RECOMMENDATIONS Institute of Medicine
SEPTEMBER 2015 • IMPROVING DIAGNOSIS IN HEALTH CARE
Goal 1: Facilitate more effective teamwork in the diagnostic process among health care professionals, patients, and their families
In recognition that the diagnostic process is a dynamic team-based activ-
ity, health care organizations should ensure that health care profession-
als have the appropriate knowledge, skills, resources, and support to
engage in teamwork in the diagnostic process. To accomplish this, they
should facilitate and support:
• Interprofessional and intraprofessional teamwork in the diagnostic
process.
• Collaboration among pathologists, radiologists, other diagnosticians,
and treating health care professionals to improve diagnostic testing
processes.
Health care professionals and organizations should partner with patients
and their families as diagnostic team members and facilitate patient and
family engagement in the diagnostic process, aligned with their needs,
values, and preferences. To accomplish this, they should:
• Provide patients with opportunities to learn about the diagnostic
process.
• Create environments in which patients and their families are comfort-
able engaging in the diagnostic process and sharing feedback and
concerns about diagnostic errors and near misses.
• Ensure patient access to electronic health records (EHRs), includ-
ing clinical notes and diagnostic testing results, to facilitate patient
engagement in the diagnostic process and patient review of health
records for accuracy.
• Identify opportunities to include patients and their families in efforts to
improve the diagnostic process by learning from diagnostic errors and
near misses.
RECOMMENDATION 1A RECOMMENDATION 1B
Goal 2: Enhance health care professional education and training in the diagnostic process
Educators should ensure that curricula and training programs across the
career trajectory:
• Address performance in the diagnostic process, including areas such
as clinical reasoning; teamwork; communication with patients, their
families, and other health care professionals; appropriate use of diag-
nostic tests and the application of these results on subsequent decision
making; and use of health information technology (IT).
• Employ educational approaches that are aligned with evidence from
the learning sciences.
Health care professional certification and accreditation organizations
should ensure that health care professionals have and maintain the com-
petencies needed for effective performance in the diagnostic process,
including the areas listed in Recommendation 2A.
RECOMMENDATION 2A RECOMMENDATION 2B
Goal 3: Ensure that health information technologies support patients and health care professionals in the diagnostic process
Health IT vendors and the Office of the Na-
tional Coordinator for Health Information Tech-
nology (ONC) should work together with users
to ensure that health IT used in the diagnostic
process demonstrates usability, incorporates
human factors knowledge, integrates mea-
surement capability, fits well within clinical
workflow, provides clinical decision support,
and facilitates the timely flow of information
among patients and health care professionals
involved in the diagnostic process.
ONC should require health IT vendors to meet
standards for interoperability among different
health IT systems to support effective, efficient,
and structured flow of patient information
across care settings to facilitate the diagnostic
process by 2018.
The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) should require
health IT vendors to:
• Routinely submit their products for inde-
pendent evaluation and notify users about
potential adverse effects on the diagnostic
process related to the use of their products.
• Permit and support the free exchange of
information about real-time user experiences
with health IT design and implementation
that adversely affect the diagnostic process.
RECOMMENDATION 3A RECOMMENDATION 3B RECOMMENDATION 3C
Goal 4: Develop and deploy approaches to identify, learn from, and reduce diagnostic errors and near misses in clinical practice
Accreditation organizations and the
Medicare conditions of participa-
tion should require that health
care organizations have programs
in place to monitor the diagnostic
process and identify, learn from,
and reduce diagnostic errors and
near misses in a timely fashion.
Proven approaches should be
incorporated into updates of these
requirements.
Health care organizations should:
• Monitor the diagnostic process
and identify, learn from, and
reduce diagnostic errors and near
misses as a component of their
research, quality improvement,
and patient safety programs.
• Implement procedures and prac-
tices to provide systematic feed-
back on diagnostic performance
to individual health care profes-
sionals, care teams, and clinical
and organizational leaders.
HHS should provide funding for
a designated subset of health
care systems to conduct routine
postmortem examinations on a
representative sample of patient
deaths.
Health care professional societies
should identify opportunities to
improve accurate and timely diag-
noses and reduce diagnostic errors
in their specialties.
RECOMMENDATION 4A RECOMMENDATION 4B RECOMMENDATION 4C RECOMMENDATION 4D
Goal 5: Establish a work system and culture that supports the diagnostic process and improvements in diagnostic performance
Health care organizations should:
• Adopt policies and practices that promote a non-punitive culture that values open discussion and feedback on diagnostic performance.
• Design the work system in which the diagnostic process occurs to support the work and activities of patients, their families, and health care profes-
sionals and to facilitate accurate and timely diagnoses.
• Develop and implement processes to ensure effective and timely communication between diagnostic testing health care professionals and treating
health care professionals across all health care delivery settings.
RECOMMENDATION 5
Goal 6: Develop a reporting environment and medical liability system that facilitates improved diagnosis by learning from diagnostic
errors and near misses
The Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) or
other or other appropriate agen-
cies or independent entities should
encourage and facilitate the volun-
tary reporting of diagnostic errors
and near misses.
AHRQ should evaluate the effec-
tiveness of patient safety organiza-
tions (PSOs) as a major mecha-
nism for voluntary reporting and
learning from these events and
modify the PSO common formats
for reporting of patient safety
events to include diagnostic errors
and near misses.
States, in collaboration with other
stakeholders (health care organi-
zations, professional liability in-
surance carriers, state and federal
policy makers, patient advocacy
groups, and medical malpractice
plaintiff and defense attorneys),
should promote a legal environ-
ment that facilitates the timely
identification, disclosure, and
learning from diagnostic errors.
Specifically, they should:
• Encourage the adoption of
communication and resolution
programs (CRPs) with legal
protections for disclosures and
apologies under state laws.
• Conduct demonstration projects
of alternative approaches to the
resolution of medical injuries,
including administrative health
courts and safe harbors for
adherence to evidenced-based
clinical practice guidelines.
Professional liability insurance car-
riers and captive insurers should
collaborate with health care
professionals on opportunities to
improve diagnostic performance
through education, training, and
practice improvement approaches
and increase participation in such
programs.
RECOMMENDATION 6A RECOMMENDATION 6B RECOMMENDATION 6C RECOMMENDATION 6D
Goal 7: Design a payment and care delivery environment that supports the diagnostic process
As long as fee schedules remain a predominant mechanism for deter-
mining clinician payment, the Centers for Medicare  Medicaid Services
(CMS) and other payers should:
• Create current procedural terminology (CPT) codes and provide cover-
age for additional evaluation and management activities not currently
coded or covered, including time spent by pathologists, radiologists,
and other clinicians in advising ordering clinicians on the selection,
use, and interpretation of diagnostic testing for specific patients.
• Reorient relative value fees to more appropriately value the time spent
with patients in evaluation and management activities.
• Modify documentation guidelines for evaluation and management ser-
vices to improve the accuracy of information in the EHR and to support
decision making in the diagnostic process.
CMS and other payers should assess the impact of payment and care
delivery models on the diagnostic process, the occurrence of diagnostic
errors, and learning from these errors.
RECOMMENDATION 7A RECOMMENDATION 7B
Goal 8: Provide dedicated funding for research on the diagnostic process and diagnostic errors
Federal agencies, including HHS, the U.S. Department of Veterans Af-
fairs, and the United States Department of Defense, should:
• Develop a coordinated research agenda on the diagnostic process and
diagnostic errors by the end of 2016.
• Commit dedicated funding to implementing this research agenda.
The federal government should pursue and encourage opportunities for
public–private partnerships among a broad range of stakeholders, such
as the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, foundations, the
diagnostic testing and health IT industries, health care organizations,
and professional liability insurers to support research on the diagnostic
process and diagnostic errors.
RECOMMENDATION 8A RECOMMENDATION 8B
To download the full report and to find additional resources, visit nas.edu/improvingdiagnosis

More Related Content

PDF
PFCC Methodology and Practice: Deliver Ideal Care Experiences and Outcomes…By...
PPT
2015 ihi international forum shadowing poster
PDF
Closing the Loop: Strategies to Extend Care in the ED
PDF
PFCC INFOGRAPHIC: Six Steps to Patient Engagement
PDF
Patient & Family Advisory Councils: the Business Case for Starting a PFAC & P...
PDF
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part I
PDF
Time for Quality Measures to Get Personal
PDF
Gamification as a means to manage chronic disease
PFCC Methodology and Practice: Deliver Ideal Care Experiences and Outcomes…By...
2015 ihi international forum shadowing poster
Closing the Loop: Strategies to Extend Care in the ED
PFCC INFOGRAPHIC: Six Steps to Patient Engagement
Patient & Family Advisory Councils: the Business Case for Starting a PFAC & P...
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part I
Time for Quality Measures to Get Personal
Gamification as a means to manage chronic disease

What's hot (20)

PDF
Automating ED Patient Follow-Up: INFOGRAPHIC
PDF
Creating value through patient support programs
PDF
Partnering with Patients, Families and Communities for Health: A Global Imper...
PDF
Your Patient Had A VTE – What Went Wrong?
PPT
The Future of Primary Care
PDF
Redefining the role of patient support programs: Shifting the focus towards p...
PDF
ICU - National Initiative 2016-2017 Topic Selection Webinar
PDF
Leveraging Patient Support Programs in Biologic-Biosimilar Competitive Landscape
PPTX
Weitzman 2013: Project ECHO
PDF
Implementing the Vincent Framework at the Frontline
PDF
TransCelerate Overview - Patient Experience Initiative
PDF
mHealth Israel_Top Health Industry Issues of 2021_Will a Shocked System Emerg...
PDF
Got Med Wreck? Targeted Repairs from the Multi-Center Medication Reconciliati...
PPTX
mHealth Israel_Incorporating the Patient Voice into Clinical Delivery Models ...
PPTX
Online Workshop: Improving Patient Care Pathways
PPTX
High impact actions to release time in general practice
PDF
Making a case for medication reconciliation in primary care
PPTX
Weitzman 2013: PCORI: Transforming Health Care
PDF
Learning from Canada’s Champions of Patient Safety and Patient Engagement
PPTX
February 15 2018 NCA Team Based Care Webiner
Automating ED Patient Follow-Up: INFOGRAPHIC
Creating value through patient support programs
Partnering with Patients, Families and Communities for Health: A Global Imper...
Your Patient Had A VTE – What Went Wrong?
The Future of Primary Care
Redefining the role of patient support programs: Shifting the focus towards p...
ICU - National Initiative 2016-2017 Topic Selection Webinar
Leveraging Patient Support Programs in Biologic-Biosimilar Competitive Landscape
Weitzman 2013: Project ECHO
Implementing the Vincent Framework at the Frontline
TransCelerate Overview - Patient Experience Initiative
mHealth Israel_Top Health Industry Issues of 2021_Will a Shocked System Emerg...
Got Med Wreck? Targeted Repairs from the Multi-Center Medication Reconciliati...
mHealth Israel_Incorporating the Patient Voice into Clinical Delivery Models ...
Online Workshop: Improving Patient Care Pathways
High impact actions to release time in general practice
Making a case for medication reconciliation in primary care
Weitzman 2013: PCORI: Transforming Health Care
Learning from Canada’s Champions of Patient Safety and Patient Engagement
February 15 2018 NCA Team Based Care Webiner
Ad

Viewers also liked (11)

PDF
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part II
PDF
Time for Quality Measures to Get Personal
PDF
The Meaningful Care Organization: Developing Patient Engagement Strategies
PDF
Diagnostic Error Toolkit
PDF
Building Patient-Centeredness in the Real World: The Engaged Patient and the ...
PDF
Risk Managing "Meaningful" Consent
PDF
Safety is Personal: Partnering with Patients and Families for the Safest Care
PDF
State of Patient Experience 2015 Infographic
PDF
Patient-Centered Strategies for HCAHPS Improvement
PDF
Dementia: through their eyes
PDF
PFCC Presentation to Masspro: Engaging Patients and Families in Redesigning Care
PFCC Methodology Meets "Lean," Part II
Time for Quality Measures to Get Personal
The Meaningful Care Organization: Developing Patient Engagement Strategies
Diagnostic Error Toolkit
Building Patient-Centeredness in the Real World: The Engaged Patient and the ...
Risk Managing "Meaningful" Consent
Safety is Personal: Partnering with Patients and Families for the Safest Care
State of Patient Experience 2015 Infographic
Patient-Centered Strategies for HCAHPS Improvement
Dementia: through their eyes
PFCC Presentation to Masspro: Engaging Patients and Families in Redesigning Care
Ad

Similar to Recommendations for Improving_Diagnosis (20)

PDF
Clearing the Error: Patient Participation in Reducing Diagnostic Error
PPTX
Himss m healthcomm_telehealth md exec summary recommendations_formatted final...
PPTX
ACCURATE RISK ADJUSTMENT SOLUTION FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS.pptx
DOCX
392Improving the 21st-CenturyHealth Care SystemA.docx
PDF
Improving Outcomes With Clinical Decision Support An Implementers Guide Secon...
PDF
HCC coding and risk adjustment.pdf
PPT
Crossing the quality chasm
PDF
Innovative health and social care systems: What the CARE Model means for Work...
PDF
Health IT and Public Health: Opportunities, Realities, and a Proposed Approach
PDF
Top tips to overcome the challenge of commissioning diagnostic services
PDF
Aligning Clinical Practice and Process Improvement
PDF
errors of diagnosis - enormity of problem
PPTX
Redesign Health Care Delivery
PPTX
Becoming Better Advocates for Your Health
PPTX
5.1 Patient safety and clinical risk.pptx
PDF
Crossing the-quality-chasm-briefing-1208
PPTX
Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations
PPTX
The State of the Nation
PDF
Improving Healthcare Systems Program
Clearing the Error: Patient Participation in Reducing Diagnostic Error
Himss m healthcomm_telehealth md exec summary recommendations_formatted final...
ACCURATE RISK ADJUSTMENT SOLUTION FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS.pptx
392Improving the 21st-CenturyHealth Care SystemA.docx
Improving Outcomes With Clinical Decision Support An Implementers Guide Secon...
HCC coding and risk adjustment.pdf
Crossing the quality chasm
Innovative health and social care systems: What the CARE Model means for Work...
Health IT and Public Health: Opportunities, Realities, and a Proposed Approach
Top tips to overcome the challenge of commissioning diagnostic services
Aligning Clinical Practice and Process Improvement
errors of diagnosis - enormity of problem
Redesign Health Care Delivery
Becoming Better Advocates for Your Health
5.1 Patient safety and clinical risk.pptx
Crossing the-quality-chasm-briefing-1208
Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 Recommendations
The State of the Nation
Improving Healthcare Systems Program

More from EngagingPatients (8)

PDF
Digital Engagement of ED Patients 4-18-16
PPTX
Creating a standard of care for patient and family engagement
PDF
PFCC Asthma Poster
PDF
ALL ABOUT ME Patient Poster
PDF
I Am a Patient, Engage Me
PDF
Innovations & Results: What's Working and What Will it Take?
PDF
Patient Activation: Where Do I Start?
PDF
The Beryl Institute 2013 State of the Patient Experience Benchmarking Study
Digital Engagement of ED Patients 4-18-16
Creating a standard of care for patient and family engagement
PFCC Asthma Poster
ALL ABOUT ME Patient Poster
I Am a Patient, Engage Me
Innovations & Results: What's Working and What Will it Take?
Patient Activation: Where Do I Start?
The Beryl Institute 2013 State of the Patient Experience Benchmarking Study

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
USG and its uses in anaesthesia practice
DOCX
CASE PRESENTATION1.docx many type of disease make them.suffer .
PPTX
Anaesthetic management of Congenital heart diseases
PPT
NIPT panel discussion HHI 09.12.2017 modified.ppt
PPT
toxicosis in pregnancy preeclampcia eclampcia.ppt
PPTX
Biomechanical preparation in primary teeth – Instrumentation and seminar 5 (2...
PPTX
The Principle of Naturopathy Self-healing, toxin removal and balance
PPTX
applied physics dental materials basic principles
PDF
Indonesian Healthtech Innovation_11Sep2019_Industry_Geraldine Seow_1.pdf
PPTX
migraine heaEDDDDDDDADFAAAAAAFdache (1).pptx
PPTX
4. Musculoskeletal X ray For health student
PDF
Dental Implants Review : A detailed Review
PPTX
MONOCHORIONIC TWIN PREGNANCY detailed.pptx
PPTX
INTRODUCTION TO BIOLOGY AND THE BRANCHES OF BIOLOGY
PDF
ICU Main Equipments and its explanations
PPTX
ANTICHOLINERGICS drugs which are used as emergency and pre medication drugs i...
PPTX
Presentation for Non Communicable Disease.pptx
PPTX
SlideEgg_100085- World Mental Health Day.pptx
PPTX
(PWD) Persons with intellectual disabilities ACT - 1.pptx
PDF
Liver Cirrhosis: Causes, Symptoms, Stages & Expert Treatment in Pune
USG and its uses in anaesthesia practice
CASE PRESENTATION1.docx many type of disease make them.suffer .
Anaesthetic management of Congenital heart diseases
NIPT panel discussion HHI 09.12.2017 modified.ppt
toxicosis in pregnancy preeclampcia eclampcia.ppt
Biomechanical preparation in primary teeth – Instrumentation and seminar 5 (2...
The Principle of Naturopathy Self-healing, toxin removal and balance
applied physics dental materials basic principles
Indonesian Healthtech Innovation_11Sep2019_Industry_Geraldine Seow_1.pdf
migraine heaEDDDDDDDADFAAAAAAFdache (1).pptx
4. Musculoskeletal X ray For health student
Dental Implants Review : A detailed Review
MONOCHORIONIC TWIN PREGNANCY detailed.pptx
INTRODUCTION TO BIOLOGY AND THE BRANCHES OF BIOLOGY
ICU Main Equipments and its explanations
ANTICHOLINERGICS drugs which are used as emergency and pre medication drugs i...
Presentation for Non Communicable Disease.pptx
SlideEgg_100085- World Mental Health Day.pptx
(PWD) Persons with intellectual disabilities ACT - 1.pptx
Liver Cirrhosis: Causes, Symptoms, Stages & Expert Treatment in Pune

Recommendations for Improving_Diagnosis

  • 1. RECOMMENDATIONS Institute of Medicine SEPTEMBER 2015 • IMPROVING DIAGNOSIS IN HEALTH CARE Goal 1: Facilitate more effective teamwork in the diagnostic process among health care professionals, patients, and their families In recognition that the diagnostic process is a dynamic team-based activ- ity, health care organizations should ensure that health care profession- als have the appropriate knowledge, skills, resources, and support to engage in teamwork in the diagnostic process. To accomplish this, they should facilitate and support: • Interprofessional and intraprofessional teamwork in the diagnostic process. • Collaboration among pathologists, radiologists, other diagnosticians, and treating health care professionals to improve diagnostic testing processes. Health care professionals and organizations should partner with patients and their families as diagnostic team members and facilitate patient and family engagement in the diagnostic process, aligned with their needs, values, and preferences. To accomplish this, they should: • Provide patients with opportunities to learn about the diagnostic process. • Create environments in which patients and their families are comfort- able engaging in the diagnostic process and sharing feedback and concerns about diagnostic errors and near misses. • Ensure patient access to electronic health records (EHRs), includ- ing clinical notes and diagnostic testing results, to facilitate patient engagement in the diagnostic process and patient review of health records for accuracy. • Identify opportunities to include patients and their families in efforts to improve the diagnostic process by learning from diagnostic errors and near misses. RECOMMENDATION 1A RECOMMENDATION 1B Goal 2: Enhance health care professional education and training in the diagnostic process Educators should ensure that curricula and training programs across the career trajectory: • Address performance in the diagnostic process, including areas such as clinical reasoning; teamwork; communication with patients, their families, and other health care professionals; appropriate use of diag- nostic tests and the application of these results on subsequent decision making; and use of health information technology (IT). • Employ educational approaches that are aligned with evidence from the learning sciences. Health care professional certification and accreditation organizations should ensure that health care professionals have and maintain the com- petencies needed for effective performance in the diagnostic process, including the areas listed in Recommendation 2A. RECOMMENDATION 2A RECOMMENDATION 2B Goal 3: Ensure that health information technologies support patients and health care professionals in the diagnostic process Health IT vendors and the Office of the Na- tional Coordinator for Health Information Tech- nology (ONC) should work together with users to ensure that health IT used in the diagnostic process demonstrates usability, incorporates human factors knowledge, integrates mea- surement capability, fits well within clinical workflow, provides clinical decision support, and facilitates the timely flow of information among patients and health care professionals involved in the diagnostic process. ONC should require health IT vendors to meet standards for interoperability among different health IT systems to support effective, efficient, and structured flow of patient information across care settings to facilitate the diagnostic process by 2018. The Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) should require health IT vendors to: • Routinely submit their products for inde- pendent evaluation and notify users about potential adverse effects on the diagnostic process related to the use of their products. • Permit and support the free exchange of information about real-time user experiences with health IT design and implementation that adversely affect the diagnostic process. RECOMMENDATION 3A RECOMMENDATION 3B RECOMMENDATION 3C Goal 4: Develop and deploy approaches to identify, learn from, and reduce diagnostic errors and near misses in clinical practice Accreditation organizations and the Medicare conditions of participa- tion should require that health care organizations have programs in place to monitor the diagnostic process and identify, learn from, and reduce diagnostic errors and near misses in a timely fashion. Proven approaches should be incorporated into updates of these requirements. Health care organizations should: • Monitor the diagnostic process and identify, learn from, and reduce diagnostic errors and near misses as a component of their research, quality improvement, and patient safety programs. • Implement procedures and prac- tices to provide systematic feed- back on diagnostic performance to individual health care profes- sionals, care teams, and clinical and organizational leaders. HHS should provide funding for a designated subset of health care systems to conduct routine postmortem examinations on a representative sample of patient deaths. Health care professional societies should identify opportunities to improve accurate and timely diag- noses and reduce diagnostic errors in their specialties. RECOMMENDATION 4A RECOMMENDATION 4B RECOMMENDATION 4C RECOMMENDATION 4D
  • 2. Goal 5: Establish a work system and culture that supports the diagnostic process and improvements in diagnostic performance Health care organizations should: • Adopt policies and practices that promote a non-punitive culture that values open discussion and feedback on diagnostic performance. • Design the work system in which the diagnostic process occurs to support the work and activities of patients, their families, and health care profes- sionals and to facilitate accurate and timely diagnoses. • Develop and implement processes to ensure effective and timely communication between diagnostic testing health care professionals and treating health care professionals across all health care delivery settings. RECOMMENDATION 5 Goal 6: Develop a reporting environment and medical liability system that facilitates improved diagnosis by learning from diagnostic errors and near misses The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) or other or other appropriate agen- cies or independent entities should encourage and facilitate the volun- tary reporting of diagnostic errors and near misses. AHRQ should evaluate the effec- tiveness of patient safety organiza- tions (PSOs) as a major mecha- nism for voluntary reporting and learning from these events and modify the PSO common formats for reporting of patient safety events to include diagnostic errors and near misses. States, in collaboration with other stakeholders (health care organi- zations, professional liability in- surance carriers, state and federal policy makers, patient advocacy groups, and medical malpractice plaintiff and defense attorneys), should promote a legal environ- ment that facilitates the timely identification, disclosure, and learning from diagnostic errors. Specifically, they should: • Encourage the adoption of communication and resolution programs (CRPs) with legal protections for disclosures and apologies under state laws. • Conduct demonstration projects of alternative approaches to the resolution of medical injuries, including administrative health courts and safe harbors for adherence to evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines. Professional liability insurance car- riers and captive insurers should collaborate with health care professionals on opportunities to improve diagnostic performance through education, training, and practice improvement approaches and increase participation in such programs. RECOMMENDATION 6A RECOMMENDATION 6B RECOMMENDATION 6C RECOMMENDATION 6D Goal 7: Design a payment and care delivery environment that supports the diagnostic process As long as fee schedules remain a predominant mechanism for deter- mining clinician payment, the Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services (CMS) and other payers should: • Create current procedural terminology (CPT) codes and provide cover- age for additional evaluation and management activities not currently coded or covered, including time spent by pathologists, radiologists, and other clinicians in advising ordering clinicians on the selection, use, and interpretation of diagnostic testing for specific patients. • Reorient relative value fees to more appropriately value the time spent with patients in evaluation and management activities. • Modify documentation guidelines for evaluation and management ser- vices to improve the accuracy of information in the EHR and to support decision making in the diagnostic process. CMS and other payers should assess the impact of payment and care delivery models on the diagnostic process, the occurrence of diagnostic errors, and learning from these errors. RECOMMENDATION 7A RECOMMENDATION 7B Goal 8: Provide dedicated funding for research on the diagnostic process and diagnostic errors Federal agencies, including HHS, the U.S. Department of Veterans Af- fairs, and the United States Department of Defense, should: • Develop a coordinated research agenda on the diagnostic process and diagnostic errors by the end of 2016. • Commit dedicated funding to implementing this research agenda. The federal government should pursue and encourage opportunities for public–private partnerships among a broad range of stakeholders, such as the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, foundations, the diagnostic testing and health IT industries, health care organizations, and professional liability insurers to support research on the diagnostic process and diagnostic errors. RECOMMENDATION 8A RECOMMENDATION 8B To download the full report and to find additional resources, visit nas.edu/improvingdiagnosis