More Related Content
Similar to Wardle jordan 1 feedback (20)
More from jordanwardle (20)
Wardle jordan 1 feedback
- 1. AS Pre-production Tasks Feedback Student Name: WARDLE Jordan Blog: http://jordanwardleasmedia.blogspot.co.uk/ Task 1 – Pre-production: Research & Planning Evidence on blog 1. Similar Products – film beginning analysis Analysis is too descriptive with little use of terminology and basic reference to the technical elements (mise-en-scene, editing, sound, cinematography). You need to show how meaning is created and how genre/narrative/characters are introduced. In American Sniper why do they use a point of view with the sniper target? What affect does this have on audience? Fast and Furious has better analysis of the Statham character but again is too descriptive. Mad Max analysis tries to examine the contrast in scenes but again is too descriptive. Age of Ultron does link continuous camera movement with efficiency of the team. Check your spelling – gusaline/gasoline Post has been extensively amended showing very good understanding of technical elements and mise-en-scene in construction of film. Good use of terminology and analytical comments. Yes 2. Genre Analysis Some attempt to analyse action genre but lacks good detail or research. Very little written on history, films, actors or directors. Some examples of box office or some history or links to other genres would add weight to analysis. A post added of key conventions used in action shows research buy again lacks good evidence. Comedy genre is barely researched. No mention of Naked Gun, Pink Panther, 48 Hours, Beverly Hills Cop or even Police Academy which is unthinkable when discussing action/comedy. A post included on key props/costumes found in genre. Post has been extensively amended to show better research into chosen genre with good examples of key actors, films and established themes. Yes 3. Target Audience Some notes into audience for own production with some comments on expectations. Some detail on stereotypical audience for this genre with evidence of box office research. Post amended showing good understanding of TA. Yes
- 2. 4. Script Completed and formatted correctly. Good genre piece. Sets up narrative well. Avoid adding camera setups. Yes 6. Storyboard Added with good technical detail and good variety of shots. Yes 7. Shotlist Good clear detail - includes shot type, location and description. Yes 8. Layouts – floor plan Clear plan for different settings. Detail for each layout. Plan should show actors’ positions and camera set up more clearly. Yes 9. Locations Good detail on how locations will be used with images. Yes 10.Costumes Good detail on how costumes reflect character and hint at narrative and genre. Images could be better to show full costume. Yes 11.Props Good detail on props and how they will be used in key scenes and how they link to narrative/genre. Only 1 image included. Yes 12.Actors Good detail on choice of actors, images included. Will the use of a pillow to show weight be successful? Yes 13.Equipment Images and reasons for choice of equipment. Microphone input addressed for reason to use the camera but no detail on microphone? Detail now added on microphone. Yes 14.Production schedule Lots of fantastic detail on shooting and editing to assist with production with good detail on pre-production. Yes Teachers comments
- 3. Jordan has almost completed his pre production for his course working at a proficient level. More detail needed on film beginnings and genre. Add missing work! Posts have been amended to show great understanding of tasks. Amendments show good commitment to work. Film beginning analysis is very strong. Mark out of 20: 13 Teacher name: M Drummond Date: January 2016 Student action plan for improvement Final mark out of 20: 17 Date: March 2016