Skip to content

Conversation

@cyberphysic4l
Copy link
Contributor

Description of change

Enabled score-based rewards in protocol version 18. Updated the protocol config snapshots and iota-framework snapshots accordingly.

Links to any relevant issues

Be sure to reference any related issues by adding fixes #(issue).

How the change has been tested

  • Basic tests (linting, compilation, formatting, unit/integration tests)
  • Patch-specific tests (correctness, functionality coverage)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have checked that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

Release Notes

  • Protocol: Updated protocol version to 18 and activates score-based rewards on Devnet.
  • Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
  • Indexer:
  • JSON-RPC:
  • GraphQL:
  • CLI:
  • Rust SDK:
  • REST API:

@cyberphysic4l cyberphysic4l requested review from a team as code owners December 2, 2025 15:12
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 2, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

6 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
apps-backend Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 2, 2025 6:05pm
apps-ui-kit Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 2, 2025 6:05pm
iota-evm-bridge Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 2, 2025 6:05pm
iota-multisig-toolkit Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 2, 2025 6:05pm
rebased-explorer Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 2, 2025 6:05pm
wallet-dashboard Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 2, 2025 6:05pm

@cyberphysic4l cyberphysic4l force-pushed the protocol-research/feat/score-integration branch from 6baa362 to 2700087 Compare December 2, 2025 15:44
@cyberphysic4l cyberphysic4l requested review from a team as code owners December 2, 2025 15:44
@cyberphysic4l cyberphysic4l force-pushed the protocol-research/feat/score-integration-bump-protocol-version branch from d69a4ea to 310abc7 Compare December 2, 2025 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants