diff options
author | Tom Lane | 2018-09-23 20:05:45 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom Lane | 2018-09-23 20:05:45 +0000 |
commit | 89b280e139c463c98eb33592216a123e89052d08 (patch) | |
tree | 226e7608f24f3ef658286ca444cfad43f9d95314 /src/backend/executor/execCurrent.c | |
parent | 2f39106a209e647d7b1895331fca115f9bb6ec8d (diff) |
Fix failure in WHERE CURRENT OF after rewinding the referenced cursor.
In a case where we have multiple relation-scan nodes in a cursor plan,
such as a scan of an inheritance tree, it's possible to fetch from a
given scan node, then rewind the cursor and fetch some row from an
earlier scan node. In such a case, execCurrent.c mistakenly thought
that the later scan node was still active, because ExecReScan hadn't
done anything to make it look not-active. We'd get some sort of
failure in the case of a SeqScan node, because the node's scan tuple
slot would be pointing at a HeapTuple whose t_self gets reset to
invalid by heapam.c. But it seems possible that for other relation
scan node types we'd actually return a valid tuple TID to the caller,
resulting in updating or deleting a tuple that shouldn't have been
considered current. To fix, forcibly clear the ScanTupleSlot in
ExecScanReScan.
Another issue here, which seems only latent at the moment but could
easily become a live bug in future, is that rewinding a cursor does
not necessarily lead to *immediately* applying ExecReScan to every
scan-level node in the plan tree. Upper-level nodes will think that
they can postpone that call if their child node is already marked
with chgParam flags. I don't see a way for that to happen today in
a plan tree that's simple enough for execCurrent.c's search_plan_tree
to understand, but that's one heck of a fragile assumption. So, add
some logic in search_plan_tree to detect chgParam flags being set on
nodes that it descended to/through, and assume that that means we
should consider lower scan nodes to be logically reset even if their
ReScan call hasn't actually happened yet.
Per bug #15395 from Matvey Arye. This has been broken for a long time,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/executor/execCurrent.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/backend/executor/execCurrent.c | 62 |
1 files changed, 46 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/executor/execCurrent.c b/src/backend/executor/execCurrent.c index f70e54fe2af..7480cf50ad0 100644 --- a/src/backend/executor/execCurrent.c +++ b/src/backend/executor/execCurrent.c @@ -23,7 +23,8 @@ static char *fetch_cursor_param_value(ExprContext *econtext, int paramId); -static ScanState *search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid); +static ScanState *search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid, + bool *pending_rescan); /* @@ -156,8 +157,10 @@ execCurrentOf(CurrentOfExpr *cexpr, * aggregation. */ ScanState *scanstate; + bool pending_rescan = false; - scanstate = search_plan_tree(queryDesc->planstate, table_oid); + scanstate = search_plan_tree(queryDesc->planstate, table_oid, + &pending_rescan); if (!scanstate) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_CURSOR_STATE), @@ -177,8 +180,12 @@ execCurrentOf(CurrentOfExpr *cexpr, errmsg("cursor \"%s\" is not positioned on a row", cursor_name))); - /* Now OK to return false if we found an inactive scan */ - if (TupIsNull(scanstate->ss_ScanTupleSlot)) + /* + * Now OK to return false if we found an inactive scan. It is + * inactive either if it's not positioned on a row, or there's a + * rescan pending for it. + */ + if (TupIsNull(scanstate->ss_ScanTupleSlot) || pending_rescan) return false; /* @@ -291,10 +298,20 @@ fetch_cursor_param_value(ExprContext *econtext, int paramId) * * Search through a PlanState tree for a scan node on the specified table. * Return NULL if not found or multiple candidates. + * + * If a candidate is found, set *pending_rescan to true if that candidate + * or any node above it has a pending rescan action, i.e. chgParam != NULL. + * That indicates that we shouldn't consider the node to be positioned on a + * valid tuple, even if its own state would indicate that it is. (Caller + * must initialize *pending_rescan to false, and should not trust its state + * if multiple candidates are found.) */ static ScanState * -search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid) +search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid, + bool *pending_rescan) { + ScanState *result = NULL; + if (node == NULL) return NULL; switch (nodeTag(node)) @@ -314,7 +331,7 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid) ScanState *sstate = (ScanState *) node; if (RelationGetRelid(sstate->ss_currentRelation) == table_oid) - return sstate; + result = sstate; break; } @@ -325,13 +342,13 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid) case T_AppendState: { AppendState *astate = (AppendState *) node; - ScanState *result = NULL; int i; for (i = 0; i < astate->as_nplans; i++) { ScanState *elem = search_plan_tree(astate->appendplans[i], - table_oid); + table_oid, + pending_rescan); if (!elem) continue; @@ -339,7 +356,7 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid) return NULL; /* multiple matches */ result = elem; } - return result; + break; } /* @@ -348,13 +365,13 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid) case T_MergeAppendState: { MergeAppendState *mstate = (MergeAppendState *) node; - ScanState *result = NULL; int i; for (i = 0; i < mstate->ms_nplans; i++) { ScanState *elem = search_plan_tree(mstate->mergeplans[i], - table_oid); + table_oid, + pending_rescan); if (!elem) continue; @@ -362,7 +379,7 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid) return NULL; /* multiple matches */ result = elem; } - return result; + break; } /* @@ -371,18 +388,31 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid) */ case T_ResultState: case T_LimitState: - return search_plan_tree(node->lefttree, table_oid); + result = search_plan_tree(node->lefttree, + table_oid, + pending_rescan); + break; /* * SubqueryScan too, but it keeps the child in a different place */ case T_SubqueryScanState: - return search_plan_tree(((SubqueryScanState *) node)->subplan, - table_oid); + result = search_plan_tree(((SubqueryScanState *) node)->subplan, + table_oid, + pending_rescan); + break; default: /* Otherwise, assume we can't descend through it */ break; } - return NULL; + + /* + * If we found a candidate at or below this node, then this node's + * chgParam indicates a pending rescan that will affect the candidate. + */ + if (result && node->chgParam != NULL) + *pending_rescan = true; + + return result; } |