Add lint to suggest as_chunks over chunks_exact with constant#16931
Open
mtotbagi wants to merge 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Open
Add lint to suggest as_chunks over chunks_exact with constant#16931mtotbagi wants to merge 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
mtotbagi wants to merge 3 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
This lint suggests using `as_chunks` or `as_chunks_mut` instead of `chunks_exact` or `chunks_exact_mut` when called with a constant size. changelog: new lint: [`chunks_exact_to_as_chunks`]
update test comments
Collaborator
|
r? @Jarcho rustbot has assigned @Jarcho. Use Why was this reviewer chosen?The reviewer was selected based on:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
changelog: [
chunks_exact_to_as_chunks]: Suggest using slice.as_chunks::() when chunks_exact(N) is called with a compile-time constant. This provides better ergonomics and type safety.fixes #15882
Picked up where #16002 left off