WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION
1 like1,059 views
This document outlines a proposed student project for an exhibition on an artistic avant-garde. Students will be placed into groups to research and create a dossier on one avant-garde movement, including its historical context, characteristics, and important artists and works. They will then design a poster and leaflet in multiple languages to propose works for the exhibition. Rubrics are provided to evaluate the written dossier, final poster and leaflet project, and student presentations.
WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION
- 1. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION INSTRUCTIONS FOR TEACHERS. Below you will find my work proposal for a small project entitled " We carry on an exhibition!". It is a cooperative work whose final product will be the poster and the leaflet of an exhibition on one of the artistic vanguards. To arrive at the final product, the students must prepare a dossier with what they have learned about the artistic avant-garde they have chosen and with their proposal for the exhibition. They must exhibit their final product before the class group. As for the evaluation, to evaluate the progress, the students will work directly in the Drive with what will be able to control who works and when. I have also made three rubrics, one to evaluate the written dossier, another for the final project and, finally, one for the oral presentation.
- 2. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION WORK PROPOSAL In a prestigious art gallery, they are organizing an exhibition about one of the historical avant- gardes that we have studied in class, but they still do not know what to do. Can you help them? The job proposal is as follows: in groups of 4 students, you must work on one of the proposed avant-gardes, perform a search and complete a dossier in which it appears: • The historical context. • General characteristics. • Authors and important works. You should also make a proposal about which authors and what works of these authors should exhibit in the art gallery. The final product is double: you must make the poster and the leaflet of the exhibition, from what appears in your dossier. The leaflet must be written in Catalan, Spanish and English. On the last day you will have to present your product to the class group. You will work directly in the Drive, with a folder shared with me in which there must be the dossier, the poster and the leaflet. For the accomplishment of the work you will have three sessions of classroom and we will use two sessions to present your final products. It is not necessary to remember that the dossier must have, cover, index, body and bibliography / webography. It must be numbered, and the paragraphs must be justified. The dossier must have at least 10 pages and must have images with its corresponding image footer (we can not forget that it is an art work).
- 3. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION RUBRIC OF WRITTEN WORK GROUP MEMBERS GRADE GROUP Evaluation indicators Beginning 1 Developing 2 Accomplished 3 Excellent 4 SCORE Title The title and the subtitle do not fit anything in the subject of the work. The work has no title and / or subtitle. The title and the subtitle do not entirely fit the subject of the work. It has a title and a subtitle quite adequate for the subject of the work. It has a title and a subtitle that is very suitable for the subject of work. The title is persuasive and the subtitle accurately describes the topic of the work. Table of contents (index) The table of contents does not reflect the sections of the work. There is no table of contents. The table of contents does not reflect all sections of the work and / or is not duly edited. The table of contents reflects all the sections of the work, ordered and, numbered but not correctly hierarchized. The table is duly edited: it appears the justified page number. The table of contents reflects all the sections of the work, correctly sorted, numbered and hierarchical The table is duly edited: it appears the justified page number. Introduction There is no introduction. The introduction does not correctly place the reader on the subject. There is an introduction that situates the reader in the subject. Methodology The various actions that have been performed one by one are not listed: interview, documentary consultation, fieldwork, experiments, surveys, visualization of audio- visuals, ... The various actions that have been done one by one are listed: interview, documentary consultation, field work, experiments, surveys, visualization of audio-visuals, ... The various actions carried out one by one are listed and explained: interview, documentary consultation, field work, experiments, surveys, visualization of audio-visuals, ... The various actions carried out one by one are documented, explained and documented: interview, documentary consultation, fieldwork, experiments, surveys, visualization of audio-visuals, ...
- 4. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION Analysis / results The information, the collected data and / or results are not commented and / or are not analysed. The analysis is not complemented. The information, the collected data and / or results are discussed, but they are not analysed. The analysis is complemented with: graphs, tables, images, plans, citations ... The information, the collected data and / or the results are discussed and commented in a little argued way. The analysis is complemented with: graphs, tables, images, plans, citations ... The information, the collected data and / or the results are analysed and commented. The analysis is complemented with: graphs, tables, images, plans, citations ... Conclusions Conclusions are not included or are not suitable for work. The work includes some conclusions that show the fundamental aspects of the work. The work includes some conclusions that comprise the fundamental aspects of the work and raise new questions (open new ways of research). Documentary sources The documentary sources are not cited. The documentary sources are cited but typologies are not distinguished. Almost all documentary sources are cited, distinguishing between books, magazines, web pages, etc. They cite all documentary sources distinguishing between books, magazines, web pages, etc. Formal aspects The general presentation of the work is incorrect. The general presentation of the work is not correct. The general presentation of the work is good. The general presentation of the work is excellent. TOTAL SCORE
- 5. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION RUBRIC OF POSTER AND LEAFTLET GROUP MEMBERS GRADE GROUP Evaluation indicators Beginning 1 Developing 2 Accomplished 3 Excellent 4 SCORE Content Support details and information are not clear or are not related to the topic. Support details and information are related, but several key aspects are not supported. Support details and information are related, but a key aspect is without support. Relevant content, giving quality details that provide information that goes beyond the obvious and predictable. Organization of information The images do not have the necessary dimensions, they are disproportionate, unclear and do not support the message. Some images are not clear and well-proportioned and do not support the message. Some images support and represent the message and have the necessary dimensions according to the poster and the leaflet. All the images support and fully represent the message and have the necessary dimensions according to the poster and the leaflet. Iconographic language The information is in disorder and its reading is not easy. Information is organized but it is not easy reading the poster and leaflet. The information is well organized and it is easy to read the poster and the leaflet. The information is very well organized and has a detailed and it is easy to read order. Format The format is not suitable for the indicated dimensions, it lacks appropriate colours and is not visually appealing. The format is not appropriate to the indicated dimensions, although it is showy. The format is suitable for the dimensions indicated, although it is colourful. The format is visibly attractive, according to the necessary dimensions. Presentation of the product Incomplete, boring Use of few computer tools or badly used. Little mastery of the subject. Clear, but disordered and incomplete information. Well organized, creative and well-expressed. Use of powerful computer tools, security in the exhibition. Very well organized, creative and well-expressed. The use of many computer tools, very good exposure, catches attention TOTAL SCORE
- 6. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF AN ORAL PRESENTATION GROUP MEMBERS (Check the box that corresponds to the student who exposes) ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪ SUBJECT A. ORGANIZATION OF THE PRESENTATION The ideas are neatly organized Well-structured and tidy Acceptable, but with some faults Disorganized There is an introduction, a body of work and conclusions Yes Unclear No Capacity for synthesis: the most significant aspects have been selected A lot Enough Little Express rigor and objectivity A lot Enough Little Score (2,5) points B. ADEQUATION OF THE COMMUNICATIVE CONTEXT AND QUALITY OF THE CONTENT Show Knowledge of the subject (rigor, objectivity and level) Well suited Acceptable, but with faults or errors Unsuitable The ideas are presented with depth, details and examples Essential information. Excellent knowledge Basic theme information, but with errors Minimum content and errors Degree of formality Well suited Acceptable Unsuitable Express rigor, clarity and precision Well explained and understandable Unclear It is not understood Define words or concepts that may be new Yes Little No Score (2,5) points
- 7. Gemma E. Ajenjo Rodríguez WE CARRY ON AN EXHIBITION C. LINGUISTIC CORRECTION Language adapts to the situation and is the subject matter Well suited Acceptable, but with faults or errors Unsuitable (Imprecisions, barbarisms, serious errors ...) Morphosyntax: concordances, structure of sentences, complete sentences ... Well suited With some errors Unsuitable Pronunciation Well suited With some errors Unsuitable Score (2,5) points D. COMMUNICATIVE EFFICACY Provides information convincingly Very convincing Fair Little convincing Speech fluid, agile, with rhythm and with the appropriate pauses A lot Enough Little Volume, tone and voice modulation Well suited Acceptable Unsuitable Adaptation of visual support A lot Enough Little Organization and clarity of the visual presentation Well suited Acceptable Unsuitable If questions are formulated answers are ... Suitable and accurate Acceptable They do not answer what they are asking Score (2,5) points FINAL MARK OBSERVATIONS