| From: | Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |
| Date: | 2024-08-01 21:26:40 |
| Message-ID: | CANzqJaAysH3-+1vMBuUnOBc98=ko5-DuKDESoTXb13SAVjxjqw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
PG 15.0 or 15.7?
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 3:58 PM Jim Vanns <jvanns(at)ilm(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry, PG15.
>
> Jim
>
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 at 20:25, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 8/1/24 12:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>> > Jim Vanns <jvanns(at)ilm(dot)com> writes:
>> >> I have two sessions, each creating a temporary table of the same name -
>> >> 'foobar'. Why would a vacuum of 'foobar' from one session block the
>> vacuum
>> >> of 'foobar' in the other session?
>> >
>> > That's fairly hard to believe. Can you provide a self-contained test
>> > case?
>>
>> Would also be nice to know what version of Postgres and where you are
>> running the server?
>>
>> >
>> > regards, tom lane
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Adrian Klaver
>> adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jim Vanns
> Principal Production Engineer
> Industrial Light & Magic, London
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Vanns | 2024-08-01 22:13:43 | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |
| Previous Message | Jim Vanns | 2024-08-01 20:00:54 | Re: VACUUM on temp table blocks VACUUM on another... |