[#89430] [Ruby trunk Misc#15229] DevelopersMeeting201801122Japan — mame@...
Issue #15229 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
3 messages
2018/10/17
[#89555] [Ruby trunk Feature#15251] Hash aset should deduplicate non tainted string — chopraanmol1@...
Issue #15251 has been updated by chopraanmol1 (Anmol Chopra).
3 messages
2018/10/25
[#89583] [PATCH] vm_trace.c (postponed_job_register): only hit main thread — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
@hsbt: I post here on ruby-core because I hit errors with
5 messages
2018/10/27
[#89584] Re: [PATCH] vm_trace.c (postponed_job_register): only hit main thread
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/10/27
thank you for you patch.
[#89590] Re: [PATCH] vm_trace.c (postponed_job_register): only hit main thread
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/10/28
Koichi Sasada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#89621] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
4 messages
2018/10/29
[#89622] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/10/29
[email protected] wrote:
[#89627] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
3 messages
2018/10/30
[#89654] [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14867 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
4 messages
2018/10/31
[#89655] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14867] Process.wait can wait for MJIT compiler process
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/10/31
[email protected] wrote:
[ruby-core:89623] [Ruby trunk Feature#15236] add support for hash shorthand
From:
lyoneil.de.sire@...
Date:
2018-10-30 00:47:09 UTC
List:
ruby-core #89623
Issue #15236 has been updated by ignatiusreza (Ignatius Reza Lesmana).
janfri (Jan Friedrich) wrote:
> I think the use of destructuring for this is much more Rubyish than the ES6 syntax.
Agreed that destructuring hash is very much ruby, since destructuring array is already supported.. but, I think supporting that does not mean that we can't support this one too.. in fact, I think supporting both would be best, since I would expect that if I can do one, I should also be able to do the other..
----------------------------------------
Feature #15236: add support for hash shorthand
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15236#change-74661
* Author: ignatiusreza (Ignatius Reza Lesmana)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
PR in github: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/pull/1990
inspired by javascript support for object literal shorthand notation `{ a }`, which will be expanded into `{ a: a }`..
to avoid ambiguity, this shorthand is only supported when hash is defined with `{ }` notation.. in other situation where the brackets is optional, e.g. function call, we still need to write it in full (`m(a : a)` instead of `m(a)`, or `m(a, b, c: c)` instead of `m(a, b, c)`..
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>