Engineering design Process

Objectives:
Define engineering design
Appreciate the importance and
challenges of engineering design
Understand the need for a
formalized systematic design
process

Objectives:
Name and briefly describe the
steps for the design process
Distinguish between different
systematic design models
Discuss ethical problems and
professional codes of ethics

Engineering design
Topic Outline
1. Definition of Engineering Design
2. Importance and Challenges of
Engineering Design
3. Introduction toSystematic Design
4. Design Process
5. Professionalism and Ethics

ABET Definition:-
(Accreditation Board for Engineering and
Technology)
• The process of devising a System,
Component or Process to meet desired
needs.
• It is a decision – making process (Often
iterative), in which the basic sciences,
mathematics and engineering sciences are
applied to optimally convert resources to
meet a stated objective.
• Among the fundamental elements of the
design process is the establishment of
objectives and criteria, synthesis, analysis,
construction, testing and evaluation.
What is engineering design? (Cond…)

• ABET Definition:-
• Curriculum must include :
• Development of student creativity
• Use of open-ended problems
• Development and use of modern design theory and methodology
• Formulation of design problem statement and specification
• Production process
• Concurrent engineering design and
• Detailed system description.
• Essential to include :
• Realistic constraints such as
• Economic factors
• Safety
• Reliability
• Ethics and
• Social impact
What is engineering design? (Cond…)

Design levels
As in any field of human activity, there are
different degrees of difficulty.
In design, these stages are
• Adaptive design
• Development design
• New design

Design levels (Cond…)
Adaptive design
• In the majority of instances,
designers work will be concerned
with the adaptation of existing
design.
• Design activity of this kind demands
no special knowledge or skill, and
problems presented are easily
solved by a designer with ordinary
technical training.
• (Example :- Elevator, Washing
Machine Etc.)

Development design
• Considerably more scientific
training and design ability are
needed.
• The designer starts from a exiting
design, but final out come may
differ markedly from initial
product.
• Example :- Manual gear box in a car
to an automatic gear box, traditional
tube-based television to the modern
plasma, LCD, and LED versions Etc.

NEW DESIGN
• Only a small number of deigns are
new designs.
• This is possibly the most difficult
level in that generating a new
concept involves mastering all the
previous skills in addition to
creativity and imagination, insight,
an foresight.
• Example :- Design of the first
automobile, airplane, or even the
wheel (Long time ago)Etc. Try to think
of entirely new design over last decade

• Design is both scientific and a
creative process.
• Albert Einstein asserted that
imagination is more important
than knowledge, for knowledge is
finites whereas imagination is
infinite
• Design does not start with an
engineering drawing made on a
CAD package such as
Pro/EngineerTM or even AutoCADTM.
Importance and challenges of engineering design

• As CAD packages become more
advanced, designers are able to
start using them earlier in their
design process.
• As design is a creative process,
most of the input will have to come
from the designer.
• Design is one of the most
important steps in the
development of a product.
• Without design, there would be no
product.
• No one likes to purchase a bad idea
or design.
Importance and challenges of engineering design (Cond…)

• Consumers will not be aware or
interested in the
• Detailed technical specifications
of a product.
• How efficient the manufacturing
process
• Consumer will usually look at its
design and “how it looks” followed
by reliability, quality, and price.
• People are willing to pay more if
they see the benefits usually
reflected in the design.
• Part of the design process will be
design for minimum cost so that a
product can be competitive.

• Investing money and resources at
the early design stage yields the
biggest ROI of a product.
• Changes can be made easily at this
early stage, whereas later on,
changes in the manufacturing
methods and so on could be
extremely costly – both in time &
Money.

• Humans have been successfully
designing to satisfy the needs of
civilization.
• Recently, Designs has been driven
to meet
• An existing requirement
• To reduce a hazard or
• An inconvenience or
• To develop a new approach
• Not all that engineers build has
become successful; occasionally,
catastrophic failures occur.
Well-publicized disasters associated with engineering
systems

systems (Cond…)

systems (Cond…)
• Chernobyl nuclear power plant
• The Challenger space shuttle
• Boeing 737
• Skywalk at the Kansas City
Hyatt Regency Hotel
• Fuel tanks of Concorde
airplanes
• Columbia Space Shuttle

systems (Cond…)
The Chernobyl nuclear power plant
disaster occurred in 1996.
According to the World Health Organization
(WHO), this lead to the evacuation and
resettlement of over 336,000 people, 56
direct deaths, 4000 thyroid cancer cases
among children, and approximately 6.6
million people highly exposed to radiation.

systems (Cond…)
The Challenger space shuttle
exploded in 1986 after an O-
ring seal in its right solid-
rocket booster failed.
This caused a flame leak, which
reached the external fuel tank.
The space shuttle was destroyed
in 73 seconds after takeoff, and all
crew members died.

systems (Cond…)
The loss of the cabin roof during the
flight of a Boeing 737 in 1988 caused
one crew member to be blown out
of the airplane.
Age and the design of the aircraft, which
relied on stress to be alleviated by control
breakaway zones, were ultimately to
blame.

systems (Cond…)
A skywalk at the Kansas City Hyatt
Regency Hotel collapsed just after
the hotel was opened in 1981.
The skywalk rods were not designed to
hold the combined weights of the
walkways and the 2000 people that had
gathered on them. 200 people were
injured, and 114 were killed.

systems (Cond…)
The design layout of the fuel tanks was
the cause of the Concorde crash in 2000,
killing 113 people.
When the aircraft struck the debris on the
runway, the tire that subsequently exploded
caused a tank to rupture.
The Concorde’s airworthiness certificate was
revoked, and all Concorde airplanes remained
grounded for 15 months.
This eventually contributed to the demise of
supersonic passenger planes.

systems (Cond…)
The crash of Columbia Space Shuttle
in 2003.
Attributed to the detachment of a piece of
debris from the external tank bipod attach
region and striking the underside or leading
edge of the port wing of the Columbia.

Reason for failures in most engineering designs
1. Incorrect or overextended assumptions
2. Poor understanding of the problem to be
solved
3. Incorrect design specifications
4. Faulty manufacturing and assembly
5. Error in design calculations
6. Incomplete experimentation and
inadequate data collection
7. Errors in drawings
8. Faulty reasoning from good assumptions

Introduction to systematic design

Introduction to systematic design (Cond…)
1. Engineering students are presented with a vast amount of
theoretical material and information.
2. Realize their weakness when engineering students are faced with
the task of logically applying what they have learned to specific
end.
3. Knowledge engineering students possess is perfectly adequate as
long as their work is based on familiar models or previous deign.
4. To develop something already in existence to a more advanced
stage or to create something entirely new without a previous
design, Engineering students will fail miserably.
5. Without a set of guidelines, they are at a loss of starting point and
a clear finishing goal line.
6. Follow a systematic approach to design and guide creativity and
technical problem-solving skills to a satisfactory end.

Systematic design process
There are various forms of the systematic
design process, all revolve around the same
following the basic principles.
• Requirements
• Product concept
• Solution concept
• Embodiment design
• Detailed design
The design engineer must learn to think
independently
1. To draw conclusions and
2. To combine solutions

Systematic design process (Cond…)
Many believe that they can acquire this skill
set by attending lectures and reading
textbooks. They fail to realize that they are
only accumulating one fresh item of
knowledge after another.
Understanding, logical deduction, and
judgement cannot be conferred from outside.
They are only acquired by diligent thinking and
working with the knowledge already
possessed.
A basic precondition for independent design is a
lively imagination.

Design process
1. To design is to create a new product
that turns into profit and benefits
society.
2. Sequence of events and a set of
guidelines that helps define a Clear
starting point that takes the designer
from visualizing a product in his / her
imagination to realizing it in real life in a
systematic manner – without hindering
their creative process.

Design process (Cond…)
3. The ability to design requires both art
and science.
4. The science can be learned through a
a. systematic process,
b. experience, and
c. problem solving technique
5. The art is gained by practice and a total
dedication to become proficient.

Ways to design a device or system
(Design process (Cond…))
The design of a device or system
can be done in one of the two
ways
• Evolutionary change
• Innovation
• Invention

Ways to design a device or system (Cond…)
Evolutionary change:
• A product is allowed to evolve
over a period of time with only
slight improvement.
• This is done when there is no
competition.
• The creative capabilities of the
designer are limited.

Ways to design a device or system (Cond…)
Innovation:
• Rapid scientific growth and
technological discoveries as well
as competition among companies
for their slice of the market have
placed a great deal of emphasis on
new products, which draw heavily
on innovation.
• The creative skills and analytical
ability of the design engineer play
an important role.

1. Requirements
a) Identifying Customer Needs
b) Market Analysis
c) Defining Goals
2. Product Concept
a) Establishing Functions
b) Task Specifications

3. Solution Concept
a) Conceptualization
b) Evaluating Alternatives
4. Embodiment Design
5. Analysis and Optimization
6. Experiment
7. Marketing

Process design map chart form – I published
in 1978.

Process design map chart form – II published in
1994.

Process design map chart form – III widely regarded
as the benchmark for the modern systematic
design process

The steps demonstrated are iterative and require a series of
decisions to move the design along. More often a design
oscillates back and forth between stages until it reaches an
acceptable form and can move to the next stage.

Identifying customer needs
(Requirements)
New design can be generated from
several sources, including the
following:-
• Client request
• Modification of an existing
design
• Generation of a new product

Identifying customer needs (Cond…)
Client request:-
In a design company, a client may
submit a request for developing an
artifact.
It is often unlikely that the need will
be expressed clearly.
The client may know only the type of
product that he or she wants; for
example, “I need a safe ladder.”

Modification of an existing design:-
Often a client asks for a modification of an
existing artifact to make it simpler and easy to
use.
In addition, companies may want to provide
customers with new, easy-to-use products.
For example, in a market search you may
notice many brand names for coffee makers
and the differences among them, such as
shape, material used, cost, or special
features.

Generation of a new product:-
In all profit-oriented industries, the attention,
talent, and abilities of management,
engineering, production, inspection,
advertising, marketing, sales, and servicing
are focused on causing the product to return
profit for the company and in turn for
company stockholders.
Unfortunately, sooner or later, every product
is preempted by another or degenerates into
profitless price competition.

Generation of a new product:-
For an industry to survive in today’s world, it
must continue to grow; it cannot afford to
remain static. This growth, throughout history,
has been built on new products. New products
have a characteristic lifecycle pattern in sales
volume and profit margins.
A product will peak out when it has saturated the
market and then begin to decline. It is obvious
that an industry must seek out and promote a
flow of new product ideas. These new products
are usually protected by applying for patents.

Market analysis
(Requirements)
Designers must locate what is already available in
the market and what they have to offer.
Information gathering is a vital task. Design
engineers may consult the following sources to
determine market availability:-
• Technical and trade journals
• Abstracts
• Research reports
• Technical libraries
• Catalog of component suppliers
• Patent Office
• The Internet

Defining goals
(Requirements)
• In this stage of the design process, the
designer defines what must be done to
resolve the need(s).
• The definition is a general statement of
the desired end product.
• Many of the difficulties encountered in
design may be traced to poorly stated
goals, or goals that were hastily written
and resulted in confusion or too much
flexibility.
• In almost all cases, the client request
comes in a vague verbal statement such
as, “I need an aluminum can crusher.” or “I
need a safe ladder.”

Defining goals (Cond…)
(Requirements)
• Designers must recognize that customer
needs are not the same as product
specifications.
• Needs should be expressed in functional
terms. Customers will offer solutions;
designers must determine the real needs,
define the problem, and act accordingly.
• During the customer interview, the
designer must listen carefully to what the
customer has to say.
• The designer’s function is to clarify the
client’s design requirements.
• An objective tree may be constructed for
clarification.

Establishing functions
(Product Concept)
• Recognizing the generality of the need
statement and where the problem/need
stands in the whole system is a
fundamental element in the design
process.
• It is useful to consider the level at which
the designer is asked to work.
• It is also useful to identify the functions
instead of the potential solutions.
• Often the functions will be divided into
subfunctions, and they will define the
requirements of the artifact.

Task specifications
(Product Concept)
• This stage requires the designer to list all
pertinent data and parameters that tend
to control the design and guide it towards
the desired goal.
• It also sets limits on the acceptable
solutions.
• It should not be defined too narrowly,
because the designer will eliminate
acceptable solutions.
• However, it cannot be too broad or vague,
because this will leave the designer with no
direction to satisfy the design goal.

Conceptualization
(Solution Concept)
• The process of generating alternative
solutions to the stated goal in the form of
concepts requires creative ability.
• The conceptualization starts with
generating new ideas. In this stage, the
designer must review the market analysis
and the task specifications as he or she
engages in the process of innovation and
creativity.
• This activity usually requires free-hand
sketches for producing a series of
alternative solutions.

Evaluating alternatives
(Solution Concept)
• The alternatives do not need to be worked
out in detail but are recorded as
possibilities to be tested.
• Alternatives to perform the functions
should be listed in an organized fashion.
• Once a number of concepts have been
generated in sufficient detail, a decision
must be made
• about which one or ones will
enter the next,
• most expensive,
• stages of the design process.

Evaluating alternatives
(Solution Concept)
• An excellent technique to guide the
designer in making the best decision
regarding these alternatives is a scoring
matrix, which forces a more penetrating
study of each alternative against
specified criteria.

Embodiment design
• This is where the product that is being
designed begins to take shape.
• This stage does not include any details
yet (no dimensions or tolerances, etc.)
but will begin to illustrate
• a clear definition of a part,
• how it will look, and
• how it interfaces with the rest of
the parts in the product assembly.

Analysis and optimization
• Once a possible solution for the stated goal
has been chosen, the synthesis phase of
the design has been completed and the
analysis phase begins.
• This is also known as ‘Detailed Design’ and
is what most of the engineering courses in
an undergraduate degree program cover.
• In essence, the solution must be tested
against the physical laws.
• The manufacturability of the chosen
product also must be checked to ensure its
usefulness.

Analysis and optimization
• A product may satisfy the physical laws,
but if it cannot be manufactured, it is a
useless product.
• This stage is put in iterative sequencing
with the original synthesis phase.

Experiment
• The experiment stage in engineering
design requires that a piece of hardware is
constructed and tested to verify the
concept and analysis of the design as to
its work ability, durability, and
performance characteristics.
• Here the design on paper is transformed
into a physical reality.
• Three techniques of construction are
available to the designer:
• Mock-up
• Model
• Prototype

Experiment
(Mock-up)
Mock-up:
a. The mock-up is generally constructed to
scale from plastics, wood, cardboard,
and so forth.
b. The mock-up is often used to check
clearance, assembly technique,
manufacturing considerations, and
appearance.
c. It is the least expensive technique,
provides the least amount of information,
and is quick and relatively easy to build.

Experiment
(Model)
Model:
This is a representation of the physical system
through a mathematical
similitude. Four types of models are used to
predict behavior of the real
system:
a. A true model is an exact geometric
reproduction of the real system, built to
scale, and satisfying all restrictions
imposed in the design parameters.
b. An adequate model is so constructed to
test specific characteristics of the design.

Experiment
(Model)
Model:
c. A distorted model purposely violates one
or more design conditions. This violation
is often required when it is difficult to
satisfy the specified conditions.
d. Dissimilar models bear no apparent
resemblance to the real system, but
through appropriate analogies, they
give accurate information on behavioral
characteristics.

Experiment
(Prototype)
Prototype:
• This is the most expensive experimental
technique and the one producing the
greatest amount of useful information.
• The prototype is the constructed, full-
scale working physical system. Here the
designer sees his or her idea come to life
and learns about such things as
appropriate construction techniques,
assembly procedures, work ability,
durability, and performance under actual
environmental conditions.

Marketing
• This stage requires specific information
that defines the device, system, or
process.
• Here the designer is required to put his or
her thoughts regarding the design on
paper for the purpose of communication
with others.
• Communication is involved in selling the
idea to management or the client,
directing the shop on how to construct
the design, and serving management in
the initial stages of commercialization.
• Report
• Flyer

Professional engineer
• Professionalism is a way of life.
• A professional person is one who
engages in an activity that requires a
specialized and comprehensive
education and is motivated by a
strong desire to serve humanity.
• The work of engineers generally
affects the day-to-day life of all
humans.
• Developing a professional frame of
mind begins with your engineering
education.

Professional engineer
• Being a professional should imply
that in addition to providing the
specialized work that is expected of
him/her, the professional engineer
should provide such services with
honesty, integrity, and morality.

NSPE code of ethics
• National Society of Professional Engineers
(NSPE)
• Engineers uphold and advance the integrity,
honor, and dignity of the engineering
profession by
• Using their knowledge and skill for
the enhancement of human
welfare.
• Being honest and impartial, and
serving with fidelity the public, their
employers and clients.
• Striving to increase the competence
and prestige of the engineering
profession.

NSPE Code of Ethics
The NSPE Code of Ethics is divided into three
main sections:
1. The Fundamental Canons: These are the
main issues that govern a professional
engineer from an ethical and professional
standing.
2. Rules of Practice: This section discusses the
first five points of the fundamental canons in
more detail.
3. Professional Obligations: This section
discusses the last point of the fundamental
canons in more detail and is focused towards
professional conduct from a legal, ethical
and societical viewpoint.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(The Fundamental Canons)
The Fundamental Canons:
1. Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public.
2. Perform services only in areas of their competence.
3. Issue public statements only in an objective and truthful manner.
4. Act for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees.
5. Avoid deceptive acts.
6. Conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, ethically, and
lawfully so as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of
the profession.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Rules of Practice)
1. Engineers shall hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the
public.
a. If engineers’ judgment is overruled under circumstances that
endanger life or property, they shall notify their employer or client
and such other authority as may be appropriate.
b. Engineers shall approve only those engineering documents that are
in conformity with applicable standards.
c. Engineers shall not reveal facts, data, or information without the
prior consent of the client or employer except as authorized or
required by law or this Code.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Rules of Practice)
d. Engineers shall not permit the use of their name or associate in
business ventures with any person or firm that they believe is
engaged in fraudulent or dishonest enterprise.
e. Engineers shall not aid or abet the unlawful practice of engineering by
a person or firm.
f. Engineers having knowledge of any alleged violation of this Code shall
report thereon to appropriate professional bodies and, when relevant,
also to public authorities, and cooperate with the proper authorities in
furnishing such information or assistance as may be required.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Rules of Practice)
2. Engineers shall perform services only in the areas of their competence.
a. Engineers shall undertake assignments only when qualified by
education or experience in the specific technical fields involved.
b. Engineers shall not affix their signatures to any plans or documents
dealing with subject matter in which they lack competence, nor to
any plan or document not prepared under their direction and control.
c. Engineers may accept assignments and assume responsibility for
coordination of an entire project and sign and seal the engineering
documents for the entire project, provided that each technical
segment is signed and sealed only by the qualified engineers who
prepared the segment.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Rules of Practice)
3. Engineers shall issue public statements only in an objective and
truthful manner.
a. Engineers shall be objective and truthful in professional reports,
statements, or testimony. They shall include all relevant and
pertinent information in such reports, statements, or testimony,
which should bear the date indicating when it was current.
b. Engineers may express publicly technical opinions that are
founded upon knowledge of the facts and competence in the
subject matter.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Rules of Practice)
c. Engineers shall issue no statements, criticisms, or arguments on
technical matters that are inspired or paid for by interested
parties, unless they have prefaced their comments by explicitly
identifying the interested parties on whose behalf they are
speaking, and by revealing the existence of any interest the
engineers may have in the matters.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Rules of Practice)
4. Engineers shall act for each employer or client as faithful agents
or trustees.
a. Engineers shall disclose all known or potential conflicts of
interest that could influence or appear to influence their
judgment or the quality of their services.
b. Engineers shall not accept compensation, financial or
otherwise, from more than one party for services on the same
project, or for services pertaining to the same project, unless the
circumstances are fully disclosed and agreed to by all interested
parties.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Rules of Practice)
c. Engineers shall not solicit or accept financial or other valuable
consideration, directly or indirectly, from outside agents in
connection with the work for which they are responsible.
d. Engineers in public service as members, advisors, or employees of
a governmental or quasi-governmental body or department shall
not participate in decisions with respect to services solicited or
provided by them or their organizations in private or public
engineering practice.
e. Engineers shall not solicit or accept a contract from a
governmental body on which a principal or officer of their
organization serves as a member.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Rules of Practice)
5. Engineers shall avoid deceptive acts.
a. Engineers shall not falsify their qualifications or permit
misrepresentation of their or their associates’ qualifications.
They shall not misrepresent or exaggerate their responsibility
in or for the subject matter of prior assignments. Brochures or
other presentations incident to the solicitation of employment
shall not misrepresent pertinent facts concerning employers,
employees, associates, joint venturers, or past
accomplishments.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Rules of Practice)
b. Engineers shall not offer, give, solicit, or receive, either directly
or indirectly, any contribution to influence the award of a
contract by public authority, or which may be reasonably
construed by the public as having the effect or intent of
influencing the awarding of a contract. They shall not offer any
gift or other valuable consideration in order to secure work.
They shall not pay a commission, percentage, or brokerage fee
in order to secure work, except to a bona fide employee or bona
fide established commercial or marketing agencies retained by
them.

NSPE Code of Ethics
(Professional Obligations)
1. Engineers shall be guided in all their relations by the highest
standards of honesty and integrity.
2. Engineers shall at all times strive to serve the public interest.
3. Engineers shall avoid all conduct or practice that deceives the
public.
4. Engineers shall not disclose, without consent, confidential
information concerning the business affairs or technical processes
of any present or former client, employer, or public body on which
they serve.
5. Engineers shall not be influenced in their professional duties by
conflicting interests.

NSPE Code of Ethics
6. Engineers shall not attempt to obtain employment or
advancement or professional engagements by untruthfully
criticizing other engineers, or by other improper or questionable
methods.
7. Engineers shall not attempt to injure, maliciously or falsely,
directly or indirectly, the professional reputation, prospects,
practice, or employment of other engineers. Engineers who
believe others are guilty of unethical or illegal practice shall present
such information to the proper authority for action.

NSPE Code of Ethics
8. Engineers shall accept personal responsibility for their professional
activities, provided, however, that engineers may seek
indemnification for services arising out of their practice for other
than gross negligence, where the engineer’s interests cannot
otherwise be protected.
9. Engineers shall give credit for engineering work to those to whom
credit is due and will recognize the proprietary interests of others.

Final thoughts
Engineers, perhaps, more than any
other single occupation, are
responsible for the artifacts of the
modern world in which many of us live.
In order to be good engineers,
we not only must be
technically competent, but we must als
o understand how to evaluate the moral
implications of our designs.

Selected Bibliography
AMBROSE, S. A. and AMON, C. H. “Systematic Design of a First-Year Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie
Mellon University.” Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 173–181, 1997.
BUCCIARELLI, L. L. Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
BURGER, C. P. “Excellence in Product Development through Innovative Engineering Design.” Engineering
Productivity andValveTechnology, pp. 1–4, 1995.
BURGHARDT, M. D. Introduction to Engineering Design and Problem Solving. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
CROSS, N. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. NewYork:Wiley, 1994.
CROSS, N., CHRISTIAN, H., and DORST, K. Analysing Design Activity. NewYork:Wiley, 1996.
DHILLON, B. S. Engineering Design: A Modern Approach.Toronto: Irwin, 1995.
DIETER, G. Engineering Design. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1983.
DYM, C. L. Engineering Design: A Synthesis ofViews.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
EEKELS, J., and ROOZNBURG, N. F. M. “A Methodological Comparison of Structures of Scientific Research and
Engineering Design:Their Similarities and Differences.” Design Studies,Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 197–203, 1991.
FLEDDERMANN,C. B. Engineering Ethics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
HENSEL, E. “A Multi-Faceted Design Process for Multi-Disciplinary Capstone Design Projects.” Proceedings of the
2001 AmericanSociety for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, 2001.
HILL, P. H. The Science of Engineering Design. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1983.
HORENSTEIN, M. N. Design Concepts for Engineers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.
JOHNSON, R. C. Mechanical Design Synthesis. Huntington, NY: Krieger, 1978.
JANSSON, D. G., CONDOOR, S. S., and BROCK, H. R. “Cognition in Design: Viewing the Hidden Side of the
Design Process.” Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design,Vol. 19, pp. 257–271, 1993.

Selected Bibliography
KARUPPOOR, S. S., BURGER, C. P., and CHONA, R. “A Way of Doing Design.” Proceedings of the 2001 American
Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, NM, 2001.
KELLEY D. S., NEWCOMER, J. L., and MCKELL, E. K. “The Design Process, Ideation and Computer- Aided
Design.” Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition,
Albuquerque, NM, 2001.
PAHL, G., and BEITZ,W. Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. NewYork: Springer-Verlag, 1996.
PUGH, S. Total Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1990.
RAY, M. S. Elements of Engineering Design. EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1985.
RADCLIFFE, D. F., and LEE, T. Y. “Design Methods used by Undergraduate Students,” Design Studies, Vol. 10, No.
4, pp. 199–207, 1989.
ROSS, S. S. Construction Disasters: Design Failures,Causes and Preventions. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1984, pp. 303–
329.
SICKAFUS, E. N. UnifiedStructured InventiveThinking. NewYork: Ntelleck, 1997.
SIDDALL, J. N. “Mechanical Design.” ASMETransactions:Journal of Mechanical Design,Vol. 101, pp. 674–681, 1979.
SUH, N. P. The Principles of Design. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1990.
ULMAN, D. G. The Mechanical Design Process. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1992.
ULRICH, K.T. and EPPINGER, S. D. Product Design and Development. NewYork: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
VIDOSIC, J. P. Elements of Engineering Design. NewYork:The Ronald Press Co., 1969.
WALTON, J. Engineering Design: From Art to Practice. NewYork:West PublishingCompany, 1991.
WATSON, S. R. “Civil Engineering History GivesValuable Lessons.” Civil Engineering, pp. 48–51, 1975.
WHITEBECK, C. http://web.mit.edu/ethics/www/essays/probcase.html.

Engineering design Process

More Related Content

What's hot(20)

Viewers also liked(14)

Similar to Engineering design Process(20)

More from Velmurugan Sivaraman(10)

Recently uploaded(20)

Engineering design Process