Skip to content

Conversation

@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jul 2, 2025

This reverts commit fdfb4fd.

This causes issues for downstream builders.

Fixes: #629


This is an automatic backport of pull request #628 done by Mergify.

This reverts commit fdfb4fd.

This causes issues for downstream builders.

Signed-off-by: Ken Dreyer <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c83f57b)
@mergify mergify bot added release-branch dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file ci-failure labels Jul 2, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@cdoern cdoern left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but we might be missing some other back ports? Or the failure may just be a flake

@mergify mergify bot added the one-approval label Jul 2, 2025
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 0cc2e30 into release-v0.10 Jul 3, 2025
11 of 14 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot removed the one-approval label Jul 3, 2025
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/release-v0.10/pr-628 branch July 3, 2025 15:34
@ktdreyer
Copy link
Contributor

ktdreyer commented Jul 3, 2025

The smoke.yaml job consistently failed on this PR.

We're missing many fixes to the CI job on the release-v0.10 branch:

git diff release-v0.10..main --no-merges -- .github/workflows/smoke.yaml

We should try backporting all of .github/workflows from main to release-v0.10.

@ktdreyer
Copy link
Contributor

ktdreyer commented Jul 3, 2025

I've backported all the CI fixes to release-v0.10 here: #637 so that we can make progress on getting CI to green for release-v0.10.

In the meantime, I don't think we should revert this PR. Instead, I think we should tag v0.10.4 with this now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci-failure dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file release-branch

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants