Promoting amicable settlement at the local level the barangay justice service

American International Journal of Social Science Vol. 3, No. 3; May 2014
Promoting Amicable Settlement at the Local Level: The Barangay Justice Service
99
System Methodology
Dr. Radzak Abag Sam
Senior Lecturer
School of Social Sciences
Universiti Sains Malaysia
Malaysia
Solayha Abubakar-Sam
Asst. Professor
Mindanao State University-Maguindanao
Philippines
Abstract
This paper discusses the methodology adopted in the implementation of “Barangay Justice Service System (BJSS)
Project in Maguindanao Province from 2003 to 2007. There were five modules covered in the project
implementation such as: Katarungan Pambarangay; Counselling; Mediation, Para Legal; and Shariah or P.D.
1083, known as “The Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines.” Lectures, workshops, case analyses and
role play were the main methods used in the series of trainings/seminars conducted for the implementation of this
project. As envisioned, cases filed at the regular courts were reduced substantially based on the records,
especially those of civil cases that were within the jurisdiction of the Katarungan Pambarangay level. They
were already taken cared by the barangay officials who underwent the BJSS training/seminars. A more improved
and systematic ways of settling disputes at the local level were also established, and these were evident with the
proper documentations and records of cases, and settlements which were not properly given due importance in
the past administration justice at the barangay level. Finally, the success of the project is not only attributed to
the support of the local leaders, but most especially the community residents who have been very cooperative in
all the phases of the project implementation due to its relevance, and responsiveness in seeking a speedy, and
impartial delivery justice services at the local level.
Keywords: Philippine Justice System Methodology at the Local Level
Introduction
Promoting amicable settlement at the local level is an alternative mechanism adopted to expedite the resolution of
cases filed by disputing parties at the local level. This is also used an option to reduce the thousands of cases filed
in the Philippine regular courts which are unattended and seemed to be dormant. The lack of court judges and
inability of the disputing parties to pay the lucrative lawyers’ fees are the common reasons used to explain the
slow pace of justice in the Philippine justice system.
However with the interventions of Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) whose main focused was to capacitate
individuals handling cases at the local level, the problem on the slow pace of justice at the community local level
seemed to find appropriate solution. More specifically, with the financial support of United States for
International Development (USAID), in partnership with the Jerry Roxas Foundation Inc., (JRF) and the
Maguindanao Foundation for Good Governance and Development Incorporated (MFGGFI), a project called
“Barangay Justice Service System (BJSS)” was implemented in Maguindanao Province, whose main purpose
was to complement the peace and development initiatives of the government by providing awareness and easy
access to justice service at the local level.

© Center for Promoting Ideas, USA www.aijssnet.com
In particular, the program was crafted with two major purposes: first, it will improve the awareness and technical
know-how of individuals handling disputes and cases at the local level so that they will become effective in their
works; second, it will enhance immediate action to cases filed at the local level so that they could no longer be
elevated to the municipal level, and thus, clogging of court dockets could be avoided1.
After five year of implementation, the project had served Six Hundred Three (603) barangays (villages) of
Maguindanao coming from the Municipalities of Datu Odin Sinsuat, Talayan, Talitay, DatuPiang, North Upi,
South Upi, Datu Blah, Mother Kabuntalan, and North Kabuntalan respectively. All of these municipalities were
mainly dominated by Muslims populace with few Christians and highlanders, particularly, Tidurays.
Contrary to some speculations, the project was not designed to change the existing structure and practices in the
community; rather it enhances, and made them more systematic and proactive. Thus, its implementation was
highly supported by the local people. These were evident by the full cooperation of both the local leaders, and
the community residents in all its phases of implementation.
However, just like other projects in the past, the BJJSS was not spared out from doubts and suspicions. This is a
recurring scenario brought about by sad experience in the past where the communities were just used as a
“dummy” and façade in the pursuit of personal agenda of some interest groups.
Despite of its noble purposes, there were still questions raised like, will BGSS suits to the peculiarities of the
Bangsamoro Communities in Maguindanao Province? How could justice services become accessible and
inexpensive for the poor without necessarily changing the established traditional approaches and methods to
dispute settlement at the local level? What methodology will be adopted, and how will the implementers go
about these? These quires will be provided appropriate explanations in the succeeding discussions.
The Project Methodology and Strategies
The BJSS follows certain methodologies and strategies of implementation which were consistent with the
acceptable norms and standards in the Bangsamoro Communities in Maguindanao Province. These include:
Social Preparation Strategies
A courtesy call to the local Chief Executive is a must before the project is to be lunched to selected local
communities. This activity is a sort of protocol, and courtesy to the Local Chief Executive and other local
officials whose purpose is discussion of what is the project all about. This is a good strategy for gaining the
support of the local officials and subsequently for seeking logistical counterpart from them. Following this
process is the social preparations of the identified pilot communities which were divided into three distinct but
related phases:
1. Baseline Survey – community residents of recipient barangays were asked of some base - line information
pertaining to the dispensation of justice at the local level. Specifically, they were asked about their level of
knowledge and familiarity of common offenses and crimes committed at their communities, and how
disputes are settled at the local level.
2. Social Marketing - Both the barangay officials and residents were gathered in a general meeting with the
presence of the municipal officials to discuss and orient them on what the project is all about. The Staff of
the MFGGDI would discuss the project content and focus, and subsequently how could it be helpful for
dispute resolution in a particular community. As an output, a Barangay Resolution adopting the BGSS is
required as basis for the project implementation. In addition, the organization of Barangay Justice Advocates
for the particular barangay is also required which consists of ten (10) individual members of the community
who are credible and can be relied upon by the barangay officials.
3. Case Documentation and Inventory - Cases, whether on record or not, were reviewed for documentation
and inventory purposes. This process helped in monitoring whether cases filed in the barangay had
increased or substantially reduced after the implementation of the project.
Modules Covered in the Project Implementation
Barangay Officials of the recipient communities were required to attend a series of trainings/seminars for the
BJSS project. The training methodologies adopted for this particular project include lectures, discussions, case
analyses and role play, and workshops and presentations.
1See Objectives of BJSS in the brochure.
100

These activities were facilitated by experts from the academe, and practitioners who were tapped by MFGGDI to
undergo BJSS trainers’ training in Capiz, IloIlo, Philippines in 2003. There were five modules covered in the
project which include:
1. KatarunganPambarangay
2. Mediation
3. Counselling
4. Para-legal
5. Shariah – P.D. 1083 or the “Code of Muslim Personal Laws”
How are these module implemented?
Module 1 - The Katarungan Pambarangay
Contrary to some doubts that the “Katarungan Pambarangay” or Barangay Justice would overhaul the existing
community structure and practices in dispute settlement at the local level, this module did not intent to change
those practices; rather it institutionalized them by providing more systematic processes for amicable settlement
so that the case result would become more convincing and acceptable to the disputing parties.
In the previous practice, local disputes were brought to the most recognized and respected leader of the
community for settlement. Usually these leaders were the elders of prominent and influential families who have
gained higher respect among the local residents. They became leader because of their wide experience and social
status in the community. The dispensation of justice is based largely on the experience of these leaders in
handling cases and with consultation with the Council of Elders. Often time, justice is served through fair trial in
the traditional way, but in instances where the disputing parties were not contended of the decision, it has no
specific processes or rules to follow that guarantee for a fair resolution, acceptable to the disputants. Further, the
traditional practices were not keen on providing documentation and records of case proceedings, and
subsequently its resolution. The leader acts as the “living witness “that is, he guarantees the implementation of
whatever is the result of the case.
Under the Katarungan Pambarangaylaw or P.D 1508 , while these traditional practices remained as the basis of
this law, it has substantial improvements on the content2. The law specified the steps and processes necessary in
the pursuit of a fair, just and inexpensive amicable settlement in three levels:
First, the Punong Barangay (village head) will conciliate the two disputing parties on his own capacity as head of
the community. He would try to convince these parties for an amicable settlement on the issues that become
source of conflict between them. He would promote the spirit better neighborhood in the community as one
family in order to settle the case.
Second, if the Punong Barangay failed on his attempt to conciliate the two disputing parties, he will organize the
so called “Lupon Tagapamayapa” or peace seeking committee, a group of 10 to 20 persons tasked to assist him
in settling the case amicably. He chairs this Lupon with the following functions:
1. Receive all complaints, written or verbal, filed by individuals against other persons who are subject to
101
amicable settlement;
2. Summon respondents, with notice to the complainants for them to appear before him/her for mediation;
3. Resolve the issue of venue of settlement and refer any legal question to the Secretary of Justice or his/her
duly designated representative;
4. Arbitrate and render an arbitration award when agreed by the conflicting parties;
5. Constitute the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo should he fail to settle the parties;
6. Appoint the members of the Pangkat should the parties fail to agree on the composition of the three-member
Pangkat by drawing of lots;
7. Administer oaths in connection with any matter relating to all proceedings in the effective implementation of
the Katarungang Pambarangay;
8. Set the time, date and place of hearing, and preside over the monthly meeting of the lupon;
9. Prepare the agenda of each meeting;
2See the KatarunganPambarangay law, P. D. 1508, and the Local Government Code of 1991.

10. See to it that the Lupon exercises administrative supervision over the various Pangkats and perform such
102
powers, duties and functions as may be prescribed by law, or ordinances;
11. Where the mediation or arbitration is made by him/her, she/he shall attest to the certification signed or issued
by the Lupon Secretary;
12. Upon successful conclusion of his/her mediation efforts, he shall reduce to writing in a language understood
by both parties.3
Third, if the Punong Barangay failed to settle the case through the Lupon, he may resort to organize a three-men
committee called Pangkat to continue his conciliatory efforts4. These people are selected from the Lupon
members, and duly agreed by both parties. The Pangkat will use arbitration method, that is, to negotiate, and
make a strong appeal for both parties to agree and settle amicably. If both parties agreed, they will put their
agreement into writing on a language understood by both. However, if they do not agree, and will insist to elevate
the case to regular trial court, the Pangkat Chairman may attest a certification to be issued by the Pangkat
Secretary, a requirement for filing an action or proceedings in the regular court, or any government office for
adjudication. Without this certification, the case will not be acceptable to the regular court.
Module 2 - Mediation
To reinforce his conciliation function, the Barangay Chairman with other officials were also equipped with
appropriate knowledge about mediation process as an important method in enhancing amicable settlement at the
barangay level. With the intervention of a third party, who should be neutral and could go on – in - between; iron
out some differences, the disputants may not aggravate the situation. This intervention may result to cool down
the situation.
There were some evidences of mediation practices in the past under traditional leadership, but these practices did
not observe a more systematic approach of “going in between” the two disputing parties, and submit themselves
to an agreement duly acceptable to both. The traditional leaders simply assert their influence to control the
situation. To some extent they become authoritative to silence the case, which could possibly result into the
dissatisfaction of the case result especially to the aggrieved party.
Under the BJSS project however, the barangay officials were equipped to assume this challenging role of
mediation with the purpose of enhancing amicable settlement between the two disputing parties. Through this
new methodology, the barangay officials were exposed to several lectures, workshops, role play and simulation,
case analyses that prepared them to become more ready in assuming mediation role between the two conflicting
parties. Specifically, the following mediation road map and steps were taught to them in the series of
training/seminars conducted:
1. Preparation for mediation
2. Mediator’s opening remarks
3. Parties’ sharing of perspective on issues and concerns
4. Mediator’s summary of issues to be addressed
5. Problem solving on each issue or set of issues
6. Reaching closure
7. Written agreement5
This road map is the general direction of how the mediation process is going to prosper until reaching the
agreement. Depending on the situation, each level has specific steps which could be flexible due to unforeseen
circumstances.
Module 3 - Counselling
With the use of the so called “soft – heart” approach, with emotional healing processes, the Counselling Method
showed that even the most tough guy or notorious man in the community would learn to bend a little to open his
heart, and become rational being to listen to explanation.
3See KatarunganPambarangay Law, P.D 1508; the Local Government Code of 1991; and KP Manuals.
4 See page 29 KatarungangPambarangay: Making it Work by Tom Villarin, also in R.A. 7309, KP Implementing Rules and
Regulations.
5Please see Mediation Road Map in the BJSS Manual.

By experience, the traditional practices popularized the concept of “advice- giving”, which means that when there
are problems, like disputes or misunderstanding between two or more individuals, or between neighborhood in
the community, the leaders, or the parents themselves give advises for solution, either solicited or not.
However, so to speak, this is not to say that the wisdom of advice-giving is not good or nor helpful. In many
instances, this process has also been tested and proven to be valuable in many situations.
Contrary to the most common process of advice- giving, the Counselling Method is far different. Under the BJSS
methodology, the Barangay Officials were trained and subsequently re-tooled for the use of a more systematic
approach in dealing with problematic persons. This is done through verbal, and face to face communication. It is
a skill to be developed that one has to nurture, and continuously practice to become more effective in dealing with
complex problems. The following are the steps in the Counselling processes adopted:
103
STEP 1: Welcome the counselee; build rapport, establish your goals; set time agreement
STEP 2: Move into counseling for Emotional Release
STEP 3: Get the facts. Distinguish between the facts and the counselee’s inferences or assumptions
STEP 4: Help the counselee identify next steps/possible solutions
STEP 5: Come to agreement. Share positive and negative consequences
STEP 6: End the session by affirming the counselee, bolstering his/her spirit.6
The aforementioned steps were just a patterned and they may not be at all the time followed sequentially.
However what is very crucial here is the ability of the Counsellor, in particular, these Barangay Officials to listen
to the grievances of the problematic person; process them through emotional healing, so that they could elicit
from their clients possible ways or alternatives for coping up with the situation based on other experiences in the
past. If the clients have limited options to solve the problem, the Counsellor may assist and help by citing similar
situations he knew in the past, and apparently, how those situations were overcome by the concerned individuals.
Listening skills of the Counsellor in this process has to be developed in order to get a complete grasp of the
situations being experienced by the problematic persons or clients. Apparently, the Counsellor could cite some
“eye-opener” alternatives if he has the complete picture of the problematic situation. These things however are
achieved if Counsellor has developed listening skills and understanding. Therefore, the Counsellor in this process
simply helps and acts as a facilitator.
Module 4 - Para Legal
The Para-Legal method was emphasized as the last option left for the disputing parties to seek justice under the
Philippine Judicial System. This is where the provisions of the law prevail based on the rules of evidences
presented before the regular trial court for arraignment purposes
However, under the BJSS methodology, filing of cases directly to the court is highly discouraged. Cases that are
subject of Katarungan Pambarangay could only be elevated to the regular court if all the necessary remedies
provided under the KP Law have been exhausted, and did not work. If these requirements are not properly
observed, much more if there is no certification issued by the Pangkat Secretary attested by the Chairman, and
duly endorsed by the Punong Barangay, the court will return back the case to the barangay concerned7.
The Para Legal method did not intent to make these barangay officials to become expert of law because law
profession under the Philippine Educational System is completed in four years period. What was emphasized
here, however, was at least for them to gain understanding of how Philippine Laws worked, and how cases filed
in the regular trial court prosper under specific court jurisdiction.
Subject areas covered in this component included Civil and Criminal Procedure, Family Code, and Human
Rights. However while all these areas were interesting, the barangay officials became more attentive to the
discussions on Human Rights due to its relevance and necessity that everyone especially the conflict –affected
areas should be aware of.
6 See Counseling Manuals provided by the GRF.
7Cases subject to KP Law jurisdictions are those whose liability for imprisonment do not exceed one year, and whose
penalty do not exceed P500.00: Please see KP Implementing Rules and Regulations or R.A. 7309.

Interestingly, to enrich participants’ learning, the Code of Muslim Personal Laws in the Philippines enacted
under P.D. 10838 was also highlighted in the series of BJSS trainings/seminars. In fact it has become regular
subject area in these trainings/seminars because most of the participants were Muslims. However due to time
constraints, the discussions of this module were only limited to Muslim Marriages, Divorce, and property
ownership as enshrined in the Code.
On the entirety, what made the BJSS project interesting and attractive, aside from its relevance in conflict
resolutions at the community level is that all the modules were delivered on the local vernacular, particularly in
“Maguidananaon dialect” that could easily be understood by the participants. This is in anticipation of the lower
educational background of the recipient barangay officials.
The BJSS Project: Way Forward
Despite of the completion of the project in 2006, the structure it has built in the recipient communities should be
nurtured to continue its noble purposes. In fact, this even provided opportunity for the barangay officials to put
into practice the theories and concepts they have learned from the BJSS trainings/seminars attended.
As a follow up activity however, the recipient barangays officials underwent seminar on Project Sustainability
Action Program (PSAP). This activity was designed primarily to ensure that the barangay officials who have
attended the BJSS trainings/seminars could come up with their concrete plan of actions in support of barangay
justice system at their respective barangays.
Fortunately, due to popular demand and good impact to the community, the BJSS, despite of its completion in
2007 was extended into another phase for two years. This time, the coverage has expanded to other barangays
which were not covered in its previous operations. At the same time, during this second phase, the program was
awarded to another partner NGOs of GRF which was also operating in Maguindanao and Cotabato City.
However, most of the program facilitators and Resource Persons were same experts involved in its previous
implementation.
As a process however, these facilitators and experts involved in the second phase underwent a refresher and
enrichment course for the upgrading of the modules and methodology in the project implementation, and in
Barangay Governance.
Lessons learned, reflections and challenges
A more improved methodology in settling disputes amicably at the local level through the BJSS was a
breakthrough in so far as dispensation of justice service at the local level is concerned. Individuals handling cases
in the past showed that they were not keen on putting into records or documents of the case proceedings and
settlement. However, these individuals, particularly the barangay officials, after attending the BJSS
trainings/seminars were awaken about these short comings, and have realized these gaps. Apparently, because of
their knowledge acquired from the trainings/seminars attended, they have started to establish their respective
documentation system, and subsequently, maintain log books and filing system for proper record purposes. The
project had also generated more interest and support not only from barangay officials but most especially the
community residents after learning that BJSS project does not intent to change the established traditional practices
and standards of settling disputes in the community, in fact the purpose is to strengthen them. Furthermore, the
project posted greater challenges to the barangay officials to research more, and get familiar with their respective
functions as elected officials to enhance more effective governance at the local level.
8Cases subject to KP Law jurisdictions are those whose liability for imprisonment do not exceed one year, and whose
penalty do not exceed P500.00: Please see KP Implementing Rules and Regulations or R.A. 7309.
104

Concluding Impression
The implementation BJSS became successful in Maguindanao Province as evident in the gradual reduction of
cases filed in the regular court. Most cases, especially those at the jurisdiction of Katarungan Pambarangay were
already taken cared by barangay officials who have attended the series of BJSS trainings/seminars. Using
methods such as lectures, workshops and presentations, case analyses and role play the five modules such as
Katarungan Pambarangay, Counselling, Mediation, Para-legal and the Shariah or RA1053 known as the “Code of
Muslim Laws in the Philippines,” were adopted in the local communities. The recipient barangay officials have
also improved significantly their system of handling disputes at the local level using amicable settlement as a
method and as an alternative. Apparently, justice became inexpensive and accessible for every member of the
community. Consequently, this process resulted to the decongestions of cases filed at the Regular Trial Court.
References
Barangay Justice Service System (BJSS) Manual of Operation for Mediation Road Map.
Barangay Justice Service System (BJSS) Manual of Operation forKatarunganPambarangay.
Barangay Justice Service System (BJSS) Manual of Operation for Counseling.
Nolledo, J. N., The Local Government Code of 1991or R.A 7160
P.D. 1508 or the KatarunganPambarangay Law
P.D.1083, or “The Code of Muslim Personal Laws of the Philippines."
R.A. 7309, KP Implementing Rules and Regulations.
Villarin, T., KatarungangPambarangay: Making it Work.
105

Promoting amicable settlement at the local level the barangay justice service

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Promoting amicable settlement at the local level the barangay justice service (20)

More from Anthony Duenas (11)

Recently uploaded (20)

Promoting amicable settlement at the local level the barangay justice service