|
From: Vicente A.S. W. <th...@th...> - 2002-07-02 09:15:22
|
----- Original Message -----=20
Microsoft doesn't innovate, they just take old technologies, put a
marketing campaigne around it, and claim that it's theirs.
=20
fasle .net is not an old tech.
=20
You're wrong, .Net is just a VM like java, with nothing new as JavaVM=20
isn't limited to be used with Java (more than 100 different languages/
compilers use it). A big API with classes for doing everything you need
isn't a new thing too, Java already had it, and before Java other =
platforms
got it too, If you call "new tech" the fact that you can use the API =
from=20
different languages, there're lots of precedents too. Finally, the =
famous=20
(and now rooted to death) Hailstorm autentification service is not a new =
thing,
Kerberos could have done the same, and it has existed for years. I think =
Hongli
Lai is right, Microsoft doesn't innovate, just puts a big marketing =
campaing with=20
too much hype so it feels it's a new thing they're doing (like the 3d =
desktop for
longhorn, when there was a running one for XWindows for years) but =
without any
supporting fact behind. They don't innovate, just copy what has been =
done before.
If you look at GUI evolution you'll see that their only REAL innovation =
(and I guess=20
I've not searched enough to find a precedent) was the taskbar (a minor =
tweak of Apple's
task drop down menu) everything else already existed. C# has some good =
things (namespace=20
being one of them), but big drawbacks (it doesn't exist a good non =
propietary implementation=20
yet as momo still has to grow).
=20
My 2cents
=20
|