INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING

THAPATHALI CAMPUS
PROJECT MEMBERS:
ASMITA KHANIYA (EXAM ROLL NO.:
PAPPU SAH (EXAM ROLL NO.: 72672)
SALINA MAHARJAN (EXAN ROLL NO.:
SHUSHILA BOHARA (EXAM ROLL NO.:
SURAJ BHANDARI (EXAM ROLL NO.:

SUPERVISED BY:
ER. BIGYAN UPADHAYAY
(STRUCTURAL ENGINEER)
FEEDBACK INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICE NEPAL LTD.

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Content of this presentation
Introduction
Objectives and scopes
Salient features of the project
Methodology
Loads and their combination
Structural analysis using SAP2000
Design of column
Design of beam
Design of slab
Design of foundation
Design of staircase
Design of lift wall
Design of basement wall
Conclusion
Recommendation

INSTITUTE
INSTITUTEOF
OFENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
THAPATHLI
THAPATHALICAMPUS
CAMPUS
Introduction

Equivalent lateral load method is used for seismic analysis

Static analysis method is adopted
Kathmandu subjected to earthquake prone zone V
SAP2000 has been used for the analysis of the structure

INSTITUTE
INSTITUTEOF
OFENGINEERING
ENGINEERING
THAPATHLI
THAPATHALICAMPUS
CAMPUS
Objective and Scope
Specific Objective:
Detailed structural analysis, design and detailing of structural components of
multi-storied building (apartment).

General scope of the project:

Equivalent lateral load method
Limit state method of design
Code of practice:
IS 456:2000
IS 875:1987 (Part 1 & 2)
IS 1893:2002
IS 13920:1993
SP 16
SP 34
NBC 201

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Salient feature of the project

1 Name: Arcadia Apartment

2 Location: Dhumbarahi, Kathmandu

3 Structural system: RCC framed structure

4 Number of storeys: Basement + 11

5 Foundation type: Raft foundation

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Project description

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Methodology
Data Collection

Preliminary Designs

Modeling of Dead load Earthquake load Live load

structure in calculation calculation calculation
SAP 2000
NO

Input of loads in model

Design of structural members using output of SAP Verification of

Run of SAP model data, IS code and Excel programming Critical Sections

Output of data from SAP

(Max BM, Max SF, Max
AF, etc.
Detailing of Structural Members YES

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Loads considered in design

Load type

Dead load

Earthquake Live load

load as per as per IS
IS 1893 875 Part II

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Loads and their comination

The various load combination

1) 1.5 (DL + LL)

2) 1.5 (DL EQ in x-direction)
3) 1.5 (DL EQ in y-direction)
4) 1.2 (DL + LL EQ in x-direction)
5) 1.2 (DL + LL EQ in y-direction)
6) 0.9 (DL 1.5 EQ in x-direction)
7) 0.9 (DL 1.5 EQ in y-direction)

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
 Structural Analysis and output of SAP2000

Program used: SAP2000

3D finite element modelling

Axial force diagram
in SAP2000

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Output of SAP2000

Bending moment M3-3 diagram Shear force V2-2 diagram

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Design of Column

Vertical members mainly used to

support axial compressive load

Designed column reinforcement

Column type Column size Reinforcement

Column - A 750 x 750 mm 16 # 32mm

Column - B 750 x 750 mm 12 # 32mm

Column - C 750 x 750 mm 4 # 25mm + 8 # 28mm

Basement Column 350 x 350 mm 8 # 28mm

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of Column section

Column Type-A Column Type-B

Column Type-C Basement Column

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of Column section

Inner column detail Corner & side column detail

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of Column section

Lapping detail of column

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Design of Beam

Beam is a flexural member which distributes the

vertical load to the column and resists the
bending moment.

BEAM TYPE

Singly reinforced Doubly reinforced Singly or doubly

reinforced flanged

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Design of Beam

By using SAP2000

Beam type Width ( b ) Total depth ( D )

Primary Beam 450 mm 650 mm
Secondary Beam 300 mm 300 mm

Design moments

End M3 Mt Mu
Left end -505.83 KNm -26.47 KNm -532.30 KNm
Mid span 142.07 KNm 7.009 KNm 149.083 KNm
Right end -489.907 KNm -8.18 KNm -497.24 KNm

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
 Detailing of Beam

Detailing of beam reinforcement

Support Mid Shear

Beam Reinforcement Reinforcement Reinforcement
type Bottom Bottom At
Top Bar Top Bar At Mid
Bar Bar Support
2 legged 2 legged
Main Beam 8 mm 8 mm @
6#25mm 3#25mm 2#25mm 2#25mm
(650x450) @ 100 m 200 mm c/
m c/c c
2 legged 2 legged
Secondary
8 mm 8 mm @
Beam 4#20mm 2#16mm 2#20mm 2#16mm
@ 100 m 200 mm c/
(300x300)
m c/c c

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of Beam

Detailing of Main Beam

Longitudinal Profile of beam along grid F-F

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of Beam

Section at Section at Section at

Left end Mid span Right end

Section of beam at different span

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Design of Slab

Plate element forming floors and roofs of the building

Carries distributed load primarily by flexure

Detailing of slab reinforcement

Slab detailing:
Along short span = 10 mm bars @ 150 mm c/c (top bars)
Along long span = 8 mm bars @ 110 mm c/c (top bars)
50% of tension reinforcement provided @ midspan should extent to within
0.1Lx or 0.1Ly of the support.

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of Slab

Section view of slab reinforcement

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of Slab

Bottom reinforcement

Top reinforcement

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of Slab

Torsional reinforcement in
slab

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Design of Foundation

Foundation is a structural element that transfers loads

from the building to the earth.

Detailing mat foundation reinforcement

Allowable bearing capacity of the soil on site is 130 KN/m2

The depth of the foundation is 1.2m

Shorter span reinforcement Longer span reinforcement

25 mm @ 200 mm c/c 25 mm @ 200 mm c/c
(Both top and bottom) (Both top and bottom)

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of foundation

Raft foundation section along Y-Y direction

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of foundation:

Raft foundation section along X-X direction

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Design of staircase:

Provides access to different levels within a building

Stair slabs are generally designed to resist dead load,
live load.

Detailing o staircase reinforcement

Main reinforcement Distribution bar

Staircase Required Provided Required Provided

12 @ 12 160mm 8 @ 8 @
Main staircase
166.67mm c/c c/c 246.49mm c/c 200mm c/c
12 @ 12150mm 8 @ 8 @
Exit Staircase
154.79mm c/c c/c 246.37mm c/c 200m c/c
INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of staircase

Section of main staircase

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of staircase

Section of emergency exit staircase

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Design of lift/shear wall

The lift wall has been designed as the reinforced wall, monolithic

to the other structural members which are subjected to the direct

compression.

The lift is a type of vertical transport equipment that efficiently moves

people or goods between floors of a building, vessel or other structure.

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of lift/shear wall

Detailing of lift wall reinforcement

Vertical Reinforcement Horizontal Reinforcement

Reinforcement Required
Required Provided Provided

12 @ 12 @ 12 @ 12 @
X-direction
204 mm c/c 200mm c/c 202.22mm c/c 200 mm c/c
12 @ 12 @ 130 12 @ 12 @
Y-diection
138.56mm c/c mm c/c 202.22 mm c/c 200 mm c/c

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of lift/shear wall

Shear wall detailing (Plan)

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing of lift/shear wall

Shear wall detailing (section) Shear wall detailing at opening

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Basement Wall

mainly designed and constructed to

retain the earth pressure and to prevent
moisture from seeping into the building

Designed basement reinforcement

Reinforcement
Face Reinforcement
Pattern
Inner (towards soil) 16 mm @ 110 mm c/c
Vertical bars
Outer (towards parking) 12 mm @ 200 mm c/c

Inner (towards soil) 12 mm @ 200 mm c/c

Horizontal bars
Outer (towards parking) 12 mm @ 200 mm c/c

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Detailing Basement Wall

Longitudinal view (Plan) Section view

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Conclusion

acquired knowledge about the design of RCC buildings more deeply

and theoretically and practically
The pure intention of this project was academic only,
but we have made an effort to make it feasible for the real construction
as well
Effective use of SAP2000
We are able to develop our knowledge to decrease the gap between
academic and professional use.

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Recommendation

Wind load is to be considered if it is subjected to wind load higher

than earthquake load.
The construction of water tanks is to be considered.
Construction of ramps in parking is to be considered.

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
Acknowledgement

We would like to express profound gratitude to:

Our guide Er. Bigyan Upadhayay

Head of Department, Mr. Shailendra Raj Khanal
Campus Chief Prof. Dr. Hari Ram Parajuli

And
My team mates

INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING
THAPATHALI CAMPUS
THANK YOU