diff options
| author | Andres Freund | 2019-01-21 18:32:19 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andres Freund | 2019-01-21 18:51:37 +0000 |
| commit | e0c4ec07284db817e1f8d9adfb3fffc952252db0 (patch) | |
| tree | ad56d635b246f6d4d0d7a17b2a4ac797d7227b62 /src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c | |
| parent | 111944c5ee567f1c45bf0f1ecfdec682af467aa6 (diff) | |
Replace uses of heap_open et al with the corresponding table_* function.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/[email protected]
Diffstat (limited to 'src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c index 2123117f8b0..231c370c6b7 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/catcache.c @@ -938,7 +938,7 @@ CatalogCacheInitializeCache(CatCache *cache) CatalogCacheInitializeCache_DEBUG1; - relation = heap_open(cache->cc_reloid, AccessShareLock); + relation = table_open(cache->cc_reloid, AccessShareLock); /* * switch to the cache context so our allocations do not vanish at the end @@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ CatalogCacheInitializeCache(CatCache *cache) */ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcxt); - heap_close(relation, AccessShareLock); + table_close(relation, AccessShareLock); CACHE3_elog(DEBUG2, "CatalogCacheInitializeCache: %s, %d keys", cache->cc_relname, cache->cc_nkeys); @@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ SearchCatCacheMiss(CatCache *cache, * * NOTE: it is possible for recursive cache lookups to occur while reading * the relation --- for example, due to shared-cache-inval messages being - * processed during heap_open(). This is OK. It's even possible for one + * processed during table_open(). This is OK. It's even possible for one * of those lookups to find and enter the very same tuple we are trying to * fetch here. If that happens, we will enter a second copy of the tuple * into the cache. The first copy will never be referenced again, and @@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ SearchCatCacheMiss(CatCache *cache, * This case is rare enough that it's not worth expending extra cycles to * detect. */ - relation = heap_open(cache->cc_reloid, AccessShareLock); + relation = table_open(cache->cc_reloid, AccessShareLock); scandesc = systable_beginscan(relation, cache->cc_indexoid, @@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@ SearchCatCacheMiss(CatCache *cache, systable_endscan(scandesc); - heap_close(relation, AccessShareLock); + table_close(relation, AccessShareLock); /* * If tuple was not found, we need to build a negative cache entry @@ -1638,7 +1638,7 @@ SearchCatCacheList(CatCache *cache, cur_skey[2].sk_argument = v3; cur_skey[3].sk_argument = v4; - relation = heap_open(cache->cc_reloid, AccessShareLock); + relation = table_open(cache->cc_reloid, AccessShareLock); scandesc = systable_beginscan(relation, cache->cc_indexoid, @@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ SearchCatCacheList(CatCache *cache, systable_endscan(scandesc); - heap_close(relation, AccessShareLock); + table_close(relation, AccessShareLock); /* Now we can build the CatCList entry. */ oldcxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(CacheMemoryContext); |