Re: [Dev-C++] Question that came up in the pub...

Those extra operator names are a tragedy that should never have been
allowed to happen :(

/Per W

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Paul Ingelbrant wrote:

>
> I just read today in "the Standard C++ Bible" (1999 I think) that there are
> special reserved words for all operators like:
>
> and for &&
> bitand for &
> eq for =
> eq_p for +=
> (or something similar... didn't think I would have use for it so soon ;-)
>
>
>
>
> (BTW, the book mentioned is not recommended by any means...
> I've just read a chapter and it's full of nonsens so far,
> e.g. "[...] the main function is declared as a function [...]".
> A circular explanation! To a newbe that must be like a crash-course
> in higher mathematics... Possibly the translator (to swedish) messed
> things up pretty good...
> Obviously the authors had a hard time to explain the basics in a
> comprehensible way (no way near Stephen Prata), but I hope the
> rest is better...)
>
> /Paul I.
>
>
>
>
>
> Citerar Per Westermark <pw...@ia...>:
>
> > You might use the following three-character sequences to represent a
> > character that isn't always available:
> > ??= instead of #
> > ??( instead of [
> > ??) instead of ]
> > ??< instead of {
> > ??> instead of }
> > ??/ instead of \
> > ??' instead of ^
> > ??! instead of |
> > ??- instead of ~
> >
> > /Per W
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Daniel Glenfield wrote:
> >
> > > tri-graphs? What are they?
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Per Westermark <pw...@ia...>
> > > >To: Daniel Glenfield <sp...@ho...>
> > > >CC: dev...@li...
> > > >Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Question that came up in the pub...
> > > >Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:59:17 +0200 (CEST)
> > > >
> > > >Still same.
> > > >
> > > >However, the standard includes tri-graphs, since some {[]}^ etc are not
> > > >readilly available on all terminals.
> > > >
> > > >/PWM
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Wed, 28 Apr 2004, Daniel Glenfield wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I believe that if europeans use C++ the names are the same for each
> > > >country,
> > > > > like class, typedef, struct, new etc. because they are part of the C++
> > > > > language, but they are also roman characters. If you are in a country
> > > >such
> > > > > as Korea or Japan, where the language does not use Roman characters,
> > do
> > > >you
> > > > > still have the same names in roman characters, or are they in
> > > > > hirigana/katakana/kanji etc. etc.  ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Daniel
> > > > >
> > > > > _________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
> > Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> > Dev...@li...
> > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-u