[#35961] require performance on 1.9 — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
Hello,
11 messages
2011/05/01
[#35985] [Backport92 - Backport #4641][Open] Please backport r31418 to 1.9.2 stable branch — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
3 messages
2011/05/03
[#36013] [Ruby 1.9 - RubySpec #4649][Open] Adding parallel constructors to Ruby 2.0 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
9 messages
2011/05/05
[#36046] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4655][Open] String#to_c does not support scientific notation — Tinco Andringa <mail@...>
7 messages
2011/05/08
[#36058] draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3 — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
18 messages
2011/05/09
[#36087] Re: draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2011/05/10
Hi Yugui, is there any plans for the next patch release of 1.9.2?
[#36102] maintenance plan of Ruby 1.9.1 and 1.9.2
— "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
2011/05/11
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#36108] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4666][Open] set ruby compatibility version to 1.9.3 in trunk — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
7 messages
2011/05/11
[#36109] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4666][Open] set ruby compatibility version to 1.9.3 in trunk
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/05/11
Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36112] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4666][Open] set ruby compatibility version to 1.9.3 in trunk
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/05/11
> Even if 1.9.3 is still binary-compatible with 1.9.1, I think that it would be easier to change
[#36124] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4666][Open] set ruby compatibility version to 1.9.3 in trunk
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/05/12
2011/5/12 Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]>:
[#36131] Re: [ruby-cvs:38172] Ruby:r30989 (trunk): * include/ruby/win32.h: define WIN32 if neither _WIN64 nor WIN32 defined. it forces to use push/pop for pack(4) pragma. — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
Hi arton,
7 messages
2011/05/12
[#36132] Re: [ruby-cvs:38172] Ruby:r30989 (trunk): * include/ruby/win32.h: define WIN32 if neither _WIN64 nor WIN32 defined. it forces to use push/pop for pack(4) pragma.
— arton <artonx@...>
2011/05/12
Hi,
[#36150] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4680][Open] [PATCH] io.c: fix busy wait with sendfile() — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
5 messages
2011/05/12
[#36156] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4683][Open] [PATCH] io.c: copy_stream execute interrupts and retry — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
11 messages
2011/05/12
[#36167] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4421] [ext/openssl] Fix RSA public key encoding — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
4 messages
2011/05/13
[#36255] Whitespace conventions? — Steve Klabnik <steve@...>
So, while working on some documentation, I've noticed that there's a lot of
12 messages
2011/05/17
[#36258] Re: Whitespace conventions?
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/05/17
2011/5/17 Steve Klabnik <[email protected]>:
[#36285] unable to load irb, 1.9.3 mingw — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all, with mingw 1.9.3, I get the following when trying to load irb:
4 messages
2011/05/17
[#36314] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
3 messages
2011/05/18
[#36316] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731][Open] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
12 messages
2011/05/18
[#38075] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/07/15
[#38098] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/07/16
Hi,
[#38108] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/07/16
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36322] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4734][Assigned] [ext/openssl] DSA#sign error — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
5 messages
2011/05/18
[#36337] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Akira Tanaka <akr@...>
8 messages
2011/05/19
[#36798] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/06/06
Akira Tanaka <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36908] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/06/10
Hi,
[#36910] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/06/10
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36373] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4757][Open] Attempt to make Enumerator docs more clear (patch included) — David Copeland <davetron5000@...>
9 messages
2011/05/21
[#36433] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4757][Open] Attempt to make Enumerator docs more clear (patch included)
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/05/24
[#37052] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4757][Open] Attempt to make Enumerator docs more clear (patch included)
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2011/06/12
2011/5/25 Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]>:
[#36648] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4757] Attempt to make Enumerator docs more clear (patch included)
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/05/31
[#36374] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4758][Open] yaml file not human readable when saving utf-8 — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
7 messages
2011/05/21
[#36390] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766][Open] Range#bsearch — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
23 messages
2011/05/22
[#38148] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766] Range#bsearch
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/07/17
[#38149] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766] Range#bsearch
— Michael Edgar <adgar@...>
2011/07/18
On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:54 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#36395] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4769][Open] Updated SMTP standards — "J.R. Garcia" <mrjohngarcia@...>
5 messages
2011/05/22
[#36406] 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hello core people,
18 messages
2011/05/23
[#36414] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/05/23
2011/5/23 Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]>:
[#36487] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/05/26
Hi Luis,
[#36488] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...>
2011/05/26
From: Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]>
[#36496] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...>
2011/05/26
From: Hidetoshi NAGAI <[email protected]>
[#36712] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/06/03
Ping Luis, how's it going?
[#36748] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/06/05
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36751] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...>
2011/06/05
Hi,
[#36777] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/06/06
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Hidetoshi NAGAI <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36778] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/06/06
(06/06/2011 01:16 PM), Luis Lavena wrote:
[#37212] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/06/18
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <[email protected]> wrote:
[#37229] Re: 1.8.7 release next month
— Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...>
2011/06/20
From: Luis Lavena <[email protected]>
[#36419] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4772][Open] Hash#add_keys — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
13 messages
2011/05/24
[#36429] GC thought — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
10 messages
2011/05/24
[#36447] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4777][Open] Ruby 1.9.2-p180 ignoring INT, TERM, and QUIT until it receives CONT — Nathan Sobo <nathansobo@...>
10 messages
2011/05/25
[#36463] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4778][Open] IO#each_chomped — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
12 messages
2011/05/25
[#36474] Error reporting, backtraces and the debugger — Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
Dear people,
6 messages
2011/05/26
[#36479] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4784][Open] Import the JSON library — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
8 messages
2011/05/26
[#36494] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4786][Open] RCR new Feature: Numeric#grouped — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
9 messages
2011/05/26
[#36528] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4795][Open] Nested classes don't seem to resolve correctly when another class exists with the same name — John Feminella <johnf@...>
5 messages
2011/05/28
[#36536] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
3 messages
2011/05/28
[#36550] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4798][Open] test_process and test_signal errors and halts on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
3 messages
2011/05/29
[#36551] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4799][Open] M17N tests are too JP specific — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
5 messages
2011/05/29
[#36558] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
12 messages
2011/05/29
[#36586] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?)
— Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
2011/05/30
Hello,
[#36589] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?)
— Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
2011/05/30
Hello, Xavier
[#36559] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>
48 messages
2011/05/30
[#36560] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/05/30
Hi,
[#36571] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...>
2011/05/30
> Iff 'key': 'value'} means {:key => 'value'} I have no objection.
[#36573] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/05/30
Hi,
[#36578] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Cezary <cezary.baginski@...>
2011/05/30
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:21:32PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#36580] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2011/05/30
Em 30-05-2011 07:58, Cezary escreveu:
[#36581] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Michael Edgar <adgar@...>
2011/05/30
Since :"#{abc}" is allowed in Ruby, I imagine that any such substitute syntax would preserve that property.
[#36582] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2011/05/30
Em 30-05-2011 09:05, Michael Edgar escreveu:
[#36587] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Cezary <cezary.baginski@...>
2011/05/30
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Michael Edgar wrote:
[#36596] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Piotr Szotkowski <chastell@...>
2011/05/30
Cezary:
[#36631] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Cezary <cezary.baginski@...>
2011/05/31
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:55:39AM +0900, Piotr Szotkowski wrote:
[#36588] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Michael Edgar <adgar@...>
2011/05/30
On May 30, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Cezary wrote:
[#36680] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
2011/06/02
On 5/30/11 9:24 AM, Michael Edgar wrote:
[#36682] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
2011/06/02
On 02/06/2011, at 10:28 AM, Kurt Stephens wrote:
[#36686] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Bill Kelly <billk@...>
2011/06/02
[#36687] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings
— Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
2011/06/02
On 6/1/11 10:17 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:
[#36565] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4803][Open] RCLASS_SUPER won't compile for C extensions as of revision 31627 — Daniel Azuma <dazuma@...>
8 messages
2011/05/30
[#36721] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4803] RCLASS_SUPER won't compile for C extensions as of revision 31627
— Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
2011/06/03
[#36773] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4803] RCLASS_SUPER won't compile for C extensions as of revision 31627
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/06/06
Hi,
[#36628] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4805][Open] Add X509::Name#hash_old for 0.9.X compat — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
7 messages
2011/05/31
[ruby-core:36630] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #1081] add File::write() convenience method
From:
Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Date:
2011-05-31 13:20:47 UTC
List:
ruby-core #36630
Issue #1081 has been updated by Yusuke Endoh. Hello, 2011/5/31 Shota Fukumori <[email protected]>: > Patch has updated, Now File.binwrite accepts Hash for specifying options: > > https://gist.github.com/69c544ec245f3a07aabd Great! I tested your patch and noticed no problem. Roger and rubyspec folks, could you also check it? In terms of maintainability, I think that it would be better to define a common function for rb_io_s_write and rb_io_s_binwrite: http://www.atdot.net/sp/view/pw92ml diff --git a/io.c b/io.c index 4e1945c..25e0974 100644 --- a/io.c +++ b/io.c @@ -805,6 +805,12 @@ struct binwrite_arg {http://www.atdot.net/sp/view/pw92ml long length; }; +struct write_arg { + VALUE io; + VALUE str; + int nosync; +}; + static VALUE io_binwrite_string(VALUE arg) { @@ -8366,6 +8372,124 @@ rb_io_s_binread(int argc, VALUE *argv, VALUE io) return rb_ensure(io_s_read, (VALUE)&arg, rb_io_close, arg.io); } +static VALUE +io_s_write0(struct write_arg *arg) +{ + return io_write(arg->io,arg->str,arg->nosync); +} + +static VALUE +io_s_write(int argc, VALUE *argv, int binary) +{ + VALUE string, offset, opt; + struct foreach_arg arg; + struct write_arg warg; + + rb_scan_args(argc, argv, "21:", NULL, &string, &offset, &opt); + + if (NIL_P(opt)) opt = rb_hash_new(); + else opt = rb_hash_dup(opt); + + + if (NIL_P(rb_hash_aref(opt,sym_mode))) { + int mode = O_WRONLY|O_CREAT; +#ifdef O_BINARY + if (binary) mode |= O_BINARY; +#endif + if (NIL_P(offset)) mode |= O_TRUNC; + rb_hash_aset(opt,sym_mode,INT2NUM(mode)); + } + open_key_args(argc,argv,opt,&arg); + +#ifndef O_BINARY + if (binary) rb_io_binmode_m(arg.io); +#endif + + if (NIL_P(arg.io)) return Qnil; + if (!NIL_P(offset)) { + struct seek_arg sarg; + int state = 0; + sarg.io = arg.io; + sarg.offset = offset; + sarg.mode = SEEK_SET; + rb_protect(seek_before_access, (VALUE)&sarg, &state); + if (state) { + rb_io_close(arg.io); + rb_jump_tag(state); + } + } + + warg.io = arg.io; + warg.str = string; + warg.nosync = 0; + + return rb_ensure(io_s_write0, (VALUE)&warg, rb_io_close, arg.io); +} + +/* + * call-seq: + * IO.write(name, string, [offset] ) => fixnum + * IO.write(name, string, [offset], open_args ) => fixnum + * + * Opens the file, optionally seeks to the given <i>offset</i>, writes + * <i>string</i>, then returns the length written. + * <code>write</code> ensures the file is closed before returning. + * If <i>offset</i> is not given, the file is truncated. Otherwise, + * it is not truncated. + * + * If the last argument is a hash, it specifies option for internal + * open(). The key would be the following. open_args: is exclusive + * to others. + * + * encoding: string or encoding + * + * specifies encoding of the read string. encoding will be ignored + * if length is specified. + * + * mode: string + * + * specifies mode argument for open(). it should start with "w" or "a" or "r+" + * otherwise it would cause error. + * + * perm: fixnum + * + * specifies perm argument for open(). + * + * open_args: array of strings + * + * specifies arguments for open() as an array. + * + * IO.write("testfile", "0123456789") #=> "0123456789" + * IO.write("testfile", "0123456789", 20) #=> "This is line one\nThi0123456789two\nThis is line three\nAnd so on...\n" + */ + +static VALUE +rb_io_s_write(int argc, VALUE *argv, VALUE io) +{ + io_s_write(argc, argv, 0); +} + +/* + * call-seq: + * IO.binwrite(name, string, [offset] ) => fixnum + * + * Opens the file, optionally seeks to the given <i>offset</i>, write + * <i>string</i> then returns the length written. + * <code>binwrite</code> ensures the file is closed before returning. + * The open mode would be "wb:ASCII-8BIT". + * If <i>offset</i> is not given, the file is truncated. Otherwise, + * it is not truncated. + * + * IO.binwrite("testfile", "0123456789") #=> "0123456789" + * IO.binwrite("testfile", "0123456789", 20) #=> "This is line one\nThi0123456789two\nThis is line three\nAnd so on...\n" + */ + +static VALUE +rb_io_s_binwrite(int argc, VALUE *argv, VALUE io) +{ + io_s_write(argc, argv, 1); +} + struct copy_stream_struct { VALUE src; VALUE dst; @@ -10315,6 +10439,8 @@ Init_IO(void) rb_define_singleton_method(rb_cIO, "readlines", rb_io_s_readlines, -1); rb_define_singleton_method(rb_cIO, "read", rb_io_s_read, -1); rb_define_singleton_method(rb_cIO, "binread", rb_io_s_binread, -1); + rb_define_singleton_method(rb_cIO, "write", rb_io_s_write, -1); + rb_define_singleton_method(rb_cIO, "binwrite", rb_io_s_binwrite, -1); rb_define_singleton_method(rb_cIO, "select", rb_f_select, -1); rb_define_singleton_method(rb_cIO, "pipe", rb_io_s_pipe, -1); rb_define_singleton_method(rb_cIO, "try_convert", rb_io_s_try_convert, 1); diff --git a/test/ruby/test_io.rb b/test/ruby/test_io.rb index f919227..8aaecd1 100644 --- a/test/ruby/test_io.rb +++ b/test/ruby/test_io.rb @@ -1861,4 +1861,61 @@ End end end + def test_s_write + t = Tempfile.new("foo") + path = t.path + t.close(false) + File.write(path, "foo\nbar\nbaz") + assert_equal("foo\nbar\nbaz", File.read(path)) + File.write(path, "FOO", 0) + assert_equal("FOO\nbar\nbaz", File.read(path)) + File.write(path, "BAR") + assert_equal("BAR", File.read(path)) + File.write(path, "\u{3042}", mode: "w", encoding: "EUC-JP") + assert_equal("\u{3042}".encode("EUC-JP"), File.read(path, encoding: "EUC-JP")) + File.delete t + assert_equal(6, File.write(path,'string',2)) + File.delete t + assert_raise(Errno::EINVAL) { File.write('/tmp/nonexisting','string',-2) } + assert_equal(6, File.write(path, 'string')) + assert_equal(3, File.write(path, 'sub', 1)) + assert_equal("ssubng", File.read(path)) + File.delete t + assert_equal(3, File.write(path, "foo", encoding: "UTF-8")) + File.delete t + assert_equal(3, File.write(path, "foo", 0, encoding: "UTF-8")) + assert_equal("foo", File.read(path)) + assert_equal(1, File.write(path, "f", 1, encoding: "UTF-8")) + assert_equal("ffo", File.read(path)) + File.delete t + assert_equal(1, File.write(path, "f", 1, encoding: "UTF-8")) + assert_equal("\00f", File.read(path)) + assert_equal(1, File.write(path, "f", 0, encoding: "UTF-8")) + assert_equal("ff", File.read(path)) + t.unlink + end + + def test_s_binwrite + t = Tempfile.new("foo") + path = t.path + t.close(false) + File.binwrite(path, "foo\nbar\nbaz") + assert_equal("foo\nbar\nbaz", File.read(path)) + File.binwrite(path, "FOO", 0) + assert_equal("FOO\nbar\nbaz", File.read(path)) + File.binwrite(path, "BAR") + assert_equal("BAR", File.read(path)) + File.binwrite(path, "\u{3042}") + assert_equal("\u{3042}".force_encoding("ASCII-8BIT"), File.binread(path)) + File.delete t + assert_equal(6, File.binwrite(path,'string',2)) + File.delete t + assert_equal(6, File.binwrite(path, 'string')) + assert_equal(3, File.binwrite(path, 'sub', 1)) + assert_equal("ssubng", File.binread(path)) + assert_equal(6, File.size(path)) + assert_raise(Errno::EINVAL) { File.binwrite('/tmp/nonexisting','string',-2) } + assert_nothing_raised(TypeError) { File.binwrite(path, "string", mode: "w", encoding: "EUC-JP") } + t.unlink + end end -- Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]> ---------------------------------------- Feature #1081: add File::write() convenience method http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/1081 Author: Suraj Kurapati Status: Assigned Priority: Normal Assignee: Yusuke Endoh Category: core Target version: 1.9.3 =begin Please add a File::write() convenience method to the core Ruby API. Currently, it is easier to read whole files than to write them: # reading a whole file --- less effort text = File::read('foo.txt') # writing a whole file --- more effort File::open('foo.txt', 'wb') {|f| f.write 'ruby!' } This imbalance can be corrected by adding a File::write method, such as the following, to the core Ruby API: class File def self.write path, data, mode = 'wb' open(path, mode) {|f| f.write data } end end Thanks for your consideration. =end -- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org