J U D G M E N T A N D
PROPOSITION
GEOVANNI S. DELOS REYES
MARCH 2025
JUDGEMENT
Judgment is the act of the mind, which
expresses affirmation, or denial of
relationships that exists between the two
ideas formed in the mind after the process of
simple apprehension is accomplished by the
mind.
This mental operation is designated as the
second act of the mind.
However, it should not be misinterpreted that
simple apprehension precedes judgment
according to the order of time for such
assertion is beyond rational demonstration
owing to the fact that the complete
reasoning process cannot be rationally
broken into different units of actions. Yet,
due to the mind’s limited capacity, books in
philosophy present the whole process by
dividing it into three units namely; simple
PROPOSITIO
N
A proposition contains judgment. It is a
judgment expressed in a sentence, or a
sentence pronouncing the agreement or
disagreement between two ideas. However,
not all kinds of sentence
are considered as proposition.
ELEMENTS OF PROPOSITION
SUBJECT
Its is the one that
either affirms or
denies something
about the
predicate
PREDICATE
It is the one in which
something is either
affirmed or denied in
whatever manner.
COPULA
The copula (also known
as verb in English
grammar) is the one
which causes the logical
connection when there is
affirmation or separation
(negation) or when there
is a denial expressed in
the whole categorical
proposition.
The Copula is expressed
in the use of the following
“be” verbs:
a. Is (am, are)
the copula “IS” is appropriately
applicable in a proposition
which affirms the relationship
existing between the subject
and the predicate.
The Copula is expressed
in the use of the following
“be” verbs:
b. Is (am, are) not
the copula “IS NOT” is functional
only in a categorical proposition
which denies the existence of
any relationship between the
subject and the predicate.
Example:
CONSTRUCTING A PROPOSITION
S
The correct form should be:
• Subject
c P
• Copula • Predicat
e
All men are rational.
• Subject
• Copula
• Predicat
e
All men
are
rational.
A QUALITY OF PROPOSITION
The quality is affirmative if the
proposition affirms something.
As a result, the proposition itself
is called an affirmative
proposition (not positive
proposition).
1 AFFIRMATIVE
Money is a medium of exchange.
EXAMPLE:
GENERAL TYPES OF PROPOSITION
SUBJECT
PREDICATE
COPULA
QUALITY:
Affirmativ
e
A QUALITY OF PROPOSITION
The quality is negative if the
proposition denies or negates
something. As a result, the
proposition itself is called a
negative proposition.
2 NEGATIVE
Mr. Brown is not a brown person
EXAMPLE:
GENERAL TYPES OF PROPOSITION
SUBJECT
PREDICATE
COPULA
QUALITY:
Negative
B. QUANTITY OF
PROPOSITION
The quantity or extension of a proposition is determined by the quantity or
extension
of the subject term. Simply, it means that whatever is the quantity or
extension of the subject term is the quantity embraced by the whole
proposition. Thus, it is safe to assume the following formula for the
convenience of the study:
Subject (Singular) = Proposition
(Singular)
GENERAL TYPES OF PROPOSITION
Subject (Particular) = Proposition
(Particular)
Subject (Universal) = Proposition
(Universal)
B. QUANTITY OF
PROPOSITION
a. Jose Rizal is a Filipino.
GENERAL TYPES OF PROPOSITION
Jose Rizal (Singular Subject) = Singular
Proposition
EXAMPLES:
b. No non-beliver has a religion.
Non-believer (Universal Subject) = Universal
Proposition
c. Some politicians are lawyers.
Politicians (Particular Subject) = Particular
THE ORDINARY
PROPOSITION (A, E, I and O)
To facilitate the study of the proposition in terms of its quality and quantity
Aristotle, the author of logic, has instituted the use of the four basic symbols
A, E, I, and O. These four symbols which are all vowels were derived from two
Latin terms namely; affirmo and nego.
this case, affirmo is the first person, singular, indicative mood, and in the active
voice of
the infinitive verb “affirmare” which means “to affirm” in English. The first two
vowels of affirmo are A and I. Hence, A and I are properly designated here as
affirmative symbols.
On the other hand, the Latin term nego is the first person, singular, indicative
mood, and in
the active voice of the infinitive verb “negare” which means in English “to deny.”
Hence, the
symbols E and O are clearly designated here as negative symbols, being derived
from nego.
The following table can help us understand vividly the
appropriate use and interpretation of such use of the
symbols in analyzing the quality and quantity of
propositions.
From the table above, it is clear that the symbols for singular and
universal propositions are the same and the difference lies only in the
quality. Always remember that these symbols are only valid for the
analysis of propositions.
Examples:
1. Every Economic Resource Used in Business Is an
Asset.
Analysis:
Proposition’s Quantity (Universal) + A
Quality (Affirmative) =
2. A Lot of Business Are Not Illiquid.
Analysis:
Proposition’s Quantity (Particular) + O
Quality (Negative) =
3. No Internal Control Can Perfectly Prevent
Fraud.
Analysis:
Proposition’s Quantity (Universal) + E
Quality (Negative) =
4. Many Filipino Artists Are Still Unrecognized.
Analysis:
Proposition’s Quantity (Particularl) + I
Quality (Affirmative) =
5. This Book is Affordable.
Analysis:
Proposition’s Quantity (Singularl) + A
Quality (Affirmative) =
The general rule is “the predicate of an affirmative proposition is particular,
unless it is singular.” As such, the determinant of the predicate is the
proposition’s quality. However, an exception to the rule is validly invoked
every time the predicate’s quantifier is proven to be singular which causes it
to be singular as well.
01 Rule for Affirmative Proposition
Quantity and/or Extension of the
Predicate
Examples:
Human souls are immaterial substances.
Analysi
s:
Proposition’s Quality (Affirmative) = Predicate (Particular) - General Rules applies
The lowest returns to the business this year is also the lowest in the country’s
history.
Analysi
s:
Proposition’s Quality (Affirmative) =
Immediate Quantifier of the Predicate (Singular) = Predicate (Singular) - an exception to the
general rule
As a rule, the determinant of the predicate is the proposition’s quality. However, an exception to the rule is validly invoked every
time the predicate’s quantifier is proven singular which causes it to be singular as well.
The general rule states that “The predicate of a negative proposition is
universal, unless it is singular.” Thus, it holds that negative propositions use a
universal predicate, except if the predicate has an immediate singular
quantifier, which also causes it to be singular.
02 Rule for Negative Proposition
Quantity and/or Extension of the
Predicate
Examples:
No money economy is spared from inflation.
Analysi
s:
Proposition’s Quality (Negative) = Predicate (Universal) - General Rules applies
Baroque is not the oldest style of architecture.
Analysi
s:
Proposition’s Quality (Negative) =
Immediate Quantifier of the Predicate (Singular) = Predicate (Singular) - an exception to the
general rule
THANK
YOU

More Related Content

PPTX
Judgment and proposition or logical statement
PPTX
Categorical Propositions- Logic
PPT
Logic hand outs#4
PPTX
judgment(proposition)
PPT
LAW PROBLEMS.ppt
PPTX
LOGIC - Seminar In Problem Solving
DOC
PDF
General Mathematics. Quarter 2 Module 5.
Judgment and proposition or logical statement
Categorical Propositions- Logic
Logic hand outs#4
judgment(proposition)
LAW PROBLEMS.ppt
LOGIC - Seminar In Problem Solving
General Mathematics. Quarter 2 Module 5.

Similar to Judgment and Proposition-Explanation .pptx (20)

PDF
Logic booklet, by Jovelle C. Abello class 101
PPTX
JUDGMENT.pptx
DOCX
Propositions
PPTX
PPTX
Lecture_-_Logic.pptttttttttttttr5rr55rtt
PPT
Philo 1 inference
PPTX
LOGIC in general mathematics123456789011
PDF
Syllogism its types with examples shown by venn diagram and their fallacy
DOCX
Primer in Logic
PPT
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
PDF
5_6192566572737889031 structure of argument
DOCX
Logic midterm notes
PPT
Intro to logic
POTX
001 logic09_syllogism
PDF
Logic 3rd Semester Notes.pdf. Bhu 3rd sem logic
PDF
logic101aB BY ENRIQUE R. TAPANAN SUMMARY
PPT
Introduction to logic and prolog - Part 1
PDF
Discrete Mathematics
Logic booklet, by Jovelle C. Abello class 101
JUDGMENT.pptx
Propositions
Lecture_-_Logic.pptttttttttttttr5rr55rtt
Philo 1 inference
LOGIC in general mathematics123456789011
Syllogism its types with examples shown by venn diagram and their fallacy
Primer in Logic
9 2 t4_chapterninepowerpoint
5_6192566572737889031 structure of argument
Logic midterm notes
Intro to logic
001 logic09_syllogism
Logic 3rd Semester Notes.pdf. Bhu 3rd sem logic
logic101aB BY ENRIQUE R. TAPANAN SUMMARY
Introduction to logic and prolog - Part 1
Discrete Mathematics
Ad

More from VannieDelosReyes (16)

PPTX
Introduction to Precalculus Presentation.pptx
PPTX
Graphs of Circular Functions Presentation.pptx
PPTX
Conic Section- Circle Presentations.pptx
PPTX
Conic Section - Hyperbola Presentation.pptx
DOCX
Assessment 3 - Wk 3 - Graph of a Circle.docx
DOCX
Assessment 5 - Wk 5 - Conic Scetion-Ellipse.docx
DOCX
Assessment 1 - Wk 1 - Conic Scetion.docx
PPTX
Theory of Knowledge-Part 2 Presentation.pptx
PPT
Introduction to Logic Powerpoint presentation.ppt
PPTX
The-Nature-of-Philosophy in Logic Subject.pptx
PPTX
Criteria of Truth 1 Presentation in Logic.pptx
PPTX
Simple-and-Compound-Statements in Logic .pptx
PPTX
Logical Relations Between Proposition.pptx
PPTX
Logic and Critical Thinking-Components-of-Philosophy.pptx
PPTX
Logic and Critical Thinking-Empiricism and Rationalism.pptx
PPTX
Logical Operations and Truth Tables.pptx
Introduction to Precalculus Presentation.pptx
Graphs of Circular Functions Presentation.pptx
Conic Section- Circle Presentations.pptx
Conic Section - Hyperbola Presentation.pptx
Assessment 3 - Wk 3 - Graph of a Circle.docx
Assessment 5 - Wk 5 - Conic Scetion-Ellipse.docx
Assessment 1 - Wk 1 - Conic Scetion.docx
Theory of Knowledge-Part 2 Presentation.pptx
Introduction to Logic Powerpoint presentation.ppt
The-Nature-of-Philosophy in Logic Subject.pptx
Criteria of Truth 1 Presentation in Logic.pptx
Simple-and-Compound-Statements in Logic .pptx
Logical Relations Between Proposition.pptx
Logic and Critical Thinking-Components-of-Philosophy.pptx
Logic and Critical Thinking-Empiricism and Rationalism.pptx
Logical Operations and Truth Tables.pptx
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PPTX
Thinking Routines and Learning Engagements.pptx
PPT
REGULATION OF RESPIRATION lecture note 200L [Autosaved]-1-1.ppt
PDF
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
PDF
English Textual Question & Ans (12th Class).pdf
PDF
0520_Scheme_of_Work_(for_examination_from_2021).pdf
PPTX
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
PDF
Literature_Review_methods_ BRACU_MKT426 course material
PDF
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
PPTX
2025 High Blood Pressure Guideline Slide Set.pptx
PDF
Nurlina - Urban Planner Portfolio (english ver)
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
PDF
Fun with Grammar (Communicative Activities for the Azar Grammar Series)
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2022).pdf
PDF
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery at WLH Hospital
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PDF
Comprehensive Lecture on the Appendix.pdf
PPTX
Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCI) – Unit IV |...
PDF
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
Thinking Routines and Learning Engagements.pptx
REGULATION OF RESPIRATION lecture note 200L [Autosaved]-1-1.ppt
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
English Textual Question & Ans (12th Class).pdf
0520_Scheme_of_Work_(for_examination_from_2021).pdf
Education and Perspectives of Education.pptx
Literature_Review_methods_ BRACU_MKT426 course material
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2021).pdf
2025 High Blood Pressure Guideline Slide Set.pptx
Nurlina - Urban Planner Portfolio (english ver)
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART (3) REALITY & MYSTERY.pdf
Fun with Grammar (Communicative Activities for the Azar Grammar Series)
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2022).pdf
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery at WLH Hospital
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Comprehensive Lecture on the Appendix.pdf
Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illnesses (IMNCI) – Unit IV |...
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf

Judgment and Proposition-Explanation .pptx

  • 1. J U D G M E N T A N D PROPOSITION GEOVANNI S. DELOS REYES MARCH 2025
  • 2. JUDGEMENT Judgment is the act of the mind, which expresses affirmation, or denial of relationships that exists between the two ideas formed in the mind after the process of simple apprehension is accomplished by the mind. This mental operation is designated as the second act of the mind. However, it should not be misinterpreted that simple apprehension precedes judgment according to the order of time for such assertion is beyond rational demonstration owing to the fact that the complete reasoning process cannot be rationally broken into different units of actions. Yet, due to the mind’s limited capacity, books in philosophy present the whole process by dividing it into three units namely; simple
  • 3. PROPOSITIO N A proposition contains judgment. It is a judgment expressed in a sentence, or a sentence pronouncing the agreement or disagreement between two ideas. However, not all kinds of sentence are considered as proposition.
  • 4. ELEMENTS OF PROPOSITION SUBJECT Its is the one that either affirms or denies something about the predicate PREDICATE It is the one in which something is either affirmed or denied in whatever manner. COPULA The copula (also known as verb in English grammar) is the one which causes the logical connection when there is affirmation or separation (negation) or when there is a denial expressed in the whole categorical proposition.
  • 5. The Copula is expressed in the use of the following “be” verbs: a. Is (am, are) the copula “IS” is appropriately applicable in a proposition which affirms the relationship existing between the subject and the predicate.
  • 6. The Copula is expressed in the use of the following “be” verbs: b. Is (am, are) not the copula “IS NOT” is functional only in a categorical proposition which denies the existence of any relationship between the subject and the predicate.
  • 7. Example: CONSTRUCTING A PROPOSITION S The correct form should be: • Subject c P • Copula • Predicat e All men are rational. • Subject • Copula • Predicat e All men are rational.
  • 8. A QUALITY OF PROPOSITION The quality is affirmative if the proposition affirms something. As a result, the proposition itself is called an affirmative proposition (not positive proposition). 1 AFFIRMATIVE Money is a medium of exchange. EXAMPLE: GENERAL TYPES OF PROPOSITION SUBJECT PREDICATE COPULA QUALITY: Affirmativ e
  • 9. A QUALITY OF PROPOSITION The quality is negative if the proposition denies or negates something. As a result, the proposition itself is called a negative proposition. 2 NEGATIVE Mr. Brown is not a brown person EXAMPLE: GENERAL TYPES OF PROPOSITION SUBJECT PREDICATE COPULA QUALITY: Negative
  • 10. B. QUANTITY OF PROPOSITION The quantity or extension of a proposition is determined by the quantity or extension of the subject term. Simply, it means that whatever is the quantity or extension of the subject term is the quantity embraced by the whole proposition. Thus, it is safe to assume the following formula for the convenience of the study: Subject (Singular) = Proposition (Singular) GENERAL TYPES OF PROPOSITION Subject (Particular) = Proposition (Particular) Subject (Universal) = Proposition (Universal)
  • 11. B. QUANTITY OF PROPOSITION a. Jose Rizal is a Filipino. GENERAL TYPES OF PROPOSITION Jose Rizal (Singular Subject) = Singular Proposition EXAMPLES: b. No non-beliver has a religion. Non-believer (Universal Subject) = Universal Proposition c. Some politicians are lawyers. Politicians (Particular Subject) = Particular
  • 12. THE ORDINARY PROPOSITION (A, E, I and O) To facilitate the study of the proposition in terms of its quality and quantity Aristotle, the author of logic, has instituted the use of the four basic symbols A, E, I, and O. These four symbols which are all vowels were derived from two Latin terms namely; affirmo and nego. this case, affirmo is the first person, singular, indicative mood, and in the active voice of the infinitive verb “affirmare” which means “to affirm” in English. The first two vowels of affirmo are A and I. Hence, A and I are properly designated here as affirmative symbols. On the other hand, the Latin term nego is the first person, singular, indicative mood, and in the active voice of the infinitive verb “negare” which means in English “to deny.” Hence, the symbols E and O are clearly designated here as negative symbols, being derived from nego.
  • 13. The following table can help us understand vividly the appropriate use and interpretation of such use of the symbols in analyzing the quality and quantity of propositions. From the table above, it is clear that the symbols for singular and universal propositions are the same and the difference lies only in the quality. Always remember that these symbols are only valid for the analysis of propositions.
  • 14. Examples: 1. Every Economic Resource Used in Business Is an Asset. Analysis: Proposition’s Quantity (Universal) + A Quality (Affirmative) = 2. A Lot of Business Are Not Illiquid. Analysis: Proposition’s Quantity (Particular) + O Quality (Negative) = 3. No Internal Control Can Perfectly Prevent Fraud. Analysis: Proposition’s Quantity (Universal) + E Quality (Negative) = 4. Many Filipino Artists Are Still Unrecognized. Analysis: Proposition’s Quantity (Particularl) + I Quality (Affirmative) = 5. This Book is Affordable. Analysis: Proposition’s Quantity (Singularl) + A Quality (Affirmative) =
  • 15. The general rule is “the predicate of an affirmative proposition is particular, unless it is singular.” As such, the determinant of the predicate is the proposition’s quality. However, an exception to the rule is validly invoked every time the predicate’s quantifier is proven to be singular which causes it to be singular as well. 01 Rule for Affirmative Proposition Quantity and/or Extension of the Predicate Examples: Human souls are immaterial substances. Analysi s: Proposition’s Quality (Affirmative) = Predicate (Particular) - General Rules applies The lowest returns to the business this year is also the lowest in the country’s history. Analysi s: Proposition’s Quality (Affirmative) = Immediate Quantifier of the Predicate (Singular) = Predicate (Singular) - an exception to the general rule As a rule, the determinant of the predicate is the proposition’s quality. However, an exception to the rule is validly invoked every time the predicate’s quantifier is proven singular which causes it to be singular as well.
  • 16. The general rule states that “The predicate of a negative proposition is universal, unless it is singular.” Thus, it holds that negative propositions use a universal predicate, except if the predicate has an immediate singular quantifier, which also causes it to be singular. 02 Rule for Negative Proposition Quantity and/or Extension of the Predicate Examples: No money economy is spared from inflation. Analysi s: Proposition’s Quality (Negative) = Predicate (Universal) - General Rules applies Baroque is not the oldest style of architecture. Analysi s: Proposition’s Quality (Negative) = Immediate Quantifier of the Predicate (Singular) = Predicate (Singular) - an exception to the general rule