[#62297] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap. — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[email protected] wrote:
7 messages
2014/05/02
[#62307] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/05/03
(2014/05/03 4:41), Eric Wong wrote:
[#62402] Re: [ruby-cvs:52906] nari:r45760 (trunk): * gc.c (gc_after_sweep): suppress unnecessary expanding heap.
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/05/05
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#62523] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — ko1@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Koichi Sasada.
3 messages
2014/05/11
[#62556] doxygen (Re: Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2014-05-11 8:50 GMT+09:00 Eric Wong <[email protected]>:
3 messages
2014/05/13
[#62727] [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
rb_unlink_method_entry may cause old_me to be swept before the new
7 messages
2014/05/24
[#63039] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/10
Hi,
[#63077] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/10
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#63086] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/06/11
(2014/06/11 4:47), Eric Wong wrote:
[#63087] Re: [RFC] vm_method.c (rb_method_entry_make): avoid freed me in m_tbl
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/06/11
SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#62862] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Any comment on officially supporting this as part of the C API?
5 messages
2014/05/30
[ruby-core:62568] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9836] [Feedback] Bad Implementation of Time.strptime
From:
matz@...
Date:
2014-05-13 23:40:20 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62568
Issue #9836 has been updated by Yukihiro Matsumoto.
Status changed from Open to Feedback
I am not sure what behavior you are referring as "extremely naive".
Please be concrete. How do you think it should behave?
Matz.
----------------------------------------
Bug #9836: Bad Implementation of Time.strptime
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9836#change-46714
* Author: Max Anselm
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-linux]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
According to the documentation, `Time.strptime` "parses +date+ using `Date._strptime` and converts it to a Time object." However this conversion is extremely naive, using only certain fields return by `Date._strptime` and ignoring the rest (for example `:wnum0`).
This creates confusing and inconsistent behavior when compared to `Date` and `DateTime`'s `strptime` methods.
For example:
```
puts Date.strptime('201418', "%Y%U")
=> 2014-05-04
puts DateTime.strptime('201418', "%Y%U")
=> 2014-05-04T00:00:00+00:00
puts Time.strptime('201418', "%Y%U")
=> 2014-01-01 00:00:00 -0500
```
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/