7
Most read
11
Most read
12
Most read
Templating & Selection of implants in THR
Prof. Dr. V .S. Ravindranath
Malposition
Component orientation
Soft-tissue tension
Failure to restore hip biomechanics
Dislocation
Excessive wear
Fixation failure
Limb length discrepancy
Mechanical failure
Multifactorial
Materials
Design
Surface finish
Position
Bone quality
Biologic response (wear debris)
Infection
Why should a THR fail?
History & clinical examination
Bone quality…
age, sex, pre-op diagnosis
Level of activity
Involvement of other joints
Mental status
Pre-op ambulation
Patient’s expectations
Limb length disturbance
supra pelvic
pelvic
infra pelvic
Pre operative planning
Real LLD
Functional LLD
Vocabulary in THR
Tear drop
Vertical offset
Horizontal offset
Inclination
Version
Combined offset
JRF- joint reaction force
ACR– Acetabular centre of rotation
Medialization
Lateralization
Morse taper
Skirted head or non skirted head
Impingement
TAL
What is templating?
A trial of the implants on the radiographs
Why should you template?
Precision of surgery
Soft tissue balance
Shorten the surgical procedure
Decrease the post op complications
Proper inventory
… bone cut & offset
Why do you want the radiographs?
Structural integrity of the Acetabulum
The inclination & version
Bone stock
Protrusio
Periacetabular osteophytes
Acetabular fractures
Dysplasias
Template the component
Structural integrity of the Femur
Medullary canal
Off sets
Version in lateral view
Template the component
Difficult to dislocate
Requirements for templating
Standard radiograph in AP view
Leg length
Neck shaft
Kohler’s line
Acetabular coverage
The lateral center-edge (CE)
angle
Femoral head extrusion index
Acetabular inclination
Acetabular version
Acetabular depth
Head sphericity & medulla of
Femur
Joint space width
Ischial spine
Requirements for templating
Standard radiographic views
Antero posterior view
Lowenstein lateral
Dunn lateral
Cross table view
Internal rotation
Femoral geometry
Offset.
External rotation
RO Marker
Groin medially
Femoral neck – head offset
Cam deformity
Sequence of templating
Acetabulum
Femur
No implant design or system… 100%
A general knowledge of Components
designs
strengths
weaknesses
cost
Acetabular templating
40° of Abduction
Lateral bone coverage
The medial border..ilioischial line
Tear drop
ACR
Subchondral bone
Inferior limit
Protrusio
Rim osteophytes
Cement mantle
Inclination,Version,Flush with native Acetabulum
Femoral templating (AP view)
Entry point
Height of prosthetic head
lengthening (short)
shortening (long)
Stem size
proximal fitting or proximal coated
distal fitting or fully coated
Femoral offset
increased
decreased
Femoral neck cut (width)
valgus
varus
long
short
Distal centralizer plug size
Depth of insertion
Isthmus
Cement mantle
lateralization
Eccentric rasping
Femoral perforation
Non circumferential cement mantle
Entry point
Femoral templating (lat. view)
Champagne flute Funnel Cylindrical
(Stovepipe)
Osteoporotic
Commonest
Dorr. L.DProximal Femoral morphology
Medial & posterior cortices
Acetabular components
Cemented
Liners /Polyethelene cup
thin
thick
Subchondral bone
Metal back
Thick walled, all poly,a good subchondral bone
2-3mm cement mantle
Un cemented
Under size/eccentric
stress centrally
peripheral gap
Oversize
stress peripherally
In growth metal shell
Hydroxyapetite coated
Poly liners
Cross-linked polyethylene
Alumina
Ceramic-on-ceramic
Metal-on-metal
Postero-superior overhang
Offsets
Vertical …25-50mm
Horizontal or medial
modular neck
modular head
head diameter
add skirt …32mm
depth of insertion
Anterior or version
during implantation
posterior bowing
dual modular necks
Femoral component
Femoral offset increase
Reduction in Neck-shaft angle Medialization of the neck
Abductor insufficiency
Rounded Rectangular neck
Short taper
Rounded
increase range of motion.
Neck & Morse taper
Femoral Acetabular impingement
Non skirted head Skirted head
Range of motion
Dislocation… jumping distance
Poly debris
Femoral component
Trapezoidal neck ,
without a skirt.Larger diameter head,
Restoration of femoral neck offsets
Affect polyethylene wear
Abductor strength
Limp (walking aids)
Risk of postoperative dislocation
Loosening of the components
Short taper
CPT
Algorithm for femoral component selection
Algorithm for Acetabular component selection
Thank you
Best Wishes

Templating of total hip replacement (THR)

  • 1.
    Templating & Selectionof implants in THR Prof. Dr. V .S. Ravindranath
  • 2.
    Malposition Component orientation Soft-tissue tension Failureto restore hip biomechanics Dislocation Excessive wear Fixation failure Limb length discrepancy Mechanical failure Multifactorial Materials Design Surface finish Position Bone quality Biologic response (wear debris) Infection Why should a THR fail?
  • 3.
    History & clinicalexamination Bone quality… age, sex, pre-op diagnosis Level of activity Involvement of other joints Mental status Pre-op ambulation Patient’s expectations Limb length disturbance supra pelvic pelvic infra pelvic Pre operative planning Real LLD Functional LLD
  • 4.
    Vocabulary in THR Teardrop Vertical offset Horizontal offset Inclination Version Combined offset JRF- joint reaction force ACR– Acetabular centre of rotation Medialization Lateralization Morse taper Skirted head or non skirted head Impingement TAL
  • 5.
    What is templating? Atrial of the implants on the radiographs Why should you template? Precision of surgery Soft tissue balance Shorten the surgical procedure Decrease the post op complications Proper inventory … bone cut & offset
  • 6.
    Why do youwant the radiographs? Structural integrity of the Acetabulum The inclination & version Bone stock Protrusio Periacetabular osteophytes Acetabular fractures Dysplasias Template the component Structural integrity of the Femur Medullary canal Off sets Version in lateral view Template the component Difficult to dislocate
  • 7.
    Requirements for templating Standardradiograph in AP view Leg length Neck shaft Kohler’s line Acetabular coverage The lateral center-edge (CE) angle Femoral head extrusion index Acetabular inclination Acetabular version Acetabular depth Head sphericity & medulla of Femur Joint space width Ischial spine
  • 8.
    Requirements for templating Standardradiographic views Antero posterior view Lowenstein lateral Dunn lateral Cross table view Internal rotation Femoral geometry Offset. External rotation RO Marker Groin medially
  • 9.
    Femoral neck –head offset Cam deformity
  • 10.
    Sequence of templating Acetabulum Femur Noimplant design or system… 100% A general knowledge of Components designs strengths weaknesses cost
  • 11.
    Acetabular templating 40° ofAbduction Lateral bone coverage The medial border..ilioischial line Tear drop ACR Subchondral bone Inferior limit Protrusio Rim osteophytes Cement mantle Inclination,Version,Flush with native Acetabulum
  • 12.
    Femoral templating (APview) Entry point Height of prosthetic head lengthening (short) shortening (long) Stem size proximal fitting or proximal coated distal fitting or fully coated Femoral offset increased decreased Femoral neck cut (width) valgus varus long short Distal centralizer plug size Depth of insertion Isthmus Cement mantle lateralization
  • 13.
    Eccentric rasping Femoral perforation Noncircumferential cement mantle Entry point Femoral templating (lat. view)
  • 14.
    Champagne flute FunnelCylindrical (Stovepipe) Osteoporotic Commonest Dorr. L.DProximal Femoral morphology Medial & posterior cortices
  • 15.
    Acetabular components Cemented Liners /Polyethelenecup thin thick Subchondral bone Metal back Thick walled, all poly,a good subchondral bone 2-3mm cement mantle Un cemented Under size/eccentric stress centrally peripheral gap Oversize stress peripherally In growth metal shell Hydroxyapetite coated Poly liners Cross-linked polyethylene Alumina Ceramic-on-ceramic Metal-on-metal Postero-superior overhang
  • 16.
    Offsets Vertical …25-50mm Horizontal ormedial modular neck modular head head diameter add skirt …32mm depth of insertion Anterior or version during implantation posterior bowing dual modular necks Femoral component
  • 17.
    Femoral offset increase Reductionin Neck-shaft angle Medialization of the neck Abductor insufficiency
  • 18.
    Rounded Rectangular neck Shorttaper Rounded increase range of motion. Neck & Morse taper
  • 19.
    Femoral Acetabular impingement Nonskirted head Skirted head Range of motion Dislocation… jumping distance Poly debris
  • 20.
    Femoral component Trapezoidal neck, without a skirt.Larger diameter head, Restoration of femoral neck offsets Affect polyethylene wear Abductor strength Limp (walking aids) Risk of postoperative dislocation Loosening of the components Short taper CPT
  • 21.
    Algorithm for femoralcomponent selection
  • 22.
    Algorithm for Acetabularcomponent selection
  • 23.