Re: [Dev-C++] keywords

Well i do not like them for all cases too, but for:=0D
 =0D
 =0D
if(x<y and y<z)=0D
 // ...=0D
 =0D
 =0D
i would think "why not?".=0D
 =0D
 =0D
=0D
Ioannis Vranos=0D
 =0D
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com=0D
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys =0D
 =0D
 =0D
 =0D
-------Original Message-------=0D
 =0D
From: Daniel Glenfield=0D
Date: =D0=E1=F1=E1=F3=EA=E5=F5=DE, 28 =D6=E5=E2=F1=EF=F5=DC=F1=E9=EF=F2 2=
003 2:07:21 =EC=EC=0D
To: no...@ho...; dev...@li...=0D
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] keywords=0D
 =0D
Really? Looks ugly to me though, I would not recommend it. But that is my
personal preference.=0D
 =0D
 =0D
>From: "Ioannis Vranos" <no...@ho...>=0D
>To: "Dev-C++ Mailing List" <dev...@li...>=0D
>Subject: [Dev-C++] keywords=0D
>Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:52:28 +0200 (GTB Standard Time)=0D
>=0D
>By the way guys and girls, did you know that in C++98 you can do:=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>#include <iostream>=0D
>=0D
>int main()=0D
>{=0D
> int x=3D1, y=3D2;=0D
>=0D
> if(x>y or x*y=3D=3D2)=0D
> std::cout<<"Beep beep\n";=0D
>=0D
>=0D
> y=3Dy bitand x;=0D
>=0D
> x and_eq y;=0D
>=0D
>}=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>That is to use keywords instead of || etc symbols?=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>Ioannis Vranos=0D
>=0D
>* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com=0D
>* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys=0D
>=0D
>=0D
>-------------------------------------------------------=0D
>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek=0D
>Welcome to geek heaven.=0D
>http://thinkgeek.com/sf=0D
>_______________________________________________=0D
>Dev-cpp-users mailing list=0D
>Dev...@li...=0D
>TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.noicys.cjb.net/devcpp/ub.htm=0D
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users