|
From: Brian C. B. <bri...@ho...> - 2002-07-30 23:29:32
|
Hi all, Personally, I think the idea of re-writing Dev-C++ in C++ is pretty counter productive, but for those who want to - its your time and your effort. I'm not going to spend time trying to persuade you to do it or not. If you want to, then do it. If not, then don't. End of story. > How in the world am I supposed to get a free copy of Borland C++ > Builder? (Dev-C++ is for Win32 remember?) > I lost contact with my national warez dealer a year ago so warez isn't > an option :-) I don't think the idea was to use Borland C++ Builder (if you had that, you would already have a pretty darn good IDE - probably a lot better than Dev-C++ as it commercial software). I think the idea was to make Dev-C++ interfaceable (is that a word?) to other compilers. Borland C++ Compiler is just the command line C++ compiler like MinGW and it is pretty good. Borland offers this package as a free download (you only have to register and take a survey) at http://www.borland.com/products/downloads/download_cbuilder.html . Just download the second link (named Compiler). Personally, it doesn't matter too much to me what compiler Dev-C++ uses - MinGW, Cygwin, or Borland. I just wanted to correct the records here. MinGW seems to fit better with Dev-C++'s open-source theme, however. Also, I want to say that I really enjoy using Dev-C++ - it is great software and I am looking forward to its future. Many thanks to the developers. Sincerely, Brian Becker Shall we accept good from God, and not trouble? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.372 / Virus Database: 207 - Release Date: 6/20/2002 |