Fix/log group #31
Fix/log group #31
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR releases dix v2.0.0 with a modularized architecture. It introduces separate packages for graph rendering (dixrender), context support (dixcontext), and HTTP visualization (dixhttp), refactors the core DI logic to use error returns, adds structured logging, updates the public API surface, and includes comprehensive documentation and examples. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Client
participant Server as dixhttp.Server
participant Handler as HTTP Handler
participant Dix as Dix Container
participant Renderer as dixrender
Client->>Server: GET /
Server->>Handler: HandleIndex()
Handler->>Server: serve template.html
Server-->>Client: HTML UI
Client->>Server: GET /api/dependencies
Server->>Handler: HandleDependencies()
Handler->>Dix: GetProviderDetails()
Dix-->>Handler: provider details
Handler->>Dix: GetObjects()
Dix-->>Handler: object instances
Handler-->>Client: JSON {Providers, Objects, Edges}
Client->>Server: GET /api/graph?type=providers
Server->>Handler: HandleGraph()
Handler->>Renderer: GenerateProviderGraph(dix, opts)
Renderer->>Dix: GetProviders()
Dix-->>Renderer: provider map
Renderer-->>Handler: DOT format string
Handler-->>Client: DOT graph
sequenceDiagram
participant App as Application
participant Dix as Dix Container
participant InternalDI as dixinternal
participant Renderer as dixrender
participant ErrorHandler as Error Handler
App->>Dix: New(opts)
Dix->>InternalDI: create container
InternalDI-->>Dix: initialized
App->>Dix: Provide(provider)
Dix->>InternalDI: handleProvide()
InternalDI->>ErrorHandler: validate or return error
ErrorHandler-->>Dix: error or success
Dix-->>App: ok
App->>Dix: GenerateGraph(dix)
Dix->>Renderer: GenerateGraphWithOptions(adapter, defaultOpts)
Renderer->>Dix: GetProviders(), GetObjects()
Dix-->>Renderer: provider/object metadata
Renderer->>Renderer: buildGraph layers
Renderer-->>Dix: Graph{Objects, Providers, ProviderTypes}
Dix-->>App: Graph result
Estimated code review effort🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @kooksee, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request represents a major overhaul of the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Ignored Files
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This is a substantial and impressive refactoring of the dix library, moving it to v2. The changes significantly improve the project's structure, maintainability, and feature set. Key improvements include:
- Modernization: Migrating from the custom
funklibrary to standard Go features likeslogfor logging and idiomaticerror/panichandling. - Modularity: Decoupling the rendering logic into a new
dixrenderpackage. - New Features: The addition of an interactive HTTP visualization server (
dixhttp) and context-aware containers (dixcontext) are excellent enhancements. - Documentation & Testing: The README has been completely overhauled and is now very comprehensive, and the new test suite in
dixinternalis thorough.
My review focuses on ensuring consistency in the new patterns and identifying small areas for improvement. I've suggested a few minor changes to align error handling in the dixcontext package, fix a typo in the README.md, and broaden the scope of the test command in the Makefile. Overall, this is a very high-quality contribution.
| .PHONY: test, lint | ||
| test: | ||
| @go test -race -v ./... -cover | ||
| @go test -v ./dixinternal/... -covermode=count -coverprofile=coverage.out |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test command is currently scoped to only the dixinternal package. To ensure all parts of the refactored project are tested, including the new dixrender, dixhttp, and dixcontext packages, it would be beneficial to run tests for all sub-packages. Changing the path to ./... will accomplish this and encourage adding tests to the other packages in the future.
@go test -v ./... -covermode=count -coverprofile=coverage.out
| func Get(ctx context.Context) *dix.Dix { | ||
| if ctx == nil { | ||
| log.Panicln("ctx is nil") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| di, ok := ctx.Value(dixKey{}).(*dix.Dix) | ||
| if !ok { | ||
| log.Panicln("dix not found") | ||
| } | ||
| return di | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func Create(ctx context.Context, dix *dix.Dix) context.Context { | ||
| if ctx == nil { | ||
| log.Panicln("ctx is nil") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if dix == nil { | ||
| log.Panicln("dix is nil") | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return context.WithValue(ctx, dixKey{}, dix) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The use of log.Panicln in Get and Create is inconsistent with the rest of the codebase, which has been refactored to use panic with an error (e.g., panic(errors.New(...))). Using panic directly provides more consistent stack traces and error handling throughout the project.
This change would also allow removing the import "log" in favor of import "errors", aligning better with the project's move to slog for structured logging.
func Get(ctx context.Context) *dix.Dix {
if ctx == nil {
panic(errors.New("ctx is nil"))
}
di, ok := ctx.Value(dixKey{}).(*dix.Dix)
if !ok {
panic(errors.New("dix not found in context"))
}
return di
}
func Create(ctx context.Context, dix *dix.Dix) context.Context {
if ctx == nil {
panic(errors.New("ctx is nil"))
}
if dix == nil {
panic(errors.New("dix is nil"))
}
return context.WithValue(ctx, dixKey{}, dix)
}
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.