[#37708] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4956][Open] [PATCH] string.c (tr_s_bang): fix leak with heap strings — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 04:46:44AM +0900, Eric Wong wrote:
[#37714] test fail test/matrix/test_matrix.rb:321 — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
http://59.106.172.211/~chkbuild/ruby-trunk/log/20110701T110101Z.log.html.gz
2011/7/1 KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]>:
Test fixed, thanks (indeed, Matrix#** now implements non integer exponents).
2011/7/2 Marc-Andre Lafortune <[email protected]>:
[#37724] open-ssl related errors on MacOSX — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
2011/7/2 SASADA Koichi <[email protected]>:
2011/7/2 Martin Bo煬et <[email protected]>:
[#37730] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4962][Open] come back gem_prelude! — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 02:18:35PM +0900, Yusuke Endoh wrote:
[#37757] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4969][Open] Subtle issue with require — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#37761] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4970][Open] FileUtils refactored — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#37805] [Ruby 1.8 - Bug #4979][Open] `require 'foo'` is ambiguous when there is both foo.rb and foo.so — Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@...>
[#37840] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4985][Open] Add %S[] support for making a list of symbols — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
I guessed that %S(...) is S-expr syntax.
[#37853] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4989][Open] Document Socket constants — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
Why change all the statuses to low here? I don't see the validity of
Hi
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 08:25, KOSAKI Motohiro <[email protected]> wrote:
[#37858] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4992][Open] finalizer中のThread.newでSEGV — Shota Fukumori <sorah@...>
> -- Thread.new in finalizer raises SEGV
[#37866] [Backport87 - Feature #4996][Open] About 1.8.7 EOL — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>
[#37913] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5003][Open] Enumerator#next segfaults in OS X Lion (10.7) — Ganesh Gunasegaran <ganesh.gunas@...>
[#37917] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5005][Open] Provide convenient access to original methods — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#37932] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5008][Open] Equal rights for Hash (like Array, String, Integer, Float) — Suraj Kurapati <sunaku@...>
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 13:25, rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas) <
[#37936] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5010][Open] Add Slop(-like) in stdlib and deprecate current OptionParser API — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Hi,
Em 09-07-2011 20:13, Nobuyoshi Nakada escreveu:
[#37985] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #2616] unable to trap in doze — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
[#37988] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5016][Open] Kernel#caller with negative limit should limit result to N initial frames — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
[#38011] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5018][Open] ruby_1_9_3 branch is missing from official GitHub mirror — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#38096] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5033][Open] PATCH: 1.9: gc_mark_children: Avoid gc_mark() tail recursion, use goto again. — Kurt Stephens <ks.ruby@...>
[#38109] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5034][Open] C Source Code formatting — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#38137] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5038][Open] Ruby 1.9.2 stops on some Regular Expressions — Bob Ambartsumov <bob@...>
[#38140] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5041][Open] Set FD_CLOEXEC for all fds (except 0, 1, 2) — Akira Tanaka <akr@...>
[#38158] Proposal to merge net2-http for Ruby 1.9.4 — Yehuda Katz <wycats@...>
I gave a talk at Ruby Kaigi about my work on Net::HTTP (
2011/7/18 Yehuda Katz <[email protected]>:
Yehuda Katz
[#38164] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5046][Open] Bug with xmlrpc::client, basic auth and long authentication strings — Herwin Weststrate <herwin@...>
[#38171] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5047][Open] Segfault (most likely involving require) — Jack Christensen <jack@...>
Hiroshi Nakamura <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jul 22, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Eric Wong wrote:
Thank you for the trying the patch.
[#38172] [Backport87 - Backport #5048][Open] Make failed on tk bindings under OSX Lion fresh install — "Wayne E. Seguin" <wayneeseguin@...>
[#38182] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5054][Open] Compress a sequence of ends — ANDO Yasushi ANDO <andyjpn@...>
[#38197] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5056][Open] About 1.9 EOL — Shyouhei Urabe <shyouhei@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On 23/08/11 at 06:50 +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
(2011/08/23 20:09), Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 23/08/11 at 20:20 +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
Hello,
[#38295] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5064][Open] HTTP user-agent class — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
[#38343] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5068][Open] Issue with "duplicated when clause is ignored" — Stefano Mioli <stefano.mioli@...>
[#38367] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5072][Open] Avoid inadvertent symbol creation in reflection methods — Jeremy Evans <merch-redmine@...>
[#38391] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5076][Open] Mac OS X Lion Support — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
[#38451] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5090][Open] Segfault using Enumerator — Robert Syme <rob.syme@...>
[#38464] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5091][Open] Can't require './.testrb' — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
[#38491] 1.9.3 Status Update? — Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
Hello ruby-core,
[#38510] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5097][Assigned] Supported platforms of Ruby 1.9.3 — Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Yui NARUSE <[email protected]> wrote:
Yui NARUSE <[email protected]> wrote:
[#38538] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5101][Open] allow optional timeout for TCPSocket.new — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/7/27 Eric Wong <[email protected]>:
Tanaka Akira <[email protected]> wrote:
2011/7/29 Eric Wong <[email protected]>:
2011/7/30 Tanaka Akira <[email protected]>:
[#38610] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5120][Open] String#split needs to be logical — Alexey Muranov <muranov@...>
[ruby-core:38189] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5054] Compress a sequence of ends
On 19 July 2011 13:27, Steve Klabnik <[email protected]> wrote: > > Issue #5054 has been updated by Steve Klabnik. > > > Yeah, I don't like this change. Mostly because that huge chain of ends is _supposed_ to look ugly; it reminds me that my code is far too nested, and should be reworked and written properly. > > I'd prefer bad code to look ugly. I don't think eeend is beautiful at all. Even if you had to write "end end" (on the same line) I'd prefer it. If we want to go that direction (knowing all previous attempts failed, and I think for a good reason), we should not stop halfway. > These bad things won't occur by introducing en(n+)d. They are many more problem invoked in the discussion. Some can probably be solved in some way, other are real issues. We have nice "unless" and you would go to the "eeeeeeend" ? Sounds crazy to me ;)