[#62904] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9894] [Open] [RFC] README.EXT: document rb_gc_register_mark_object — normalperson@...
Issue #9894 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/06/02
[#63321] [ANN] ElixirConf 2014 - Don't Miss Jos辿 Valim and Dave Thomas — Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...>
Just a few more weeks until ElixirConf 2014!
6 messages
2014/06/24
[ruby-core:62888] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9622] Extra method arguments are magically swallowed after first successful call, possible method cache bug
From:
nagachika00@...
Date:
2014-06-01 17:04:21 UTC
List:
ruby-core #62888
Issue #9622 has been updated by Tomoyuki Chikanaga.
Backport changed from 1.9.3: REQUIRED, 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: REQUIRED to 1.9.3: REQUIRED, 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: DONE
Backported into `ruby_2_1` at r46302.
----------------------------------------
Bug #9622: Extra method arguments are magically swallowed after first successful call, possible method cache bug
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9622#change-46996
* Author: Jean Boussier
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category: core
* Target version:
* ruby -v: 2.0.0
* Backport: 1.9.3: REQUIRED, 2.0.0: DONE, 2.1: DONE
----------------------------------------
The following code behaviour totally change since ruby 2.0.0
~~~
class Foo
def bar(*args)
attribute(:bar, *args)
end
def attribute(name)
puts name
end
end
foo = Foo.new
begin
foo.bar(100)
rescue => e
puts e.class.name
end
foo.bar # legit
5.times do
foo.bar(100)
end
puts 'No errors??? WTF???'
~~~
ruby < 2.0 output:
~~~
ArgumentError
bar
(eval):3:in `attribute': wrong number of arguments (2 for 1) (ArgumentError)
from (eval):3:in `bar'
from foo.rb:28
from foo.rb:27:in `times'
from foo.rb:27
~~~
Which is expected.
But ruby >= 2.0 output
~~~
ArgumentError
bar
bar
bar
bar
bar
bar
No errors??? WTF???
~~~
In short, after the first successful call, the extra arguments are just ignored. I have no idea of what is going on here, but it look like a broken optimization.
All rubies >= 2.0 are affected. 1.8.7 and 1.9.3 are fine.
Regards.
A gist describing the issue: https://gist.github.com/byroot/9495455
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/