Re: MergeAppend could consider sorting cheapest child path

From: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Malakhov <HukuToc(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: MergeAppend could consider sorting cheapest child path
Date: 2025-05-05 11:41:17
Message-ID: 10f1cc9d-cbf8-4374-b348-df7bce031aa0@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/5/25 13:38, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
> Let's check next version of the patch in the attachment.
Oops, I forgot some tails - see this new version.

--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Consider-explicit-sort-of-the-MergeAppend-subpath.patch text/x-patch 28.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-05-05 11:45:42 Re: Questions about logicalrep_worker_launch()
Previous Message Andrei Lepikhov 2025-05-05 11:38:39 Re: MergeAppend could consider sorting cheapest child path