Sage fiesole somerville_2012

SAGE White Paper on Discoverability
in the Twenty-First Century: Collaborative Opportunities for
Publishers,
Vendors, and Librarians

Fiesole Collection Development Retreat Pre-Conference
Fiesole, Italy, April 12, 2012

Mary M. Somerville, MLS, MA, PhD
University of Colorado Denver, USA
Dis claimer: This white paper was s upported by S AGE in an effort to
contribute further to the convers ation and debate around
dis coverability. It does not neces s arily reflect the views or policies of
S AGE. Additionally, the views of this pres enter, while s upported by Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
S AGE, do not neces s arily reflect the views of policies of S AGE. Singapore | Washington DC

Discoverability White Paper Scope:

● Best practices for access and discovery of content in libraries

● Big problems that publishers, vendors, and libraries need to
solve

● Real solutions that librarians and publishers can implement

● Further observations for improving discoverability and visibility

Source: Somerville, M. M., Schader, B. J., and Sack, J. R. Improving Discoverability of Scholarly Content in
the Twenty-First Century: Collaboration Opportunities for Librarians, Publishers, and Vendors. A White
Paper commissioned by SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2012.
http://surveys.sagepublications.com/Survey.aspx?surveyid=3431

Fiesole Collection Development Retreat Pre-Conference Los Angeles | London | New Delhi
Singapore | Washington DC

Symbiotic (but disrupted and fragmented) Scholarly Ecosystem:

● Librarians manage systems for institutional collection,
dissemination, and retrieval of scholarly corpus
● Publishers produce and promote authors’ work through
formats findable on the open Web and in library catalogs
● Publishers’ technology vendors supply e-pub platforms and
strategic SEO advice
● Libraries’ technology vendors connect publishers’ digital
content to OPACs through ERMs and web scale discovery
services


Cross Sector Interviewees:

● Scholarly publishers and published authors
● Search engine developers, database providers, A&I
services, and academic publishers
● Electronic Resource Management (ERM) and Integrated
Library System (ILS) vendors
● Librarians who advance institutional discoverability

… including Michael Buschman/Serials Solutions, Lettie
Conrad/SAGE, Michael Gorrell/EBSCO, Suzanne Kemperman
/OCLC, John Sack/HighWire Press, Jabin White/ITHAKA,
Simon Inger/Simon Inger Consulting, Ltd.


Some Discoverability Starting Points
and Search Catalysts:

• Open URL link resolver for ‘known item’ /citation search
• Specialized bibliographic databases–w/out or with full text
• A-Z database or journal list in OPAC listing library holdings
• Library website research pages listing authoritative resources
• Publisher websites, journal homepages, and alert services
• Web search engines , like Google Scholar, to direct traffic to
publishers and libraries
• Discovery layer services which conduct ‘Google like’ searches of
formerly ‘silo-ed’ library content through a single index
• Referrals from colleagues, blogs, and other ‘invisible college’
(trusted experts) network, including Web 2.0 media contacts
Los Angeles | London | New Delhi

Discoverability (working definition):

Scholars’ capacity to locate relevant content
in the scholarly corpus as needed to advance
research and other creative activity at
appropriate points in workflow.

Analysis of Industry Experts Found:

• Improved discoverability depends on cross sector strategies

• Discovery acceleration tools in familiar web environments

• Detailed indexing for highly relevant and precise results

• Seamless identification and fulfillment user experiences

Some ‘conversation starters’ to improve discoverability and visibility,
access and discovery, and usage and creation of the scholarly
corpus:

● Establish common standards for structured metadata,
information organization, resource presentation, and usage
statistics
● Explore and implement cross-platform and cross-publisher
industry best practices and shared standards
● Create online product interfaces and publisher website
designs that conform to (yet to be determined) standards
and functionalities
● Monitor (changing) researcher behaviors and apply findings
to publisher and library educational tools and system and
interface redesigns


Collaboration Through Combination of Technologies,
Standards, and Practices:

● Open URL (link resolver) navigation technology that shows
options for obtaining target content and shows ‘best’
version of scholarly content for which users have ‘rights’
through academic affiliation validated by institutional
authentication (National Information Standards
Organization/NISO and Knowledge Bases and Related
Tools/KBART)
● Open Researcher and Contributor ID/ORCID assigns unique
identifiers to associate researches and entities with
research outputs, identifies version of record and most
recent or authoritative version of given work through its life
publication cycle (NISO has also recommended standard
version terms and CROSSRef has released a new feature
for version validation, CrossMark)


Collaboration Through Combination of Technologies,
Standards, and Practices (continued):

● ScholarlyArticle offers structured data schema to enable
improved discovery of appropriate content through
consideration of a variety of unique properties, including
publisher, editor, reviewer, genre, reviews, ratings,
institution, location, creation date, and modification date, as
well as author, title, and source – all value added signifiers
of provenance and authority


Recent Developments in Cross Sector
Communication and Collaboration:

New NISO Open Discovery Initiative Committee will convene open
discovery libraries, information content providers, and discovery
service providers to develop formal standards and recommended
best practices for ‘next generation’ library discovery services using an
aggregated index search of a wide range of resources, licensed and
free, from multiple providers. This will necessarily require, for
instance, creation of consistent vocabulary and business practices to
clarify exactly which resources are available in uniquely licensed and
purchased electronic content and which are indexed in full text or by
citations only, or both, and whether the metadata derives from
aggregated databases or directly though the full text. (released
October 25, 2011)

Communication and Collaboration (continued):

National Federation of Advanced Information Service (NFAIS)
Discovery Service Code of Practice Draft:

“discovery services have the potential to provide ease of information
discovery, access, and use, benefitting not only its member
organizations, but also the global community of information seekers.
However, the relative newness of these services has generated
questions and concerns among information providers and librarians
as to how these services meet expectations with regard to issues
related to traditional search and retrieval services; e.g., usage reports,
ranking algorithms, content coverage, updates, product identification,
etc. Accordingly, this document has been developed to assist those
who choose to use this new distribution channel through the provision
of guidelines that will help avoid the disruption of theAngeles | |London |balance
Los delicate New Delhi
Singapore Washington DC
of interests involved.” (released to NISO, Feb 1, 2012)

Communication and Collaboration (continued):

COUNTER Code of Practice for Usage Factors Draft:

“ provides specifications for the recording and reporting of Usage
Factors that are consistent with the COUNTER Code of Practice for
E-resources. …including specifications for the metadata to be
recorded, the content types and article versions whose usage may be
counted, as well as the Publication Period and Usage Period to be
used.” (released Mar 2012)


Recent Study on Collaboration Opportunities Between Publishers,
Librarians, and Vendors:

Libraries at Webscale (OCLC) January 2012 reports on the
question: “what next?” and concludes “big collaboration in the
information ecosystem will come not only from broader collaboration
across libraries, library groups, consortia, and partnerships across
the broader knowledge community – across researchers,
publishers, commercial vendors, and Webscale providers such as
Google, Amazon, and Facebook.” (page 31)


OCLC Libraries at Webscale ‘Thought Leaders’ Recommendations:

• “Connect users with content regardless of format or where it is
stored by creating new models of partnership with all types of
content providers
• Develop new forms of knowledge through dialogue and discourse
that are easily distributed, reviewed, and added to the collective
collection
• Build creative ‘spaces’ that encourage collaborations of pure
exploration and invention among any ecosystem members,
organizations, or groups
• Build bridges, links, and tunnels to wells of information that make
it easy to find, connect, compare, mix, or mash up all content into
any format.” (p. 32-33)


ht:/ uvy.sg p b aio s o /uvy s xsr y =3 3
t / r s a e u l tn.c mS r .ap ?uv id 4 1
p s e ic e e Singapore | Washington DC

Sage fiesole somerville_2012

More Related Content

Similar to Sage fiesole somerville_2012 (20)

More from SAGE Publishing (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Sage fiesole somerville_2012