Skip to content

Conversation

@arthrod
Copy link
Owner

@arthrod arthrod commented May 20, 2025

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • docs/package.json
  • docs/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
medium severity Race Condition
SNYK-JS-NEXT-10176058
  708  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Race Condition

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 20, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Ignore keyword(s) in the title.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch snyk-fix-39895b03e30c83935f40978b4b1f57f6
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or crs to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or cr anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@arthrod
Copy link
Owner Author

arthrod commented May 20, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @arthrod, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

Hello team, gemini-code-assist here to provide a summary of this pull request. This PR was automatically generated by Snyk to address a security vulnerability found in the next dependency. Specifically, it aims to fix a Race Condition vulnerability (SNYK-JS-NEXT-10176058) by upgrading the next package in the docs directory from version 14.2.23 to 14.2.24. The changes involve updating the version specified in package.json and the corresponding entries, including integrity hashes and resolved URLs, in the package-lock.json file.

Highlights

  • Security Upgrade: The primary goal of this PR is to perform a security upgrade of the next dependency in the docs project.
  • Vulnerability Fix: This upgrade specifically targets and fixes a medium severity Race Condition vulnerability (SNYK-JS-NEXT-10176058) identified by Snyk.
  • Dependency Version Bump: The next package is being updated from version 14.2.23 to 14.2.24.

Changelog

  • docs/package-lock.json
    • Updated the root next dependency version from 14.2.23 to 14.2.24 (line 4272).
    • Updated the @next/env dependency version from 14.2.23 to 14.2.24 (line 501).
    • Updated various @next/swc-* optional dependencies to version 14.2.24 (lines 507, 523, 539, 555, 571, 587, 603, 619, 635).
    • Updated resolved URLs and integrity hashes for all upgraded @next/* dependencies.
    • Temporarily changed the package name in the lockfile (line 2).
  • docs/package.json
    • Updated the next dependency version constraint from ^14.2.15 to ^14.2.24 (line 3).
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A package needs a bump,
Security takes a jump.
From old to new,
A fix comes through,
No more security slump.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This Snyk pull request correctly upgrades the next package to 14.2.24, addressing the specified security vulnerability (SNYK-JS-NEXT-10176058). The updates to next and its related sub-dependencies in both docs/package.json and docs/package-lock.json appear to correctly apply the security fix, including version bumps and integrity hash updates.

One notable and unusual change is the modification of the name field in docs/package-lock.json from "docs" to "relock-npm-lock-v2-cU24Bg". This deviation from standard npm behavior warrants attention and is detailed in the review comments.

Summary of Findings

  • Unexpected name field change in package-lock.json: The name field in docs/package-lock.json was changed from "docs" to "relock-npm-lock-v2-cU24Bg". This is non-standard and should ideally be reverted to "docs" for consistency with npm conventions.

Merge Readiness

The pull request successfully applies the necessary security upgrade for the next package. However, there is an unexpected change in the name field of docs/package-lock.json which should be addressed or clarified before merging. This change deviates from standard npm behavior and could lead to confusion. I am unable to approve pull requests myself. It is recommended that this specific modification to the name field be reviewed and ideally reverted to "docs". Once this is addressed, the PR should be in a good state for merging by authorized maintainers.

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
{
"name": "docs",
"name": "relock-npm-lock-v2-cU24Bg",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The name field in package-lock.json has been changed from "docs" to "relock-npm-lock-v2-cU24Bg". This is an unexpected modification. According to npm's behavior, this field should ideally match the name in package.json. Since docs/package.json does not explicitly define a name, it would typically default to the directory name, which is "docs".

Could you clarify if this change is intentional or an artifact of the lockfile regeneration process? It's recommended to revert this to "docs" to maintain consistency with standard npm practices and avoid potential confusion or issues with tools that might parse this field.

    "name": "docs",

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants