

Why do you support throwing gay people off of buildings?


Why do you support throwing gay people off of buildings?


Its not lossless.


Bullhlshit. You think they werent using your libraries before for profit.
Free software shouldnt mean that every company can use our code in anyway they like.
That is exactly what free means. I have never seen people write attributions for nuget or js packages used.


No. He has access to all the same information we all had. He chose not to care. Ignorance is not an excuse anymore.
Its not about how they treated the guests.
I dont have the time to correct androids shitty keyboard.
Because the next step is troops in greenland. Good luck with that.


God i cant wait till this starts happening where where
The question was terrible. Heres how you ask that.
Can you look at the board behind you mam, what are you doing to fix that?


Removed by mod


The american public are already in their corner. Weve been waiting for all of you to sanction us and kick us out of your territory but it seems your all going to wait untik there are troops being deployed before you wake up. Seems to be what happened in WW2 also. So u guess no shock there
Why do you support child porn being posted on twitter


No the way YOU use it removes the value. This is a user problem not a tech problem. As most things in IT are.
Good way to catch a manslaughter charge. Possibly on a kid.
This would be better with a dont tred on me flag/logo somewhere
But i was told a judge blocked this…
You’re confidently missing the point.
No one is saying Denmark should “break the treaty for fun.” The argument is about strategic preemption, not vibes. Treaties aren’t magic shields, they’re conditional frameworks that already collapse the moment an invasion happens. Yes, treaties have repercussions. That’s exactly why the discussion exists. Sanctions vs. occupation is not a hard comparison. One hurts your economy; the other erases your sovereignty. Pretending those are equivalent outcomes is absurd. And “waiting for us to incur repercussions” only makes sense if waiting actually improves Denmark’s position. If an invasion is imminent, waiting doesn’t preserve legality, it just burns time and leverage.
Also, international law explicitly allows anticipatory self-defense under imminent threat. This isn’t some Reddit-brained loophole; it’s been debated for decades. You acting like no one’s considered that doesn’t make it true.
So yeah — people have thought about this. You just seem locked into a cartoon version of how treaties and warfare actually work.
Show us in the post where they make any distinctions between “establishment” dems and just democrats.
No he got a peace prize before he fucking did anything
Someone doesnt know aboht the irish