A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye / International Journal of Engineering
          Research and Applications (IJERA)      ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                      Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391
        Performance Evaluation Of Recycled Aggregate Used In
                             Concrete
            *A.N.Dabhade ,**Dr.S.R.Choudhari, ***Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye
           *(Asst.Prof.K.I.T.S. Ramtek)**(Principal of VNIET, Nagpur)***(Prof. Y.C.C.E.,Nagpur)



ABSTRACT
         This research presents a review of             and to reduce the volume changes resulting from the
literature on recycling and reuse of waste              settling and hardening process.
concrete aggregate. As the raw materials                          Recycling is the act of processing the used
obtained from the demolition activity takes place       material for use in creating new product. The usage
such as, building roads, bridges, and fly over,         of natural aggregate is getting more intense with the
subway, remolding cylinder and block etc.               advanced development in infrastructure area. In
Dumping of raw material has become a problem            order to reduce the usage of natural aggregate,
for many countries. Construction industry in            recycled aggregate can be used as the replacement
India generate around 10-20 million tones of            material. Recycled aggregate comprised of crushed,
waste annually. This technique is still not use in      graded inorganic particle processed from the
India. In this paper the literature related to the      materials that have been used in the construction
recycling and reuse of waste concrete aggregate         and demolition wastes. These materials are from
is presented and conventional coarse recycled           building, roads, bridges etc.
aggregate is being replaced with recycled
aggregate.                                              Many researchers have come a crossed many
         The investigation was carried out using        benefits and barriers. Barriers like in some countries
workability test, compressive test, split tensile       it is considered that low economic cost of natural
test and bulk density, water absorption, impact         aggregate than that of recycled aggregate, non-
value test, crushing value test, Fineness modulus.      regular supply of waste. Benefits are like reduction
There were total of sixth batches of concrete           in transportation cost, wastes generally present near
mixes, consists of every 20% increment of               the construction site, and it increased the demand of
recycled aggregate replacement from 0% to               eco-friendly products and reuse of materials.
100%.Moreover, 100% of recycled aggregate mix                    The objective of the research is to recycle
batches included, different water/cement ratio of       and reuse the large amount of waste generated from
0.5,0.6 and 0.7. The workability of concrete            construction and demolition due to increase in
considerably reduced as the amount of recycled          population and urbanization or natural disaster.
aggregate increased. For the strength           of      These wastes constitute a major portion of total
characteristics, the results showed that a              solid waste production in the world, and most of it is
gradually increasing in the compressive strength        used in the landfills. Due to the shortage of dumping
up to 20% of recycled aggregate and as well as          sites and increase in cost of transport, majority of
for the tensile strength as the percentage of           developed/developing countries are facing problems
recycled aggregate.                                     in handling and disposal of such wastes. By
                                                        considering all the aspect, it is beneficial to reuse
Keywords: Compressive strength , Natural                the generated waste for effective utilization and to
aggregate, Recycled coarse aggregate, Split tensile     save environment.
strength                                                         In India very less progress in research on
                                                        the reuse and recycling of construction and
INTRODUCTION                                            demolition waste has been made. This may be due
          The Concrete Consist of Cement, Sand and      to lack of awareness and standard on recycle and
Course and Fine Aggregate. Their proportion in the      reuse of recycled aggregate in the construction
concrete is based on grade of concrete. Cement has      industry. Hence this research will carry out a
two main functions, to fill voids between aggregate     systematic study of recycling the construction and
particles and water tightness and to give Strength to   demolition waste by conducting the various
hardened concrete. The aggregate which comprises        experiments.
of 70 to 80 % of volume of concrete has Three main
functions are to provide a cheap filler, to provide a   EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME
mass of particles for resisting the action of applied   . Cement: Ordinary Portland cement of 53 grade
loads                                                   conforming to IS-1489(pare 1)-1991.All the test are
                                                        conducted as per IS 8112-1989 and result as shown.



                                                                                            1387 | P a g e
A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye / International Journal of Engineering
          Research and Applications (IJERA)      ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                      Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391
                                                   Test on cement
                              Characters              Experimental                 As per IS :
                                                         values                    8112-1989
                           Consistency of                    33.0%                        _
                               Cement
                           Specific gravity                  2.84                       3.15
                            Initial setting              125 mins                     >30 mins
                                 time
                             Final setting               300 mins                  <600 mins
                                 time
                              Fineness of                     1%                      < 10 %
                                cement
          Fine aggregate: River sand locally available in nearby area.
          Coarse aggregate: Machine crushed granite obtained from quarry was used as a coarse aggregate
          Recycled aggregate: It is obtained from demolition of concrete.
                 Property of aggregate            Experimental          Experimental              Experimental
                                                  value of Fine        value of Natural             value of
                                                   Aggregate              aggregate                Recycled
                                                                                                   aggregate
                   Specific gravity                   2.22%                 3.47                      2.77

                 Bulk Density kg/m3                 1470kg/m³              1448kg/m³              1370kg/m3

                  Fineness modulus                     3.70                    6.24                   5.55

                   Water absorption                     5%                    2.4%                   4.3%

                  Imapact value test                     -                   16.66%                 26.66%

                  Crushing value test                    -                   12.50%                  25.6%


RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
         From the study of test result it was found that 40% of recycled aggregate can be effectively used in
conventional coarse aggregate for making the M20 grade concrete for 0.5 water cement ratio and 20%
replacement is efficient for 0.6 and 0.7 water cement ratio. It is observed that in all the tests, strength of concrete
is gradually decreased as percentage of recycled aggregate increased. The comparison of 7 days and 28 days
compressive as well as split tensile strength for various water cement ratio is shown below.
                                 Compressive strength and Split tensile strength
                                                    For 0.5 W/C
    Sr. no.    Specimen designation
                                            Compressive strength       Split Tensile strength
                                                  (N/mm2)                    (N/mm2)
                                              7days           28days       7days        28 days
      1                  CM                   16.63           27.67        1.92           3.24
      2                 CM20                  17.22           26.53        1.88           3.073
      3                 CM40                  17.66           26.82        1.84           2.82
      4                 CM60                  17.31           25.92        1.71           2.73
      5                 CM80                  17.30           25.57        1.42           2.23
      6                CM100                  14.23           23.73        1.22           2.09



                                                                                                      1388 | P a g e
A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye / International Journal of Engineering
       Research and Applications (IJERA)      ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                   Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391




                     Comparative graph for 7 and 28 days at 0.5 W/C.



                      Compressive strength and Split Tensile strength
                                      For 0.6 W/C
 Sr. no.      Specimen designation

                                           Compressive strength         Split tensile strength
                                               (N/mm2)                        (N/mm2)

                                           7days        28days          7days         28 days


   1                  CM                   19.41         28.53          1.86            3.19


   2                 CM20                  17.70         27.41          1.84            3.01


   3                 CM40                  17.31         26.20          1.75            2.73


   4                 CM60                  16.73         25.00          1.69            2.67


   5                 CM80                  16.95         24.62          1.59            2.13


   6                CM100                  14.00         23.88          1.51            2.02




                                                                                   1389 | P a g e
A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye / International Journal of Engineering
       Research and Applications (IJERA)      ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                   Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391




                     Comparative graph for 7 and 28 days at 0.6 W/C.

                Comparison of Compressive strength and plit tensile strength
                                     For 0.7 W/C
 Sr. no.      Specimen designation

                                           Compressive strength        Spilt tensile strength
                                               (N/mm2)                       (N/mm2)

                                           7days        28days         7days         28 days


   1                  CM                   19.18         27.89         1.83            3.09


   2                 CM20                  18.89         27.12         1.76            2.83


   3                 CM40                  17.33         26.09         1.70            2.56


   4                 CM60                  17.03         25.01         1.64            2.40


   5                 CM80                  16.20         23.12         1.61            2.15


   6                CM100                  12.98         21.32         1.56            1.98




                                                                                  1390 | P a g e
A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye / International Journal of Engineering
          Research and Applications (IJERA)      ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com
                      Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391




                               Comparative graph for 7 and 28 days at 0.7 W/C.

CONCLUSION                                                 REFERENCES
          The various experiments on the concrete           1.  Cervantes V., Dr. Roesler J., Bordelon A.,
have been performed. From the experiments it was                (2007), ‘Fracture and Drying Shrinkage
found that the replacement of 100% NA by RCA can                Properties of Concrete Containing Recycled
be possible. The replacement of aggregate was                   Concrete Aggregate’, Technical Note no: 34,
carried out by 0, 20,40,60,80 and 100%. The different           1-23.
ratios of the water-cement ratio were used.                 2. Etxeberria M., Vazquez E., Mari A., Barra M.,
Significant potential is required for growth of                 Hendriks Ch. F., Maasakkers M.H.J. van,
recycled aggregate. It’s a ‘green’ solution for                 (2001), ‘the role and influence of recycled
anticipated world. From the various experiments and             aggregate, in “recycled aggregate concrete’, 1-
results the following conclusion were made.                     10.
                                                            3. Evangelista Luís R., de Brito Jorge C., (2005),
  1.   It is found that as the natural aggregate replace        ‘Criteria for the Use of Fine Recycled
       the strength of the concrete decreases.                  Concrete Aggregates in Concrete Production’,
  2.   Natural resources are not unlimited. There is a          1-8.
       global need to protect our environment and           4. Fernando Martínez , Belén González ,(2005),
       preserve our scarce natural resources for next           ‘Shear Strength Of Concrete With Recycled
       generations. Recycling of Construction &                 Aggregates, national conference, 1-10.
       Demolition materials can help reserve our            5. Fong, Winston F.K., Yeung Mr. Jaime S.K.,
       public fill capacity and precious landfill space.        (2002), ‘Production and application of
  3.   It can also help reduce the need for quarrying           recycled aggregate’, 1-12.
       and damage to our natural landscape.                 6. Fong, Ir Winston F.K., Jaime S. K. Yeung,
  4.   The replacement of more water is required as             Poon C. S., (2002), ‘Hong Kong Experience
       compare to that of the natural aggregate, for            Of     Using     RecycledAggregates      From
       which the admixture has to be used.                      Construction And Demolition Materials In
            5. Usage of recycled aggregates can not             Ready Mix Concrete’, International Workshop
       only preserve the finite raw materials, but              on Sustainable Development and Concrete
                Also reduce energy consumption and              Technology, 267-275.
       overall construction costs.                          7. Gupta S. M., Setiea B., (1988), ‘Concrete
       6. Use of the waste aggregate in the new                 Aggregate from Demolition Waste’, Thesis,
       concrete as the recycled concrete aggregate              208-216.
       reduces the environmental pollution as well as       8. Gutierrez, Pilar Alaejos, Jaun, Marta Sanchez
       providing an economic value for               the        de, (2001), ‘Utilization of recycled concrete
       waste material.                                          aggregate for structural concrete’ National
  7.   The higher water/cement ratios, the                      Programme of Construction and Demolition
       compressive strength of recycled concrete is             Waste, 1-11.
       similar to that of normal concrete. At lower         9. Gambhir M.L., (1996), Second edition,
       water/cement ratios, the compressive strength            ‘Concrete technology’, 161-166.
       of recycled concrete is much lower than that of      10. Hasbi Yaprak, Huseyin Yılmaz Aruntas,
       normal concrete.                                         Ilhami Demir, Osman Simsek and Gokhan
                                                                Durmus, (2011) Vol.6, ‘Effects of the fine
                                                                recycled concrete aggregates on the concrete
                                                                properties’, International Journal of the
                                                                Physical Sciences, 2455-2461.



                                                                                             1391 | P a g e

Hw2413871391

  • 1.
    A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye/ International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391 Performance Evaluation Of Recycled Aggregate Used In Concrete *A.N.Dabhade ,**Dr.S.R.Choudhari, ***Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye *(Asst.Prof.K.I.T.S. Ramtek)**(Principal of VNIET, Nagpur)***(Prof. Y.C.C.E.,Nagpur) ABSTRACT This research presents a review of and to reduce the volume changes resulting from the literature on recycling and reuse of waste settling and hardening process. concrete aggregate. As the raw materials Recycling is the act of processing the used obtained from the demolition activity takes place material for use in creating new product. The usage such as, building roads, bridges, and fly over, of natural aggregate is getting more intense with the subway, remolding cylinder and block etc. advanced development in infrastructure area. In Dumping of raw material has become a problem order to reduce the usage of natural aggregate, for many countries. Construction industry in recycled aggregate can be used as the replacement India generate around 10-20 million tones of material. Recycled aggregate comprised of crushed, waste annually. This technique is still not use in graded inorganic particle processed from the India. In this paper the literature related to the materials that have been used in the construction recycling and reuse of waste concrete aggregate and demolition wastes. These materials are from is presented and conventional coarse recycled building, roads, bridges etc. aggregate is being replaced with recycled aggregate. Many researchers have come a crossed many The investigation was carried out using benefits and barriers. Barriers like in some countries workability test, compressive test, split tensile it is considered that low economic cost of natural test and bulk density, water absorption, impact aggregate than that of recycled aggregate, non- value test, crushing value test, Fineness modulus. regular supply of waste. Benefits are like reduction There were total of sixth batches of concrete in transportation cost, wastes generally present near mixes, consists of every 20% increment of the construction site, and it increased the demand of recycled aggregate replacement from 0% to eco-friendly products and reuse of materials. 100%.Moreover, 100% of recycled aggregate mix The objective of the research is to recycle batches included, different water/cement ratio of and reuse the large amount of waste generated from 0.5,0.6 and 0.7. The workability of concrete construction and demolition due to increase in considerably reduced as the amount of recycled population and urbanization or natural disaster. aggregate increased. For the strength of These wastes constitute a major portion of total characteristics, the results showed that a solid waste production in the world, and most of it is gradually increasing in the compressive strength used in the landfills. Due to the shortage of dumping up to 20% of recycled aggregate and as well as sites and increase in cost of transport, majority of for the tensile strength as the percentage of developed/developing countries are facing problems recycled aggregate. in handling and disposal of such wastes. By considering all the aspect, it is beneficial to reuse Keywords: Compressive strength , Natural the generated waste for effective utilization and to aggregate, Recycled coarse aggregate, Split tensile save environment. strength In India very less progress in research on the reuse and recycling of construction and INTRODUCTION demolition waste has been made. This may be due The Concrete Consist of Cement, Sand and to lack of awareness and standard on recycle and Course and Fine Aggregate. Their proportion in the reuse of recycled aggregate in the construction concrete is based on grade of concrete. Cement has industry. Hence this research will carry out a two main functions, to fill voids between aggregate systematic study of recycling the construction and particles and water tightness and to give Strength to demolition waste by conducting the various hardened concrete. The aggregate which comprises experiments. of 70 to 80 % of volume of concrete has Three main functions are to provide a cheap filler, to provide a EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME mass of particles for resisting the action of applied . Cement: Ordinary Portland cement of 53 grade loads conforming to IS-1489(pare 1)-1991.All the test are conducted as per IS 8112-1989 and result as shown. 1387 | P a g e
  • 2.
    A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye/ International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391 Test on cement Characters Experimental As per IS : values 8112-1989 Consistency of 33.0% _ Cement Specific gravity 2.84 3.15 Initial setting 125 mins >30 mins time Final setting 300 mins <600 mins time Fineness of 1% < 10 % cement Fine aggregate: River sand locally available in nearby area. Coarse aggregate: Machine crushed granite obtained from quarry was used as a coarse aggregate Recycled aggregate: It is obtained from demolition of concrete. Property of aggregate Experimental Experimental Experimental value of Fine value of Natural value of Aggregate aggregate Recycled aggregate Specific gravity 2.22% 3.47 2.77 Bulk Density kg/m3 1470kg/m³ 1448kg/m³ 1370kg/m3 Fineness modulus 3.70 6.24 5.55 Water absorption 5% 2.4% 4.3% Imapact value test - 16.66% 26.66% Crushing value test - 12.50% 25.6% RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS From the study of test result it was found that 40% of recycled aggregate can be effectively used in conventional coarse aggregate for making the M20 grade concrete for 0.5 water cement ratio and 20% replacement is efficient for 0.6 and 0.7 water cement ratio. It is observed that in all the tests, strength of concrete is gradually decreased as percentage of recycled aggregate increased. The comparison of 7 days and 28 days compressive as well as split tensile strength for various water cement ratio is shown below. Compressive strength and Split tensile strength For 0.5 W/C Sr. no. Specimen designation Compressive strength Split Tensile strength (N/mm2) (N/mm2) 7days 28days 7days 28 days 1 CM 16.63 27.67 1.92 3.24 2 CM20 17.22 26.53 1.88 3.073 3 CM40 17.66 26.82 1.84 2.82 4 CM60 17.31 25.92 1.71 2.73 5 CM80 17.30 25.57 1.42 2.23 6 CM100 14.23 23.73 1.22 2.09 1388 | P a g e
  • 3.
    A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye/ International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391 Comparative graph for 7 and 28 days at 0.5 W/C. Compressive strength and Split Tensile strength For 0.6 W/C Sr. no. Specimen designation Compressive strength Split tensile strength (N/mm2) (N/mm2) 7days 28days 7days 28 days 1 CM 19.41 28.53 1.86 3.19 2 CM20 17.70 27.41 1.84 3.01 3 CM40 17.31 26.20 1.75 2.73 4 CM60 16.73 25.00 1.69 2.67 5 CM80 16.95 24.62 1.59 2.13 6 CM100 14.00 23.88 1.51 2.02 1389 | P a g e
  • 4.
    A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye/ International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391 Comparative graph for 7 and 28 days at 0.6 W/C. Comparison of Compressive strength and plit tensile strength For 0.7 W/C Sr. no. Specimen designation Compressive strength Spilt tensile strength (N/mm2) (N/mm2) 7days 28days 7days 28 days 1 CM 19.18 27.89 1.83 3.09 2 CM20 18.89 27.12 1.76 2.83 3 CM40 17.33 26.09 1.70 2.56 4 CM60 17.03 25.01 1.64 2.40 5 CM80 16.20 23.12 1.61 2.15 6 CM100 12.98 21.32 1.56 1.98 1390 | P a g e
  • 5.
    A.N.Dabhade, Dr.S.R.Choudhari, Dr.A.R.Gajbhiye/ International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622 www.ijera.com Vol. 2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.1387-1391 Comparative graph for 7 and 28 days at 0.7 W/C. CONCLUSION REFERENCES The various experiments on the concrete 1. Cervantes V., Dr. Roesler J., Bordelon A., have been performed. From the experiments it was (2007), ‘Fracture and Drying Shrinkage found that the replacement of 100% NA by RCA can Properties of Concrete Containing Recycled be possible. The replacement of aggregate was Concrete Aggregate’, Technical Note no: 34, carried out by 0, 20,40,60,80 and 100%. The different 1-23. ratios of the water-cement ratio were used. 2. Etxeberria M., Vazquez E., Mari A., Barra M., Significant potential is required for growth of Hendriks Ch. F., Maasakkers M.H.J. van, recycled aggregate. It’s a ‘green’ solution for (2001), ‘the role and influence of recycled anticipated world. From the various experiments and aggregate, in “recycled aggregate concrete’, 1- results the following conclusion were made. 10. 3. Evangelista Luís R., de Brito Jorge C., (2005), 1. It is found that as the natural aggregate replace ‘Criteria for the Use of Fine Recycled the strength of the concrete decreases. Concrete Aggregates in Concrete Production’, 2. Natural resources are not unlimited. There is a 1-8. global need to protect our environment and 4. Fernando Martínez , Belén González ,(2005), preserve our scarce natural resources for next ‘Shear Strength Of Concrete With Recycled generations. Recycling of Construction & Aggregates, national conference, 1-10. Demolition materials can help reserve our 5. Fong, Winston F.K., Yeung Mr. Jaime S.K., public fill capacity and precious landfill space. (2002), ‘Production and application of 3. It can also help reduce the need for quarrying recycled aggregate’, 1-12. and damage to our natural landscape. 6. Fong, Ir Winston F.K., Jaime S. K. Yeung, 4. The replacement of more water is required as Poon C. S., (2002), ‘Hong Kong Experience compare to that of the natural aggregate, for Of Using RecycledAggregates From which the admixture has to be used. Construction And Demolition Materials In 5. Usage of recycled aggregates can not Ready Mix Concrete’, International Workshop only preserve the finite raw materials, but on Sustainable Development and Concrete Also reduce energy consumption and Technology, 267-275. overall construction costs. 7. Gupta S. M., Setiea B., (1988), ‘Concrete 6. Use of the waste aggregate in the new Aggregate from Demolition Waste’, Thesis, concrete as the recycled concrete aggregate 208-216. reduces the environmental pollution as well as 8. Gutierrez, Pilar Alaejos, Jaun, Marta Sanchez providing an economic value for the de, (2001), ‘Utilization of recycled concrete waste material. aggregate for structural concrete’ National 7. The higher water/cement ratios, the Programme of Construction and Demolition compressive strength of recycled concrete is Waste, 1-11. similar to that of normal concrete. At lower 9. Gambhir M.L., (1996), Second edition, water/cement ratios, the compressive strength ‘Concrete technology’, 161-166. of recycled concrete is much lower than that of 10. Hasbi Yaprak, Huseyin Yılmaz Aruntas, normal concrete. Ilhami Demir, Osman Simsek and Gokhan Durmus, (2011) Vol.6, ‘Effects of the fine recycled concrete aggregates on the concrete properties’, International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 2455-2461. 1391 | P a g e