are aware of their
expertise and of how
to reveal their skills to
learners.”

17
To illustrate this, it is helpful to look again at the seven-
step model for teaching metacognitive strategies:18
So, just as a PE teacher might
begin by modelling a forward roll,
in a maths lesson, a model worked
example19
of a given task or problem
can be used. For example, a teacher
first shares a completed worked
example of adding fractions before
looking more closely at the steps
involved in working out the solution.
After the step-by-step modelling,
the teacher gradually removes the
scaffold, getting pupils to undertake
a partially completed equation.
Teachers should be aware that some pupils may find
it hard to articulate their thoughts while doing a task,
and doing so may interfere with their ability to complete
the task successfully. It may be that metacognitive
reflection needs to follow the completion of the task
for novice pupils, and not occur concurrently, as
task completion may demand all of a pupil’s mental
resources.
Misconception 3: Metacognition represents ‘higher order’ thinking and is therefore more
important than mere cognition or subject knowledge
We know that metacognition is the knowledge of cognition and the strategies to regulate and control it. However, it would be a
mistake to see metacognition as somehow ‘higher order’, hierarchically, over cognitive activities such as remembering knowledge
(Bloom’s taxonomy is sometimes misinterpreted as being a hierarchy that privileges ‘evaluation’ over ‘knowledge’). As has been
pointed out, it is very hard to have metacognitive knowledge about how competent you are in a given subject domain, or how
best you can learn, without sound subject knowledge.20
For example, a student can use metacognitive planning strategies when drafting a GCSE essay about Shakespeare. But without
an understanding of Shakespeare’s plays, language, and the relevant social context, the essay will not be successful. We cannot
adequately deploy metacognitive strategies for monitoring and evaluating our essay-writing if we do not first understand the
components of a successful essay and have a knowledge of Shakespeare’s world.
Metacognition and cognition display a complex interplay as pupils learn. We should look to develop both concurrently and not
create false hierarchies where they do not exist.
Activating prior
knowledge
1
Explicit strategy
instruction
2
Modelling of
learned strategy
3
Memorisation of
strategy
4
Guided
practice
5
Independent
practice
6
Structured
reflection
7
Student Teacher
“It may be that
metacognitive
reflection needs to
follow the completion
of the task for novice
pupils, and not occur
concurrently.”

4
Set an appropriate level of challenge to develop pupils’
self-regulation and metacognition.
Challenge is key to developing self-regulation and
metacognition: if learners are not challenged, they
will not develop new and useful strategies; nor will
they reflect deeply on the content they are engaging
with, or on their learning strategies, or stretch their
understanding of themselves. Put simply, and somewhat
paradoxically, if pupils have to undertake a task that
makes them struggle (remember ‘deliberate difficulties’),
they are more likely (in the future) to recall information
from such tasks from their long-term memory.21
A successful pupil will regularly engage in
metacognitive reflection, asking questions of
themselves as they learn and take on challenging
tasks, such as:
Knowledge of task:
• Is this task too challenging for me?
• What are the most difficult aspects of this task?
• How much time should I devote to this task?
• Are there easy bits I can get ‘done’?
Knowledge of self:
• Is this task asking for subject knowledge I can
remember?
• Do I understand the concept(s) that underpins this
task?
• Am I motivated to stick at this tricky task?
• What can I do to keep myself focused?
Knowledge of strategies:
• Are my notes effective for understanding this task?
• Do I need to ask the teacher for help?
• What strategies can I deploy if I am stuck?
• What can I do to ensure I remember what I’ve
learned?
A successful metacognitive learner will ask such
questions, either consciously or as an unconscious
process, and typically exhibit an awareness of the
degree of challenge in what they are learning. However,
challenge needs to be set at an appropriate level,
otherwise one or both of the following may occur:
• the learner will not accept the challenge; or
• the learner will suffer cognitive overload.
Accepted challenge and motivation
As we know, motivation is one of the essential
components of self-regulated learning. Pupils, and
even animals, opt out of difficult trials; they avoid tests
they are unlikely to answer correctly.22
Where learners
are being challenged it is important to ensure they
feel emotionally supported as well as being motivated
to persevere. Metacognition, then, is of special
importance when pupils make decisions about how to
study and how to maintain effort and motivation until
the task is complete.23
Take homework, for example—an ever-present
challenge to pupils, teachers, and parents alike. It
is paramount to pitch homework at the right level of
challenge, especially as the control and monitoring
offered by the teacher in the classroom is absent.
Metacognitive strategies are required to preserve self-
motivation in this undertaking.
First, pupils will make a judgement on how
challenging the homework is to them. If a given
homework is clearly difficult, then a pupil will need
self-efficacy24
—or self-confidence in their ability to
complete a given task—which is shown to predict
the deployment of metacognitive strategies. In
motivating pupils to persevere at challenging tasks,
it is important to reward effort rather than absolute
levels of achievement; to give feedback about
personal progress, and to avoid social comparison.
One obvious factor that has been found to relate to
more effective use of metacognitive strategies, and
sticking to tasks like homework, is the ability to delay
gratification. Pupils who are better able to delay

19
gratification in favour of studying, or undertaking
homework, are also better at planning and regulating
their learning, and vice versa.25
In Walter Mischel’s famous ‘marshmallow
test’, young children were given the challenge
of delaying their gratification by being offered the
choice of one small reward—the marshmallow—or
wait for 15 minutes to gain a larger reward of two
marshmallows.26
In this experiment, the children
deployed a range of metacognitive strategies such
as not looking at the marshmallow, or closing their
eyes and thinking of something completely different.
It is such strategies that teachers can support
children to deploy in a range of contexts, such as the
aforementioned homework example.
Helping pupils reduce cognitive
overload
What is an appropriate level of challenge? This
question requires expert knowledge both of a given
subject, and of pupils in the classroom. ‘Cognitive
load’ theory,27
developed by John Sweller out of
the study of problem solving, offers a handy model to
understand the ‘Goldilocks degree of challenge’: not
too hard, not too easy, but just right.
Put simply, ‘cognitive load’ is the amount of
information our working memory can hold at any one
time. The working memory is where we process
information and is key to learning. The capacity of
the working memory is limited. We can, however,
support pupils to maximise their working memory
with a range of apt metacognitive strategies. For
example, we can rehearse the components of
a complex task (such as the worked examples
already mentioned) so that it becomes automated,
thus freeing up working memory capacity. Or we
might suggest creating stories from information
to be remembered,28
or grouping information into
more memorable categories or more accessible
‘chunks’.29
Understanding cognitive load
in relation to self-regulation and
metacognition has a number of
consequences. First, where we
can draw on existing knowledge
from the long-term memory, we
increase capacity; this is one
reason why knowledge matters
and why learners need to be
taught to first try and activate prior
knowledge. Second, we need to
make sure that learning activities
don’t overburden working memory;
we need to teach strategies to
cope with demanding tasks—for example, using
diagrams, notes, and other external aids, talking
through the problem out loud, or breaking the task
down into simpler steps.
In terms of developing self-regulated learning and
metacognition, this means we need to make sure
that we don’t give too much information at the same
time (when delivering explicit instruction), and do not
expect the learner to take on too much challenge
when doing guided practice and independent work.
The use of structured planning templates,
teacher modelling, worked examples, and
breaking down activities into steps can help
achieve this.
It also means that any metacognitive teaching tasks—
like asking pupils to reflect on their learning—should be
carefully placed so as not to distract from the learning at
hand. Teachers shouldn’t expect pupils to develop new
cognitive and metacognitive skills at the same time.
“ ‘Cognitive load’
theory offers a handy
model to understand
the ‘Goldilocks
degree of challenge’:
not too hard, not too
easy, but just right.”

5
20
Promote and develop metacognitive talk in the
classroom.
Year 4 pupils had been constructing branching keys which used yes/no questions to identify animals (see example below). However,
the pupils had found this harder to do than expected, so the teacher devoted part of the next science lesson to talking about this work.
Ms Marshall: How confident do you feel about making keys? Lots of us found this hard to do last time, let’s try to work out what
was tricky about making keys.
Calvin: The questions.
Ms Marshall: What was tricky about the questions?
Calvin: Making new ones.
Amelie: Thinking of a different question each time.
Abdul: And it had to be a yes/no question.
Janiyah: And the answer might change.
Ms Marshall: How might the answer change?
Janiyah: Because it depends, sometimes the animal might live in
the water, sometimes they might go on land.
Elliott: And you can’t ask someone about their favourite, because
everyone has a different favourite.
Ms Marshall: Oh yes, so we only want the questions to have one
answer, and it has to be a yes or a no. Perhaps we need to make
a list of questions to help us get started. Questions which will
divide the animals in half each time…
After creating a class list of questions, the teacher asked the children to consider how confident they felt and then used this to
create mixed groups of three. They worked in these groups to create branching keys with post-it notes, pausing for a mini-
plenary where pupils walked around to look at others’ work. The pupils discussed the features of the questions and keys
which worked well, then returned to their own keys to improve them.
Does it have fur?
Does it have feathers?
Does it have dry or moist skin?
Does it have scales?
Yes No
Yes No
Dry Moist
Scales No scales
Metacognitive talk in a Year 4 science lesson30

21
Teachers asking challenging questions—guiding pupils
with oral feedback, prompting dialogue, and scaffolding
productive ‘exploratory’ talk where appropriate—is an
ideal way to share and develop effective learning.31
The teacher in the opening example helps pupils to
understand how to construct a branching key—the
cognitive strategies needed. She also encourages them
to discuss what they found hard, and to think in advance
about what could go wrong. All the time, she is guiding
and probing thinking, getting pupils to listen actively and
respond. It is the stuff of great teaching, but too often, if
we do not name the strategies, such expert development
of metacognitive talk can remain implicit and hidden.
Interactions with others are one way to test one’s own
metacognitive strategies and knowledge, so both
peers and teachers have a role to play here. As you
can see from the example above, classroom talk can
build knowledge and understanding. In this example,
the pupils share both their awareness of strategies
(knowledge of strategies) and of how hard they have
found the task in the past (knowledge of tasks).
A number of classroom interventions that aim to develop
the quality of classroom talk can also be effective ways
of improving and practising learners’ metacognitive
skills. As devised by Robin Alexander, ‘Dialogic
teaching’,32
for example, emphasises classroom
dialogue through which pupils learn to reason, discuss,
argue, and explain. A key element of the dialogic
approach is to encourage a higher quality of teacher
talk by going beyond the closed ‘teacher question–pupil
response–teacher feedback’ sequence. Importantly,
in this and other successful interventions, dialogue
needs to be purposeful and not just conversation, with
teachers using questions to elicit further thought.
Common teaching strategies to better organise and
structure classroom talk and dialogue include ‘Socratic
talk’, ‘talk partners’, and ‘debating’ (each strategy
having its own clear parameters and rules for responsible
dialogue). Such strategies—provided they are sufficiently
challenging, build on firm pupil subject knowledge,
are realistic, and suitably guided and supported by
the teacher—can help develop self-regulation and
metacognition. We should take care, however, not to
focus on dialogue simply as an end in itself without it
being wedded to these necessary conditions.
Types of classroom talk
Professor Robin Alexander’s most recent account of dialogic
teaching identifies six basic talk repertoires for effective teaching
and learning (talk settings, everyday talk, learning talk, teaching talk,
questioning, and extending). Use of the repertoires is guided by
five principles or criteria that highlight what is essential to make talk
engaging and cognitively productive. For example, talk should be
cumulative and purposeful.33
The most relevant repertoires for developing metacognitive skills are
learning talk and teaching talk. Learning talk includes narrating,
questioning, and discussing; teaching talk includes instruction,
exposition, and dialogue.
Alexander observes that all ‘have their place’,34
but that discussion
and dialogue are both the most potent and the least common and
therefore need to be given much greater prominence because they
are most likely to open up the ‘learning talk’ and move it beyond the
mere giving of closed answers.

6
22
Explicitly teach pupils how to organise, and effectively
manage, their learning independently
Nathan knew that to revise properly he would need a technology ‘black out’. With a little help from his father, Nathan made his
bedroom more like an office than a games room during his GCSE revision.
Each evening at seven o’clock, just after dinner, Nathan would switch off his phone and go upstairs to revise. First, he’d check
his revision plan and get out what he needed before steeling himself to do some hard work. Strategy number one was always a
quick flashcard challenge, mixing up his cards from his different subjects, before testing himself. Then Nathan would test himself
on different topics, with past questions or simply seeing what he could recall with a blank piece of paper, before ticking them off
his revision plan.
Expecting his usual lull after forty-five minutes, Nathan would grab a drink and a biscuit (or three) before getting back to his
revision. At the end of his revision session, he would end with the nightly ritual of returning to his revision plan to chalk up his
victories and losses.
The aim of the skills and approaches discussed
in the rest of this report is to develop learners that
are able to manage their learning independently.
The phrase ‘independent learning’, rather like
metacognition, is commonly used in schools, but
perhaps our understanding is
not so commonly shared. Put
simply, independent learning is
when pupils learn with a degree
of autonomy, making active
choices to manage and organise
their learning, while deploying
metacognitive strategies in the
process. The GCSE revision
undertaken by Nathan is a typical
example of independent learning.
Supporting pupils like Nathan
to self-regulate—providing them
with timely feedback and helping them to plan, monitor,
and evaluate their progress—forms the basis for
successful, independent learning.
Research emphasises the need for guided practice,
in which the teacher provides support, prompts,
and scaffolding, particularly during the initial stages
of practice. The pupil can assume more and more
responsibility as they become more proficient. To revise
effectively, pupils like Nathan need revision approaches
clearly modelled for them—vital cognitive strategies
such as using self-testing flashcards—before they gain
independent expertise.
Independent practice can play an important role in
developing self-regulation and metacognition provided
that tasks are sufficiently challenging, build on firm
pupil subject knowledge, are realistic, and are suitably
guided and supported by the teacher.
“The aim of the skills
and approaches
discussed in the rest
of this report is to
develop learners that
are able to manage
their learning
independently.”

Effective learners use a number of strategies to
help them learn well independently. According to
Zimmerman,35
these can include:
• setting specific short-term goals (for example,
Nathan executing his revision plan);
• adopting powerful strategies for attaining the goals
(Nathan’s self-testing using flashcards);
• monitoring performance for signs of progress
(Nathan monitoring his progress by answering past
questions);
• restructuring one’s physical and social context
to make it compatible with one’s goals (Nathan
changing his bedroom so it was fit for revision and
learning);
• managing time-use efficiently (Nathan giving himself
an appropriate break);
• self-evaluating one’s methods (Nathan checking his
revision plan at the end of his session); and
• attributing causation to results and adapting future
methods (Nathan checking his revision plan, ticking,
or not, appropriately before adapting his revision
plan).
Motivation and independent study
Pupils need to manage their motivation so that they are
able to stick to learning, particularly when there is no
teacher to guide independent study. An obvious truth is
that our pupils often have to make tricky choices when
learning independently, such as doing their homework
tasks over giving in to more immediate gratifications.
Of course, this requires self-control, which is itself a
metacognitive process.
Pupils therefore need to regulate their motivational
investment in learning activities, not least in light of
the fact that they are often confronted with a choice
between immediately-rewarding activities and activities
that may seem less so but that support longer term
learning goals (thus the need to ‘delay gratification’
as discussed in the previous recommendation). For
example, Nathan, as he undertakes his revision, may
likely have the urge to contact his friends by phone
rather than revise!
Our pupils need to be able to balance short term—or
proximal—goals, with longer term learning goals and
rewards—their distal goals. These are, again, not
necessarily strategies that children spontaneously
develop, so they will need to be taught. Whether this
should happen through direct instruction or other
methods, such as modelling, is debatable.
A

24
Misconception 4: You can easily teach metacognitive knowledge and strategies in discrete
‘thinking skills’ lessons
There is little evidence of the benefit of teaching metacognitive approaches in ‘learning to learn’ or ‘thinking skills’ sessions. Pupils
find it hard to transfer these generic tips to specific tasks.
Self-regulated learning and metacognition have often been found to be context-dependent, so how you best plan in Key Stage 2
art may have significant differences to planning strategies in GCSE maths. This means that a pupil who shows strong self-regulated
learning and metacognitive competence in one task or subject domain may be weak in another, and metacognitive strategies may or
may not be effective, depending on the specific task, subject, or problem tackled. This does not, however, mean that metacognitive
knowledge and skills will automatically develop through content knowledge teaching.
That being said, over time, metacognition can become more generic, and older metacognitive learners can possess an array of
strategies that they then judiciously apply across a range of contexts and to a range of tasks. This maturation also includes the
development of a growing understanding of when to use what strategies, or when good strategies may be missing in the learner’s
repertoire.
Accuracy of judgements
One issue that pupils often have with independent
learning is their accuracy of judgement. They
tend not to have very realistic views of how well they
have learned something, or which strategy has been
effective. Consequently, they can make unrealistic
‘judgements of learning’.36
Like adults, they can suffer
from the ‘planning fallacy’—
underestimating how much time
and resource will be required
to plan successfully. Improving
pupils’ judgements on learning
and the effectiveness of particular
strategies will likely require further
instruction.
Nathan, for example, revising
his GCSEs, is an effective
metacognitive learner who
is deploying a range of effective strategies. More
commonly, pupils are unaware of the benefits of certain
type of study, such as the benefit of spaced practice
(where practice is broken up into a number of short
sessions, over a longer period of time) compared to
massed practice (when individuals practise a task
continuously without rest)—more commonly known as
‘cramming’.37
Their judgements of learning can make
them feel—albeit falsely—like they are learning more
successfully when cramming.
Explicit teaching can help alleviate this issue of pupil
over-confidence. For example, one experimental study
found that direct instruction on the benefits of spaced
practice decreased underestimation, while this was
not the case for simply providing feedback.38
Teaching
tools like ‘exam wrappers’ (a post-exam student
self-evaluation feedback tool) offer teachers and pupils
a way to evaluate and analyse errors, and revision
patterns, for a given exam. This can help improve
pupils’ accuracy of judgement.
“Their judgements of
learning can make
them feel—albeit
falsely—like they
are learning more
successfully when
cramming.”

A
In a recent and extensive study on pupils’ learning,
Dunlosky et al. analysed the techniques that prove most
effective, such as ‘spaced practice’, and those regularly
undertaken by pupils with underwhelming effects, such
as rereading and highlighting.39
The value of different
techniques is summarised in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Effectiveness of ten learning techniques,from Dunlosky et al (2013) 39
Practice testing Self-testing or taking practice tests on material to be learned.
Distributed (‘spaced’) practice Implementing a schedule of practice that spreads out activities
over time.
Elaborative interrogation Generating an explanation for why an explicitly stated fact or
concept is true.
Self-explanation Explaining how new information is related to known information,
or explaining steps taken during problem solving.
Interleaved practice Implementing a schedule of practice that mixes different kinds
of problems, or a schedule of study that mixes different kinds of
material, within a single study session.
Summarization Writing summaries (of various lengths) of to-be-learned texts.
Highlighting Marking potentially important portions of to-be-learned materials
while reading.
Keyword mnemonic Using keywords and mental imagery to associate verbal materials.
Imagery use for text learning Attempting to form mental images of text materials while reading
or listening.
Rereading Restudying text material again after an initial reading.
Low
utility
Moderate
utility
High
utility

Schools should support teachers to develop their
knowledge of these approaches and expect them
to be applied appropriately.
7
There is no shortage of interesting research evidence
or advice on teaching and learning for school teachers
and leaders. Even so, it is widely accepted that
teachers often lack the time, tools, and training to
implement new strategies and to translate research
evidence into action.
Metacognition and self-regulation
are no exception to this problem.
Despite strong evidence that
they are important, there are also
many examples of interventions
designed to improve pupils’ self-
regulatory skills that have had
no impact on pupil outcomes.
Sometimes this is due to a distinct
lack of understanding of what
metacognition is; this, in turn
leads to misconceptions and often
weak implementation. As with any
changes to classroom practice and
pedagogy, teachers will need a lot of support, training,
and time to practise in order to implement them. It is
important that supporting pupils’ metacognition and
self-regulation skills isn’t seen as something ‘extra’ for
teachers to do, but an effective pedagogy that can be
used to support their normal classroom practice.
Key aspects of successful
implementation:
1. Sufficient time needs to be built in for the
implementation to work and to have an effect on
pupils. Time is needed both to train teachers and to
allow them to practise and embed the new methods.
2. High quality professional development for
teachers is key to any successful intervention. The
teachers are the people who are going to make the
difference in their classrooms, with the particular
challenge of integrating metacognition to specific
subject domains or specific phases, so the focus
should be on supporting them to do this.
3. Teachers need to be provided with high quality
tools, such as textbooks and resources, and
support, such as on-going mentoring and
coaching.
4. While what happens in the classroom is what will
ultimately make the difference to pupil learning,
support from senior leadership in the school
is key to making that happen effectively and
consistently. Senior leaders need, for example, to
support all the steps outlined above, and make
sure approaches are implemented consistently and
coherently across the school so every pupil in every
lesson gets the best possible learning environment.
Their commitment is crucial to implementation
effectiveness.
The EEF’s Putting Evidence to Work—A School’s Guide
to Implementation40
describes the implementation
journey in more detail.
Support teachers with high quality
continuous professional development
Given the challenge of developing self-regulated
learning and metacognition in pupils, it is crucial that
the key principles of effective continuing professional
development (CPD) are followed to allow teachers to
develop their knowledge.
In their overview of research on effective CPD for the
Teacher Development Trust, Cordingley et al. (2015)
identified the following key aspects:41
• sufficient time needs to be devoted to CPD,
preferably at least two terms;
• activities need to be iterative and build on how well
approaches are working in the classroom;
• CPD needs to build on teachers’ starting knowledge
and understanding, and explore—and where
necessary challenge—existing beliefs and practices;
“As with any changes
to classroom practice
and pedagogy,
teachers will need
a lot of support,
training, and time to
practise in order to
implement them.”

• CPD needs to focus firmly on pupils’ learning;
• internal input is helpful as it can challenge existing
beliefs more easily;
• external and internal facilitators need both subject
expertise and expertise on CPD delivery; and
• peer support is useful to encourage reflection and
risk-taking.
Good CPD will show teachers that development of
metacognition should not be an ‘extra’ task that adds to
their workload but is intrinsic to their teaching activities.
Assessing the impact of self-regulation
and metacognition interventions
It is widely recognised that the reliable assessment
of self-regulated learning and metacognition is
challenging. Nevertheless, assessment is crucial to
guide practice in the classroom.
The development of measures of self-regulation and
metacognition has followed changes in our knowledge
and understanding of the processes involved. Thus, as
it has become clearer that self-regulated learning and
metacognition are subject- and task-specific, generic
instruments have largely been replaced by subject- or
task-specific ones.42
Alongside typical standardised test
performance, there are more qualitative assessments
that teachers can use.
Typical assessments of metacognition that can be
used in the classroom by teachers include:
• traces—observable metacognitive strategies
used by pupils while completing a task, such as
underlining a passage or making notes;
• observation—observing learners while they are
completing a task, and estimating their use of
metacognition directly, allows teachers to take
non-verbal behaviours and social interactions into
account; recording measures like ‘time-on-task’ or
homework completion rates can also let teachers
make inferences about self-regulated learning;
• self-report questionnaires—perhaps the most
common assessment strategy is retrospective
pupil self-reporting in the
form of questionnaires
(a note of caution should
attend this method: recalling
metacognitive strategies
accurately is a difficult
challenge for learners);
• structured interviews—
though challenging to
implement, interviews can
take the form of a hypothetical
learning scenario, with pupils
asked to describe how they
would use self-regulated
learning strategies during it,
thus allowing them to access,
or not, more context-specific
strategies;43
and
• talk aloud protocols—assessments that get
pupils to express their thought processes while
doing a particular task (these self-reporting
measures, however, may be biased by pupils’
literacy and ability to articulate their thoughts).
Research indicates that assessment during task
performance appears to be more predictive and
accurate than assessment before or after task
performance.44
Teacher assessments of their pupils
appear moderately accurate.
However, each of these assessment methods have
their limitations and biases, so teachers should be
circumspect in generalising their results.
“Good CPD will
show teachers
that development
of metacognition
should not be an
‘extra’ task that adds
to their workload but
is intrinsic to their
teaching activities.”

28
REFERENCES
1. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/
evidence-summaries/early-years-toolkit/self-regulation-
strategies/
2. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/tools/
guidance-reports/
3. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/
evidence-summaries/teaching-learning-toolkit/
4. Zimmerman, B. J. (2010) ‘Becoming a Self-Regulated
Learner: An Overview’, Theory into Practice, 41 (2).
5. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J. and Graesser, A. C. (2009)
Handbook of Metacognition in Education, New York
and London: Routledge.
6. Whitebread, D. & Coltman, P. (2010) ‘Aspects of
pedagogy supporting metacognition and self-
regulation in mathematical learning of young
children: evidence from an observational study’, ZDM
Mathematics Education, 42 (2), 163-178 https://doi.
org/10.1007/s11858-009-0233-1
7. Bernard, S., Proust, J. and Clement, F. (2015)
‘Procedural Metacognition and False Belief
Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children’, PLOS One,
10 (10): e0141321. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141321
8. Clark, I. and Dumas, G. (2016) ‘The Regulation of Task
Performance: A Trans-Disciplinary Review’, Frontiers in
Psychology, 6, p. 1862.
9. Callan, G. L., Marchant, G. J., Finch, W. H. and
German, R. L. (2016) ‘Metacognition, Strategies,
Achievement, and Demographics: Relationships
Across Countries’, Educational Sciences – Theory and
Practise, 16 (5), pp. 1485–1502.
10. Pappas S., Ginsburg H. P. and Jiang M. (2003) ‘SES
differences in young children’s metacognition in the
context of mathematical problem solving’, Cognitive
Development, 18 (3), pp. 431–450.
11. https://cambridge-community.org.uk/professional-
development/gswmeta/index.html
12. Mason, L. H. (2013) ‘Teaching Students Who Struggle With
Learning to Think Before, While, and After Reading: Effects
of Self-Regulated Strategy Development Instruction’,
Reading & Writing Quarterly, 29:2, pp. 124–144.
13. Torgerson, D., Torgerson, C., Ainsworth, H., Buckley, H.,
Heaps, C., Hewitt, C. and Mitchell, N. (2014) ‘Improving
Writing Quality. Evaluation report and executive
summary’, London: Education Endowment Foundation.
14. Robinson, D. H., Katayama, A. D., Beth, A., Odom,
S., Hsieh, Y-P. and Vanderveen, A. (2010) ‘Increasing
Text Comprehension and Graphic Note Taking Using a
Partial Graphic Organizer’, The Journal of Educational
Research, 100:2, pp. 103-111, 10.3200/JOER.100.2.103-
111
15. Willingham, D. and Lovette, G. (2014) ‘Can Reading
Comprehension be taught?’, Teachers College Record.
Accessible online: http://www.danielwillingham.com/
uploads/5/0/0/7/5007325/willingham&lovette_2014_
can_reading_comprehension_be_taught_.pdf
guidance-reports/
17. Bjork, E. L. and Bjork, R. A. (2011) ‘Making things hard
on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable
difficulties to enhance learning’, in M. A. Gernsbacher,
R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough and J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),
Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating
fundamental contributions to society (2nd edition). (pp.
59-68). New York: Worth.
18. Adapted from Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson,
C., D’Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., &
Olinghouse, N. (2012). “Teaching Elementary School
Students to Be Effective Writers”: A practice guide
(NCEE 2012- 4058). Washington, DC: National Center
for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance,
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of
Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/
Docs/PracticeGuide/writing_pg_062612.pdf
19. Sweller, J. (2006) ‘The worked example effect and human
cognition’, Learning and Instruction, 16 (2), pp. 165–169.
20. Pressley, M. and Harris, K. R. (2006) ‘Cognitive
strategy instruction: from basic research to classroom
instruction’, in P. A. Alexander and P. Winne (eds),
Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd edn),
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum (pp. 265–286).
21. Bjork, E. L. and Bjork, R. A. (2011) (op. cit.).

29
22. Kornell, N. (2009) ‘Metacognition in animals and humans’,
Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18 (1).
23. Kornell, N. and Bjork, R. A. (2007) The promise and
perils of self-regulated study’, Psychonomic Bulletin and
Review, 14, p. 219.
24. Gutman, L. and Schoon, I. (2013) ‘The impact of non-
cognitive skills on outcomes for young people: Literature
review’, Education Endowment Foundation.
25. Bembenutty, H. and Karabenick, S. (2004) ‘Inherent
Association Between Academic Delay of Gratification,
Future Time Perspective, and Self-Regulated Learning’,
Educational Psychology Review, 16 (1), pp. 35–57.
26. Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B. and Raskoff Zeiss, A.
(1972) ‘Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in
delay of gratification’, Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 21 (2), pp. 204–218. doi:10.1037/
h0032198. ISSN 0022-3514. PMID 5010404.
27. Sweller, J. (1988) ‘Cognitive load during problem solving:
Effects on learning’, Cognitive Science, 12, pp. 257–285.
28. McNamara, D. S. and Scott, J. L. (2001) ‘Working
memory capacity and strategy use’, Memory and
Cognition, 29, pp. 10–17.
29. Neath, I. and Surprenant, A. M. (2003) in Taflinger M.
(ed.), Human Memory (2nd edn), Canada: Vicki Knight.
30. Adapted from the Teacher Assessment in Primary
Science (TAPS) project: https://pstt.org.uk/resources/
curriculum-materials/assessment
31. Mercer, N. & Dawes, L. (2008) The value of Exploratory
Talk. In Mercer, N. & Hodgkinson, S. (2008)
(eds) Exploring Talk in School. London: Sage.
32. Alexander, R. J. (2017) Towards Dialogic Teaching:
rethinking classroom talk (5th edn), Dialogos.
33. Alexander R. J. (2017) ‘Developing Dialogue: process,
trial, outcomes’, paper for the 17th international
conference of EARLI, Finland. http://www.
robinalexander.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/
EARLI-2017-paper-170825.pdf
34. Alexander, R. J. (2008), Essays on Pedagogy, Routledge.
35. Op. cit, Zimmerman (2010).
36. Logan J.M., Castel A.D., Haber S. & Viehman E.J.
(2012). Metacognition and the spacing effect: The role
of repetition, feedback, and instruction on judgments
of learning for massed and spaced rehearsal.
Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 175-195.
37. Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S.
H. K and Pashler, H. (2012) ‘Using Spacing to Enhance
Diverse Forms of Learning: Review of Recent Research
and Implications for Instruction’, Educational Psychology
Review, 24, pp. 369–378.
38. Logan J. M., Castel A. D., Haber S. and Viehman, E. J.
(2012) ‘Metacognition and the spacing effect: The role
of repetition, feedback, and instruction on judgments
of learning for massed and spaced rehearsal’,
Metacognition and Learning, 7 (3), pp. 175–95.
39. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J.
and Willingham, D. T. (2013) ‘Improving students’ learning
with effective learning techniques: Promising directions
from cognitive and educational psychology’, Psychological
Science in the Public Interest, 14 (1), pp. 4–58.
guidance-reports/a-schools-guide-to-implementation/
41. Cordingley, P. Higgins, S. Greany, T. Buckler, N.
Coles-Jordan, D. Crisp, B. Saunders, L. Coe, R
(2015) Developing Great Teaching—Lessons from
the international reviews into effective professional
development. Teacher Development Trust.
42. Dent, A. and Koenka, A. (2016) ‘The Relation Between
Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement
Across Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-Analysis’,
Educational Psychology Review, 28 (4), pp. 425–474.
43. Dent, A. and Koenka, A. (2016) (Op. Cit.).
44. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, H. A. M. and
Afflerbach, P. (2006) ‘Metacognition and learning:
conceptual and methodological considerations’,
Metacognition and Learning, 1 (1), pp. 3–14.

30
This guidance report was written by Alex Quigley (Huntington School), Professor Daniel Muijs (previously University of Southampton,
now at Ofsted) and Eleanor Stringer (Education Endowment Foundation). It draws on the best available evidence regarding the
development of metacognition and self-regulated learning, based on a review conducted by Professor Daniel Muijs and Dr Christian
Bokhove (University of Southampton).
The guidance report was created over three stages:
1. Scoping. The EEF consulted with a number of teachers and academics about the scope of the report. We then appointed an
advisory panel and the review team, and agreed research questions for the review.
2. Evidence review. The review team conducted searches for the best available international evidence, using a range of databases,
and a systematic methodology to classify strength of evidence.
3. Writing recommendations. The EEF worked with the advisory panel and reviewers to draft the guidance report and
recommendations. The final report was written by Alex Quigley, Professor Daniel Muijs and Eleanor Stringer, with input and
feedback from many others.
The advisory panel consisted of Kate Atkins (Rosendale School), Professor Steve Higgins (Durham University), Dr David Whitebread
(Cambridge University) and Professor Jonathan Sharples (EEF and UCL Institute of Education). We would like to thank them for the
support, challenge, and input they provided throughout the three stages.
We would like to thank the researchers and practitioners who were involved in providing support and feedback on drafts of this
guidance. These include Dylan Wiliam, Robin Alexander, Sarah Earle (Bath Spa University), Simon Cox (Blackpool Research School),
Rebecca Pentney (East Cambridgeshire and Fenland Research School), Russell Spink (Stoke-on-Trent Research School), and many
others.
HOW WAS THIS GUIDANCE COMPILED?

EEF_Metacognition_and_self-regulated_learning.pdf

5th Floor, Millbank Tower
21–24 Millbank
London
SW1P 4QP
Production and artwork by Percipio
https://percipio.london/
www.educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk
@EducEndowFoundn
Facebook.com/EducEndowFoundn

EEF_Metacognition_and_self-regulated_learning.pdf

More Related Content

Similar to EEF_Metacognition_and_self-regulated_learning.pdf (20)

More from san jaramillo (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

EEF_Metacognition_and_self-regulated_learning.pdf