2
Most read
5
Most read
11
Most read
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION
Prof. Prabha Panth,
Osmania University,
Hyderabad
Monopolistic Competition
• Capitalist markets are neither pure monopoly nor
perfect competition.
• Monopolist cannot fully stop competition,
because some rival firms will enter.
• And perfect competition does not really exist,
there will always be some monopoly factors in it.
• Therefore capitalist markets could have some
features of monopoly and some of perfect
competition.
• Joan Robinson and Edward Chamberlin called
such a market as “Monopolistic Competition.”
2
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Characteristics
Monopolistic competition refers to a market
organisation that has many sellers of a
differentiated product.
Characteristics:
1. Large number of buyers and sellers, but less than
in PC.
2. Sellers cannot influence each other in the market
3. Differentiated products: heterogeneous – so each
seller is a monopolist for his brand. Price maker.
3
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
4. D-curve for each firm is downward sloping, high price
elasticity as there are many substitutes.
5. U-shaped cost curves.
6. Free entry and exit.
7. High cross elasticity: Many substitutes, so if firm A’s
price increases, consumers shift to B.
8. No industry, but a group of firms producing similar but
differentiated products.
9. Advertisement costs are extra costs in this market.
10. Firms do not anticipate or retaliate to other firms’
market practices. Are independent of each other.
11. Non-price competition
Characteristics
4
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Product Differentiation
• Non homogeneous and differentiated
products.
• Real or perceived differences of products, but
same in actual purpose of use.
• Differences could be due to:
– External features, such as branding of commodity
or features such as packaging
– Internal features such as colour, perfume, shape,
size,
– Examples: soaps, tooth paste, cosmetics,
shampoos, ready made, textiles, confectionery
5
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Short Run Equilibrium of a MC firm
• The firm is rational – wants to maximise its
profits.
• Faces a downward sloping D-curve for its
product.
• Price maker.
• AC includes Selling Costs. Has to advertise to
attract consumers.
• Chamberlin’s two heroic assumptions:
1. Symmetry in Demand: all firms have the same
demand levels. All firms are of the same size.
2. Uniform costs: all firms have the same levels of cost
– U-shaped cost curves
6
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Short Run Equilibrium
RC
0
Q
D = AR
MR
SAC
SMC
F
Q1
E
P
C
C1
ABNORMAL
PROFITS
7
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Firms earn short
run profits by using
the conditions for
profit
maximisation: -
1) MC = MR
2) MC rising
Product Differentiation and
Advertisement
• Short term profits earned through successful
advertisements.
• Advertisement needed to show product
differentiation and attract consumers.
• But in the long run, other firms also advertise, or
bring in other innovations.
• Mono-comp firms tend to cluster together, to
attract customers from each other, called the
“spill over effect”:
– E.g. restaurants, medical shops, mechanics, gold and
jewellery shops
8
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Long Run Equilibrium
• In the long run the Mono-Comp firm faces three
situations:
 With free entry, the market size of each firm
decreases,
 Selling costs increase, and
 Economies of scale
• In the long run, the MC firm will earn only normal
profits.
• But at an output < PC, and with excess capacity.
• Inefficiency in production.
9
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Long Run Equilibrium
RC
0
Q
D = AR
MR
LAC
LMC
F
E
P = AC
Q1
Normal Profit
Efficient level of
Production
G
10
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Long run equilibrium
• Demand curve is less steep, and market share of firms
decrease due to entry of new firms.
• Demand curve of a firm will shift downwards due to
entry of new firms,
• Given the long run costs, equilibrium output, OQ1
gives zero profit, for at E, LAC = AR.
• But minimum LAC is at G, the level of efficient
production.
• The firm stops production at E, which is the falling part
of the LAC curve
• Hence the firm, though getting zero profit in the long
run, is not as efficient as a firm in perfect competition.
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
PC Mon-Comp Monopoly
Number of firms Large nos Large nos < PC Single firm
Demand curve Horizontal straight
line
Downward sloping
(gentle)
Downward sloping
(steep)
Elasticity - Infinity Elastic (- e > 1) Inelastic (- e < 1)
Price Price taker Price maker Price maker
Product Homogeneous Differentiated No substitutes
Entry Easy Easy Blocked
Short run profits Possible yes yes
Long run profits Normal profits Normal profits Abnormal profits
Efficiency and size Optimum Efficient
(minimum LRAC)
Inefficient, >
optimum (LRAC)
Inefficient, >
optimum (LRAC)
Capacity use Full Capacity Excess capacity Excess capacity
Welfare to
consumers
P = MC P > MC P > MC
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Selling Costs
• Selling costs include
• Promotion expenses,
• Packaging, and
• Advertisement expenditure.
• Free gifts,
• Through this the firms want to influence
consumers’ demand.
• But it also leads to increase in their costs.
• These costs are extra in Mono-comp as compared
to other markets.
13
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Merits of Advertising
• Mono-comp firms show product
differentiation through advertising.
• Merits of Advertisement:
 Information on new products, and
improvements in old products,
 Consumers made aware of better deals and
offers.
 Reduces asymmetric information between seller
and the consumer.
 Intensifies competition, innovation and efficiency
14
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Demerits
• Manipulates consumer tastes, without
conveying any useful information. (e.g.
fashions, food and drink habits, new gadgets)
• Advertising may also try to create
differentiation within products that are
actually very similar.
• Advertising tries to make demand curves less
elastic, and impedes competition.
15
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Demerits of Advertisement
• Product differentiation encourages brand
loyalty, and makes consumers less price
sensitive
• This then leads to a high mark up over
marginal cost.
• Increases the ability of firms to charge more
than marginal cost. Market power.
16
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Demerits of Advertisement
• Heavy spending on advertising creates barrier
to entry, as new firms also have to spend on
advertising.
• Wasteful costs on advertisement.
• Affects size and quality of the product.
• Wrong and misleading information, harmful
effects not shown. (smoking, junk food, colas)
• Unethical and dangerous ads.
17
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Questions
Short Answers:
1. What is meant by differentiated products? Why
is this necessary in Monopolistic Competitive?
2. What are the extra costs of production borne by
a firm in monopolistic competition?
3. How does a monopolistic competitive firm
achieve short run equilibrium?
18
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
Essay Questions:
1. Compare Monopolistic competition to a)
monopoly, and b) perfect competition?
2. Explain the long run equilibrium situation of a
monopolistic competitive firm. How does it differ
from other markets?
3. What are selling costs? What are the advantages
and disadvantages – to the firm and to the
consumers?
19
30/04/2016 Prabha Panth

More Related Content

PPTX
Perfect competition
PPT
Market structures – perfect competition
PPT
Unit 4 review_session
PPTX
MONOPOLY MARKET
 
PPTX
Factor market
PPT
Monopoly
PPTX
Market Structures and Economic Efficiency
PPTX
Bilateral monopoly
Perfect competition
Market structures – perfect competition
Unit 4 review_session
MONOPOLY MARKET
 
Factor market
Monopoly
Market Structures and Economic Efficiency
Bilateral monopoly

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Monopoly market
PPT
Market structure oligopoly
PPTX
Monopolistic competition
PPTX
Monopolistic Competition
PPTX
Price discrimination with graphical representation
PPSX
Perfect competition
PPTX
Price discrimination
PPT
Perfect competition
PPTX
Oligopoly
PPTX
Perfect Competitive Market
PPSX
Price discrimination Under Monopoly
PPTX
Monopolistic competition
PPTX
Cob-Web model 11-3-15.pptx
PPTX
Market structures perfect & imperfect competitions
PPSX
Baumol’s theory of sales maximisation
PPTX
Production function ppt in economics
PPTX
Producer Equilibrium
PDF
Imperfect Competition
PPTX
Profit maximization
Monopoly market
Market structure oligopoly
Monopolistic competition
Monopolistic Competition
Price discrimination with graphical representation
Perfect competition
Price discrimination
Perfect competition
Oligopoly
Perfect Competitive Market
Price discrimination Under Monopoly
Monopolistic competition
Cob-Web model 11-3-15.pptx
Market structures perfect & imperfect competitions
Baumol’s theory of sales maximisation
Production function ppt in economics
Producer Equilibrium
Imperfect Competition
Profit maximization
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PPT
Perfect competition
PPTX
Monopolistic Competition
PPTX
Monopolistic Competition
PPT
Monopolistic Competition
PPT
6 monopolistic competition
PPT
Monopolistic Competition
PPTX
Dairy costs example p.c.
PPTX
Imperfect competion 2
PPTX
monopolistic competition and international trade
PPTX
40215240 law-of-demand
PPTX
Marginalism
XLSX
Demand function
PPTX
Demand function - ENGINEERING ECONOMICS & FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING - DR.K.BARANID...
PPTX
Monopolistic competition & oligopoly
PPTX
Monopolistic competition basic things
PPT
13 monopolistic competition
PPTX
oligopoly
PPT
Chapter 10 monopolistic competition & oligopoly
PPT
Monopolistic competition rev
PPTX
demand and its determinants
Perfect competition
Monopolistic Competition
Monopolistic Competition
Monopolistic Competition
6 monopolistic competition
Monopolistic Competition
Dairy costs example p.c.
Imperfect competion 2
monopolistic competition and international trade
40215240 law-of-demand
Marginalism
Demand function
Demand function - ENGINEERING ECONOMICS & FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING - DR.K.BARANID...
Monopolistic competition & oligopoly
Monopolistic competition basic things
13 monopolistic competition
oligopoly
Chapter 10 monopolistic competition & oligopoly
Monopolistic competition rev
demand and its determinants
Ad

Similar to Monopolistic competition (20)

PPT
8350636.ppt business
PDF
Monopolistic competition
PPTX
Market price and output determinantion
 
PPTX
Unit 2 3 4 And 2 3 5 Mc And Oligopoly
PDF
chap#16 monopolistic competition microeconomics.pdf
PPTX
Monopolistic Competition
PPT
Prinecomi lectureppt ch12
PPTX
(MaE) 9 - Monopolisitic Competition.pptx
PPT
mopolistic competition- all you neeed to know
PPTX
CHAPTER ONE.pptx
PPTX
Pricing under monopolistic competition
PPTX
Imperfect competion 2
PPT
Monopolistic competition
PDF
8. Monopolistic competition.pdf
PPTX
Imperfect competion 2
PPTX
Imperfect competition.pptx
PPTX
Monopolistic competition
DOCX
14 Monopolistic competition
PPTX
Economics alternative market structures
PPT
Monopolistic 5 a
8350636.ppt business
Monopolistic competition
Market price and output determinantion
 
Unit 2 3 4 And 2 3 5 Mc And Oligopoly
chap#16 monopolistic competition microeconomics.pdf
Monopolistic Competition
Prinecomi lectureppt ch12
(MaE) 9 - Monopolisitic Competition.pptx
mopolistic competition- all you neeed to know
CHAPTER ONE.pptx
Pricing under monopolistic competition
Imperfect competion 2
Monopolistic competition
8. Monopolistic competition.pdf
Imperfect competion 2
Imperfect competition.pptx
Monopolistic competition
14 Monopolistic competition
Economics alternative market structures
Monopolistic 5 a

More from Prabha Panth (20)

PPSX
Control of inflation
PPS
Inflation - causes and measurement
PPSX
Health Economics
PPSX
91 education1
PPSX
Ricardian theory of value
PPS
Industrial pollution and control
PPSX
Adam smith value theory
PPSX
Classical theory of value
PPSX
Theories of strong sustainability
PPSX
Schumpeter’s views of capitalism
PPSX
Physiocarcy
PPSX
Weber and the spirit of capitalism
PPSX
Political economy
PPSX
Labour theory of wages
PPSX
Sylos labini’s model of limit pricing
PPSX
Bain’s limit pricing model
PPSX
Williamson’s model of managerial discretion
PPSX
Market failure
PPSX
The Social welfare function
PPSX
Unemployment
Control of inflation
Inflation - causes and measurement
Health Economics
91 education1
Ricardian theory of value
Industrial pollution and control
Adam smith value theory
Classical theory of value
Theories of strong sustainability
Schumpeter’s views of capitalism
Physiocarcy
Weber and the spirit of capitalism
Political economy
Labour theory of wages
Sylos labini’s model of limit pricing
Bain’s limit pricing model
Williamson’s model of managerial discretion
Market failure
The Social welfare function
Unemployment

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
DRUGS USED FOR HORMONAL DISORDER, SUPPLIMENTATION, CONTRACEPTION, & MEDICAL T...
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PDF
Race Reva University – Shaping Future Leaders in Artificial Intelligence
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PDF
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2020).pdf
PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
PDF
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
PDF
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
PDF
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
PDF
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
PPTX
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
Myanmar Dental Journal, The Journal of the Myanmar Dental Association (2013).pdf
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PDF
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PDF
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
PDF
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
DRUGS USED FOR HORMONAL DISORDER, SUPPLIMENTATION, CONTRACEPTION, & MEDICAL T...
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Race Reva University – Shaping Future Leaders in Artificial Intelligence
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
Journal of Dental Science - UDMY (2020).pdf
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
BP 505 T. PHARMACEUTICAL JURISPRUDENCE (UNIT 1).pdf
My India Quiz Book_20210205121199924.pdf
Τίμαιος είναι φιλοσοφικός διάλογος του Πλάτωνα
1.3 FINAL REVISED K-10 PE and Health CG 2023 Grades 4-10 (1).pdf
What’s under the hood: Parsing standardized learning content for AI
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
Myanmar Dental Journal, The Journal of the Myanmar Dental Association (2013).pdf
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
LIFE & LIVING TRILOGY - PART - (2) THE PURPOSE OF LIFE.pdf
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
Climate and Adaptation MCQs class 7 from chatgpt
LEARNERS WITH ADDITIONAL NEEDS ProfEd Topic
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department

Monopolistic competition

  • 1. MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION Prof. Prabha Panth, Osmania University, Hyderabad
  • 2. Monopolistic Competition • Capitalist markets are neither pure monopoly nor perfect competition. • Monopolist cannot fully stop competition, because some rival firms will enter. • And perfect competition does not really exist, there will always be some monopoly factors in it. • Therefore capitalist markets could have some features of monopoly and some of perfect competition. • Joan Robinson and Edward Chamberlin called such a market as “Monopolistic Competition.” 2 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 3. Characteristics Monopolistic competition refers to a market organisation that has many sellers of a differentiated product. Characteristics: 1. Large number of buyers and sellers, but less than in PC. 2. Sellers cannot influence each other in the market 3. Differentiated products: heterogeneous – so each seller is a monopolist for his brand. Price maker. 3 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 4. 4. D-curve for each firm is downward sloping, high price elasticity as there are many substitutes. 5. U-shaped cost curves. 6. Free entry and exit. 7. High cross elasticity: Many substitutes, so if firm A’s price increases, consumers shift to B. 8. No industry, but a group of firms producing similar but differentiated products. 9. Advertisement costs are extra costs in this market. 10. Firms do not anticipate or retaliate to other firms’ market practices. Are independent of each other. 11. Non-price competition Characteristics 4 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 5. Product Differentiation • Non homogeneous and differentiated products. • Real or perceived differences of products, but same in actual purpose of use. • Differences could be due to: – External features, such as branding of commodity or features such as packaging – Internal features such as colour, perfume, shape, size, – Examples: soaps, tooth paste, cosmetics, shampoos, ready made, textiles, confectionery 5 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 6. Short Run Equilibrium of a MC firm • The firm is rational – wants to maximise its profits. • Faces a downward sloping D-curve for its product. • Price maker. • AC includes Selling Costs. Has to advertise to attract consumers. • Chamberlin’s two heroic assumptions: 1. Symmetry in Demand: all firms have the same demand levels. All firms are of the same size. 2. Uniform costs: all firms have the same levels of cost – U-shaped cost curves 6 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 7. Short Run Equilibrium RC 0 Q D = AR MR SAC SMC F Q1 E P C C1 ABNORMAL PROFITS 7 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth Firms earn short run profits by using the conditions for profit maximisation: - 1) MC = MR 2) MC rising
  • 8. Product Differentiation and Advertisement • Short term profits earned through successful advertisements. • Advertisement needed to show product differentiation and attract consumers. • But in the long run, other firms also advertise, or bring in other innovations. • Mono-comp firms tend to cluster together, to attract customers from each other, called the “spill over effect”: – E.g. restaurants, medical shops, mechanics, gold and jewellery shops 8 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 9. Long Run Equilibrium • In the long run the Mono-Comp firm faces three situations:  With free entry, the market size of each firm decreases,  Selling costs increase, and  Economies of scale • In the long run, the MC firm will earn only normal profits. • But at an output < PC, and with excess capacity. • Inefficiency in production. 9 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 10. Long Run Equilibrium RC 0 Q D = AR MR LAC LMC F E P = AC Q1 Normal Profit Efficient level of Production G 10 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 11. Long run equilibrium • Demand curve is less steep, and market share of firms decrease due to entry of new firms. • Demand curve of a firm will shift downwards due to entry of new firms, • Given the long run costs, equilibrium output, OQ1 gives zero profit, for at E, LAC = AR. • But minimum LAC is at G, the level of efficient production. • The firm stops production at E, which is the falling part of the LAC curve • Hence the firm, though getting zero profit in the long run, is not as efficient as a firm in perfect competition. 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 12. PC Mon-Comp Monopoly Number of firms Large nos Large nos < PC Single firm Demand curve Horizontal straight line Downward sloping (gentle) Downward sloping (steep) Elasticity - Infinity Elastic (- e > 1) Inelastic (- e < 1) Price Price taker Price maker Price maker Product Homogeneous Differentiated No substitutes Entry Easy Easy Blocked Short run profits Possible yes yes Long run profits Normal profits Normal profits Abnormal profits Efficiency and size Optimum Efficient (minimum LRAC) Inefficient, > optimum (LRAC) Inefficient, > optimum (LRAC) Capacity use Full Capacity Excess capacity Excess capacity Welfare to consumers P = MC P > MC P > MC 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 13. Selling Costs • Selling costs include • Promotion expenses, • Packaging, and • Advertisement expenditure. • Free gifts, • Through this the firms want to influence consumers’ demand. • But it also leads to increase in their costs. • These costs are extra in Mono-comp as compared to other markets. 13 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 14. Merits of Advertising • Mono-comp firms show product differentiation through advertising. • Merits of Advertisement:  Information on new products, and improvements in old products,  Consumers made aware of better deals and offers.  Reduces asymmetric information between seller and the consumer.  Intensifies competition, innovation and efficiency 14 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 15. Demerits • Manipulates consumer tastes, without conveying any useful information. (e.g. fashions, food and drink habits, new gadgets) • Advertising may also try to create differentiation within products that are actually very similar. • Advertising tries to make demand curves less elastic, and impedes competition. 15 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 16. Demerits of Advertisement • Product differentiation encourages brand loyalty, and makes consumers less price sensitive • This then leads to a high mark up over marginal cost. • Increases the ability of firms to charge more than marginal cost. Market power. 16 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 17. Demerits of Advertisement • Heavy spending on advertising creates barrier to entry, as new firms also have to spend on advertising. • Wasteful costs on advertisement. • Affects size and quality of the product. • Wrong and misleading information, harmful effects not shown. (smoking, junk food, colas) • Unethical and dangerous ads. 17 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 18. Questions Short Answers: 1. What is meant by differentiated products? Why is this necessary in Monopolistic Competitive? 2. What are the extra costs of production borne by a firm in monopolistic competition? 3. How does a monopolistic competitive firm achieve short run equilibrium? 18 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth
  • 19. Essay Questions: 1. Compare Monopolistic competition to a) monopoly, and b) perfect competition? 2. Explain the long run equilibrium situation of a monopolistic competitive firm. How does it differ from other markets? 3. What are selling costs? What are the advantages and disadvantages – to the firm and to the consumers? 19 30/04/2016 Prabha Panth