CHAPTER – I
INTRODUCTION
Art, one might easily surmise, has a history as old as
human civilization. Although art depends largely on one’s
personal perspective, it has also led to the birth of many schools of
thought and practice. So to say, it is a product of a particular social
and cultural milieu. Art is such an integral part of our everyday
life that it can take any form or content. For these reasons, art
becomes subjective and means different things to every single
person on earth. That is why, any discussion on art is a very
difficult endeavour. However, there is no doubt that art influences
the individuals involved in the process. Art also helps to express
through the medium of one’s choice. The person involved in the
process of expressing one’s emotions and thoughts creatively,
becomes an artist. The twin aspects - Art and An Artist - are so
very engaging and they cover a broad spectrum of activities related
to art and life. All in all, we can have only a comprehensive
definition of Art.
Art is a product of human activity, made with
the intention of stimulating the human senses
as the human mind; thus art is an action, an
object, or a collection of actions and objects
created with the intention of transmitting
emotions and ideas. Beyond this description,
there is no general agreed upon definition of
art, since defining the boundaries of art is
subjective, but the impetus for art is often
called human creativity. 1
This is how Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia on the
internet, tries to define art. Certainly, the impetus for art could be
observed, even in the pre-historic man when he tried to express his
joys and sorrows creatively. It satisfies one’s innate desire to
follow and imitate. Even before the evolution of languages, the art
started to influence human mind and civilization. Of course, the art
of those times might have been quite different from the
sophisticated forms of arts of now. As the civilization evolved, the
various forms of arts too got refined and customized under
1
< http:www:[Link]/wiki /Ar t > 18 Aug. 2007.
2
patronages. In the course of this evolution of art, there emerged
many theories and schools of art too.
Of them, not many might have considered Art as an
inessential component of life. In the western civilization, Plato in
Republic Book – II advocated the banishment of artists from the
ideal state. Plato argued that all art is a copy of the world of
senses, which is itself an illusion beyond which the wise man must
be trained to penetrate and that the works of art are thrice removed
from reality.2
The credit of upholding the need for art in life and
identifying the humanizing factor in art goes to Plato’s student,
Aristotle. In Poetics, he defended the uses of Art to an ordinary
man and also analyzed the theory of imitation and pleasure. Scores
of theories have evolved from Aristotle’s Poetics until now in the
western civilization.
Likewise, Art is interpreted by various schools of
thoughts in India also. However, in the Indian context, the concept
of art is also considered as one of the paths to realize, to experience
2
House, Humphery. Aristotle’s Poetics, A Course of Eight Lectures. Ludhiana: Kalyani
Publishers, 1970, pp.22-23.
3
the Supreme God. Ananda Coomaraswamy, an eminent scholar on
Indian aesthetics feels, ‘Religion and art are thus names for one
and the same experience – an intuition of reality and identity’.3
T.N. Sreekantaiyya in Indian Poetics explains the phrase,
Kavyanando Brahmananda Sahodaraha in the following
paragraph, while discussing the benefits of poetry -
The delight, which is the necessary fruit of
poetry, should be included in the list of human
values. Theorists praise this delight as
resembling the enjoyment of Brahman, when
tasting poetry, the ego and the self-interest of
reader slip off. He forgets his love and hates,
becalms his restlessly agitating mind and loses
himself in a super mundane delight. It is true
that this poetic delight is temporary, limited to
the moment of reading the poem and seeing the
play. It is true that even during the period of its
experience; there will be no definite awareness
of the ultimate reality. But it is also true that, in
3
Coomaraswamy, K. Ananda. The Dance of Shiva. New Delhi: Sagara Publications, 1968,
p.41.
4
this limited context itself the soul of man will
have escaped from the afflictions of mundane
life and have the first taste of divine bliss which
is available to great ascetics. Poetry also is
yoga; it is the yoga of a layman.4
The important thing is that even in the religious rites
[Pujas] there is a form of art called Astavadhana Seva, where
dance and music are offered to god in the form of services. Thus,
it could be understood that in the context of India, any art is closely
related to the spiritual life. The inclination towards spiritual
awareness through art could be considered as the unique feature of
Indian Arts.
India has a rich cultural heritage having existed for many
centuries. It consists of various art forms such as Sangetha,
Nrithya, Natya, Nataka, Shilpashastra and others. Marga and
Desi forms multiply the number of those art forms. There are
thousands of internationally celebrated artists in these art forms.
There is a well-organized and established art and aesthetic theories
4
Sreekantaiyya, T.N. Indian Poetics [Tr. N. Balasubrahmanya]. New Delhi: Sahitya
Academy, 2001, pp.197-198.
5
in India. The arts that were being learnt in the traditional Guru-
Shishya Parampara once are now taught in the Universities as core
subjects at both U.G. and P.G. levels. Besides this, the number of
students who opt to learn various fine arts has increased. There are
thousands of 'Sabhas' in India, which are working hard to promote
Indian dance and music. In Chennai alone, there are around a
hundred ‘Sabhas’. Both the Central and the State Governments are
sponsoring various scholarships to promote fine arts in India. They
also organize various art festivals right from the regional level to
national and international level. Both Governmental and Non-
Governmental Organizations are sending troops of artistes to other
nations under the cultural exchange plan. All in all, Indian Arts is
in a vibrant form now. Surely, it won’t be an exaggeration if one
said that Art has emerged as one of the major strands and guiding
forces of life in India.
It is an acknowledged fact that the creative writings
reflect the mores and experiences of contemporary life. ‘It is true
that the artist draws his sustenance from the society he lives in, but
it is equally true that he breathes new life into it, invigorates it and
renders the drab life a shade better than he found it’, Dr. C.D.
6
Narasimhaiah observes.5 When this is the fact, do we get
proportionate number of Indian creative writings, which discuss the
rich cultural heritage of India as their major theme? An interesting
thing here is, when we talk about writers on art, they too belong to
the class of artists. Their works on art become their impressions of
another form of art. It could be perceived as one form of art
reacting to another form of art, leading to the synthesis and a new
organic experience. This harmony between two different forms of
art would certainly enrich the experience of the readers, if handled
effectively by the artists, here the writers. But the question is how
effectively have the Indian writers utilized this rich cultural
heritage in their creative works?
The number of art fictions, which use art and artists as
their themes (here after called as art-fictions only) is not as
discouraging in the regional languages as in the case of Indo-
Anglian literature. There are a few art fictions (novels), which
use art and artists as their subject matter, in the regional
languages. For example, in Kannada literature we have
[Link]’s Sandhyaraga, Ta. Ra. Susbha Rao’s Hamsagethe,
5
Naik M.K. (ed.) Aspects of Indian Writing in English, Essays in Honor of Professor K.R.
Srinivasa Iyengar. Delhi: The Macmillan, 1979, pp.172-173.
7
Masti Venkatesha Iyengar's Subbanna, Dr. K. Shivarama
Karantha’s Moga Padeda Mana, Dr.S.L. Byrappa’s Mandra.
But the situation is not so in the case of Indo-Anglian
Literature. Even though it has successfully depicted various
facets of Indian life to carve its own niche in the world literature,
it is intriguing that the number of art fictions in English is not
very significant. [Link] Bhattacharya’s Music for Mohini
[1952], R.K. Narayan’s The Guide [1958], M.V. Rama Sarma’s
The Bliss of life [1979], Kunjapur Nigamantha Gopalan’s Hema
[1993], Anitha Nair’s Mistress [2005] are a few titles that straight
away come to ours mind in Indo-Anglian Literature. When
compared with the use of English in the day-to-day life in India,
the number of art fictions, which try to probe deep into Indian art,
is perhaps disproportionate. The one possible reason could be
that the native culture or art could be discussed easily in the
native languages. The direct relation between culture and
language might have offered a privilege of natural speech to
Indian native languages to provide penetrating insights into art.
The other important reason could be the limitation of a writer, for
he may lack the understanding of finer aspects of Indian art and
8
aesthetics to use it in the creative writings. They might have
preferred to remain on the peripherals of Indian experiences
instead of penetrating deep into the Indianness, as Raja Rao did in
his novel The Serpent and the Rope.
There might be many essays on art and artists in
general. But essays, rather critical essays based on the available
art fictions in Indian English are still rare. Recently Kshama
Gupta’s essay titled Narayan’s The Guide in the light of Rasa
Theory6, tries to interpret The Guide in the light of Indian
aesthetics. Any discussion on art helps to validate or rectify and
to spread the existing values and convictions. Thus, the works of
a creative writer (a novelist) reflect the mores and experiences of
contemporary life around him. Eventhough India has the vibrant
cultural ambience, still it remains a puzzle that art-fictions are
rarely discussed from the perspectives of art and culture.
In this study, an attempt is made to initiate a
meaningful literary discussion on two art fictions, The Guide by
[Link] and Mistress by Anita Nair. R K Narayan, one of the
6
6. Agrawal, Matti. [ed.] New Perspectives on Indian English Writings.
New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers, 2007, p. 206.
9
trinities of Indo-Anglian literature, hailed from the culturally rich
city Chennai and lived in Mysore -again a place of rich heritage.
He is recognized as a writer having a peculiar vision of life. While
some have called it ‘comic vision’, yet others (like Prof. M. K.
Naik) have preferred to brand it as ‘ironic vision’. He wrote The
Guide in the year 1958, which won the Sahithya Akademy Award
also in 1960. There comes Rosie alias Nalini as a Bharathanatyam
artist in this novel. The character of Rosie is discussed in this
study as an artist. Anita Nair, who hails from culturally rich state
Kerala and lives in Bangalore, is the other novelist of our interest.
The 426 – page novel Mistress was published in the year 2005.
The Asian Age has described Anita Nair’s third novel Mistress as a
novel where, ‘Fiction and research go hand-in-hand’7. Most of the
English dailies and weeklies and a few literary journals too have
appreciated Anita Nair’s attempt to focus the discussion on art and
artistic concerns from a new point of view in her novel Mistress.
The two novels are selected as the benchmarks for the discussion.
The two novels, which belong to different periods of time and
space and voice their concerns towards art and aesthetics, and it is
hoped it would help us to trace the changes in the socio-cultural
7
Mukundan, M. “When Art is a Metaphor for Mistress”, Asian Age, 27 Sept.2007. p.12.
10
aspects of life. In this study, an attempt is made to analyze the
artistic concerns, and artistic integrity in the characters as well as in
the novelists.
It may be observed that whenever the writers make
use of a form of art other than theirs (dance, music, painting or
drama)along with their medium of expression (words) it brings an
added value to their art, writing. The moment The Guide and
Mistress are considered as the art novels, it draws the attention of
the readers to the artistic qualities, concerns and convictions,
visions of the characters and of the novelists too. Usually the
characters are set on the move by the novelist and later the
characters grow themselves in the given socio-cultural setting. The
characters could grow independently because of the experiences in
their life - of course, in the hands of an artist-novelist. Otherwise,
the characters may emerge as mere puppets who mouth the ideas of
the writers, like in the novel Hema by Kunjapura Nigamantha
Gopalan. Here is a possibility of exploring the world of artists
presented by the novelists, who are another kind of artists and the
world in which the artist characters live, act, enjoy, suffer, lament
or realize something. The discussion on art could be concentrated
11
further by focusing on the individual artists and investigating
whether the artists have sacrificed anything on their way to
understanding art or compromised with demands of life. If they
have succeeded in understanding the concerns of art, it is necessary
to trace their path of success. If they have not then it is even more
important to find reasons for their failures. The failure could be
because of their inability to grasp the realities of their artistic lives.
It could also point at their limitation or failure to apply or
implement what they have understood or realized about art in the
course of life. The failure could also be the result of partial view of
art and life instead of a better understanding, which could bring
harmony between life and art. The partial view results in constant
tension, conflict between convictions of life and convictions of art.
This conflict may lead to unbridged gap between life and art. The
same question could be rephrased. Have these writers addressed
the artistic concerns of their chosen field to which their
protagonists belong? Then it would become a typical case study of
Art versus Artist, a critical study of how art suffers or gains at the
hands of the exponents of another art. The fascinating question
here is whether to attribute the successes or failures of the artist
characters in the novels to themselves or to the creator of those
12
characters, the novelist. Probably if the artists themselves try to
write an art-fiction the above question may not arise at all because
they can write authoritatively an art and aesthetics, using their first
hand experience. But then the novel can suffer. Otherwise, the
creative writer must depend both on his intuitive understanding or
must get the practical experience through its study to portray the
artist-characters effectively. When a novelist indulges in a serious
discourse, he would succeed to create a character in flesh and
blood. The protagonist’s views then might be closest to the views
of the novelist. Unless a creative writer has a clear picture of the
art in his 'inner eye', how is it be possible for him to create a
genuine artist-protagonist? If the protagonist fails to impress as an
artist having artistic and aesthetic concerns then it could be the
shortcoming of the novelist and may not be the shortcoming of the
protagonist. Thus, art may suffer at the hands of other artists. In
an attempt to answer these questions, it is proposed to approach the
novels from a new point of few.
The chapterisation of this dissertation is designed in this way:
CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION:
13
This chapter attempts to make some references to important
theories on art and aesthetics, with the emphasis on the Indian
aesthetics. Then the vibrant form of art in India is discussed and
the attention is drawn towards the availability or non-availability of
art-fictions in Indian Literature, especially in Indo-Anglian
Literature. The reasons for selecting the two art fictions for this
critical study on Art versus Artist are also discussed along with the
important questions on Art versus Artist concept. At the end, the
matrix of the dissertation is presented.
CHAPTER II – SEARCH OR NO SEARCH ? :
This chapter attempts a critical analysis of R.K. Narayan’s The
Guide. Keeping in mind the questions raised in the first chapter,
this chapter tries to analyze the character of Rosie alias Nalini as an
artist along with the analysis of other characters on their views on
art. Later in the chapter R.K. Narayan’s role as a novelist in
evolving a discourse on art is also examined. This chapter tries to
answer the question as to how deep or faithful the search of an
artist in this novel is.
CHAPTER III - THE SEARCH AND RESEARCH:
14
Here an attempt is made to analyse and interpret the quests of the
characters in the novel Mistress, besides that of the novelist, Anita
Nair. It tries to explore the unending quests of the characters in the
novel to have their identity and to find words and expressions to
their views on art. An earnest attempt is made to understand and
analyse discourse that the novel offers through the protagonist.
The artistic merits of the novel Mistress are also probed in this
chapter.
CHAPTER IV –
ENTERTAINMENT versus ENLIGHTENMENT:
This chapter compares and contrasts the two novels, The Guide and
Mistress in the light of the questions raised in the first chapter.
Literary and artistic merits along with the limitations of the two
novels and of the novelists are discussed in this chapter. The
chapter also scrutinizes the question how a literary text gains the
advantage when it provides enlightenment along with
entertainment.
CHAPTER V - CONCLUSION:
15
This chapter analyses the question whether art suffers or gains
when a man of letters uses another art form for his or her discourse
on the selected field of one’s choice (i.e. art fiction). The possible
changes that might have taken place in the field of art are also
discussed here. The chapter summarizes the argument of the
dissertation and draws the attention towards the need to continue
the discussion further.
It is to be acknowledged that the intricacies of art
could make any literary discussion on art and artist very arduous
-even unending. Still an attempt is being made here to raise
meaningful questions leading to a fruitful literary discussion of two
art-novels with a view to understand artistic as well as artists’
concerns and to present an organic view on art and life. It is hoped
that this investigation will expand the horizon of our knowledge, in
a small way though.
16