Re: [Dev-C++] Visual Editor

Hi,

On 25 Oct 2006 at 8:38, Steven Carter wrote:

> I understand the original poster's comments that it is a bad thing for
> him. Up until last spring it was a detracting point for me.  However,
> since that time I became increasingly interested in server-side
> applications without any GUI whatsoever.  Also, my devt laptop is not
> very powerful.  At this time Dev-C++ is perfect for my task.
> Previously, building business apps for a desktop it was not very
> productive.  Use the right tool for the job.

that is exactly why I think Dev-C++=B4s role is good:
you have a development environment that you can use regardless of which wi=
dget set (or 
even none at all) you like to use!

The original poster said he found QT to do what he wants, and I already su=
ccessfully used 
some GTK interface builder from within Dev-C++. If you don=B4t need a GUI,=
 use plain Dev-
C++, if you need a GUI, plug something into Dev-C++ for visually editing t=
he GUI 
components, but you do not have to change your IDE and work flow (which yo=
u probably are 
used to).

> On 25/10/06, w.w...@as... <w.w...@as...> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On 25 Oct 2006 at 1:10, M. Bashir Al-Noimi wrote:
> >
> > > M. Bashir Al-Noimi wrote:
> > > > Is Dev-C++ has visual editor like Visual C++, or like CDT (eclipse=
.org
> > > > <http://www.eclipse.org/vep>) ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ok ... guys, i got what i need ;-)
> > >
> > > Dev-C++ hasn't GUI editor, from my hand this is bad point, but i fou=
nd
> > > QT, it's great one specially for GUI editing, i found that QT better
> > > than Borland C++ Builder, M$ VC++, or Delphi.
> >
> > I don=B4t think this is a bad point, because unlike other products, yo=
u have the choice of which
> > "GUI Editor" (or widget set) you like to use and are not forced to use=
 any specific (integrated,
> > proprietary) one.
> > You could also have a look at Glade, AFAIR it can be used from within =
Dev-C++, too.
> >
> > > QT is what i looking for ... thanks all
> > >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Wolfgang
> >

Regards,
Wolfgang